Register      Login
ASEG Extended Abstracts ASEG Extended Abstracts Society
ASEG Extended Abstracts
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Groundwater Assessment in a Coal Measures Sequence Using Borehole Magnetic Resonance

Mark Krejci, Melinda Lett, Adam Lloyd, Tim Hopper, Tom Neville and Benjamin Birt

ASEG Extended Abstracts 2018(1) 1 - 5
Published: 2018

Abstract

Hydraulic behaviour of an aquifer is defined in terms of the volumes of water present, both producible and not (specific yield and specific retention), and the productivity of the water (hydraulic conductivity). These parameters are typically evaluated using pumping tests, which provide zonal average properties, or more rarely on core samples, which provide discrete point measurements. Both methods can be costly and time-consuming, potentially limiting the amount of characterisation that can be conducted on a given project, and a significant measurement scale difference exists between the two. Borehole magnetic resonance has been applied in the oil and gas industry for the evaluation of bound and free fluid volumes, analogous to specific retention and specific yield, and permeability, analogous to hydraulic conductivity, for over twenty years. These quantities are evaluated continuously, allowing for cost-effective characterisation, and at a measurement scale that is intermediate between that of core and pumping tests, providing a convenient framework for the integration of all measurements. The role of borehole magnetic resonance measurements in hydrogeological characterisation is illustrated as part of a larger hydrogeological study of a coal measures unit and associated overburden. Borehole magnetic resonance has been used for aquifer and aquitard identification, and to provide continuous estimates of hydraulic properties. These results have been compared and reconciled with pumping test and core data, considering the scale differences between measurements. Finally, an integrated hydrogeological description of the target rock units has been developed.

https://doi.org/10.1071/ASEG2018abT7_3H

© ASEG 2018

PDF (952 KB) Export Citation Cited By (2)

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share via Email

View Dimensions