Register      Login
Australian Systematic Botany Australian Systematic Botany Society
Taxonomy, biogeography and evolution of plants
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Elaeocarpus sedentarius sp. nov. (Elaeocarpaceae)—morphometric analysis of a new, rare species from eastern Australia

David Maynard A , Darren Crayn A B F , Maurizio Rossetto A C , Robert Kooyman A D and Mark Coode E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Herbarium of New South Wales, Botanic Gardens Trust, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

B Australian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, Cairns Campus, McGregor Road, Smithfield, Qld 4878, Australia.

C School of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resources Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

D Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.

E Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK.

F Corresponding author. Email: darren.crayn@jcu.edu.au

Australian Systematic Botany 21(3) 192-200 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB07031
Submitted: 13 July 2007  Accepted: 5 June 2008   Published: 20 August 2008

Abstract

To assess the status of a putative new species of Elaeocarpus L. (Elaeocarpaceae) from north-eastern New South Wales (NSW), with respect to the morphologically similar E. blepharoceras Schltr. from New Guinea, we undertook morphometric analysis of 11 vegetative attributes measured on 11 specimens of the putative new species and eight of E. blepharoceras. Cluster analysis (flexible UPGMA) and ordination (PCC) separates highland specimens of E. blepharoceras from the NSW material plus lowland E. blepharoceras. Furthermore, the ordination shows some separation of the NSW material into Koonyum Range and Nightcap Range groups. Although it is not clearly differentiated from lowland E. blepharoceras on morphometric analysis, description of the NSW material as E. sedentarius D.J.Maynard & Crayn is justified by (1) additional features such as the anther awns (short and sparsely hairy in E. sedentarius and much longer and densely bristly in E. blepharoceras), variation in the number of locules (3(–4) in E. sedentarius and (2–)3 in E. blepharoceras), leaf margin features (short setae terminating veins on leaf margins of E. blepharoceras, lacking in E. sedentarius) and (2) geographic isolation (>2000 km) is likely to prevent gene flow. The distribution, relationships and conservation status of E. sedentarius are discussed.


Acknowledgements

We thank Gordon Guymer and Stephen Bonser for discussions, Barry Conn and Elizabeth Brown for help with the PATN analyses, the directors of BRI and CANB for loan material, Chris Allen for the map, Peter Wilson for help with the Latin and Catherine Wardrop for the illustrations. This research was funded by the Hermon Slade Foundation and the trustees are gratefully thanked for their support.


References


APG (2003) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141, 399–436.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Belbin L (1984) FUSE, a FORTRAN 5 program for agglomerative fusion on micro-computers. Computers & Geosciences 10, 361–384.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Belbin L (1991) Semi-strong hybrid scaling, a new ordination algorithm. Journal of Vegetation Science 2, 491–496.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Belbin L (1993) ‘PATN analysis package. Users’ and technical reference manuals.’ (CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology: Canberra)

Coode MJE (1978) A conspectus of Elaeocarpus in Papuasia. Brunonia 1, 131–298.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Coode MJE (1984) Elaeocarpus in Australia and New Zealand. Kew Bulletin 39, 509–586.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Coode MJE (2004) Elaeocarpaceae. In ‘Families and genera of vascular plants’. (Ed. K Kubitzki) pp. 135–144. (Springer: Berlin)

Crayn DM, Rossetto M, Maynard DJ (2006) Molecular phylogeny and dating reveals an Oligo-Miocene radiation of dry-adapted shrubs (Tremandraceae) from rainforest tree progenitors (Elaeocarpaceae) in Australia. American Journal of Botany 93, 1328–1342.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dettmann ME, Clifford HT (2001) The fossil record of Elaeocarpus L. fruits. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 46, 461–497. open url image1

Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27, 857–871.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Holmgren PK , Holmgren NH (1998–continuously updated) ‘Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff.’ http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/

Hyland BPM , Whiffin T , Christophel DC , Gray B , Elick RW (2003) ‘Australian tropical rain forest plants–trees, shrubs and vines.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Manly BJF (1991) ‘Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology.’ (Chapman & Hall: London)

Maynard DJ (2004) A molecular phylogeny for Australian Elaeocarpus (Elaeocarpaceae) and the affinities of a putative new taxon. BSc Thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Norman JA, Christidis L, Joseph L, Slikas B, Alpers D (2002) Unravelling a biogeographical knot: origin of the ‘leapfrog’ distribution pattern of Australo-Papuan sooty owls (Strigiformes) and logrunners (Passeriformes). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 269, 2127–2133.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service (2002) ‘Recovery Plan for Elaeocarpus sp. Rocky Creek (syn. E. sp. 2 ‘Minyon’).’ (NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service: Sydney)

Podani J (2000) ‘Introduction to the exploration of multivariate biological data.’ (Backhuys Publishers: Leiden)

Quinn FC , Williams JB , Gross CL and Bruhl JJ (1995) Rare and threatened plants of north-eastern NSW. Report prepared for National Parks and Wildlife Service with the Nature Conservation Agency.

Rich AS (1995) A preliminary research and recovery study for the rare tree Elaeocarpus sp. 2 ‘Minyon’ in north-eastern NSW. BSc Thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.

Rossetto M, Kooyman R, Sherwin W, Jones R (2008) Dispersal limitations, rather than bottlenecks and habitat specificity, can restrict the distribution of rare and endemic rainforest trees. American Journal of Botany 95, 321–329.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schlechter R (1916) Die Elaeocarpaceen Papuasiens. In ‘Beiträge zur Flora von Papuasien. V’. (Ed. C Lauterbach) Botanische Jahrbucher 54, 92–155.

Smith AC (1942) Studies on Papuasian plants. VI. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 25, 104–121. open url image1

Sneath PHA , Sokal RR (1973) ‘Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification.’ (WH Freeman and Company: San Francisco)

Tirel C (1982) Élaéocarpacées. In ‘Flore de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et Dépendances’. (Eds A Aubréville, J-F Leroy) pp. 3–124. (Muséum National D’Histoire Naturelle: Paris)

Weibel RW (1968) Morphologie de l’embryon et de la graine des Elaeocarpus. Candollea 23, 101–108. open url image1