Perceptions of primary care and hospital clinicians on the use of the Ankle Brachial Pressure Index in general practice
Thomas Ding 1 3 , Hywel Lloyd 21 Primary and Community Care, Southern DHB, Mosgiel Health Centre, New Zealand
2 Department of General Practice and Rural Health, University of Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
3 Corresponding author. Email: thomasgding@gmail.com
Journal of Primary Health Care 13(2) 165-170 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC20057
Published: 15 April 2021
Journal Compilation © Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners 2021 This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral arterial disease is an increasingly prevalent chronic illness globally. The Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) is a well-established, simple, relatively quick and non-invasive assessment useful in diagnosing and quantifying peripheral arterial disease. ABPIs may be currently underutilised in general practice.
AIM: To explore perspectives of health professionals on the role of the ABPI.
METHODS: One-to-one interviews were conducted with health professionals using snowball sampling. Questions centred around interviewees’ education on, experience with and view on the usefulness of the ABPI in general practice. Interviews were recorded and used for thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Participants consisted of 13 health-care professionals: nine general practitioners, two vascular surgeons and two allied health professionals. Most general practitioners interviewed identified benefits of ABPIs use in primary care, including aiding peripheral arterial disease diagnostics, management, referral and triage. No general practitioners stated they had ever had formal training in undertaking ABPIs. Two of the nine general practitioners stated regular ABPI use in their practice. Participants who did not use ABPIs identified practical barriers to its use in general practice, including cost of equipment, length of time needed and perceived low patient need to justify cost. All interviewees agreed that there was a role for ABPI use in the community if barriers were overcome.
DISCUSSION: There was consensus among general practitioners that ABPI use is beneficial. Many general practitioners named similar practical barriers to more common use of ABPIs in general practice. They saw a role for ABPIs in primary care, although it may be more practical as a tool for specialised individual clinicians to use for communities, given practical barriers of cost, time and perceived low patient need. Formal training could be considered, as none of the interviewed general practitioners had ever had any.
KEYwords: Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI); peripheral arterial disease (PAD); general practice; referral; venous disease; investigations; claudication; vascular surgery; cardiovascular disease (CVD); nursing; compression bandaging
References
[1] Khan TH, Farooqui FA, Niazi K. Critical review of the ankle brachial index. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2008; 4 101–6.| Critical review of the ankle brachial index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19936284PubMed |
[2] Haigh K, Bingley J, Golledge J, Walker PJ. Peripheral arterial disease: screening in general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2013; 42 391–5.
| 23781546PubMed |
[3] Hirsch AT, Duval S. The global pandemic of peripheral artery disease. Lancet. 2013; 382 1312–4.
| The global pandemic of peripheral artery disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23915884PubMed |
[4] Al-Qaisi M, Nott DM, King DH, Kaddoura S. Ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI): an update for practitioners. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009; 5 833–41.
| Ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI): an update for practitioners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19851521PubMed |
[5] Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007; 45 S5–67.
| Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17223489PubMed |
[6] Rooke TW, Hirsch AT, Misra S, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (updating the 2005 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58 2020–45.
| 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (updating the 2005 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21963765PubMed |
[7] Mohler E, Giri J. Management of peripheral arterial disease patients: comparing the ACC/AHA and TASC-II guidelines. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008; 24 2509–22.
| Management of peripheral arterial disease patients: comparing the ACC/AHA and TASC-II guidelines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18664318PubMed |
[8] Best Practice Advocacy Centre (BPAC) New Zealand. The ankle-brachial pressure index: an under-used tool in primary care? Dunedin: Best Practice Advocacy Centre (BPAC) New Zealand; 2014.
[9] Davies JH, Kenkre J, Williams EM. Current utility of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) in general practice: implications for its use in cardiovascular disease screening. BMC Fam Pract. 2014; 15 69
| Current utility of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) in general practice: implications for its use in cardiovascular disease screening.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24742018PubMed |
[10] Yap Kannan R, Dattani N, Sayers RD, Bown MJ. Survey of ankle-brachial pressure index use and its perceived barriers by general practitioners in the UK. Postgrad Med J. 2016; 92 322
| Survey of ankle-brachial pressure index use and its perceived barriers by general practitioners in the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26846131PubMed |
[11] Nexøe J, Damsbo B, Lund JO, Munck A. Measurement of blood pressure, ankle blood pressure and calculation of ankle brachial index in general practice. Fam Pract. 2012; 29 345–51.
| Measurement of blood pressure, ankle blood pressure and calculation of ankle brachial index in general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22024665PubMed |
[12] Nicolaï SPA, Kruidenier LM, Rouwet EV, et al. Ankle brachial index measurement in primary care: are we doing it right? Br J Gen Pract. 2009; 59 422–7.
| Ankle brachial index measurement in primary care: are we doing it right?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Meyer D, Bureau JM, Vu Tri D. Ankle brachial index: motivations, training, and practices among 165 general practitioners in Ile-de-France. J Mal Vasc. 2014; 39 18–25.
| Ankle brachial index: motivations, training, and practices among 165 general practitioners in Ile-de-France.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24332303PubMed |
[14] Chen PY, Lawford KM, Shah N, et al. Perceptions of the ankle brachial index amongst podiatrists registered in Western Australia. J Foot Ankle Res. 2012; 5 19
| Perceptions of the ankle brachial index amongst podiatrists registered in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22846188PubMed |
