Articles citing this paper
A cost analysis of inpatient compared with outpatient prostaglandin E2 cervical priming for induction of labour: results from the OPRA trial
Pamela L. Adelson A F , Garry R. Wedlock B , Chris S. Wilkinson C , Kirsten Howard D , Robert L. Bryce E and Deborah A. Turnbull A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. Email: deborah.turnbull@adelaide.edu.au
B Health Informatics, Performance, Planning and Outcomes Unit, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, 55 King William Road, North Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Email: garry.wedlock2@health.sa.gov.au
C Maternal Fetal Medicine, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia. Email: chris.wilkinson@health.sa.gov.au
D Sydney School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building (A27), The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email: kirsten.howard@sydney.edu.au
E Centre for Perinatal Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia. Email: robert.bryce@health.sa.gov.au
F Corresponding author. Email: pamela.adelson@adelaide.edu.au
Australian Health Review 37(4) 467-473 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13081
Submitted: 22 April 2013 Accepted: 29 July 2013 Published: 10 September 2013
25 articles found in Crossref database.
Efficacy of pharmacological and mechanical cervical priming methods for induction of labour and their applicability for outpatient management: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Khan Hiba,
Buaki-Sogo Maria Amparo,
Barlow Philip,
Vardanyan Robert,
Zatorska Anna,
Miller George,
Arjomandi Rad Arian,
Malawana Johann, Shah Nishel M.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2023 287 p.80
Induction of labor using prostaglandin vaginal gel: cost analysis comparing early amniotomy with repeat prostaglandin gel
Beckmann Michael,
Merollini Katharina,
Kumar Sailesh, Flenady Vicki
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2016 199 p.96
A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Wilkinson Chris,
Adelson Pamela, Turnbull Deborah
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2015 15(1).
Women’s experience of induction of labor using PGE2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient
Beckmann Michael,
Acreman Melissa,
Schmidt Emily,
Merollini Katharina M.D., Miller Yvette
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2020 249 p.1
Fetal heart rate patterns and the incidence of adverse events after oral misoprostol administration for cervical ripening among low-risk pregnancies
Kandahari Nazineen,
Tucker Lue-Yen S.,
Schneider Allison N.,
Raine-Bennett Tina R., Mohta Vanitha J.
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2023 36(1).
Women’s preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment
Howard Kirsten,
Gerard Karen,
Adelson Pamela,
Bryce Robert,
Wilkinson Chris, Turnbull Deborah
BMC Health Services Research. 2014 14(1).
Woman-Centred Induction of Labour (the WOCIL project)
O’Dwyer Sabrina,
Clark Anna,
Taggart Hayley, Noori Muna
BMJ Open Quality. 2019 8(2). p.e000389
Outpatient vs inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A retrospective study
Hallén Natalie,
Amini Mahdi,
Wide‐Swensson Dag, Herbst Andreas
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2023 102(5). p.605
Outpatient cervical ripening
Amorosa Jennifer M.H., Stone Joanne L.
Seminars in Perinatology. 2015 39(6). p.488
Observational Study of Neonatal Safety for Outpatient Labour Induction Priming with Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert
Cundiff Geoffrey W.,
Simpson Mary Lynn,
Koenig Nicole, Lee Terry
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2017 39(5). p.354
Double balloon catheter versus vaginal prostaglandins for induction of labor: an observational ambidirectional cohort study
Cruz-Lemini MD, PhD Monica,
Bailón-Queiruga MD Marta ,
Mallén MD, PhD Maria del Carmen Medina ,
Fornell MD Anna Mundó ,
Guervós Raquel Pérez ,
de Luis Anna Ramos , Llurba MD, PhD Elisa
Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal. 2023 14(2). p.77
From “disappointing” to “fantastic”: Women's experiences with labor induction in a U.S. tertiary hospital
Danilack Valery A.,
Siegel‐Reamer Leah,
Lum Liana,
Kesselring Cailey,
Brousseau Erin Christine, Guthrie Kate M.
Birth. 2023 50(4). p.959
Predictive Factors for the Success of Vaginal Dinoprostone for the Induction of Labour
Liu Wenjie,
Guo Li,
Feng Lizhen,
Wang Jie,
Zhang Miao, Fan Xiaobin
International Journal of Women's Health. 2024 Volume 16 p.1093
A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (OPRA study)
Wilkinson C,
Bryce R,
Adelson P, Turnbull D
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2015 122(1). p.94
Using the WHO-INTEGRATE evidence-to-decision framework to develop recommendations for induction of labour
Murano Melissa,
Chou Doris,
Costa Maria Laura, Turner Tari
Health Research Policy and Systems. 2022 20(1).
Changes in local protocols on inpatient cervical priming and introduction of outpatient priming: A nationwide survey in the Netherlands
Croll Dorothée M.R.,
Hoge Peter C.,
Verhoeven Corine. J.M.,
de Boer Marjon A.,
Bloemenkamp Kitty W.M., de Heus Roel
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2021 263 p.148
Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes
Alfirevic Zarko,
Gyte Gillian ML,
Nogueira Pileggi Vicky,
Plachcinski Rachel,
Osoti Alfred O, Finucane Elaine M
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020 2020(8).
Outpatient induction of labour with prostaglandins: Safety, effectiveness and women's views
Smith Lisa Kirsten
British Journal of Midwifery. 2017 25(12). p.774
Outpatient labour induction
Wilkinson Chris
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2021 77 p.15
Safety, effectiveness, womenʼs experience, and economic costs of outpatient induction in women with uncomplicated pregnancies: A systematic review and meta‐analyses
Sangskär Heléne,
Berglin Lisa,
Sengpiel Verena,
Svanberg Therese,
Svensson Mikael,
Berter Beatrice,
Elden Helen,
Sjögren Petteri,
Strandell Annika, Carlsson Ylva
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2023 161(2). p.343
Cervical ripening at home or in-hospital—prospective cohort study and process evaluation (CHOICE) study: a protocol
Stock Sarah Jane,
Bhide Amarnath,
Richardson Heather,
Black Mairead,
Yuill Cassandra,
Harkness Mairi,
Reid Maggie,
Wee Fiona,
Cheyne Helen,
McCourt Christine,
Rana Dikshyanta,
Boyd Kathleen Anne,
Sanders Julia,
Heera Neelam,
Huddleston Jane,
Denison Fiona,
Pasupathy Dharmintra,
Modi Neena,
Smith Gordon, Norrie John
BMJ Open. 2021 11(5). p.e050452
Labor Induction Outcomes with Outpatient Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening among Low-Risk Women
Kandahari Nazineen,
Schneider Allison N.,
Tucker Lue-Yen S.,
Raine-Bennett Tina R., Mohta Vanitha J.
American Journal of Perinatology. 2024 41(S 01). p.e818
Is There a Place for Outpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening?
Leopold Beth, Sciscione Anthony
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2017 44(4). p.583
Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
Beckmann M,
Gibbons K,
Flenady V, Kumar S
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020 127(5). p.571
Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Dong Susan,
Khan Maria,
Hashimi Farahnosh,
Chamy Caroline, D’Souza Rohan
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020 20(1).
