Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

How well has part-time work on return from maternity leave been accepted in the workplace? Learnings from allied health professional managers in Queensland Health

Julie Hulcombe https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0690-388X A C , Sandra Capra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0926-8500 A and Gillian Whitehouse https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-0369 B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Level 2, Connell Building, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. Email: s.capra@uq.edu.au

B School of Political Science and International Studies, Level 5, General Purpose North (39A), The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. Email: g.whitehouse@uq.edu.au

C Corresponding author. Email: julie.hulcombe@uq.net.au

Australian Health Review 45(5) 627-632 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20288
Submitted: 7 October 2020  Accepted: 2 February 2021   Published: 18 May 2021

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to explore allied health professional (AHP) managers’ implementation of the right to request part-time hours on return from maternity leave in Queensland Health (QH) hospitals.

Methods Qualitative data were collected via interviews with AHP managers from a cross-section of professions with variations in workforce size and gender composition. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results Twenty-one of a potential 40 AHP managers agreed to participate in the study (response rate 53%). The main finding was that the implementation of part-time work arrangements was being driven by regulation and work was being managed without complementary changes to established workplace practices or adequate organisational support.

Conclusion The use of regulatory instruments to implement part-time work in organisations without complementary work redesign, change management and organisational support suggests that there are significant barriers to this type of flexible working arrangement (FWA) becoming accepted workplace practice for AHPs in QH. A whole-of-organisation approach is needed to make FWA a reality.

What is known about the topic? Research has underlined the importance of implementation and management rather than simply the adoption of FWA policies. However, there have been few reports about AHP management of part-time hours on return from maternity leave.

What does this paper add? This paper provides information specifically about the management response to part-time work entitlements for AHP in QH. It indicates that managers are implementing part-time work because it is a regulatory requirement, but often without a substantive commitment to FWA complementary redesign of services or sufficient organisational support.

What are the implications for practitioners? Complementary work redesign measures and resources are needed to make workplaces genuinely flexible rather than just superficially consistent with regulatory requirements.


References

[1]  Burgmann L. AIM insights. Managing in a flexible work environment. White paper. Sydney: Australian Institute of Management; 2012 Available at: https://www.wgea.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/AIM-Managing-in-a-Flexible-Work-Environment.pdf [verified 11 January 2021].

[2]  Wheatley D. Employee satisfaction and use of flexible working arrangements. Work Employ Soc 2017; 31 567–85.
Employee satisfaction and use of flexible working arrangements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  May K, McAlinde F, Splawa-Neyman M, et al Flexible, capable, adaptable: a dynamic allied health workforce. Asia Pac J Health Manage 2017; 12 25–35.
Flexible, capable, adaptable: a dynamic allied health workforce.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Skinner N, Pocock B. Flexibility and work–life interference in Australia. J Ind Relat 2011; 53 65–82.
Flexibility and work–life interference in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Ryan A, Kossek EE. Work–life policy implementation: breaking down or creating barriers to inclusiveness? Hum Resour Manage 2008; 47 295–310.
Work–life policy implementation: breaking down or creating barriers to inclusiveness?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Chung H. Gender, flexibility stigma and the perceived negative consequences of flexible working in the UK. Soc Indic Res 2020; 151 521–45.
Gender, flexibility stigma and the perceived negative consequences of flexible working in the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Rooney M. Professional managers’ perceptions on managing the impact of flexible working practices in Irish healthcare. Physiotherapy Prac Res 2009; 30 45–9.
Professional managers’ perceptions on managing the impact of flexible working practices in Irish healthcare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Sutton KL, Noe RA. Family-friendly programs and work-life integration: more myth than magic? In: Kossek EE, Lambert SJ, editors. Work and life integration: organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005. pp. 151–169.

[9]  Kossek EE, Lewis S, Hammer LB. Work–life initiatives and organizational change: overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream. Hum Relat 2010; 63 3–19.
Work–life initiatives and organizational change: overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22021934PubMed |

[10]  Cooper R, Baird M. Bringing the ‘right to request’ flexible working arrangements to life: from policies to practices. Employee Relat 2015; 37 568–81.
Bringing the ‘right to request’ flexible working arrangements to life: from policies to practices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Putnam L, Myers K, Gailliard BM. Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Hum Relat 2014; 67 413–40.
Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Hulcombe J, Capra S, Whitehouse G. Allied health professionals in Queensland Health returning to work after maternity leave: hours of work and duration of time on part-time hours. Aust Health Rev 2020; 44 56–61.
Allied health professionals in Queensland Health returning to work after maternity leave: hours of work and duration of time on part-time hours.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30696546PubMed |

[13]  Draper A, Swift JA. Qualitative research in nutrition and dietetics: data collection issues. J Hum Nutr Diet 2011; 24 3–12.
Qualitative research in nutrition and dietetics: data collection issues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21091918PubMed |

[14]  Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3 77–101.
Using thematic analysis in psychology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Department of Health, Australian Government. Modified Monash model. 2019. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/health-workforce/health-workforce-classifications/modified-monash-model#how-to-find-current-areas-under-the-mmm [verified 11 January 2021].

[16]  Parcsi L, Curtin M. Experiences of occupational therapists returning to work after maternity leave. Aust Occup Ther J 2013; 60 252–9.
Experiences of occupational therapists returning to work after maternity leave.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23888975PubMed |

[17]  Rubery J. Regulating for gender equality: a policy framework to support the universal caregiver vision. Soc Polit 2015; 22 513–38.
Regulating for gender equality: a policy framework to support the universal caregiver vision.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Gornick JC, Meyers MK. Creating gender egalitarian societies: an agenda for reform. Polit Soc 2008; 36 313–49.
Creating gender egalitarian societies: an agenda for reform.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |