Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Realist evaluation of allied health management in Queensland: what works, in which contexts and why

Sharon Mickan A B D , Jessica Dawber A and Julie Hulcombe C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Gold Coast Health, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Southport, Qld 4215, Australia. Email: jessica.dawber@health.qld.gov.au

B Griffith Health, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia.

C Allied Health Professions Office of Queensland, Department of Health, Queensland Government, 15 Butterfield Street, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia. Email: julie.hulcombe@health.qld.gov.au

D Corresponding author. Email: sharon.mickan@health.qld.gov.au

Australian Health Review 43(4) 466-473 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17265
Submitted: 22 November 2017  Accepted: 27 March 2018   Published: 30 August 2018

Journal compilation © AHHA 2019 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Objective Allied health structures and leadership positions vary throughout Australia and New Zealand in their design and implementation. It is not clear which organisational factors support allied health leaders and professionals to enhance clinical outcomes. The aim of this project was to identify key organisational contexts and corresponding mechanisms that influenced effective outcomes for allied health professionals.

Methods A qualitative realist evaluation was chosen to describe key aspects of allied health organisational structures, identify positive outcomes and describe how context and processes are operationalised to influence outcomes for the allied health workforce and the populations they serve.

Results A purposive sample of nine allied health leaders, five executives and 49 allied health professionals were interviewed individually and in focus groups, representing nine Queensland Health services. Marked differences exist in the title and focus of senior allied health leaders’ roles. The use of a qualitative realist evaluation methodology enabled identification of the mechanisms that work to achieve effective and efficient outcomes, within specific contexts.

Conclusions The initial middle range theory of allied health organisational structures in Queensland was supported and extended to better understand which contexts were important and which key mechanisms were activated to achieve effective outcomes. Executive allied health leadership roles enable allied health leaders to use their influence in organisational planning and decision-making to ensure allied health professionals deliver successful patient care services. Professional governance systems embed the management and support of the clinical workforce most efficiently within professional disciplines. With consistent data management systems, allied health professional staff can be integrated within clinical teams that provide high-quality care. Interprofessional learning opportunities can enhance collaborative teamwork and, when allied health professionals are supported to understand and use research, they can deliver positive patient and business outcomes for the health service.

What is known about the topic? A collective allied health organisational structure encourages engagement of allied health professionals within healthcare organisations. Organisational structures commonly include management and leadership strategies and service delivery models. Allied health leaders in Queensland work across a range of senior management levels to ensure adequate resources for sufficient suitably skilled professional staff to meet patient needs.

What does this paper add? Literature to date has described how allied health professionals operate within organisational structures. This paper examines key aspects of allied health management, governance and leadership, together with mechanisms that support allied health professionals to deliver effective clinical and business outcomes for their local community.

What are the implications for practitioners? Health service executives and allied health leaders should consider supporting executive allied health leadership roles to influence strategic planning and decision-making, as well as to deliver outcomes that are important to the health service. When allied health leaders implement integrated professional and operational governance systems, executives described allied health professionals as influential in supporting team-based models of care that add value to the business and improve outcomes for patients. When allied health leaders use consistent data management, executives reinforced the benefit of aligning activity data with financial costs to monitor, recognise and reimburse appropriate clinical interventions for patients. When allied health leaders support allied health workforce capability through educational and research opportunities, clinicians can use research to inform their clinical practice.


References

[1]  Boyce RA. Organisational governance structures in allied health services: a decade of change. Aust Health Rev 2001; 24 22–36.
Organisational governance structures in allied health services: a decade of change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Mueller J, Neads P. Allied health and organisational structure: massaging the organisation to facilitate outcomes. N Z J Physiother 2005; 33 48–54.

[3]  Braithwaite J, Westbrook M. Rethinking clinical organisational structures: an attitude survey of doctors, nurses and allied health staff in clinical directorates. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10 10–7.
Rethinking clinical organisational structures: an attitude survey of doctors, nurses and allied health staff in clinical directorates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Mason J. Review of Australian Government health workforce programs. Australian Government, Department of Health; 2013. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/review-australian-government-health-workforce-programs [verified 9 August 2018].

[5]  Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. London: Sage Publications; 2013.

[6]  Jagosh J, Bush PL, Salsberg J, Macaulay AC, Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Cargo M, Green LW, Herbert CP, Pluye P. A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health 2015; 15 725
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Boyce RA, Jackway P. Allied health leaders: Australian public sector health boards and top management teams. Report to the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services (Office of the Chief Allied Health Advisor). Melbourne; 2016. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316284511_Boyce_RA_and_Jackway_PT_2016_Allied_Health_Leaders_Australian_Public_Sector_Health_Boards_and_ Top_Management_Teams_Melbourne_Australia_Department_of_Health_ Human_ServicesOffice_of_the_Chief_Allied_Hea [verified 9 August 2018].

[8]  Jacob A, Roe D, Merrigan R, Brown T. The Casey Allied Health Model of Interdisciplinary Care (CAHMIC): development and implementation. Int J Ther Rehabil 2013; 20 387–95.
The Casey Allied Health Model of Interdisciplinary Care (CAHMIC): development and implementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |