Speech pathologists' perspectives on the use of augmentative and alternative communication devices with people with acquired brain injury and reflections from lived experience
Jan Mackey



A Applied Communication Skills,
B
C Occupational Therapy Department,
D
Abstract
Communication changes following acquired brain injury (ABI) may necessitate use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Speech pathologists regularly assist people with ABI and their families with AAC assessment and recommendations, as well as education and training on AAC use. To date, there has been no Australian research investigating the perspectives of speech pathologists working in the field of ABI and AAC. This research aimed to 1) Explore speech pathologists’ insights regarding enablers and barriers to considerations and uptake, and ongoing use, of AAC by people with ABI and 2) Understand their perspectives on AAC acceptance, abandonment and rejection.
A qualitative research design, with semi-structured interviews, was used with seven speech pathologists working across three Australian states. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed. To triangulate results, the lived experience reflections of one co-author, who has an ABI and uses AAC, were drawn on.
Seven themes were identified, relating to four of the five domains of the World Health Organization’s assistive technology model. These included that AAC should be person-centred, with consideration of both products and personnel required, and with effective policy aiding AAC trial, uptake and use.
This research has highlighted considerations for AAC use by people with ABI, from the perspective of speech pathologists and aided by lived experience reflections. Speech pathologists need to understand the breadth of products, and good practice service steps, to ensure successful AAC use and skill development. Listening to the perspectives of people with ABI is central to that understanding.
Keywords: Assistive technology, brain injuries, acquired communication disorders, speech-language pathology.
References
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) (n.d.). Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/public/speech/disorders/aac/.
Beukelman, D. R., Fager, S., Ball, L., Dietz, A. (2007) AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: a review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 23(3), 230-242.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Blackstone, S. W., Williams, M. B., Joyce, M. (2002) Future AAC technology needs: consumer perspectives. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA 14(1), 3-16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bradley, E., Curry, L., Devers, K. (2007) Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research 42(4), 1758-1772.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Carlson, J. (2010) Avoiding traps in member checking. The Qualitative Report 15(5), 1102-1113.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., Neville, A. (2014) The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum 41(5), 545-547.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Curtin, M., Fossey, E. (2007) Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: guidelines for occupational therapists. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy 54(2), 88-94.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
de Joode, E. A., van Boxtel, M. P., Verhey, F. R., van Heugten, C. M. (2012) Use of assistive technology in cognitive rehabilitation: exploratory studies of the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals and potential users. Brain Injury 26(10), 1257-1266.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., Ska, B. (2002) The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability 14(3), 101-105.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Devotta, K., Woodhall-Melnik, J., Pedersen, C., Wendaferew, A., Dowbor, T., Guilcher, S., Matheson, F. I. (2016) Enriching qualitative research by engaging peer interviewers: a case study. Qualitative Research 16(6), 661-680.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Doyle, M., Fager, S. (2011) Traumatic Brain Injury and AAC: supporting communication through recovery. The ASHA Leader 16(2),.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fried-Oken, M., Beukelman, D. R., Hux, K. (2012) Current and future AAC research considerations for adults with acquired cognitive and communication impairments. Assistive Technology 24(1), 56-66.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fager, S., Hux, K., Beukelman, D. R., Karantounis, R. (2006) Augmentative and alternative communication use and acceptance by adults with traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 22(1), 37-47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hodkinson, D. (2005) Insider research’ in the study of youth cultures. Journal of Youth Studies 8(2), 131-149.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC) (n.d.). What is AAC? Retrieved from https://isaac-online.org/english/what-is-aac/.
Jamwal, R., Callaway, L., Ackerl, J., Farnworth, L., Winkler, D. (2017) Electronic assistive technology used by people with acquired brain injury in shared supported accommodation: implications for occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 80(2), 89-98.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Krefting, L. (1991) Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 45(3), 214-222.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
MacDonald, S. (2017) Introducing the model of cognitive-communication competence: a model to guide evidence-based communication interventions after brain injury. Brain Injury 31(13-14), 1760-1780.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission. (2021). Supporting effective communication. Retrieved from https://www.ndiscommission.gov.au/workers/supporting-effective-communication.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., Moules, N. J. (2017) Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1), 1-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Otter.ai. (2022). Otter.ai. Retrieved from https://www.otter.ai/.
Pampoulou, E. (2019) Speech and language therapists' views about AAC system acceptance by people with acquired communication disorders. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 14(5), 471-478.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Roulston, K. (2010) Considering quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 10(2), 199-228.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sloan, S., Callaway, L., Winkler, D., McKinley, K., Ziino, C. (2012) Accommodation outcomes and transitions following community-based intervention for individuals with acquired brain injury. Brain Impairment 13(1), 24-43.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Togher, L., Douglas, J., Turkstra, L., Welch-West, P., Janzen, S., Harnett, A., Wiseman-Hakes, C. (2023) INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part IV: cognitive-communication and social cognition disorders. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 38(1), 65-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
World Health Organization/UNICEF. (2022). The World Health Organization and UNICEF Global Report on Assistive Technology. Geneva, CH: Authors. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049451.
World Health Organization (n.d.), Assistive Technology. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/teams/health-product-policy-and-standards/assistive-and-medical-technology/assistive-technology.