Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Prioritising interventions for the reduction of erosion in classical gullies: a modelling study

Matthew J. Prentice https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5563-2046 A B , Mark W. Waud https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-6224 C , Samille C. Loch-Wilkinson https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9064-0893 C , David P. Hamilton https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9341-8777 A and Melanie E. Roberts https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-9651 A D *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.

B Environmental Research Institute, The University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.

C Healthy Land and Water, Brisbane City, Qld 4000, Australia.

D School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia.

* Correspondence to: m.roberts2@griffith.edu.au

Handling Editor: Somasundaram Jayaraman

Soil Research 62, SR23014 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR23014
Submitted: 19 January 2023  Accepted: 7 November 2023  Published: 12 December 2023

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY)

Abstract

Context

Gully erosion is a significant socioeconomic and environmental issue that affects agricultural productivity, infrastructure, and water quality of receiving waters. Despite a variety of interventions to prevent gully formation and rehabilitate existing gullies, cost-effective interventions are specific to individual gullies.

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a suite of gully management interventions across three different classical gullies.

Methods

A one-dimensional process-based model, MERGE (modelling erosion resistance for gully erosion), was used to quantify the sediment yield exiting the gullies, in response to various management interventions.

Key results

The net decrease in sediment yield was 2.5–57.4% for each of four interventions applied in isolation and 51.2–78.7% in combination. Reductions in sediment yield for each intervention varied markedly among sites, by a factor of 2.6–78.3 in absolute terms. This resulted in a unique ranking of the interventions by their effectiveness for a given site. Overall, interventions applied in combination were most effective, outperforming those applied in isolation by a factor of 1.24–1.37, but the effect of applying interventions in combination was not additive.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the ability of the gully erosion model MERGE to be a useful tool to identify and tailor effective intervention strategies for individual gullies, and be a useful guide for decision making for erosion management.

Implications

Analysis of expected benefits of gully remediation using tools such as MERGE is important for assessing options at gully sites due to their widely varying response.

Keywords: environmental restoration, gully erosion, management, mathematical modelling, MERGE, permanent gully, process-based model, water quality.

References

Adame MF, Roberts ME, Hamilton DP, Ndehedehe CE, Reis V, Lu J, Griffiths M, Curwen G, Ronan M (2019) Tropical coastal wetlands ameliorate nitrogen export during floods. Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 671.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Addisie MB, Ayele GK, Gessesse AA, Tilahun SA, Moges MM, Zegeye AD, Mekuria W, Schmitter P, Langendoen EJ, Steenhuis TS (2016) Rehabilitating gullies with low cost methods, in the sub humid Ethiopian highlands. Technical report. Available at https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H047636.pdf

Alonso CV, Bennett SJ, Stein OR (2002) Predicting head cut erosion and migration in concentrated flows typical of upland areas. Water Resources Research 38, 39–1-39–15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bartley R, Poesen J, Wilkinson S, Vanmaercke M (2020) A review of the magnitude and response times for sediment yield reductions following the rehabilitation of gullied landscapes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 45, 3250-3279.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bellin N, Vanacker V, van Wesemael B, Solé-Benet A, Bakker MM (2011) Natural and anthropogenic controls on soil erosion in the Internal Betic Cordillera (southeast Spain). CATENA 87, 190-200.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bennett FR, Singh A, Roberts ME (2023) Parameter sensitivity analysis of the MERGE quasi-steady state gully erosion model. In ‘MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation’. (Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand) https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.bennett128

Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J, Galat D, Gloss S, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Katz S, Kondolf GM, Lake PS, Lave R, Meyer JL, O’Donnell TK, Pagano L, Powell B, Sudduth E (2005) Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308, 636-637.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Boix-Fayos C, de Vente J, Martinez-Mena M, Barberá GG, Castillo V (2008) The impact of land use change and check-dams on catchment sediment yield. Hydrological Processes 22, 4922-4935.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bureau of Meterology (2022) Daily rainfall Amberley (DNRM) TM. Station number 40816, product code IDCJAC0009 reference: 89383337. Available at https://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/ [Accessed 19 September 2022]

Calero JAG, Krása J, Quinton JN, Klik A, Castiel EF, Intrigliolo DS, Chen L, Strauss P, Yun X, Dostál T (2021) Best management practices for optimized use of soil and water in agriculture. Technical report. (CSIC – Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible (IAS)) doi:10.20350/digitalCSIC/13964

Castillo C, Gómez JA (2016) A century of gully erosion research: urgency, complexity and study approaches. Earth-Science Reviews 160, 300-319.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chen H, Cai Q (2006) Impact of hillslope vegetation restoration on gully erosion induced sediment yield. Science in China Series D 49, 176-192.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chow V (1959) ‘Open channel hydraulics.’ (McGraw-Hill Book Co.: New York)

Cuddington K, Fortin M-J, Gerber LR, Hastings A, Liebhold A, O’Connor M, Ray C (2013) Process-based models are required to manage ecological systems in a changing world. Ecosphere 4, 1-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ellis RJ (2018) Dynamic SedNet component model reference guide: update 2017. Technical report. (Queensland Department of Environment and Science) Available at https://www.publications.qld.gov.au/ckan-publications-attachments-prod/resources/99660005-afff-4b56-9639-6a9336332eec/dynamicsednet_referenceguide_2017.pdf

Frankl A, Nyssen J, Vanmaercke M, Poesen J (2021) Gully prevention and control: techniques, failures and effectiveness. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 46, 220-238.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Garbrecht JD, Starks PJ (2009) Watershed sediment yield reduction through soil conservation in a West-Central Oklahoma watershed. Ecohydrology 2, 313-320.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gomez B, Banbury K, Marden M, Trustrum NA, Peacock DH, Hoskin PJ (2003) Gully erosion and sediment production: Te Weraroa Stream, New Zealand. Water Resources Research 39, 1187.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Guo M, Wang W, Kang H, Yang B (2018) Changes in soil properties and erodibility of gully heads induced by vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land 10, 712-725.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hamilton DP, Salmaso N, Paerl HW (2016) Mitigating harmful cyanobacterial blooms: strategies for control of nitrogen and phosphorus loads. Aquatic Ecology 50, 351-366.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hancock GR, Evans KG, Willgoose GR, Moliere DR, Saynor MJ, Loch RJ (2000) Medium-term erosion simulation of an abandoned mine site using the SIBERIA landscape evolution model. Soil Research 38, 249.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Haregeweyn N, Tsunekawa A, Nyssen J, Poesen J, Tsubo M, Meshesha DT, Schütt B, Adgo E, Tegegne F (2015) Soil erosion and conservation in Ethiopia: a review. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 39, 750-774.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hartman BD, Bookhagen B, Chadwick OA (2016) The effects of check dams and other erosion control structures on the restoration of Andean bofedal ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 24, 761-772.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hunt LP, McIvor JG, Grice AC, Bray SG (2014) Principles and guidelines for managing cattle grazing in the grazing lands of northern Australia: stocking rates, pasture resting, prescribed fire, paddock size and water points – a review. The Rangeland Journal 36, 105.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kavehei E, Roberts ME, Cadier C, Griffiths M, Argent S, Hamilton DP, Lu J, Bayley M, Adame MF (2021) Nitrogen processing by treatment wetlands in a tropical catchment dominated by agricultural landuse. Marine Pollution Bulletin 172, 112800.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Koci J, Wilkinson SN, Hawdon AA, Kinsey-Henderson AE, Bartley R, Goodwin NR (2021) Rehabilitation effects on gully sediment yields and vegetation in a savanna rangeland. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 46, 1007-1025.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kuhnle RA, Bingner RL, Alonso CV, Wilson CG, Simon A (2008) Conservation practice effects on sediment load in the Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63, 496-503.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Langendoen EJ, Zegeye AD, Tebebu TY, Steenhuis TS, Ayele GK, Tilahun SA, Ayana EK (2014) Using computer models to design gully erosion control structures for humid northern Ethiopia. In ‘Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Hydroscience & Engineering’. (Eds R Lehfeldt, R Kopmann) pp. 1137–1146. (Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau) Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Essayas-Ayana/publication/275973144_Using_Computer_Models_to_Design_Gully_Erosion_Control_Structures_for_humid_northern_ethiopia/links/554d6c5808ae12808b34edce/Using-Computer-Models-to-Design-Gully-Erosion-Control-Structures-for-humid-northern-ethiopia.pdf

Lewis SE, Bainbridge ZT, Kuhnert PM, Sherman BS, Henderson B, Dougall C, Cooper M, Brodie JE (2013) Calculating sediment trapping efficiencies for reservoirs in tropical settings: a case study from the Burdekin Falls Dam, NE Australia. Water Resources Research 49, 1017-1029.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nkonya E, Anderson W, Kato E, Koo J, Mirzabaev A, von Braun J, Meyer S (2016) Global cost of land degradation. In ‘Economics of land degradation and improvement – a global assessment for sustainable development’. (Eds E Nkonya, A Mirzabaev, J von Braun) pp. 117–165. (Springer International Publishing) doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3_6

Nyssen J, Poesen J, Veyret-Picot M, Moeyersons J, Haile M, Deckers J, Dewit J, Naudts J, Teka K, Govers G (2006) Assessment of gully erosion rates through interviews and measurements: a case study from northern Ethiopia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31, 167-185.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nyssen J, Poesen J, Descheemaeker K, Haregeweyn N, Haile M, Moeyersons J, Frankl A, Govers G, Munro N, Deckers J (2008) Effects of region-wide soil and water conservation in semi-arid areas: the case of northern Ethiopia. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie 52, 291-315.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G, Valentin C (2003) Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs. CATENA 50, 91-133.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Prentice MJ, Waud MW, Hamilton DP, Roberts ME (2021) Assessing performance of the MERGE model for simulating gully interventions. In ‘24th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 5 to 10 December’. (Eds RW Vervoort, AA Voinov, JP Evans, L Marshall) pp. 729–735. (Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc.) doi:10.36334/modsim.2021.L4.prentice

Prosser IP (2018) Improving how gully erosion and river sediment transport processes are represented in Queensland catchment models. (Department of Environment and Science) Available at https://science.des.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0030/80787/qwmn-gully-erosion-processes-report.pdf

Quiñonero-Rubio JM, Nadeu E, Boix-Fayos C, de Vente J (2016) Evaluation of the effectiveness of forest restoration and check-dams to reduce catchment sediment yield. Land Degradation & Development 27, 1018-1031.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ran D-C, Luo Q-H, Zhou Z-H, Wang G-Q, Zhang X-H (2008) Sediment retention by check dams in the Hekouzhen-Longmen Section of the Yellow River. International Journal of Sediment Research 23, 159-166.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rey F (2003) Influence of vegetation distribution on sediment yield in forested marly gullies. CATENA 50, 549-562.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Roberts ME (2020) MERGE: modelling erosion resistance for gully erosion – a process-based model of erosion from an idealised linear gully. Soil Research 58, 576-591.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Roberts M (2022) Regional pilot application of the MERGE gully erosion model. Technical report. Report to Queensland Water Modelling Network. (Department of Environment and Science) Available at https://science.des.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/285052/QWMN-MERGE-Regional-Pilot-Final-Report.pdf

Roberts ME, Roots K (2023) Porous check dams and the MERGE gully erosion model. In ‘MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation’. (Eds J Vaze, C Chilcott, L Hutley, S Cuddy). (Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand) doi:10.36334/modsim.2023.roberts

Roberts ME, Burrows RM, Thwaites RN, Hamilton DP (2022) Modelling classical gullies – a review. Geomorphology 407, 108216.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rose CW, Yu B, Ward DP, Saxton NE, Olley JM, Tews EK (2014) The erosive growth of hillside gullies. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 39, 1989-2001.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rust S, Star M (2017) The cost effectiveness of remediating erosion gullies: a case study in the Fitzroy. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 25, 233-247.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sidorchuk A (1999) Dynamic and static models of gully erosion. CATENA 37, 401-414.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Stokes A, Douglas GB, Fourcaud T, Giadrossich F, Gillies C, Hubble T, Kim JH, Loades KW, Mao Z, McIvor IR, Mickovski SB, Mitchell S, Osman N, Phillips C, Poesen J, Polster D, Preti F, Raymond P, Rey F, Schwarz M, Walker LR (2014) Ecological mitigation of hillslope instability: ten key issues facing researchers and practitioners. Plant and Soil 377, 1-23.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Streeter MT, Schilling KE, Burras CL, Wolter CF (2021) Erosion and sediment delivery in southern Iowa watersheds: implications for conservation planning. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 76, 103-115.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Valentin C, Poesen J, Li Y (2005) Gully erosion: impacts, factors and control. CATENA 63, 132-153.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Vannoppen W, Vanmaercke M, De Baets S, Poesen J (2015) A review of the mechanical effects of plant roots on concentrated flow erosion rates. Earth-Science Reviews 150, 666-678.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wilkinson S, Hairsine P, Brooks A, Bartley R, Hawdon A, Pietsch T, Shepherd B, Austin J (2019) Gully and stream bank toolbox. A technical guide for the Reef Trust Gully and Stream Bank Erosion Control Program. 2nd edn. Commonwealth of Australia.

Yibeltal M, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Adgo E, Meshesha DT, Masunaga T, Tsubo M, Billi P, Ebabu K, Berihun ML (2021) Effect of subsurface water level on gully headcut retreat in tropical highlands of ethiopia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 46, 1209-1222.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yitbarek TW, Belliethathan S, Stringer LC (2010) The onsite cost of gully erosion and cost-benefit of gully rehabilitation: a case study in ethiopia. Land Degradation & Development 23, 157-166.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Zhang B-J, Zhang G-H, Zhu P-Z, Yang H-Y (2019) Temporal variations in soil erodibility indicators of vegetation-restored steep gully slopes on the loess plateau of china. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 286, 106661.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |