Hydrogen and carbon dioxide pipelines – why a different engineering approach is required
Peter Cox A *A
![]() Peter is a recognised leader in the gas, renewable fuels, carbon capture, utilisation and storage and emerging Hydrogen industry. He is a past president and Board member of the Australian Pipelines and Gas Association for 15 years and currently a Director of the Future Fuels Cooperative Research Centre. He has been responsible for the successful completion of major midstream and upstream projects as both project sponsor and project manager. He is currently globally responsible for business growth and strategy for the Onshore Upstream and Midstream sectors within Worley, focussing on new technologies as part of the broader energy transition. Peter contributed to the Net Zero Australia study providing costing methodologies for the economic modelling of the infrastructure required for Australia to meet net zero. |
Abstract
Australia is planning to construct a network of hydrogen (H2) pipelines to deliver H2 to hard-to-abate industries. Similarly, a network of carbon dioxide (CO2) pipelines will be required to deliver captured CO2 from industry and direct air capture (DAC) facilities to sequestration sites, and to enable beneficial use of CO2. Major universities in Australia partnered with Princeton University to prepare the Net Zero Australia Study. They created a model to determine the lowest cost physical infrastructure required for Australia to reach net zero for both domestic energy and exports. The model showed that for Australia to reach net zero using today’s technology, it could need nearly 15,000 km of H2 pipelines, 20,000 km of CO2 pipelines and approximately 8000 km of water pipelines depending on the scenario. Australia currently has approximately 42,000 km of gas pipelines. This study showed that we need to build around another 42,000 km of pipelines to achieve net zero. It has taken us over 60 years to build the first 42,000 km and now we need to build the next 42,000 in just 25 years. To efficiently transport CO2 via pipelines, it is compressed to a super-critical phase liquid which can cause long running fractures in the event of failure requiring a very different approach to their design. Similarly, H2 pipelines require a very different approach due to the potential for embrittlement and need to also provide storage. This paper describes the alternative engineering approach to designing these pipelines to safely transport and store these energy transition fluids.
Keywords: CCUS, decarbonisation, energy transition, fracture control, fracture mechanics, gas supply, hydrogen embrittlement, pipelines, renewable hydrogen.
![]() Peter is a recognised leader in the gas, renewable fuels, carbon capture, utilisation and storage and emerging Hydrogen industry. He is a past president and Board member of the Australian Pipelines and Gas Association for 15 years and currently a Director of the Future Fuels Cooperative Research Centre. He has been responsible for the successful completion of major midstream and upstream projects as both project sponsor and project manager. He is currently globally responsible for business growth and strategy for the Onshore Upstream and Midstream sectors within Worley, focussing on new technologies as part of the broader energy transition. Peter contributed to the Net Zero Australia study providing costing methodologies for the economic modelling of the infrastructure required for Australia to meet net zero. |