Redesigning the soil Tea Bag Index methodology for school and citizen science in Australia
Wartini Ng
A * , Alex B. McBratney A , Vanessa Pino A , Eugenia O’Brien A and Bendrik Baumeister B
A
B
Abstract
The Tea Bag Index (TBI) evaluates the rate of organic matter decomposition using Lipton tea bags. However, this tea bag cannot be easily found in Australia, having to be imported from Europe. The 90-day incubation period also poses problems for school and citizen science projects, such as missing tea bags and organism-induced damage.
The study aims to: (1) investigate the suitable alternative Australian tea bag brands for the decomposition studies; (2) assess the potential for reducing the incubation period; and (3) evaluate the priming effects of different substrates on decomposition rate.
The feasibility of two local Australian tea bag brands (Madame Flavour or T2) was compared to Lipton by collecting time-series data over the incubation period in pot experiments with the addition of sugar, citric acid and microplastic.
We found an alternative tea brand that can be used for TBI in Australia.
(1) Madame Flavour tea bags can be used as an alternative litter material for the TBI in Australia. (2) The incubation period potentially could be reduced to 21 days, with another sampling taken on day 4 and 14. (3) Although there is a significant difference in decomposition rate between the control and substrates addition, no significant difference in decomposition rate is found among different substrates.
The utilisation of the Madame Flavour tea bag enables the adoption of decomposition studies by a broader spectrum of citizen scientists in Australia.
Keywords: Australian tea brand, citizen science, climate change, decomposition, decomposition rate, green tea, rooibos tea, Tea Bag Index.
References
Aerts R (2006) The freezer defrosting: global warming and litter decomposition rates in cold biomes. Journal of Ecology 94(4), 713-724.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bocock KL, Gilbert OJW (1957) The disappearance of leaf litter under different woodland conditions. Plant and Soil 9(2), 179-185.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Correll RL, Harch BD, Kirkby CA, O’Brien K, Pankhurst CE (1997) Statistical analysis of reduction in tensile strength of cotton strips as a measure of soil microbial activity. Journal of Microbiological Methods 31(1–2), 9-17.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
de Sherbinin A, Bowser A, Chuang T-R, Cooper C, Danielsen F, Edmunds R, Elias P, Faustman E, Hultquist C, Mondardini R, Popescu I, Shonowo A, Sivakumar K (2021) The critical importance of citizen science data. Frontiers in Climate 3, 650760.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
de Souza Machado AA, Lau CW, Till J, Kloas W, Lehmann A, Becker R, Rillig MC (2018) Impacts of microplastics on the soil biophysical environment. Environmental Science & Technology 52(17), 9656-9665.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Didion M, Repo A, Liski J, Forsius M, Bierbaumer M, Djukic I (2016) Towards harmonizing leaf litter decomposition studies using standard tea bags – a field study and model application. Forests 7(12), 167.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Duddigan S, Shaw LJ, Alexander PD, Collins CD (2020) Chemical underpinning of the Tea Bag Index: an examination of the decomposition of tea leaves. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2020, 1-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Duis K, Coors A (2016) Microplastics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment: sources (with a specific focus on personal care products), fate and effects. Environmental Sciences Europe 28(1), 2.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Effland MJ (1977) Modified procedure to determine acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp. Tappi 60(10), 143-144.
| Google Scholar |
Eggleton P, Griffiths H, Ashton L, Law S, Evans T, Parr K (2020) Not our cup of tea: the Tea Bag Index (Kueskamp et al. 2013) for assessing decomposition is problematic in most environments, due to macrofauna. Authorea
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Goulding KWT (2016) Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use and Management 32(3), 390-399.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Keuskamp JA, Dingemans BJJ, Lehtinen T, Sarneel JM, Hefting MM (2013) Tea Bag Index: a novel approach to collect uniform decomposition data across ecosystems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(11), 1070-1075.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kögel-Knabner I (2002) The macromolecular organic composition of plant and microbial residues as inputs to soil organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34(2), 139-162.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kountoupes DL, Oberhauser KS (2008) Citizen science and youth audiences: educational outcomes of the Monarch Larva Monitoring Project. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship 1(1), 10-20 10.54656/CGNR5551.
| Google Scholar |
Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K (2000) Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32(11-12), 1485-1498.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Liu H, Yang X, Liu G, Liang C, Xue S, Chen H, Ritsema CJ, Geissen V (2017) Response of soil dissolved organic matter to microplastic addition in Chinese loess soil. Chemosphere 185, 907-917.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
MacDonald E, Brummell ME, Bieniada A, Elliott J, Engering A, Gauthier T-L, Saraswati S, Touchette S, Turmel-Courchesne L, Strack M (2018) Using the Tea Bag Index to characterize decomposition rates in restored peatlands. Boreal Environment Research 23, 221-235.
| Google Scholar |
Marley ACRG, Smeaton C, Austin WEN (2019) An assessment of the Tea Bag Index method as a proxy for organic matter decomposition in intertidal environments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 124(10), 2991-3004.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McBratney A, Field DJ, Koch A (2014) The dimensions of soil security. Geoderma 213, 203-213.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Minasny B, Malone BP, McBratney AB, Angers DA, Arrouays D, Chambers A, Chaplot V, Chen Z-S, Cheng K, Das BS, Field DJ, Gimona A, Hedley CB, Hong SY, Mandal B, Marchant BP, Martin M, McConkey BG, Mulder VL, O’Rourke S, Richer-de-Forges AC, Odeh I, Padarian J, Paustian K, Pan G, Poggio L, Savin I, Stolbovoy V, Stockmann U, Sulaeman Y, Tsui C-C, Vagen T-G, van Wesemael B, Winowiecki L (2017) Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 292, 59-86.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Molina JAE, Clapp CE, Larson WE (1980) Potentially mineralizable nitrogen in soil: the simple exponential model does not apply for the first 12 weeks of incubation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44(2), 442-443.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mori T (2022a) Is the Tea Bag Index (TBI) useful for comparing decomposition rates among Soils? Ecologies 3(4), 521-529.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mori T (2022b) Validation of the Tea Bag Index as a standard approach for assessing organic matter decomposition: a laboratory incubation experiment. Ecological Indicators 141, 109077.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mori T, Nakamura R, Aoyagi R (2022) Risk of misinterpreting the Tea Bag Index: field observations and a random simulation. Ecological Research 37(3), 381-389.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pino V, McBratney A, O’Brien E, Ng W (2021) Boosting soil citizen-science using Tea Bag Index method towards soil security in Australia. Soil Security 5, 100016.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Prescott CE (2005) Do rates of litter decomposition tell us anything we really need to know? Forest Ecology and Management 220(1–3), 66-74.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ryan MG, Melillo JM, Ricca A (1990) A comparison of methods for determining proximate carbon fractions of forest litter. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20(2), 166-171.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Seelen LMS, Flaim G, Keuskamp J, Teurlincx S, Arias Font R, Tolunay D, Frankova M, Sumberova K, Temponeras M, Lenhardt M, Jennings E, de Senerpont Domis LN (2019) An affordable and reliable assessment of aquatic decomposition: tailoring the Tea Bag Index to surface waters. Water Research 151, 31-43.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Seyfried MS, Rao PSC (1988) Kinetics of nitrogen mineralization in Costa Rican soils: model evaluation and pretreatment effects. Plant and Soil 106(2), 159-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Shah HR, Martinez LR (2016) Current approaches in implementing citizen science in the classroom. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 17(1), 17-22.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Slocum MG, Roberts J, Mendelssohn IA (2009) Artist canvas as a new standard for the cotton-strip assay. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 172(1), 71-74 10.1002/jpln.200800179.
| Google Scholar |
Stanford G, Smith SJ (1972) Nitrogen mineralization potentials of soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 36(3), 465-472.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stockmann U, Adams MA, Crawford JW, Field DJ, Henakaarchchi N, Jenkins M, Minasny B, McBratney AB, Courcelles VdRd, Singh K, Wheeler I, Abbott L, Angers DA, Baldock J, Bird M, Brookes PC, Chenu C, Jastrow JD, Lal R, Lehmann J, O’Donnell AG, Parton WJ, Whitehead D, Zimmermann M (2013) The knowns, known unknowns and unknowns of sequestration of soil organic carbon. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 164, 80-99.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Teo A, Kristensen NP, Keuskamp JA, Evans TA, Foo M, Chisholm RA (2020) Validation and extension of the Tea Bag Index to collect decomposition data from termite-rich ecosystems. Pedobiologia 80, 150639.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tregidgo DJ, West SE, Ashmore MR (2013) Can citizen science produce good science? Testing the OPAL Air Survey methodology, using lichens as indicators of nitrogenous pollution. Environmental Pollution 182, 448-451.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Trevathan-Tackett SM, Brodersen KE, Macreadie PI (2020) Effects of elevated temperature on microbial breakdown of seagrass leaf and tea litter biomass. Biogeochemistry 151(2–3), 171-185.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tulloch AIT, Possingham HP, Joseph LN, Szabo J, Martin TG (2013) Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biological Conservation 165, 128-138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
