Analysis of adoption of genetic tools in the northern Australia beef industry

Patricia Menchon; Jaime K. Manning; Dave L. Swain; Amy Cosby

doi:10.1071/AN25090

RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Next Contents Vol 65(12)

Analysis of adoption of genetic tools in the northern Australia beef industry

Patricia Menchon

^A ^* , Jaime K. Manning

^A , Dave L. Swain ^A ^B and Amy Cosby

^A

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A Institute for Future Farming Systems, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity Australia, Rockhampton, Qld 4701, Australia. Email: j.k.manning@cqu.edu.au, a.cosby@cqu.edu.au

^B TerraCipher, 337 Laurel Bank Road, Alton Downs, Qld 4702, Australia. Email: dave.swain@terracipher.com

^* Correspondence to: p.menchon@cqu.edu.au

Handling Editor: Kieren McCosker

Animal Production Science 65, AN25090 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN25090

Submitted: 20 March 2025 Accepted: 28 July 2025 Published: 18 August 2025

© 2025 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context

Genetic improvement of beef production systems has become a priority for beef cattle producers in northern Australia. However, reports from across Australia indicate that 76% and 59% of commercial and stud cattle beef cattle producers, respectively, use genetic evaluation services, which is considerably higher than the current levels of northern Australian beef producers.

Aims

This study aims to identify the demographic and productive variables that influence decision-making regarding the use of genetic tools, and identify the motivations, limitations and preferences of northern Australia beef cattle producers.

Methods

An online survey was completed by 97 beef producers in northern Australia. Participants were classified into seedstock and commercial beef cattle producers. The data were analysed with logistic regression and nonparametric tests.

Key results

The results demonstrate that for seedstock beef cattle producers, each additional year of age increased the likelihood of adopting genetic tools by 6.4%. In contrast, for commercial beef cattle producers, each additional year of age decreased the likelihood by 5.2%. However, commercial beef cattle producers who collect phenotypic data are more likely to adopt genetic tools. Beef cattle producers preferred records of fertility and growth traits of beef cattle. Furthermore, recording data at the birth of beef cattle in northern Australia emerges as a barrier to the adoption of genetic tools. A key motivation for adoption is understanding genetic tools and their impact on the business.

Conclusions

Understanding genetic tools and their impact on beef enterprises is critical to motivating their adoption by beef cattle producers. Demographic, production and profitability factors associated with their use affect the likelihood of adoption of genetic tools in the northern Australian beef industry.

Implications

An understanding of genetic tools, the impact on the economic benefits of beef cattle enterprises by producers and the reasons for change in complex decision-making related to animal genetic improvement are fundamental in the process of developing extension strategies. Future research is needed to understand the training demands and delivery methods under northern Australian conditions.

Keywords: adoption, attitudes, beef, breeding, extension, genetic, preferences, traits.

References

AGBU (2023) Animal genetics and breeding unit. Available at https://www.une.edu.au/research/research-centres-institutes/agbu-animal-genetics-and-breeding-unit [Retrieved September]

Agricultural Business Research Institute (2015) Barriers to adoption of genetic improvement technologies in northern Australia beef herds. B.NBP.0753 Final Report – Meat and Livestock Australia. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/contentassets/9a8bc22ebb634d089ce0af851db65bad/b.nbp.0753_final_report.pdf

Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (2023) Farm data portal - beta. Available at https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/data/farm-data-portal [Retrived 15 May]

Awasthi TR, Morshed A, Chang AZ, Mandala S, Swain DL (2024) Impact of weighing frequency on the determination of daily weights of cattle. In ‘2024 International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications (ICoDSA)’, 10–11 July 2024, Kuta, Bali, Indonesia. (IEEE Xplore)

Banks R (2022a) 433. Strategies to support phenotyping for genomic selection R&D and implementation in beef and sheep industries. In ‘Proceedings of 12th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production (WCGALP)’, 3–8 July 2022, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. (Wageningen Academic Publishers)

Banks R (2022b) Evolution of genetics organisations’ strategies through the implementation of genomic selection: learnings and prospects. Agriculture 12(10), 1524.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bell AW (2019) Animal science down under: a history of research, development and extension in support of Australia’s livestock industries. Animal Production Science 60(2), 193-231.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bell A, Sangster N (2023) Research, development and adoption for the north Australian beef cattle breeding industry: an analysis of needs and gaps. Animal Production Science 63(1), 1-40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

BREEDPLAN (2023) Accelerate genetic progress. Available at https://breedplan.une.edu.au/ [Retrieved September 2023]

Burns BM, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG (2010) A review of factors that impact on the capacity of beef cattle females to conceive, maintain a pregnancy and wean a calf–implications for reproductive efficiency in northern Australia. Animal Reproduction Science 122(1–2), 1-22.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Campbell A, King AEH (2022) Choosing sustainability: decision making and sustainable practice adoption with examples from US great plains cattle grazing systems. Animals 12(3), 286.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Chang AZ, Swain DL, Trotter MG (2020) Calf loss in northern Australia: a systematic review. The Rangeland Journal 42(1), 9-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chang AZ, Imaz JA, Gonzalez LA (2021) Calf birth weight predicted remotely using automated in-paddock weighing technology. Animals 11(5), 1254.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chilcott C, Ash A, Lehnert S, Stokes C, Charmley E, Collins K, Pavey C, Macintosh A, Simpson A, Berglas R, White E, Amity M (2020) Northern Australia beef situation analysis. A report to the Cooperative Research Centre for Developing Northern Australia. (CRC for Developing Northern Australia)

Cole JB, VanRaden PM (2018) Symposium review: possibilities in an age of genomics: the future of selection indices. Journal of Dairy Science 101(4), 3686-3701.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Copley JP, Hayes BJ, Ross EM, Speight S, Fordyce G, Wood BJ, Engle BN (2024) Investigating genotype by environment interaction for beef cattle fertility traits in commercial herds in northern Australia with multi-trait analysis. Genetics Selection Evolution 56(1), 70.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Corder GW, Foreman DI (2014) ‘Comparing more than two unrelated samples: the Kruskal–Wallis H-test.’ (John Wiley and Sons, Incorporated)

Daniel WW, Cross CL (2018) ‘Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences.’ (Wiley)

Dill MD, Emvalomatis G, Saatkamp H, Rossi JA, Pereira GR, Barcellos JOJ (2015) Factors affecting adoption of economic management practices in beef cattle production in Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. Journal of Rural Studies 42, 21-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Field AP (2018) ‘Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics.’ 5th edn. (SAGE)

Gebre KT, Yfter KA, Teweldemedhn TG, Gebremariam T (2020) Participatory definition of trait preferences and breeding practices of goats in Aba’ala, Afar region: as input for designing genetic improvement program. Tropical Animal Health and Production 52(1), 41-52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Government of Western Australia (2021) The western Australian beef industry. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. Available at https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/export-services/western-australian-beef-industry?page=0%2C0#smartpaging_toc_p0_s0_h2 [Retrieved 15 May]

Greenwood PL, Gardner GE, Ferguson DM (2018) Current situation and future prospects for the Australian beef industry – a review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 31(7), 992-1006.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Griffith GR, Parnell PF, Clark RA, Timms J, Hyland PW, Mulholland C (2008) Paper 1: the cooperative research centre for beef genetic technologies and the “accelerated adoption through sustainable beef profit partnerships” project. Australian Farm Business Management Journal 5(1/2), 1-10 Available at https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.202615911075687.
| Google Scholar |

Hayes B, Speight S, Ross E, Dodd E, Fordyce G (2022) Accelerating genetic gain for productivity and profitability in Northern beef cattle with genomic technologies. Final Report P.PSH.0833. Meat and Livestock Australia. Availabe at https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/reports/2023/P.PSH.0833-accelerating-genetic-gain-for-productivity-and-profitability-in-northern-beef-cattle-with-genomic-technologies-final-report/

Jakku E, Farbotko C, Curnock M, Watson II (2022) Insights on technology adoption and innovation among northern Australian beef producers. CSIRO, Australia.

Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PJ, Corbet NJ, Grant T (2014) Genetics of early and lifetime annual reproductive performance in cows of two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 54(1), 1-15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Johnston DJ, Grantt TP, Schatz TJ, Burns BM, Fordyce G, Lyons RE (2017) The Repronomics project–enabling genetic improvement in reproduction in Northern Australia. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 22, 385-388.
| Google Scholar |

Johnston DJ, Ferdosi MH, Connors NK, Boerner V, Cook J, Girard CJ, Swan AA, Tier B (2018) Implementation of single-step genomic BREEDPLAN evaluations in Australian beef cattle. Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 11, 269.
| Google Scholar |

Johnston DJ, Ferdosi MH, Connors NK, Cook J, Girard C, Swan A (2023) BREEDPLAN single-step genomic evaluations deliver increased accuracies across all breeds and EBVs. Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 25, 111-114.
| Google Scholar |

Martin-Collado D, Byrne TJ, Diaz C, Amer PR (2018) Complexity of animal breeding choice making. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 135(6), 395-409.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Martin-Collado D, Díaz C, Benito-Ruiz G, Ondé D, Rubio A, Byrne TJ (2021) Measuring farmers’ attitude towards breeding tools: the livestock breeding attitude scale. Animal 15(2), 100062.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McCosker KD, Jephcott S, Burns BM, Smith DR, Fordyce G, O’Rourke PK, McGowan MR (2020) Reproductive performance of northern Australia beef herds. 1. Survey of nutritional, breeding and herd health management practices and of the environment. Animal Production Science 63(4), 301-310.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Menchon P, Manning JK, Swain DL, Cosby A (2024) Exploration of extension research to promote genetic improvement in cattle production: systematic review. Animals 14(2), 231.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Menchon P, Manning JK, Swain DL, Cosby A (2025) Exploring adoption factors, preferences to the use of beef genetic tools in Northern Australia. Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 26, 447-450.
| Google Scholar |

Miller S (2022) Genomic selection in beef cattle creates additional opportunities for embryo technologies to meet industry needs. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 35(2), 98-105.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Miller SP (2023) Livestock breeding, where have we been and what lies ahead? Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 25, 10-22.
| Google Scholar |

MLA (2022) Producer adoption outcomes report: 2021–2022. Meat and Livestock Australia. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/research-and-development/documents/mla-adoption-outcomes-report-2021-2022-web.pdf

Montes de Oca Munguia O, Llewellyn R (2020) The adopters versus the technology: which matters more when predicting or explaining adoption? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 42(1), 80-91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moore KL, Girard CJ, Grant TP, Johnston DJ (2019) Increases in accuracy of female reproduction genetic evaluations for beef breeds in northern Australia. Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 23, 366-369.
| Google Scholar |

Moore KL, Johnston DJ, Grant TP (2023) An investigation into potential genetic predictors of birth weight in tropically adapted beef cattle in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 63(11), 1105-1112.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mueller ML, Van Eenennaam AL (2022) Synergistic power of genomic selection, assisted reproductive technologies, and gene editing to drive genetic improvement of cattle. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience 3(1), 13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

NABRC (2022) North Australia Beef Research Council (NABRC) Producer Identified RD&A priorities for 2023 24. North Australia Beef Research Council.

Nettle R, Major J, Turner L, Harris J (2022) Selecting methods of agricultural extension to support diverse adoption pathways: a review and case studies. Animal Production Science 64, AN22329.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Qualtrics (2024) Qualtrics survey software. Available at https://www.qualtrics.com [accessed April 2024]

Quddus A (2022) Dissemination of technological innovations of livestock in bangladesh: adoption levels and behavioral precision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92(2), 461-472.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Reverter A, Porto-Neto LR, Fortes MRS, McCulloch R, Lyons RE, Moore S, Nicol D, Henshall J, Lehnert SA (2016) Genomic analyses of tropical beef cattle fertility based on genotyping pools of Brahman cows with unknown pedigree. Journal of Animal Science 94, 4096-4108.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sitienei I, Gillespie J, Scaglia G (2018) Adoption of management practices and breed types by US grass-fed beef producers. The Professional Animal Scientist 34(6), 571-580.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sloane B, Walker L (2023) MLA genetics insights. Finall Report L.GEN.2205. Meat and Livestock Australia. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/contentassets/f0758d90686b48eca21cebbfd2d03000/.gen.2205---genetics-insights-final-report-public.pdfl