Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH FRONT

Gap in funding for specialist hospitals treating patients with traumatic spinal cord injury under an activity-based funding model in New South Wales, Australia

Bharat Phani Vaikuntam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-4380 A E , James W. Middleton A B , Patrick McElduff C , John Walsh A , Jim Pearse C , Luke Connelly D and Lisa N. Sharwood A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School – Northern, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia. Email: james.middleton@sydney.edu.au; magoo.actuarial@gmail.com; lisa.sharwood@sydney.edu.au

B NSW State-wide Spinal Cord Injury Service, Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood, Sydney, NSW 2067, Australia.

C Health Policy Analysis Pty Ltd, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia. Email: pmcelduff@healthpolicy.com.au; JPearse@healthpolicy.com.au

D Centre for Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia. Email: l.connelly@uq.edu.au

E Corresponding author. Email: bvai6198@uni.sydney.edu.au

Australian Health Review 44(3) 365-376 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH19083
Submitted: 05 April 2019  Accepted: 05 December 2019   Published: 27 May 2020

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to estimate the difference between treatment costs in acute care settings and the level of funding public hospitals would receive under the activity-based funding model.

Methods Patients aged ≥16 years who had sustained an incident traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) between June 2013 and June 2016 in New South Wales were included in the study. Patients were identified from record-linked health data. Costs were estimated using two approaches: (1) using District Network Return (DNR) data; and (2) based on national weighted activity units (NWAU) assigned to activity-based funding activity. The funding gap in acute care treatment costs for TSCI patients was determined as the difference in cost estimates between the two approaches.

Results Over the study period, 534 patients sustained an acute incident TSCI, accounting for 811 acute care hospital separations within index episodes. The total acute care treatment cost was estimated at A$40.5 million and A$29.9 million using the DNR- and NWAU-based methods respectively. The funding gap in total costs was greatest for the specialist spinal cord injury unit (SCIU) colocated with a major trauma service (MTS), at A$4.4 million over the study period.

Conclusions The findings of this study suggest a substantial gap in funding for resource-intensive patients with TSCI in specialist hospitals under current DRG-based funding methods.

What is known about the topic? DRG-based funding methods underestimate the treatment costs at the hospital level for patients with complex resource-intensive needs. This underestimation of true direct costs can lead to under-resourcing of those hospitals providing specialist services.

What does this paper add? This study provides evidence of a difference between true direct costs in acute care settings and the level of funding hospitals would receive if funded according to the National Efficient Price and NWAU for patients with TSCI. The findings provide evidence of a shortfall in the casemix funding to public hospitals under the activity-based funding for resource-intensive care, such as patients with TSCI. Specifically, depending on the classification system, the principal referral hospitals, the SCIU colocated with an MTS and stand-alone SCIU were underfunded, whereas other non-specialist hospitals were overfunded for the acute care treatment of patients with TSCI.

What are the implications for practitioners? Although health care financing mechanisms may vary internationally, the results of this study are applicable to other hospital payment systems based on diagnosis-related groups that describe patients of similar clinical characteristics and resource use. Such evidence is believed to be useful in understanding the adequacy of hospital payments and informing payment reform efforts. These findings may have service redesign policy implications and provide evidence for additional loadings for specialist hospitals treating low-volume, resource-intensive patients.


References

[1]  Campbell AR, Vittinghoff E, Morabito D, Paine M, Shagoury C, Praetz P, Grey D, McAninch JW, Schecter WP. Trauma centers in a managed care environment. J Trauma 1995; 39 246–53.
Trauma centers in a managed care environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 7674392PubMed |

[2]  Aucar JA, Hicks LL. Economic modeling comparing trauma and general surgery reimbursement. Am J Surg 2005; 190 951–60.
Economic modeling comparing trauma and general surgery reimbursement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Moos RM, Sprengel K, Jensen KO, Jentzsch T, Simmen HP, Seifert B, Ciritsis B, Neuhaus V, Volbracht J, Mehra T. Reimbursement of care for severe trauma under Swiss DRG. Swiss Med Wkly 2016; 146 w14334
Reimbursement of care for severe trauma under Swiss DRG.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27544067PubMed |

[4]  Mahlke L, Lefering R, Siebert H, Windolf J, Roeder N, Franz D. Abbildung von Schwerverletzten im DRG-System: wird die Schwerverletztenversorgung doch bezahlbar? [English title: Description of the severely injured in the DRG system: is treatment of the severely injured still affordable?] Der Chirurg 2013; 84 978–86.
Abbildung von Schwerverletzten im DRG-System: wird die Schwerverletztenversorgung doch bezahlbar? [English title: Description of the severely injured in the DRG system: is treatment of the severely injured still affordable?]Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Curtis K, Mitchell R, Dickson C, Black D, Lam M. Do AR-DRGs adequately describe the trauma patient episode in New South Wales, Australia? Health Inf Manag 2011; 40 7–13.
Do AR-DRGs adequately describe the trauma patient episode in New South Wales, Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21430303PubMed |

[6]  Curtis K, Lam M, Mitchell R, Dickson C, McDonnell K. Major trauma: the unseen financial burden to trauma centres, a descriptive multicentre analysis. Aust Health Rev 2014; 38 30–7.
Major trauma: the unseen financial burden to trauma centres, a descriptive multicentre analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24240704PubMed |

[7]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Health expenditure Australia 2017–18. Cat. no. HWE 077. Canberra: AIHW; 2019.

[8]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s health 2018: in brief. Report no. 1760543778. Canberra: AIHW; 2018.

[9]  Busato A, von Below G. The implementation of DRG-based hospital reimbursement in Switzerland: a population-based perspective. Health Res Policy Syst 2010; 8 31
The implementation of DRG-based hospital reimbursement in Switzerland: a population-based perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20950481PubMed |

[10]  Palmer KS, Agoritsas T, Martin D, Scott T, Mulla SM, Miller AP, Agarwal A, Bresnahan A, Hazzan AA, Jeffery RA, Merglen A. Activity-based funding of hospitals and its impact on mortality, readmission, discharge destination, severity of illness, and volume of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9 e109975
Activity-based funding of hospitals and its impact on mortality, readmission, discharge destination, severity of illness, and volume of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25347697PubMed |

[11]  Middleton PM, Davies SR, Anand S, Reinten-Reynolds T, Marial O, Middleton JW. The pre-hospital epidemiology and management of spinal cord injuries in New South Wales: 2004–2008. Injury 2012; 43 480–5.
The pre-hospital epidemiology and management of spinal cord injuries in New South Wales: 2004–2008.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22244002PubMed |

[12]  Vaikuntam BP, Middleton JW, McElduff P, Connelly L, Pearse J, Stanford R, Walsh J, Sharwood LN. Identifying predictors of higher acute care costs for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury and modeling acute care pathway redesign: a record linkage study. Spine 2019; 44 E947–83.
Identifying predictors of higher acute care costs for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury and modeling acute care pathway redesign: a record linkage study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  National Health Funding Body. National health reform – about the agreement. 2018. Available at: https://www.publichospitalfunding.gov.au/public-hospital-funding/about-agreement [verified 14 May 2020].

[14]  Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA). National pricing model technical specifications 2013–14. Sydney: IHPA; 2013.

[15]  Hall J. Health-care reform in Australia: advancing or side-stepping? Health Econ 2010; 19 1259–63.
Health-care reform in Australia: advancing or side-stepping?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20938999PubMed |

[16]  NSW Health. Selected specialty and statewide service plans number 6: NSW trauma services. 2009. Available at: https://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/244236/NSW_Trauma_Services_Plan_Dec_2009.pdf [verified 17 January 2020].

[17]  Walters BC, Hadley MN, Hurlbert RJ, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, Harrigan MR, Rozelle CJ, Ryken TC, Theodore N. Guidelines for the management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries: 2013 update. Neurosurgery 2013; 60 82–91.
Guidelines for the management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries: 2013 update.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23839357PubMed |

[18]  Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for healthcare professionals. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31 403–79.
Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for healthcare professionals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18959359PubMed |

[19]  Longo F, Siciliani L, Street A. Are cost differences between specialist and general hospitals compensated by the prospective payment system? Euro J Health Econ 2019; 20 7–26.
Are cost differences between specialist and general hospitals compensated by the prospective payment system?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Vaikuntam BP, Middleton JW, McElduff P, Pearse J, Walsh J, Cameron ID, Sharwood LN. Assessing the impact of care pathways on potentially preventable complications and costs for spinal trauma patients: protocol for a data linkage study using cohort study and administrative data. BMJ Open 2018; 8 e023785
Assessing the impact of care pathways on potentially preventable complications and costs for spinal trauma patients: protocol for a data linkage study using cohort study and administrative data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30413515PubMed |

[21]  Gedeborg R, Warner M, Chen L-H, Gulliver P, Cryer C, Robitaille Y, Bauer R, Ubeda C, Lauritsen J, Harrison J, Henley G. Internationally comparable diagnosis-specific survival probabilities for calculation of the ICD-10-based injury severity score. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 76 358–65.
Internationally comparable diagnosis-specific survival probabilities for calculation of the ICD-10-based injury severity score.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24398769PubMed |

[22]  Gagné M, Moore L, Beaudoin C, Kuimi BL, Sirois MJ. Performance of International Classification of Diseases-based injury severity measures used to predict in-hospital mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016; 80 419–26.
Performance of International Classification of Diseases-based injury severity measures used to predict in-hospital mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26713976PubMed |

[23]  Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, Muggivan A, Quan H, Ghali WA. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57 1288–94.
New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15617955PubMed |

[24]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Hospitals info & downloads: glossary. 2019. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/health-welfare-services/hospitals/glossary [verified 19 February 2019].

[25]  Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA). Australian hospital patient costing standards – part 1: standards – version 4.0. Sydney: IPHA; 2018.

[26]  PricewaterhouseCoopers. Culturally and linguistically diverse patient costing study report. Sydney: Independent Hospital Pricing Authority; 2015.

[27]  Independent Hospital Pricing Authority. National weighted activity unit (NWAU) calculators 2013–14. 2013. Available at: https://www.ihpa.gov.au/what-we-do/pricing/national-weighted-activity-unit-nwau-calculators/nwau-calculators-2013-14 [verified 2 July 2018].

[28]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australian hospital peer groups. Canberra: AIHW; 2015.

[29]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. Consumer price index. 2017. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/6401.0 [verified 23 March 2020].

[30]  Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA). Pricing and funding for safety and quality – risk adjustment model for hospital acquired complications – 2018/19. Version 3. Sydney: IHPA; 2018.

[31]  Henderson T, Shepheard J, Sundararajan V. Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2006; 44 1011–19.
Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17063133PubMed |

[32]  Independent Hospital Pricing Authority. Activity based funding. 2018. Available at: https://www.ihpa.gov.au/what-we-do/activity-based-funding [verified 28 November 2018].

[33]  Zafirah SA, Nur AM, Puteh SEW, Aljunid SM. Potential loss of revenue due to errors in clinical coding during the implementation of the Malaysia diagnosis related group (MY-DRG®) Casemix system in a teaching hospital in Malaysia. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18 38
Potential loss of revenue due to errors in clinical coding during the implementation of the Malaysia diagnosis related group (MY-DRG®) Casemix system in a teaching hospital in Malaysia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29370785PubMed |

[34]  Nouraei SA, Hudovsky A, Frampton AE, Mufti U, White NB, Wathen CG, Sandhu GS, Darzi A, A study of clinical coding accuracy in surgery: implications for the use of administrative big data for outcomes management. Ann Surg 2015; 261 1096–107.
A study of clinical coding accuracy in surgery: implications for the use of administrative big data for outcomes management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25470740PubMed |

[35]  Nouraei SA, Virk JS, Hudovsky A, Wathen C, Darzi A, Parsons D. Accuracy of clinician–clinical coder information handover following acute medical admissions: implication for using administrative datasets in clinical outcomes management. J Public Health (Oxf) 2016; 38 352–62.
Accuracy of clinician–clinical coder information handover following acute medical admissions: implication for using administrative datasets in clinical outcomes management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[36]  Jameson S, Reed MR. Payment by results and coding practice in the National Health Service: the importance for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89-B 1427–30.
Payment by results and coding practice in the National Health Service: the importance for orthopaedic surgeons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Jackson T. Data quality: not selling ourselves short. Health Inf Manag 2014; 43 4–6.
| 24948660PubMed |

[38]  Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA). National pricing model technical specifications 2014–15. Sydney: IHPA; 2014.

[39]  Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA). National pricing model technical specifications 2015–16. Sydney: IHPA; 2015.