Environmental, Social and Governance principles in Australian publicly funded healthcare: an extension of value-based care
Aletha Ward A * , Mark E. Holmes A , Isabella Ward
A
B
C
D
Abstract
Australia’s publicly funded healthcare system is financed through a complex mix of Commonwealth, State, Territory and private sources, which include activity-based funding, fee for service and block funding. These models may be insufficient to meet future budgetary constraints, and healthcare systems in Australia and worldwide are increasingly adopting value-based healthcare (VBHC), which is defined as ‘health outcomes that matter to patients relative to the resources or costs required, over a full cycle of care’. There is no national Australian strategy for the adoption of VBHC, and examining other industries or policies may provide solutions to enhance implementation. For example, as of January 2025, the Australian Securities Exchange will mandate climate-related disclosures for listed companies. This change reflects a growing societal and shareholder emphasis on environmental accountability. Our paper argues that universally applying Environmental, Social and Governance principles across all healthcare sectors represents a strategic evolution of VBHC to ensure fiscally responsible climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.
Keywords: Australian healthcare, climate change, environmental impact, ESG, ethical governance, governance, social responsibility, value-based care.
Environmental, Social and Governance principles as an extension of value-based care
The Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) principles, summarised in Table 1, have gained significant societal traction. Integrating these principles into value-based healthcare (VBHC) definitions is crucial for creating a sustainable, resilient healthcare system. This approach enables effective climate response, financial optimisation, and meeting evolving patient and societal needs. Integrating ESG principles and VBHC creates a mutually reinforcing framework that promotes sustainable, ethical and patient-centred care. This alignment provides a robust foundation for enabling policy changes that address both societal and environmental imperatives while optimising health care outcomes.
Environment | Climate change | |
Biodiversity loss | ||
Air pollution | ||
Renewable energy transition | ||
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions | ||
Deforestation | ||
Waste reduction and management | ||
Nature-based solutions | ||
Social | Diversity and inclusion | |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, culture and heritage | ||
Anti-racist practice | ||
Anti-misogyny practice | ||
Anti-discrimination | ||
Human rights | ||
Modern slavery | ||
Health and safety | ||
Cyber security | ||
Governance | Risk management | |
Antibribery and corruption | ||
Shareholder management | ||
Accountability | ||
Board independence | ||
Decision-making | ||
Leadership |
Greenhouse gas emissions from healthcare organisations have increased by 36% since 2016.1 Environmental principles in health care aim to reduce this ecological footprint while potentially improving public health outcomes. This involves reducing emissions, improving energy efficiency and adapting to climate risks.2 Reducing air pollution, for instance, benefits both environment and respiratory health.
Social principles encompass human rights, labour practices and community engagement, revealing critical health disparities evident in the unequal health outcomes across ethnic groups and rural−urban populations.2 Implementing ESG principles involves resolving biases within the healthcare system, building positive relationships with communities, supporting community development, promoting workforce diversity and minimising adverse social impacts.3 ESG broadens the perspective of patient satisfaction to the system’s overall societal impact, which includes healthcare institutions’ roles as employers and economic drivers in diverse communities.4
Governance in Australian healthcare ensures transparency and accountability within the complex federal−state structure and ensures fair and efficient resource allocation across jurisdictions that are responsive to diverse population needs.5 Current Australian healthcare governance frameworks remain misaligned with VBHC principles, particularly in financial management and the utilisation of systematic patient outcome data. Advancing toward VBHC governance will require strategic policy reforms, with the integration of predefined ESG outcomes offering a promising pathway to facilitate systemic transformation.
The ESG principles involve robust risk management practices to identify, assess and mitigate financial, operational and reputational risks, particularly during climate-driven disasters.6 The National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards7 provide a framework for quality improvement and risk management in healthcare organisations. Integrating ESG principles and a data-driven VBHC approach with these standards could enhance sector governance by enshrining ethical decision-making, stakeholder engagement and long-term sustainability.
Environmental, Social and Governance principles defining value-based healthcare
VBHC focuses on achieving the best possible health outcomes for the cost incurred.8 It represents a shift from volume-based care to a model that prioritises quality, efficiency and person-centred care.9 A key component of VBHC is defining and measuring ‘value’, which is based on data and definitions developed by patients, providers, payers, suppliers and society.10 The ESG principles expand this approach by incorporating broader societal and environmental considerations as key determinants of value. In the environmental domain, ESG expands on value-based care’s efficiency focus to consider wider ecological impacts. For instance, although telemedicine might be favoured in value-based care for cost reduction and increased consumer satisfaction, an ESG approach would also value the reduced carbon emissions from decreased patient and practitioner travel.
By integrating ESG principles within a value-based care framework, healthcare organisations can deliver care that not only improves patient outcomes but also contributes to the overall health and wellbeing of communities and the environment. This approach represents a natural evolution of VBHC to expand the definition of ‘value’ to encompass broader societal and environmental considerations driven by the people receiving the care. For example, VBHC strategically targets cost reduction and service optimisation by eliminating unnecessary medical tests or implementing innovative care models, such as nurse-led approaches in rural and remote areas. These targeted interventions simultaneously promote sustainability, consistency and transparency, which fosters a culture of continuous improvement to enhance the overall value delivered to patients and the healthcare system.
Implementing Environmental, Social and Governance principles in Australian publicly funded healthcare
Here are some key steps we recommend for extending VBHC using ESG principles in the public healthcare system:
Establish standardised definitions for value-based outcomes that integrate ESG principles as core value metrics, implementing a transparent reporting framework aligned with the Australian Securities Exchange disclosure requirements to enhance public accountability and understanding.
Accelerate the collection and utilisation of patient outcome and sustainability data, engage key stakeholders and use co-design to drive evidence-based, ethical decision-making, enabling a person-centred approach that guides funding priorities while promoting environmental responsibility.
Develop ESG and VBHC metrics that go beyond traditional health outcomes and financial measures. These might include carbon emissions, waste reduction, workforce diversity, community engagement and ethical governance indicators.
Prioritise investments in sustainable healthcare infrastructure and innovative care models, such as nurse-led care, pharmacist-administered vaccines and technologies that reduce environmental impact while enhancing care delivery, particularly in rural and remote regions.
Use ESG principles to address health inequalities by addressing social determinants of health with an emphasis on Closing the Gap in Indigenous health.11
Conclusion
ESG principles can enhance VBHC in Australia’s public healthcare by considering environmental impact, social responsibility and ethical governance alongside health outcomes and financial metrics. As Australia faces escalating climate impacts and corresponding health inequities, adopting, defining and reporting ESG principles as part of VBHC is crucial for creating sustainable, equitable and effective future healthcare systems. Like Australian Securities Exchange’s ESG reporting mandate for listed companies, Australia’s public healthcare should embrace these principles to ensure long-term resilience, cost effectiveness, transparency and societal-driven definitions of value in their health care.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable as no new data were generated or analysed during this study.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of, and should not be attributed to the publisher, the journal owner or CSIRO.
Declaration of funding
There is no source of funding provided for the research or preparation of this paper.
References
1 Romanello M, Walawender M, Hsu S-C, et al. The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Facing record-breaking threats from delayed action. The Lancet 2024; 404: 1847-1896.
| Google Scholar |
2 Department of Health and Aged Care. National Health and Climate Strategy Front Cover. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care; 2023. pp. 10–120. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-12/national-health-and-climate-strategy.pdf [cited 31 August 2024].
3 Leung TCH, You CSX. ESG Application in Sustainable Development of the Healthcare Industry. In: Leung TCH, Chiu WK, You CSX, Fong BYF, editors. Environmental, Social and Governance and Sustainable Development in Healthcare. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2023. pp. 47–64. Available at https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-99-1564-4 [cited 31 August 2024].
4 Chime C. Esg Risks and Integration by Healthcare Companies. 2024. p. 7. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4860007 [cited 31 August 2024].
5 Dijkstra J. Putting ESG at the heart of healthcare governance - KPMG Global. KPMG. 2023. Available at https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2023/08/putting-esg-at-the-heart-of-healthcare-governance.html [cited 31 August 2024].
6 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural and remote health. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Government; 2024. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-remote-australians/rural-and-remote-health [cited 31 August 2024].
7 Bagh T, Fuwei J, Khan MA. From risk to resilience: Climate change risk, ESG investments engagement and Firm’s value. Heliyon 2024; 10(5): e26757. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024027889 [cited 31 August 2024].
| Google Scholar |
8 Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (second edition). Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare; 2021. Available at https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/national-safety-and-quality-health-service-standards-second-edition [cited 31 August 2024].
9 Teisberg E, Wallace S, O’Hara S. Defining and Implementing value-based Healthcare. Acad Med 2020; 95(5): 682-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 NSW Health. What is value based healthcare? NSW Government. NSW Health; 2024. Available at https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Value/Pages/about.aspx [cited 31 August 2024].
11 NEJM Catalyst. What Is Value-Based Healthcare? 2017. Available at https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.17.0558 [accessed 1 March 2021].