Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Recent trends in pirfenidone and nintedanib use for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Australia

Ingrid A. Cox https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5130-4088 A B , Barbara de Graaff A B , Tamera J. Corte B C D , Ian Glaspole B E F , Daniel C. Chambers B G H , Yuben Moodley B I J K , Alan Teoh B D , E. Haydn Walters A B * and Andrew J. Palmer A B L M *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Menzies Institute for Medical Research, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia. Email: ingrid.cox@utas.edu.au; barbara.degraaff@utas.edu.au; haydn.walters@utas.edu.au

B National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence for Pulmonary Fibrosis, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. Email: tamera.corte@sydney.edu.au; ian.glaspole@monash.edu; alan.teoh@health.nsw.gov.au

C Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

D Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

E Interstitial Lung Disease Clinic, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

F Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

G School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. Email: daniel.chambers@health.qld.gov.au

H Queensland Lung Transplant Service, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

I Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia. Email: yuben.moodley@uwa.edu.au

J Institute of Respiratory Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

K Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia.

L Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

M Corresponding author. Email: andrew.palmer@utas.edu.au

Australian Health Review 45(6) 718-727 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20337
Submitted: 25 November 2020  Accepted: 10 March 2021   Published: 28 October 2021

Abstract

Objectives Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is one of the most common forms of interstitial lung disease presenting in people aged ≥50 years. There is currently no cure for IPF, but two medications (pirfenidone and nintedanib) have been shown to slow the functional decline of the lungs. In 2017, these two medications were listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) for subsidisation in Australia. This study evaluated local trends in the use of these two medications.

Methods Prescription data for this analysis were obtained from the PBS Item Reports for the period May 2017–May 2020. Population data were extracted from the Australian Bureau of Statistics data cubes. A descriptive approach was used to conduct and report the analysis to illustrate trends in the use of these two medications and associated costs.

Results There were 44 010 prescriptions processed for the treatment for IPF in the 3-year period. Nintedanib use was higher than pirfenidone use, accounting for 54% of prescriptions. New South Wales accounted for 35% of the total prescriptions but, when standardised against population size, the Australian Capital Territory accounted for the highest proportion of prescriptions (24%). Prescriptions for nintedanib and pirfenidone were associated with a total cost of A$131 377 951 over the period 2017–20.

Conclusion This study provides initial information on prescription rates, practices and expenditure for pirfenidone and nintedanib. In addition, we provide some insight into possible pharmacological and epidemiological trends based on jurisdictional differences. Together, the results from this study provide a platform for future research given the dearth of information on IPF in Australia.

What is known about the topic? Data regarding trends in the utilisation of antifibrotics for the treatment of IPF in Australia are currently limited.

What does this paper add? This study demonstrated that nintedanib use was slightly higher than pirfenidone use, and that there were variations in jurisdictional prescribing practices. The highest number of prescriptions and costs were attributable to New South Wales but, when standardised against population size, the Australian Capital Territory had the highest number of prescriptions and costs.

What are the implications for practitioners? This study provides some insights into the use of pirfenidone and nintedanib, as well as pharmacoepidemiological trends, in Australia, which is useful for economic evaluation and modelling future health expenditure.

Keywords: antifibrotics, pharmacoepidemiology, health economics, health funding and financing, interstitial lung disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, medication costs, pharmaceuticals.


References

[1]  Richeldi L, Collard HR, Jones MG. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet 2017; 389 1941–52.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28365056PubMed |

[2]  Hutchinson J, Fogarty A, Hubbard R, McKeever T. Global incidence and mortality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review. Eur Respir J 2015; 46 795–806.
Global incidence and mortality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25976683PubMed |

[3]  Nalysnyk L, Cid-Ruzafa J, Rotella P, Esser D. Incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: review of the literature. Eur Respir Rev 2012; 21 355–61.
Incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23204124PubMed |

[4]  Raghu G. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: lessons from clinical trials over the past 25 years. Eur Respir J 2017; 50 1701209
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: lessons from clinical trials over the past 25 years.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29074545PubMed |

[5]  Therapeutic Goods Administration. Australian public assessment report for pirfenidone. Canberra: Department of Health, Australian Government; 2016. Available at https://www.tga.gov.au/auspar/auspar-pirfenidone

[6]  Therapeutic Goods Administration. Australian public assessment report for nintedanib esilate. Canberra: Department of Health, Australian Government; 2016. Available at https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-nintedanib-esilate-160208.pdf

[7]  Raghu G, Rochwerg B, Zhang Y, Garcia CAC, Azuma A, Behr J, et al An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline: treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An update of the 2011 clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 192 e3–19.
An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline: treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An update of the 2011 clinical practice guideline.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26177183PubMed |

[8]  Cameli P, Refini RM, Bergantini L, d’Alessandro M, Alonzi V, Magnoni C, et al Long-term follow-up of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with pirfenidone or nintedanib: a real-life comparison study. Front Mol Biosci 2020; 7 581828
Long-term follow-up of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with pirfenidone or nintedanib: a real-life comparison study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33102528PubMed |

[9]  Cerri S, Monari M, Guerrieri A, Donatelli P, Bassi I, Garuti M, et al Real-life comparison of pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a 24-month assessment. Respir Med 2019; 159 105803
Real-life comparison of pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a 24-month assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31670147PubMed |

[10]  Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). Public Summary Document – November 2016 PBAC Meeting: Nintedanib. Canberra: Department of Health, Australian Government; 2016. Available at https://www.pbs.gov.au/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/psd/2016-11/files/nintedanib-psd-november-2016.pdf

[11]  Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). Recommendations made by the PBAC – December 2016. Canberra: Department of Health, Australia Government; 2016. Available at https://www.pbs.gov.au/pbs/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/pbac-outcomes/recommendations-pbac-december-2016

[12]  Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Pirfenidone. Canberra: Department of Health, Australian Government; 2020. Available at https://www.pbs.gov.au/medicine/item/11136D-11406H-11410M

[13]  Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Nintedanib. Canberra: Department of Health, Australian Government; 2020. Available at https://www.pbs.gov.au/medicine/item/11100F-11106M

[14]  Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Australian demographic statistics, Dec 2019. Canberra: Australian Government; 2020. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/dec-2019#data-downloads-data-cubes

[15]  R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 3.5.1 edn. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.

[16]  Campbell JA, Simpson S, Ahmad H, Taylor BV, van der Mei I, Palmer AJ. Change in multiple sclerosis prevalence over time in Australia 2010–2017 utilising disease-modifying therapy prescription data. Mult Scler 2020; 26 1315–28.
Change in multiple sclerosis prevalence over time in Australia 2010–2017 utilising disease-modifying therapy prescription data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31347952PubMed |

[17]  Støvring H, Andersen M, Beck-Nielsen H, Green A, Vach W. Counting drugs to understand the disease: the case of measuring the diabetes epidemic. Popul Health Metr 2007; 5 2
Counting drugs to understand the disease: the case of measuring the diabetes epidemic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17313683PubMed |

[18]  Vaes B, Ruelens C, Saikali S, Smets A, Henrard S, Renard F, et al Estimating the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and thyroid disorders using medication data in Flanders, Belgium. Eur J Public Health 2018; 28 193–8.
Estimating the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and thyroid disorders using medication data in Flanders, Belgium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29016831PubMed |

[19]  Strongman H, Kausar I, Maher TM. Incidence, prevalence, and survival of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the UK. Adv Ther 2018; 35 724–36.
Incidence, prevalence, and survival of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29644539PubMed |

[20]  Drug Utilisation Sub-committee PBAC. Nintedanib and pirfenidone: 24 month predicted versus actual analysis. Canberra: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, Department of Health, Australian Government; 2020.

[21]  Bargagli E, Piccioli C, Rosi E, Torricelli E, Turi L, Piccioli E, et al Pirfenidone and nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: real-life experience in an Italian referral centre. Pulmonology 2019; 25 149–53.
Pirfenidone and nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: real-life experience in an Italian referral centre.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30236523PubMed |

[22]  Salisbury ML, Conoscenti CS, Culver DA, Yow E, Neely ML, Bender S, et al Antifibrotic drug use in patients with IPF: data from the IPF-PRO Registry. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2020; 17 1413–23.
Antifibrotic drug use in patients with IPF: data from the IPF-PRO Registry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32574517PubMed |

[23]  Audibert C, Livoti C, Caze A. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: physicians’ perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2016; 3 80–5.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: physicians’ perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29736460PubMed |

[24]  Baumgartner A, Drame K, Geutjens S, Airaksinen M. Does the polypill improve patient adherence compared to its individual formulations? A systematic review. Pharmaceutics 2020; 12 190
Does the polypill improve patient adherence compared to its individual formulations? A systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Chan P, Bax L, Chen C, Zhang N, Huang S-P, Soares H, et al Model-based meta-analysis on the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2017; 6 695–704.
Model-based meta-analysis on the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28699195PubMed |

[26]  Richeldi L, Brown KK, Cottin V, Selman M, Kimura T, Stowasser S. P8 Pooled analysis of data from the TOMORROW and INPULSIS trials of nintedanib in IPF. Thorax 2015; 70 A78
P8 Pooled analysis of data from the TOMORROW and INPULSIS trials of nintedanib in IPF.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  Costabel U, Bendstrup E, Cottin V, Dewint P, Egan JJJ, Ferguson J, et al Pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: expert panel discussion on the management of drug-related adverse events. Adv Ther 2014; 31 375–91.
Pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: expert panel discussion on the management of drug-related adverse events.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24639005PubMed |

[28]  Cossman RE, Cossman JS, James WL, Blanchard T, Thomas R, Pol LG, et al Correlating pharmaceutical data with a national health survey as a proxy for estimating rural population health. Popul Health Metr 2010; 8 25
Correlating pharmaceutical data with a national health survey as a proxy for estimating rural population health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20840767PubMed |

[29]  Duarte-Ramos F, Cabrita J. Using a pharmacoepidemiological approach to estimate diabetes type 2 prevalence in Portugal. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006; 15 269–74.
Using a pharmacoepidemiological approach to estimate diabetes type 2 prevalence in Portugal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16294365PubMed |

[30]  Jo HE, Troy LK, Keir G, Chambers DC, Holland A, Goh N, et al Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Australia and New Zealand: a position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the Lung Foundation Australia. Respirology 2017; 22 1436–58.
Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Australia and New Zealand: a position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the Lung Foundation Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28845557PubMed |