Stocktake Sale on now: wide range of books at up to 70% off!
Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Te hāpai i te mana wāhine, te takahi i te mana wāhine: Māori women’s experiences of empowerment and disempowerment in sexual and reproductive healthcare

Chelsea Harris https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7640-9193 1 * , Susan Bidwell 2 , Ben Hudson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2794-8876 1 , Maira Patu 3 , Christina McKerchar https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4443-4241 2 , Ibrahim S. Al-Busaidi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-4162 1
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Department of Primary Care and Clinical Simulation, University of Otago, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.

2 Department of Population Health, University of Otago, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.

3 Māori/Indigenous Health Institute, University of Otago, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.

* Correspondence to: Chelsea.harris@otago.ac.nz

Handling Editor: Tim Stokes

Journal of Primary Health Care https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25037
Submitted: 4 March 2025  Accepted: 21 May 2025  Published: 23 June 2025

© 2025 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Introduction

Māori have poorer sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes compared to non-Māori New Zealanders. Patient experiences of SRH services affect how they access, utilise, and benefit from services. Learning about how wāhine Māori (Māori women) experience care related to SRH could inform improvements in how services provide care for wāhine.

Aim

This study aimed to explore the experiences wāhine have when accessing SRH services.

Methods

This qualitative study utilised semi-structured interviews to explore the lived experiences of wāhine when accessing sexual healthcare. Inductive thematic analysis was performed to generate themes from the data.

Results

Twelve wāhine were interviewed. An overarching theme, Te Hāpai i te mana wāhine, te takahi i te mana wāhine (empowering women, disempowering women), was identified. This theme had four subthemes: creating comfortable spaces; manaakitanga (kindness and respect) overcomes barriers to care; patients are people, not numbers; and the importance of mana-enhancing care. The data showed that wāhine benefit from services and care that make them feel comfortable and respected and that dehumanising care can impact further engagement with services.

Discussion

Wāhine have variable experiences when accessing sexual healthcare, and although some of those experiences showed how positive interactions with healthcare staff facilitated effective care, many experiences demonstrated how dehumanising clinical care can sometimes be. Such care risks perpetuating health inequities indirectly by eroding the trust wāhine have in healthcare services, and directly by limiting the effectiveness of healthcare encounters. Recommendations are made to improve care provided to wāhine in sexual health settings.

Keywords: doctor-patient relationship, equity, Kaupapa Māori, Māori health, patient experience, sexual health, wāhine, women’s health.

WHAT GAP THIS FILLS
What is already known: Patients’ experiences with healthcare services can influence how patients access, trust, utilise, and benefit from care, ultimately affecting health outcomes. Māori experience inequitable sexual and reproductive health outcomes, as well as inequitable access to and delivery of healthcare.
What this study adds: Wāhine Māori (Māori women) have variable experiences of sexual healthcare. Healthcare encounters where wāhine are treated with manaakitanga (kindness and respect), and where staff attempt to make connections with wāhine (whakawhanaungatanga) are empowering; however, dehumanising experiences were frequent and impacted trust in and benefit from services.

Introduction

In Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), Māori experience inequities in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes compared to other ethnicities. Wāhine Māori (Māori women) have higher rates of pregnancy-related mortality compared to NZ European women,1 lower rates of cervical screening and higher rates of cervical cancer,2 and are inequitably affected by sexually transmitted infections (STIs).3 Abortions for wāhine Māori (and Pacific women) tend to happen at later gestations,4 indicating barriers to access.4 The numerous health inequities impacting Māori (not limited to SRH) are a breach of the Treaty of Waitangi.5 Such inequities stem from failures of the healthcare system to be accessible to and respectful of the needs and values of Maōri.6 Similar inequities in SRH affect Indigenous Peoples elsewhere.7 Irihapeti Ramsden (a Māori nurse and philosopher) developed a Kawa Whakaruruhau (cultural safety) framework that transformed how nurses are taught about cross-cultural interactions with patients, including being aware of how historical events and personal biases might impact those interactions.8 Ramsden’s principles of cultural safety have been extended to the training of other healthcare providers (HCPs); however, inequities in NZ’s healthcare system continue.9

Patient satisfaction with HCPs could influence health outcomes. Patients who have negative healthcare experiences are less likely to follow treatment plans10 and are more likely to disengage from healthcare.11 This is an issue for marginalised groups, who can experience feeling unheard and judged.12 Adverse interactions with HCPs could exacerbate the complexities of SRH-related care, which can be fraught with difficulties, especially if the patient and provider are of different gender13,14 or culture.15 It is important for patients to feel comfortable with their HCPs when seeking SRH care.

Colonisation continues to shape Māori experiences of and access to healthcare.16 There is little literature exploring how wāhine Māori experience SRH healthcare, which is provided by primary care, sexual health clinics, youth health clinics, Sexual Wellbeing Aotearoa, midwives, and hospitals. There is evidence that Māori youth feel less understood (compared to Pākehā/white youth) at SRH appointments,17 and more likely to have negative experiences of SRH care.17 Young wāhine Māori have reported barriers to accessing SRH care, such as affordability, concerns about exposing their bodies, or feeling judged or otherwise negatively perceived by staff.18 Further research into the experiences Māori have of SRH care could guide improvements in health care. The current study, therefore, aimed to explore the experiences a group of wāhine have when accessing SRH care.

Methods

This is a qualitative Kaupapa Māori study. Kaupapa Māori research prioritises Māori values and self-determination, challenging the normalisation of Western culture.19 Wāhine Māori were interviewed to learn about their experiences of SRH care. Wāhine aged 18–69 years were initially recruited from an urban general practice in Canterbury, NZ (flyers were handed out to eligible patients, and a Māori receptionist called eligible patients to inform them of the study), with snowballing performed to recruit further participants from outside of the clinic. Recruitment ceased once 12 wāhine were recruited. The semi-structured interviews lasted 35–75 min and were audio-recorded and transcribed manually by CH. The transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis,20 undertaken by CH, with results being reviewed by SB and MP. Randomly allocated names are used to identify the wāhine in the manuscript for anonymity. The interview topic guide is provided as Supplementary material.

Ethical approval was granted by the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (reference number: H22/148). Consultation with the Ngāi Tahu Research Consultation Committee was undertaken. The COREQ checklist for qualitative studies21 guided reporting of the study and is provided as Supplementary material. All participants consented to the publication of anonymised data.

Results

Twelve wāhine aged 25–57 years were interviewed in 2023 (11 in person, 1 via video conferencing). Thematic analysis produced two main themes: He mana tō te mātauranga (knowledge is power) and Te hāpai i te mana wāhine, te takahi i te mana wāhine (empowering women, disempowering women). This paper presents the second theme. The first is reported elsewhere.22 Quotes pertain to experiences of general practice, midwifery care, and hospital care.

Te hāpai i te mana wāhine, te takahi i te mana wāhine had four subthemes:

  • Creating comfortable spaces

  • Manaakitanga (kindness and respect) overcomes barriers to care

  • Patients are people, not numbers

  • The importance of mana-enhancing care.

Creating comfortable spaces

The spaces we create in healthcare – not just their physical qualities, but more importantly, their warmth, non-judgementalism, and safety – play an important role in the healthcare experiences of wāhine.

Nikita (39) described her experience of arriving at the hospital for a termination:

It was probably the most horrible feeling … talk through a screen, a window that you can’t see anybody, and tell them what you were there for … you could see all these females walking up to that particular room, so you knew exactly what they were there for … you had to tell them what your name was, you had to say this loud, in a big foyer … (Nikita, 39)

Nikita also described a better reception experience from earlier in life, when she went to a student health clinic:

I walked in there, and it was just a room full of people … I didn’t want to say it verbally where everyone could hear me … So she [receptionist] wrote me a note on a little piece of paper and asked, “Do you want a pregnancy test?”, and I was like, “Yes, please”. (Nikita, 39)

While the initial reception area set the tone for the healthcare encounter, the environment and interactions with HCPs were also important for wāhine in facilitating comfort for asking questions and disclosing information.

It’s usually very cold and straight to the point, so it doesn’t leave much room for me to want to ask questions, or feel comfortable talking more about what we’re doing (Maia, 39)

Whina (40) demonstrated how HCPs can increase patient comfort:

Maybe you can just ask “do you have any questions for me, do you want to know anything about me before we start?”. (Whina, 40)

If patients are not voluntarily providing information about their sexual health, or feel uncomfortable asking questions, then it is important that providers consider screening for issues or questions. This does not always happen:

I don’t reckon I’ve been asked about contraception since I had my second child … I don’t think … people ever talked to me about contraception. (Whina, 40)

I just realised then … why hasn’t she talked to me about this before? … she’s been my family doctor for my whole life … whereas all my mates, all their doctors talked to them about it … (Pip, 25)

Ruth (37) suggested that Indigenous women might need prompting to raise SRH issues during consults:

I guess asking more questions when it comes to ethnic women? Because they’re not just gonna say it. (Ruth, 37)

Manaakitanga overcomes barriers to care

Wāhine described wanting staff who were caring, and often preferred female HCPs:

It would have to be a lady doctor. (Aroha, 57)

Wāhine reported that female staff were easier to relate to and provided a relaxing environment:

She [daughter] saw a nurse … she was absolutely lovely and my daughter explained … “I liked her … because she could relate to me … she’s been through the same thing we’re going through.” (Nikita, 39, regarding her teen daughter’s first contraception appointment)

It was all women in there … they just saw me as a woman that needed help … it was very empowering to know that there were other women there to awhi you. (Marama, 50, regarding a termination appointment)

Some of the women preferred staff who were both female and Māori:

Especially a Māori woman … I’m not sure how many Māori women get into it [healthcare] … I find that, even with female doctors, I find that a little bit overwhelming because I don’t see a recognisable female face … If I had a brown woman face with me I think I’d feel a hell of a lot more comfortable because it’s recognisable as someone that’s a safe space for me. (Marama, 50)

I’d be like, “Nah I want a female, and I want a Māori. Or at least a Māori chaperone”. (Nikita, 39)

Two of the wāhine described positive experiences with male general practitioners (GPs) – these cases were associated with long-term continuity of care with their GPs. Anahera’s (35) GP had cared for four generations of her whānau (family), facilitating a doctor–patient relationship that provided a safe space for SRH care:

I had the same doctor for 31 years, which was Dr [name], and he did everything for me … I miss him. (Anahera, 35)

Marama (50) fondly recalled her experience with her long-standing male GP when she presented with an unplanned pregnancy. Their relationship allowed for humour, putting her at ease:

I went to my doctor, who I did feel safe with … he was an older guy, no-nonsense, like “oh well, you’ve done fucked up, you’ve got a belly full of arms and legs now, what are we gonna do?” … I said “I don’t want it”, he goes, “Rightie-o, let’s get you an appointment …”. (Marama, 50)

Some of the wāhine described unpleasant encounters with female staff:

This lady next to me who was supposed to be watching him, and she was just stone cold, she wasn’t comforting or nothing, she was just basically there for him, not for me. (Nikita, 39, describing having a female nurse chaperone for a pelvic exam)

This example, and the examples of positive experiences with male doctors, suggest that the ability of HCPs to provide warm and reassuring care can overcome barriers caused by gender. It is important that wāhine are able to access HCPs who they feel comfortable with. If wāhine experienced more sensitivity when they encounter the healthcare system, they might be more receptive to seeing male staff. Whina states:

I feel like … there needs to be some sensitivity education in medical school, perhaps? (Whina, 40)

Patients are people, not numbers

Participants spoke poorly of experiences that made them feel like they were numbers rather than people. The short duration of GP consults exacerbates this:

They’ve only got fifteen minutes to suss it all out … Are they really getting down to the core of the problem within fifteen minutes? … is it about the money? (Aroha, 57)

Hospital appointments were also experienced to be rushed at times:

Overall … it was good, but it felt like, in and out … like “okay, you’re on your way”. (Joanne, 28, describing hospital care after a miscarriage)

When appointments are too short, patients may not discuss everything they wish to or ask questions, and HCPs lack time for whakawhanaungatanga (building relationship through making connections).

Overly “clinical” care was associated with feeling disconnected from or unseen by HCPs. Marama described her experience of arriving at the hospital in labour as a teenager, having not told anyone that she was pregnant:

They were sort of more like, “she’s got no prenatal history, we don’t know anything about the baby” … they weren’t terribly concerned about anything else, and I was in such a zoned-out, eighteen year-old, “I’m not ready, I’m not ready! I’m pretending it’s not really happening”. (Marama, 50)

Marama also commented that staff simply being “nice” does not quite override the fear associated with termination if care is too clinical:

The doctors were very nice, but they’re very … clinical, which is obviously what they have to be, but it’s very scary. (Marama, 50)

Whina described how SRH requires care with more nuance compared to some other areas of healthcare:

I feel like it’s kind of flippant … I understand that to doctors stuff is just stuff, but in regards to sexual health I think it’s quite a personal thing … I feel like it’s just talked about as if it’s, you know you’ve got a cold or something … (Whina, 40)

Maia (39) told of how, when she miscarried her first pregnancy, she never heard back from her midwife after being referred into hospital:

Throughout that entire time there was just zero contact from the midwife, and we were trying to get a hold of them to help us … ‘cause it was our first time going through it … so that was pretty horrible … we never heard from that midwife again. (Maia, 39)

In contrast, Maia’s second midwife provided a service that was more responsive to her needs:

I reached out to a midwife … had a really good chat with her, told her my feelings about the last midwife I had, and she was really sympathetic, and reassured me that that shouldn’t have happened … she’s been amazing. (Maia, 39)

If wāhine are to trust the system that is responsible for their SRH care, wāhine need to feel that healthcare staff care about wāhine. Whina notes that whakawhanaungatanga can help:

I feel like when someone makes an effort with whanaungatanga, then actually I feel like that, even if it’s just for that fifteen minutes, they’re invested in where I’m at today. (Whina, 40)

The importance of mana-enhancing care

Manaakitanga involves treating others with dignity. The wāhine in this study provided stories of experiencing the opposite of this:

I got the feeling that I may have been a bit of a guinea pig? … ’Cause of who, my race. He didn’t put it out there as that, but I just kind of got a … you know? Sometimes you just feel what you feel (Aroha, 57, regarding experiences of repeated cervical investigations, about which she felt uninformed)

Mere (44) recalled how her GP wanted her to discontinue the contraceptive pill due to her age, but when she asked for information about the Depo Provera injection, the GP would only provide her information about the Jadelle:

He gave me about a fifteen minute lecture on why I shouldn’t still be on the pill … so I talked to him about the Depo, and all the information he printed off for me was regards to the rod … so I left and I was pissed. Because I felt like I wasn’t listened to. (Mere, 44)

At the time of the interview, Mere still did not have any contraception. She also described a dehumanising experience on a delivery ward:

After having [my daughter] within fifteen minutes the nurse came in and said “right get up, get in the shower … you’re being transferred”. And my whole body was just convulsing … I was like, “Oh can’t you just wait?”, and she was like, “No, I want you up now” … she came in fifteen minutes later and said, “Why are you still sitting on the bed, I asked you to have a shower” … she went and got a wheelchair … wheeled me into the shower … it felt like I was a joke. (Mere, 40)

Mere’s experience and that of Marama (described earlier), demonstrate how long the feelings of being undervalued as people in themselves during childbirth can persist, tainting the memories of the births of their children.

Sarah (41) recalled her experience in hospital when she miscarried a pregnancy that she had intended on terminating:

I just think that they … mistreated me a bit unfairly because you knew that you weren’t going to have it … one nurse was quite blunt and said “Well I don’t know why you’re upset, you were going to get rid of it anyway”, but … you’re still sensitive. (Sarah, 41)

Lisa (44) recalled being treated with dignity by the hospital staff during a termination:

They were really good … very supportive, quite lovely. (Lisa, 44)

When wāhine feel disrespected, or don’t have a say in their healthcare, this can damage the relationship they have with HCPs and its therapeutic potential. Mere stated:

We shouldn’t just be pushed to the corner and not allowed to say what we want to say. (Mere, 44)

Discussion

This study provides insights into the experiences wāhine Māori have when accessing SRH care, and demonstrates that services provide a mixture of dehumanising and empowering care. The theme “Te hāpai i te mana wāhine, te takahi i te mana wāhine” (empowering women, disempowering women) was generated, with the four subthemes discussed above.

The wāhine in this study mentioned that clinical reception areas can be sources of discomfort. The reception area in general practice clinics has been described as an impersonal gate-keeping mechanism where one pays bills and discusses private information with a receptionist in front of the waiting room.23 A study interviewing receptionists in NZ clinics found that some of the receptionists did not consider the atmosphere of the waiting room as their responsibility to manage.24 However, Māori receptionists saw it as part of their job to make the waiting room a welcoming social space, including playing with children if parents needed support.24 One receptionist worked for a Māori organisation that prioritised whānau, making caring for children part of the practice’s norm.24 Another study interviewing young wāhine found that reception staff played an important part in helping the wāhine feel welcome and relaxed.18 These findings, and those of this study, indicate that clinical reception areas can set the tone for the healthcare experience, and that whānau-centred care supports this.

The wāhine described how interactions with HCPs facilitated, or did not facilitate, discussion about SRH. Patients tend to feel that HCPs should initiate discussions about SRH, whereas HCPs tend to report that they would only discuss SRH if patients raised the subject.25 This reluctance of HCPs to raise the subject is more likely to impact wāhine who are past reproductive age, as such women will not present for contraception, and older women will not present for cervical screening – these are presentations that prompt HCPs to discuss broader SRH.14 Women in NZ aged 40–69 years report a lack of initiation of discussion of SRH by GPs, and this was associated with reduced testing for and awareness about STIs.26 For HCPs to address SRH issues, they need to be aware when there is something to address. Therefore, it is important that patients feel comfortable talking to staff.

Some wāhine in this study expressed a preference for staff who are both female and Māori, and this has been found elsewhere.18 Patients generally prefer discussing sex with GPs of the same gender as themselves,13 and GPs can feel the same way.14 In contrast, a survey of women attending gynaecology and obstetrics clinics in Auckland, NZ, found that having a Māori doctor in such a setting was not so important to Māori participants, and only half of all of the participants (mixed ethnicities) preferred a female specialist.27 It is possible that this disparity in preferences between primary and secondary care could be because appointments at specialist Women’s Health clinics are expected to be about SRH, and patients expect staff to be sensitive to the needs of women. While the same sensitivity might be hoped for in primary care, it may be perceived as less guaranteed. The current study found that the gender barrier was counter-balanced if wāhine had long-standing relationships with male GPs. This fits with other literature that shows that Māori patients have been found to appreciate continuity of care with GPs.28,29

Wāhine expressed dissatisfaction with services that felt rushed or impersonal. Short appointment times are a barrier to healthcare access for Māori and impair the development of the HCP–patient relationship,30 which is important for whānau to build trust in their HCP. Other studies have also found that patients find appointment times too short.12,24 Such care leaves patients feeling unheard. People (particularly from marginalised communities) who feel dismissed by their HCPs can become dissatisfied with healthcare services and reluctant to continue using them.12 If patients do not use healthcare services, this will adversely impact health outcomes.

Wāhine want and deserve to be treated with dignity. Colonisation has resulted in institutions and societal stigma that victim-blame wāhine Māori who are teen mothers, who suffer financial difficulty or intimate partner violence (IPV),31 and stigmatisation was experienced in healthcare settings by the wāhine in this study. Colonisation involves the dehumanisation of the colonised,32 and this continues to impact wāhine Māori accessing SRH care. The participants described feeling judged and/or invalidated, and being told what to do. There are other reports of wāhine experiencing this in healthcare. A study interviewing young Māori mothers described participants experiencing feelings of being judged in hospitals during childbirth.25 Feeling seen and valued as women in themselves (rather than simply the mother of a baby), being treated with respect, and having a sense of control have been shown to be important to wāhine Māori during birthing experiences.26

Strengths and limitations

This is the first study the authors are aware of documenting wāhine Māori experiences of SRH care. As the interviewer (CH) identifies as wāhine Māori, this and whakawhanaungatanga facilitated comfortable dialogue during interviews, resulting in a rich dataset. The age range of the wāhine allowed for the collection of cross-generational data (although older wāhine may have had difficulties recollecting events many years prior). A limitation is that wāhine were not offered the opportunity to read and amend interview transcripts. In addition, only 12 wāhine in one city were interviewed. Further research with more wāhine from different parts of NZ would be valuable, as there is variation in healthcare services across NZ and in the experiences of Māori.

Implications for policy and practice

Clinical services could improve wāhine Māori experiences by ensuring reception areas are welcoming and allow discrete conversation with staff. HCPs need to be aware of their role in helping wāhine to feel comfortable divulging and asking for information – HCPs should use whakawhanaungatanga to build connections with wāhine and build trust. Enhancing the training and recruitment of Māori HCPs within a culturally responsive system, supported by Māori-led services and staff who engage with whānau, can address SRH inequities and expand HCP choice for wāhine Māori. Such HCPs are likely to have a high workload (demand will likely exceed supply), so must be supported by employers to carry this workload and avoid burnout. Finally, HCP training should promote personal reflection and communication skills. Ramsden’s Kawa Whakaruruhau framework8 is of vital importance in the training of all HCPs. The Meihana Model33 is another framework taught to medical students at the Otago University School of Medicine, that guides clinicians in considering how colonisation impacts the health of Māori patients and the importance of facets of Te Ao Māori (the Māori world) to wellbeing. The Model can be used to improve how HCPs provide care for and communicate with Māori, as demonstrated by Al-Busaidi et al.34

Conclusions

The wāhine in this study highlighted how care that lacks manaakitanga and whakawhanaungatanga can leave them feeling dismissed and small. Sexual and reproductive healthcare providers must create environments where wāhine feel safe and supported, fostering trust and enabling better engagement and outcomes.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available online.

Data availability

The dataset used and analysed during the current study is not available due to confidentiality and sensitivity of the nature of the data.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Declaration of funding

This research did not receive any specific funding. No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the wāhine who were interviewed for this research. We also acknowledge the staff at the medical centre who assisted with recruitment and academic colleagues external to the clinic who also assisted with this. CH acknowledges her relative SH, who kindly allowed CH to practice the interview with her before CH interviewed participants.

Author contributions

CH conceived of the idea, organised and carried out the interviews, transcribed and coded the data, and generated the themes and final manuscript. SB assisted with study design, checked the coding, and provided feedback and guidance during the thematic analysis and writing process. BH and IA provided guidance with setting up the study and support to CH throughout. MP provided guidance to keep the study in line with Kauapapa Māori research principles, and gave feedback on the developing themes. CM provided guidance with the writing of the manuscript. All authors read, provided feedback for, and approved the final manuscript.

References

Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee. Sixteenth annual report of the perinatal and maternal mortality review committee: reporting morbidity and mortality 2021. Wellington; 2024. Available at https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/Our-work/Mortality-review-committee/PMMRC/Publications-resources/16thPMMRCReport_FINAL.pdf

Hider P, Dempster-Rivett K, Williman J, et al. A review of cervical cancer occurrences in New Zealand 2008-2012. N Z Med J 2018; 131: 53-63.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

The Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd. Sexually transmitted infections in New Zealand: supplementary annual surveillance report 2022. Porirua; 2023. Available at https://www.esr.cri.nz/media/zv5bzjyo/esr-sexually-transmitted-infections-supplementary-annual-surveillance-report-2022.pdf

Ministry of Health. Abortion Services Aotearoa New Zealand: annual report. Wellington. 2024. Available at https://www.health.govt.nz/publications/abortion-services-aotearoa-new-zealand-annual-report-2024

Waitangi Tribunal. Hauora: Report on Stage One of the Health Services and Outcomes Kaupapa Inquiry; 2023. Available at https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/For-the-health-sector/Specific-life-stage/Health-of-older-people/Hauora-2023-W.pdf

Espiner E, Paine SJ, Weston M, et al. Barriers and facilitators for Māori in accessing hospital services in Aotearoa New Zealand. N Z Med J 2021; 134(1546): 47-58.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

Inter-Agency Support Group on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights of Indigenous Peoples; 2014. Available at https://www.un.org/en/ga/69/meetings/indigenous/pdf/IASG%20Thematic%20Paper_Reproductive%20Health%20-%20rev1.pdf

Ramsden I. Kawa Whakaruruhau: Cultural safety in nursing education in Aotearoa (New Zealand). Transcultural Nursing Conference Sydney; 1993. Available at https://www.nursingpraxis.org/article/83804-kawa-whakaruruhau-cultural-safety-in-nursing-education-aotearoa-nz

Hunter K, Roberts J, Foster M, et al. Dr Irihapeti Ramsden’s powerful petition for cultural safety. Nurs Prax Aotearoa N Z 2021; 37(1): 25-8.
| Google Scholar |

10  Krot K, Rudawska I. Is patient satisfaction the key to promote compliance in health care sector? Econ Sociol 2019; 12: 291-300.
| Google Scholar |

11  Smith CP. First, do no harm: institutional betrayal and trust in health care organizations. J Multidiscip Healthc 2017; 10(3): 133-44.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

12  Bradby H, Lindenmeyer A, Phillimore J, et al. ‘If there were doctors who could understand our problems, I would already be better’: dissatisfactory health care and marginalisation in superdiverse neighbourhoods. Sociol Health Illn 2020; 42(4): 739-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

13  Ryan KL, Arbuckle-Bernstein V, Smith G, et al. Let’s Talk About Sex: A Survey of Patients’ Preferences when addressing Sexual Health Concerns in a Family Medicine Residency Program Office. PRiMER 2018; 2: 23.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

14  Hinchliff S, Gott M, Galena E. GPs’ perceptions of the gender-related barriers to discussing sexual health in consultations: a qualitative study. Eur J Gen Pract 2004; 10(2): 56-60.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

15  Rowland D. Culture and Practice: Identifying the Issues. In: Rowland D, Jannini E, editors. Cultural Differences and the Practice of Sexual Medicine. Trends in Andrology and Sexual Medicine. Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 3–21.

16  Curtis E, Jones R, Willing E, et al. Indigenous adaptation of a model for understanding the determinants of ethnic health inequities. Discov Soc Sci Health 2023; 3(1): 10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

17  Rose SB, Garrett SM, McKinlay EM, et al. Experience of sexual healthcare by Māori and Non-Māori young people: an online survey of 15–24 year olds in hawkes bay, New Zealand. Int J Sex Health 2022; 34(1): 118-29.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

18  Waetford C. The knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour of Young Māori Women in Relation to Sexual Health: A Descriptive Qualitative Study. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology; 2008.

19  Walker S, Eketone A, Gibbs A. An exploration of kaupapa Maori research, its principles, processes and applications. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2006; 9(4): 331-44.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

20  Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

21  Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19(6): 349-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

22  Harris C, Bidwell S, Hudson B, et al. He mana tō te mātauranga - knowledge is power: a qualitative study of sexual and reproductive healthcare experiences of wāhine Māori. J Prim Health Care 2024;
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

23  Kearns RA, Neuwelt PM, Eggleton K. Permeable boundaries? Patient perspectives on space and time in general practice waiting rooms. Health Place 2020; 63: 102347.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

24  Neuwelt PM, Kearns RA, Browne AJ. The place of receptionists in access to primary care: challenges in the space between community and consultation. Soc Sci Med 2015; 133: 287-95.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

25  Zhang X, Sherman L, Foster M. Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on sexual ahealth discussion in the United States: a scoping review. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103(11): 2205-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

26  Morison T, Cook CM. Midlife safer sex challenges for heterosexual New Zealand women re-partnering or in casual relationships. J Prim Health Care 2015; 7(2): 137-44.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

27  Ekeroma A, Harillal M. Women’s choice in the gender and ethnicity of her obstetrician and gynaecologist. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 43(5): 354-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

28  Reid J, Cormack D, Crowe M. The significance of relational continuity of care for Māori patient engagement with predominantly non-Māori doctors: findings from a qualitative study. Aust N Z J Public Health 2016; 40(2): 120-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

29  Slater T, Matheson A, Davies C, et al. ‘It’s whanaungatanga and all that kind of stuff’: Maori cancer patients’ experiences of health services. J Prim Health Care 2013; 5(4): 308-14.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

30  Simmonds S, Carter M, Preval N, et al. Baseline Data Capture: Cultural Safety, Partnership and Health Equity Initiatives. Wellington: Medical Council of New Zealand, Te Ohu Rata o Aotearoa, and Allen+Clarke; 2020.

31  Dhunna S, Lawton B, Cram F. An Affront to Her Mana: Young Māori Mothers’ experiences of intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence 2021; 36(13–14): 6191-226.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

32  Boucher D. Reclaiming history: dehumanization and the failure of decolonization. Int J Soc Econ 2019; 46(11): 1250-63.
| Google Scholar |

33  Pitama S, Robertson P, Cram F, et al. Meihana Model: A Clinical Assessment Framework. N Z J Psychol 2007; 36:.
| Google Scholar |

34  Al-Busaidi IS, Huria T, Pitama S, et al. Māori Indigenous Health Framework in action: addressing ethnic disparities in healthcare. N Z Med J 2018; 131(1470): 89-93.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |