Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Replacement of a protein–energy supplement by a same-cost maize-based supplement on performance and product quality of pasture-finished Nellore heifers

Laura Cristina Souza Castro A , Wellington da Costa de Campos B , Ivanna Moraes de Oliveira C F , Rodolfo Maciel Fernandes C , Matheus Henrique Moretti D , Marcella Toledo Piza Roth B , Flávio Dutra de Resende C E and Gustavo Rezende Siqueira C E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Aquidauana,MS 79200-000, Brazil.

B Department of Animal Science, Centro Universitário da Fundação Educacional de Barretos, Barretos, SP 14783-226, Brazil.

C Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil.

D Agroceres Multimix, Rio Claro, SP 13502-741, Brazil.

E Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Colina, SP 14770-000, Brazil.

F Corresponding author. Email: imoraesdeoliveira@yahoo.com.br

Animal Production Science 60(15) 1808-1813 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20047
Submitted: 4 February 2020  Accepted: 17 April 2020   Published: 23 June 2020

Abstract

Context: In the largest beef-producing countries in the world, the slaughter of female cows accounts for ~30–40% of all beef produced.

Aims: The objective of this study was to evaluate the replacement of a protein–energy supplement (PES) by a same-cost maize-based supplement (MBS) on the performance and final product of Nellore heifers grazing Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu pasture during the wet season in Brazil.

Methods: Ninety-six Nellore heifers of bodyweight (BW) 281 ± 7.55 kg and aged 23 months were used. Six were slaughtered at the start of the experiment. The remaining 90 heifers received one of the following three supplements with their predominantly pasture diet for 133 days: control, mineral salt ad libitum; PES, with protein 250 g/kg dry matter (DM) and total digestible nutrient 600 g/kg DM, offered at 3 g/kg BW.day (as-fed basis); MBS, with crude protein 90 g/kg DM and total digestible nutrient 850 g/kg DM, offered at 7 g/kg BW.day (as-fed basis). The variables were evaluated in a completely randomised block design with 30 heifers per treatment.

Key results: Average daily gain and final BW were similar (P > 0.05) in PES and MBS treatments, and relative to the control increased (P < 0.01) average daily gain by ~24% and final BW by 7%. Pasture intakes were decreased, with substitution levels of 8.0% for heifers receiving PES and 10.4% for those receiving MBS. Carcass weight (kg/day) and carcass gain (g carcass/kg BW) were greater (P < 0.001) for heifers receiving MBS and PES than for the control group. Backfat depth was greater (P < 0.001) in heifers receiving MBS (7.91 mm) than in those receiving PES (6.25 mm), and the lowest (P < 0.001) measurement was observed in the control group (4.85 mm).

Conclusions: Maize-based supplement (7 g/kg BW.day) provided the same growth rate as PES (3 g/kg BW.day) but yielded heavier and slightly fatter carcasses of pasture-finished Nellore heifers during the wet season (133 days) with a similar cost, and with more total digestible nutrients than pasture plus mineral salt.

Implications: Maize-based supplement provided to Nellore heifers on pasture may improve performance despite lower pasture intakes but needs to be evaluated carefully in terms of costs involved.

Additional keywords: body composition, rates of gain.


References

AOAC (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists.’ 15th edn. (AOAC: Arlington, VA, USA)

AOAC (1995) ‘Official methods of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists.’ 16th edn. (AOAC: Washington, DC, USA)

Berchielli TT, Messana JD, Canesin RC (2012) Enteric methane production in tropical pastures. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal 13, 954–968.
Enteric methane production in tropical pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bonilha SFM, Tedeschi LO, Packer IU, Razook AG, Nardon RF, Figueiredo LA, Alleoni GF (2011) Chemical composition of whole body and carcass of Bos indicus and tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds. Journal of Animal Science 89, 2859–2866.
Chemical composition of whole body and carcass of Bos indicus and tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cañeque V, Sañudo C (2005) ‘Estandarización de las metodologías para evaluar la calidad del producto (animal vivo, canal, carne y grasa) en los rumiantes.’ (Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria: Madrid)

Caton JS, Dhuyvetter DV (1997) Influence of energy supplementation on grazing ruminants: requirements and responses. Journal of Animal Science 75, 533–542.
Influence of energy supplementation on grazing ruminants: requirements and responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9051477PubMed |

CONCEA (2013) Resolução Normativa No. 12 de 20 de Setembro de 2013. Conselho Nacional de Controle de Experimentação Animal. Available at http://www.icmbio.gov.br/ran/images/stories/legislacao/ RESOLU%C3%87%C3%83O_NORMATIVA_No-_12_-_20–09–2013. pdf [Verified 21 February 2018]

De Vries MFW (1995) Estimating forage intake and quality in grazing cattle: a reconsideration of the hand-plucking method. Journal of Range Management 48, 370–375.
Estimating forage intake and quality in grazing cattle: a reconsideration of the hand-plucking method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) ‘Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications).’ (USDA: Washington, DC)

Hankins OG, Howe PE (1946) ‘Estimation of the composition of beef carcasses and cuts. Technical Bulletin No. 926.’ (USDA: Washington, DC)

IBGE (2017) Estatística da Produção Pecuária. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro. Available at ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Producao_Pecuaria/Fasciculo_Indicadores_IBGE/abate-leite-couro-ovos_201701caderno.pdf [Verified 21 February 2018]

Moretti MH, Reis RA, Casagrande DR, Ruggieri AC, Oliveira RV, Berchielli TT (2011) Energetic protein supplementation on heifers performance in grazing during the finish phase. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 35, 606–612.
Energetic protein supplementation on heifers performance in grazing during the finish phase.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mott GO, Lucas HL (1952) The design, conduct and interpretation of grazing trials on cultivated and improved pastures. In ‘Proceedings Sixth International Grasslands Congress’. 17–23 August 1952, Pennsylvania State College, State College, PA. pp. 1380–1385. (International Grasslands Congress)

Oliveira AS, Detmann E, Campos JMS, Pina DS, Souza SM, Costa MG (2011a) Meta-analysis of the impact of neutral detergent fiber on intake, digestibility and performance of lactating dairy cows. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 1587–1595.
Meta-analysis of the impact of neutral detergent fiber on intake, digestibility and performance of lactating dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oliveira IM, Paulino PVR, Marcondes MI, Valadares Filho SC, Detmann E, Cavali J, Duarte MS, Mezzomo R (2011b) Pattern of tissue deposition, gain and body composition of Nellore, F1 Simmental × Nellore and F1 Angus × Nellore steers fed at maintenance or ad libitum with two levels of concentrate in the diet. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 2886–2893.
Pattern of tissue deposition, gain and body composition of Nellore, F1 Simmental × Nellore and F1 Angus × Nellore steers fed at maintenance or ad libitum with two levels of concentrate in the diet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Owens FN, Gill DR, Secrist DS, Coleman SW (1995) Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3152–3172.
Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 8617688PubMed |

Paulino PVR, Valadares Filho SDC, Detmann E, Valadares RFD, Fonseca MA, Véras RML, Oliveira DM (2008) Productive performance of Nellore cattle of different gender fed diets containing two levels of concentrate allowance. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 1079–1087.
Productive performance of Nellore cattle of different gender fed diets containing two levels of concentrate allowance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pazdiora RD, Resende FD, Faria MH, Siqueira GR, Souza Almeida GB, Sampaio RL, Pacheco PS, Prietto MSR (2013) Animal performance and carcass characteristics of Nellore young bulls fed coated or uncoated urea slaughtered at different weights. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 42, 273–283.
Animal performance and carcass characteristics of Nellore young bulls fed coated or uncoated urea slaughtered at different weights.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ribeiro ELA, Hernandez JA, Zanella EL, Shimokomaki M, Prudêncio-Ferreira SH, Youssef E, Ribeiro HJS, Bogden R, Reeves JJ (2004) Growth and carcass characteristics of pasture fed LHRH immunocastrated, castrated and intact Bos indicus bulls. Meat Science 68, 285–290.
Growth and carcass characteristics of pasture fed LHRH immunocastrated, castrated and intact Bos indicus bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Roth MTP, Resende FD, Oliveira IM, Fernandes RM, Custódio L, Siqueira GR (2017) Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle? Livestock Science 204, 122–128.
Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sampaio RL, Resende FD, Reis RA, Oliveira IM, Custódio L, Fernandes RM, Pazdiora RD, Siqueira GR (2017) The nutritional interrelationship between the growing and finishing phases in crossbred cattle raised in a tropical system. Tropical Animal Health and Production 49, 1015–1024.
The nutritional interrelationship between the growing and finishing phases in crossbred cattle raised in a tropical system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28447231PubMed |

Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6, 461–464.
Estimating the dimension of a model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sollenberger LE, Cherney DJ (1995) Evaluating forage production and quality. ‘Forages: the science of grasslands agriculture’ (Eds RF Barnes, DA Miller, CJ Nelson) pp. 97–110. (Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA)

Stockdale CR (2000) Levels of pasture substitution when concentrates are fed to grazing dairy cows in northern Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 913–921.
Levels of pasture substitution when concentrates are fed to grazing dairy cows in northern Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sugimoto M, Saito W, Ooi M, Oikawa M (2012) Effects of days on feed, roughage sources and inclusion levels of grain in concentrate on finishing performance and carcass characteristics in cull beef cows. Animal Science Journal 83, 460–468.
Effects of days on feed, roughage sources and inclusion levels of grain in concentrate on finishing performance and carcass characteristics in cull beef cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22694329PubMed |

USDA (2019) Livestock slaughter. Today’s Report 2019. Available at https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Todays_Reports/reports/lstk1219.pdf [Verified 1 June 2019]

Valadares Filho SC, Costa e Silva LF, Lopes SA, Prados LF, Chizzotti ML, Machado PAS, Bissaro LZ, Furtado T (2016). BR-CORTE 3.0. Nutritional requirements, diet formulation and performance prediction of Zebu and crossbred cattle. BR-CORTE. Available at www.brcorte.com.br [Verified 2 April 2019]

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB (1985) ‘Analysis of forages and fibrous foods.’ (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA)

Venkata Reddy B, Sivakumar AS, Jeong DW, Woo YB, Park SJ, Lee SY, Byun JY, Kim CH, Cho SH, Hwang I (2015) Beef quality traits of heifer in comparison with steer, bull and cow at various feeding environments. Animal Science Journal 86, 1–16.
Beef quality traits of heifer in comparison with steer, bull and cow at various feeding environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25236779PubMed |