Corporatisation and ownership concentration in diagnostic imaging: an audit of Australian practices
Sean Docking
A * , Jenn Lacy-Nichols B , Martin Hensher C and Rachelle Buchbinder A
A
B
C
Abstract
Increasing ownership of health service providers by large for-profit corporations, along with high ownership concentration that reduces competition, may negatively affect healthcare access, quality, and costs. Our objective was to determine the ownership of Australian diagnostic imaging clinics by ownership category and identify areas of high ownership concentration.
A list of clinics providing ultrasound, X-ray, and at least one advanced imaging modality (computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) were obtained from Services Australia on 31 March 2024. Information about ownership of diagnostic imaging clinics was extracted from the Australian Business Register, the Orbis database, and if necessary, a search of the clinic website. The number and proportion of diagnostic imaging clinics by ownership category were calculated. Areas of high ownership concentration were defined as one company owning ≥30% of non-government owned clinics within a jurisdiction.
A total of 1235 diagnostic imaging clinics were identified, with ownership data obtained for 1226 (99.3%). Most clinics are owned by for-profit corporations (public limited n = 412; 33.6%, institutional investor-backed n = 277; 22.6%). Areas of high ownership concentration were identified in South Australia, Tasmania, Northern Territory, and Australian Capital Territory. Four companies (two public limited and two investor-backed) own ≥50% of clinics that provide Medicare-rebatable MRI services.
The Australian diagnostic imaging sector is dominated by large for-profit corporations, with high ownership concentration apparent in four jurisdictions. For-profit corporations, healthcare system managers, and funders may have conflicting goals. It is incumbent upon Australian federal, state, and territory governments to ensure that public funds are used to provide affordable, high-value care.
Keywords: commercial determinants of health, financialisation, health economics, health policy, magnetic resonance imaging, private equity, privatisation, radiology.
References
1 Galloway H. Corporatization of Radiology in Australia. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5: 86-91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Berquist VL. Private equity investment in health care delivery, Australia, 2008–2022. Med J Aust 2024; 220: 368-371.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Gilmore AB, Fabbri A, Baum F, et al. Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health. Lancet 2023; 401: 1194-1213.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Davis L, D’Souza S. Private equity in radiology – Why aren't we more concerned? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2024; 53: 449-451.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Borsa A, Bejarano G, Ellen M, et al. Evaluating trends in private equity ownership and impacts on health outcomes, costs, and quality: systematic review. BMJ 2023; 382: e075244.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Goodair B, Reeves A. The effect of health-care privatisation on the quality of care. Lancet Public Health 2024; 9: 199.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Scott A, Taylor T, Russell G, et al. Associations between corporate ownership of primary care providers and doctor wellbeing, workload, access, organizational efficiency, and service quality. Health Policy 2024; 142: 105028.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Lacy-Nichols J, Bentley R, Elshaug AG. Commercial determinants of human rights: for-profit health care and housing. Med J Aust 2023; 219: 4-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
9 Fleishon HB, Vijayasarathi A, Pyatt R, et al. White Paper: Corporatization in Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16: 1364-1374.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Joyce C, McDonald H, Lawlor-Smith L. General practitioners’ perceptions of different practice models: a qualitative study. Aust J Prim Health 2016; 22: 388.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Munro P, Bradshaw N, Stephenson N. 2012 RANZCR Radiology Workforce Census Report: Australia. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. 2013. Available at https://www.ranzcr.com/search/2012-radiology-workforce-census-report-australia
12 Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Modified Monash Model. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. 2023. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/topics/rural-health-workforce/classifications/mmm [accessed 24 January 2024].
13 Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. MRI and PET unit locations in Australia. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. 2022. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/topics/diagnostic-imaging/MRI-and-PET-locations [accessed 19 December 2023].
14 Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Full versus Partial Medicare-eligible MRI machines in the Diagnostic Imaging Services Table. 2023. Available at http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Factsheet-Medicare_Eligible_MRI_Machines [accessed 29 October 2024].
15 Bureau van Dijk. Orbis. 2024. Available at https://login.bvdinfo.com/R1/Orbis [accessed 29 October 2024].
16 Wood B, Baker P, Scrinis G, et al. Maximising the wealth of few at the expense of the health of many: a public health analysis of market power and corporate wealth and income distribution in the global soft drink market. Glob Health 2021; 17: 138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
17 ESRI. ArcGIS Online. 2024. Available at https://www.arcgis.com/index.html
18 Scheffler R, Alexander L, Fulton B, et al. Monetizing Medicine: Private equity and competition in physician practice markets. American Antitrust Institute. 10 July. 2023. Available at https://www.antitrustinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AAI-UCB-EG_Private-Equity-I-Physician-Practice-Report_FINAL.pdf
19 Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. Final Report: Care, Dignity and Respect. 1 March. 2021. Available at https://www.royalcommission.gov.au/aged-care/final-report
20 Australian Bureau of Statistics. Private Hospitals, Australia, 2016-17 financial year. 2018. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/health-services/private-hospitals-australia/latest-release [accessed 15 November 2024].
22 Duckett S, Romanes D. Blood Money: Paying for pathology services. Grattan Institute. February. 2016. Available at https://www.grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/935-blood-money.pdf
23 Attinger SA, Jackson E, Karpin I, et al. Addressing the consequences of the corporatization of reproductive medicine. Med Law Rev 2024; 32: 444-467.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
24 McInerney M, Hinchcliff R, Fitzgerald G, et al. Private Equity Investment in Private For-Profit Healthcare in Australia and New Zealand: A scoping review. Asia Pac J Health Manag 2023; 18: 4-19.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
25 Gravelle H, Scott A, Sivey P, et al. Competition, Prices and Quality in the Market for Physician Consultations. J Ind Econ 2016; 64: 135-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
26 Bai G, Anderson GF. US Hospitals Are Still Using Chargemaster Markups To Maximize Revenues. Health Aff 2016; 35: 1658-1664.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Baras JD, Baker LC. Magnetic Resonance Imaging And Low Back Pain Care For Medicare Patients. Health Aff 2009; 28: 1133-1140.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Baker L, Birnbaum H, Geppert J, et al. The Relationship Between Technology Availability And Health Care Spending. Health Aff 2003; 22: W3-537-W3-551.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
29 Docking S, Haddock R, Buchbinder R. Australian health policies related to diagnostic imaging: too much of a good thing? Aust Health Rev 2022; 46: 635-638.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
31 Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Budget 2024–25: Reforming Diagnostic Imaging. 2024. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-05/budget-2024-25-reforming-diagnostic-imaging.pdf
32 Hensher M, Tisdell J, Zimitat C. Too much medicine: Insights and explanations from economic theory and research. Soc Sci Med 2017; 176: 77-84.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
33 Mendelson RM. Diagnostic imaging: Doing the right thing. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64: 353-360.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
34 Mathauer I, Dkhimi F, World Health Organization. Analytical guide to assess a mixed provider payment system. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Available at https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/311020 [accessed 22 November 2024].
35 Liu G. Data quality problems troubling business and financial researchers: A literature review and synthetic analysis. J Bus Finance Librariansh 2020; 25: 315-371.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
36 Alford-Teaster J, Lange JM, Hubbard RA, et al. Is the closest facility the one actually used? An assessment of travel time estimation based on mammography facilities. Int J Health Geogr 2016; 15: 8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
