Local communities’ responses to CSG salt and brine management options in Queensland’s Surat Basin
Katherine Witt A * , Debashish Dev A and Amrita Kambo AA
![]() Associate Professor Katherine Witt is Chair in Social Performance at The University of Queensland’s Gas and Energy Transition Research Centre. She has been studying the social dimensions of onshore gas development for over 10 years in Queensland and more recently in the Beetaloo region of the Northern Territory. |
![]() Dr Debashish Dev is an interdisciplinary researcher specialising in energy transition, communication, sustainable development, community engagement and understanding social change processes. His work integrates social performance and regional development priorities of energy policies and initiatives, focusing on improving community participation and social acceptance. |
![]() Dr Amrita Kambo is a multi-disciplinary researcher at The University of Queensland. Her work borrows and applies theoretical constructs from concepts such as social acceptance and social licence to operate (SLO). |
Abstract
The coal seam gas (CSG) brine and salt management has remained a complex and contested issue in Queensland over the past decade. The CSG industry has so far invested over AUD100 million in finding a suitable solution to this issue, with salt encapsulation in engineered landfills emerging as the preferred solution with its technical, environmental and economic feasibility until a better alternative is available. However, the salt encapsulation option has faced criticism by some in the media, expressing concerns about long-term environmental risks and responsibilities. This ongoing study examines local community perceptions of options for CSG brine management, focusing on information and engagement needs for social acceptance of salt encapsulation. Drawing on focus group discussions with local landholders and community leaders (e.g. those in respected positions such as leaders of community and business groups, local council staff) in the Surat Basin, the initial findings reveal diverse perspectives, both in favour and in opposition to the salt encapsulation option. Transparent and honest communication, timely and adequate response to community concerns and community-focused long-term planning would go towards social acceptance of CSG brine management.
Keywords: brine, coal seam gas (CSG), produced water, reverse osmosis, risk perception, salt encapsulation, social acceptance, social risk, Surat Basin.
![]() Associate Professor Katherine Witt is Chair in Social Performance at The University of Queensland’s Gas and Energy Transition Research Centre. She has been studying the social dimensions of onshore gas development for over 10 years in Queensland and more recently in the Beetaloo region of the Northern Territory. |
![]() Dr Debashish Dev is an interdisciplinary researcher specialising in energy transition, communication, sustainable development, community engagement and understanding social change processes. His work integrates social performance and regional development priorities of energy policies and initiatives, focusing on improving community participation and social acceptance. |
![]() Dr Amrita Kambo is a multi-disciplinary researcher at The University of Queensland. Her work borrows and applies theoretical constructs from concepts such as social acceptance and social licence to operate (SLO). |