Impact of communication modalities on autonomy and social participation of persons with locked-in syndrome
Marie-Christine Rousseau
A B * , Margaux Hautin C , Véronique Blandin D , Frédéric Pellas E , Pascal Auquier B , Karine Baumstarck B and Sébastien Lazzarotto B
A
B
C
D
E
Abstract
Locked-in syndrome (LIS) is a complex neurological condition characterised by paralysis of all four limbs and anarthria. Persons with LIS may communicate via eye blinks/low technology Augmentative and Alternative Communication devices (low tech AAC devices) or may use high technology Augmentative and Alternative Communication devices (high tech AAC devices). Our three objectives were: (1) to describe the distribution of communication modalities used by persons with LIS, (2) to describe the satisfaction of persons with LIS with their communication modality and social participation, and (3) to compare the characteristics and social participation among high tech AAC devices users versus low tech AAC devices or eye blinking users.
The questionnaires were sent by e-mail to persons with LIS. Data collected were communication modality, examination of communication ability, satisfaction with the communication modality and contribution of the communication modality to social participation.
Of the 53 participants, their mean age was 52 years, 43% used low tech AAC devices, 43% used high tech AAC devices and 13% communicated via eye blinking. Communication ability was examined in only half the participants. Participants’ satisfaction with their communication modality in terms of ergonomics, rapidity, adaptability and functionality were 80, 67, 36 and 47% respectively. Participants who used high tech AAC devices had significantly better e-mail and social network access, could more often initiate conversations and had longer communication durations.
The communication abilities of persons with LIS should be examined as quickly as possible and repeated regularly. High tech AAC devices should be rapidly and systematically proposed.
Keywords: autonomy augmentative and alternative communication devices, communication, communication evaluation, communication partners, internet access, locked-in syndrome, proxies, social participation.
References
American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (1995) Recommendations for use of uniform nomenclature pertinent to patients with severe alterations in consciousness. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 76(2), 205-209.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bauer G, Gerstenbrand F, Rumpl E (1979) Varieties of the locked-in syndrome. Journal of Neurology 221(2), 77-91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Branco MP, Pels EGM, Nijboer F, Ramsey NF, Vansteensel MJ (2023) Brain-Computer interfaces for communication: Preferences of individuals with locked-in syndrome, caregivers and researchers. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 18(6), 963-973.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brownlee A, Palovcak M (2007) The role of augmentative communication devices in the medical management of ALS. NeuroRehabilitation 22(6), 445-450.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bruno MA, Pellas F, Bernheim JL, Ledoux D, Goldman S, Demertzi A, Majerus S, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Blandin V, Boly M, Boveroux P, Moonen G, Laureys S, Schnakers C (2008) [Life with Locked-In syndrome]. Rev Med Liege 63(5-6), 445-51.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bruno M-A, Pellas F, Schnakers C, Van Eeckhout P, Bernheim J, Pantke K-H, Damas F, Faymonville M-E, Moonen G, Goldman S, Laureys S (2008b) [Blink and you live: The locked-in syndrome]. Revue Neurologique 164(4), 322-335.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bruno M-A, Bernheim JL, Ledoux D, Pellas F, Demertzi A, Laureys S (2011) A survey on self-assessed well-being in a cohort of chronic locked-in syndrome patients: Happy majority, miserable minority. BMJ Open 1(1), e000039.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Casanova E, Lazzari RE, Lotta S, Mazzucchi A (2003) Locked-in syndrome: Improvement in the prognosis after an early intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84(6), 862-867.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Doble JE, Haig AJ, Anderson C, Katz R (2003) Impairment, activity, participation, life satisfaction, and survival in persons with locked-in syndrome for over a decade: Follow-up on a previously reported cohort. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 18(5), 435-444.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Farr E, Altonji K, Harvey RL (2021) Locked-In Syndrome: Practical Rehabilitation Management. PM & R: The Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation 13(12), 1418-1428.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Fried-Oken M, Mooney A, Peters B (2015) Supporting communication for patients with neurodegenerative disease. NeuroRehabilitation 37(1), 69-87.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Koch Fager S, Fried-Oken M, Jakobs T, Beukelman DR (2019) New and emerging access technologies for adults with complex communication needs and severe motor impairments: State of the science. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985) 35(1), 13-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Kohnen RF, Lavrijsen JCM, Bor JHJ, Koopmans RTCM (2013) The prevalence and characteristics of patients with classic locked-in syndrome in Dutch nursing homes. Journal of Neurology 260(6), 1527-1534.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Kübler A, Kotchoubey B, Kaiser J, Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N (2001) Brain-computer communication: Unlocking the locked in. Psychological Bulletin 127(3), 358-375.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Laureys S, Pellas F, Van Eeckhout P, Ghorbel S, Schnakers C, Perrin F, Berré J, Faymonville M-E, Pantke K-H, Damas F, Lamy M, Moonen G, Goldman S (2005) The locked-in syndrome: What is it like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? Progress in Brain Research 150, 495-511.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lugo ZR, Bruno M-A, Gosseries O, Demertzi A, Heine L, Thonnard M, Blandin V, Pellas F, Laureys S (2015) Beyond the gaze: Communicating in chronic locked-in syndrome. Brain Injury 29(9), 1056-1061.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lulé D, Zickler C, Häcker S, Bruno MA, Demertzi A, Pellas F, Laureys S, Kübler A (2009) Life can be worth living in locked-in syndrome. Progress in Brain Research 177, 339-351.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Nizzi M-C, Blandin V, Demertzi A (2020) Attitudes towards Personhood in the Locked-in Syndrome: From Third- to First- Person Perspective and to Interpersonal Significance. Neuroethics 13(2), 193-201.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Papadopoulou SL, Dionyssiotis Y, Krikonis K, Lаgopati N, Kamenov I, Markoula S (2019) Therapeutic Approaches in Locked-in Syndrome. Folia Medica 61(3), 343-351.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Patterson JR, Grabois M (1986) Locked-in syndrome: a review of 139 cases. Stroke 17(4), 758-64.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Pels EGM, Aarnoutse EJ, Ramsey NF, Vansteensel MJ (2017) Estimated Prevalence of the Target Population for Brain-Computer Interface Neurotechnology in the Netherlands. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 31(7), 677-685.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Plum F, Posner JB (1972) The diagnosis of stupor and coma. Contemporary Neurology Series 10, 1-286.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
Rigby P, Ryan SE, Campbell KA (2011) Electronic aids to daily living and quality of life for persons with tetraplegia. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 6(3), 260-267.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rousseau M-C, Pietra S, Nadji M, Billette de Villemeur T (2013) Evaluation of quality of life in complete locked-in syndrome patients. Journal of Palliative Medicine 16(11), 1455-1458.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Rousseau M-C, Baumstarck K, Alessandrini M, Blandin V, Billette de Villemeur T, Auquier P (2015) Quality of life in patients with locked-in syndrome: Evolution over a 6-year period. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 10, 88.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Rowland C, Fried-Oken M (2010) Communication Matrix: A clinical and research assessment tool targeting children with severe communication disorders. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine 3(4), 319-329.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Schnetzer L, McCoy M, Bergmann J, Kunz A, Leis S, Trinka E (2023) Locked-in syndrome revisited. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders 16, 17562864231160873.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Smith E, Delargy M (2005) Locked-in syndrome. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 330(7488), 406-409.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Snoeys L, Vanhoof G, Manders E (2013) Living with locked-in syndrome: An explorative study on health care situation, communication and quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation 35(9), 713-718.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Vlieghe S (2019) La domotique en santé, un espoir pour l’autonomie des patients. Journal of Neuroradiology 46(2), 91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Voity K, Lopez T, Chan JP, Greenwald BD (2024) Update on How to Approach a Patient with Locked-In Syndrome and Their Communication Ability. Brain Sciences 14(1), 92.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
