Articles citing this paper
Consumer sensory requirements for beef and their implications for the Australian beef industry
A. F. Egan, D. M. Ferguson and J. M. Thompson
41(7) pp.855 - 859
46 articles found in Crossref database.
A review of factors influencing key biological components of maternal productivity in temperate beef cattle
Walmsley B. J.,
Lee S. J.,
Parnell P. F., Pitchford W. S.
Animal Production Science. 2018 58(1). p.1
CRC 'Regional Combinations' project — effects of genetics and growth paths on beef production and meat quality: experimental design, methods and measurements.
McKiernan W. A.,
Wilkins J. F.,
Barwick S. A.,
Tudor G. D.,
McIntyre B. L.,
Graham J. F.,
Deland M. P. B., Davies L.
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2005 45(8). p.959
Animal Breeding and Genetics (2023)
The most important attributes of beef sensory quality and production variables that can affect it: A review
Santos Diva,
Monteiro Maria João,
Voss Hans-Peter,
Komora Norton,
Teixeira Paula, Pintado Manuela
Livestock Science. 2021 250 p.104573
Meat Tenderness: Underlying Mechanisms, Instrumental Measurement, and Sensory Assessment
Dunshea Frank ,
Ha Minh,
Purslow Peter,
Miller Rhonda ,
Warner Robyn,
Vaskoska Rozita Spiroska,
Wheeler Tommy L., Li Xin
Meat and Muscle Biology. 2021 4(2).
Economic effects of alternate growth path, time of calving and breed type combinations across southern Australian beef cattle environments: feedlot finishing at the New South Wales experimental site
Davies B. L.,
Alford A. R., Griffith G. R.
Animal Production Science. 2009 49(6). p.535
Prediction of ossification from live and carcass traits in young beef cattle: model development and evaluation1
Gudex Boyd W,
McPhee Malcolm J,
Oddy Victor H, Walmsley Brad J
Journal of Animal Science. 2019 97(1). p.144
Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology (2022)
Are Marbling and the Prediction of Beef Eating Quality Affected by Different Grading Sites?
Liu Jingjing,
Pogorzelski Grzegorz,
Neveu Alix,
Legrand Isabelle,
Pethick David,
Ellies-Oury Marie-Pierre, Hocquette Jean-François
Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021 8
Effect of different post-weaning growth paths on long-term weight gain, carcass characteristics and eating quality of beef cattle
Tomkins N. W.,
Harper G. S.,
Bruce H. L., Hunter R. A.
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2006 46(12). p.1571
Polymorphism of Genes and Their Impact on Beef Quality
Kostusiak Piotr,
Slósarz Jan,
Gołębiewski Marcin,
Grodkowski Grzegorz, Puppel Kamila
Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2023 45(6). p.4749
The effects of purchase and consumption on beef quality attribute beliefs: a study of tourists visiting Vanuatu
Lees Nic, Greenhalgh Jill
Cogent Business & Management. 2024 11(1).
An Investigation on the Influence of Various Biochemical Tenderness Factors on Eight Different Bovine Muscles
Hammond Peang A.,
Chun Colin K. Y.,
Wu Wan Jun,
Welter Amelia A.,
O'Quinn Travis G.,
Magnin-Bissel Geraldine,
Geisbrecht Erika R., Chao Michael D.
Meat and Muscle Biology. 2022 6(1).
Modeling the relationship between scanned rump and 12th-rib fat in young temperate and tropical bovines: Model development and evaluation1,2
Walmsley B. J.,
Wolcott M. L., McPhee M. J.
Journal of Animal Science. 2010 88(5). p.1848
Understanding the Relationship Between Perceived Quality Cues and Quality Attributes in the Purchase of Meat in Malaysia
Chamhuri Norshamliza, Batt Peter J.
Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing. 2013 25(3). p.187
Interpretive structural modelling and fuzzy MICMAC approaches for customer centric beef supply chain: application of a big data technique
Mishra Nishikant,
Singh Akshit,
Rana Nripendra P., Dwivedi Yogesh K.
Production Planning & Control. 2017 28(11-12). p.945
Evaluation of citrus fiber as a natural alternative to sodium tripolyphosphate in marinated boneless broiler chicken breast and inside beef skirt (transversus abdominis)
Howard Kendal R.,
Runyan Cheyenne L.,
Poe Allen B.,
Cassens Andrew M., Kinman Lea A.
Animal Bioscience. 2024 37(1). p.116
The role of cooking in consumers' quality formation: An exploratory study of beef steaks
Kang Naomi,
Panzone Luca, Kuznesof Sharron
Meat Science. 2022 186 p.108730
Modelling systems to describe maternal productivity, with the aim of improving beef production efficiency by eliciting practice change
Walmsley B. J., Oddy V. H.
Animal Production Science. 2018 58(1). p.193
Characterising shape patterns using features derived from best-fitting ellipsoids
Gontar Amelia,
Tronnolone Hayden,
Binder Benjamin J., Bottema Murk J.
Pattern Recognition. 2018 83 p.365
River Buffalo Meat Production and Quality: Sustainability, Productivity, Nutritional and Sensory Properties
Guerrero-Legarreta Isabel ,
Napolitano Fabio ,
Cruz-Monterrosa Rosy ,
Mota-Rojas Daniel ,
Mora-Medina Patricia ,
Ramírez-Bribiesca Efren ,
Bertoni Aldo ,
Berdugo-Gutiérrez Jesus , Braghieri Ada
Journal of Buffalo Science. 2020 9 p.159
Who cares about meat carbon footprint? Exploring preferences for credence factors among Australian consumers
De Valck Jeremy,
Rolfe John,
Star Megan,
Rajapaksa Darshana, Burton Michael
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023 418 p.138157
Genetics of meat quality and carcass traits and the impact of tenderstretching in two tropical beef genotypes
Wolcott M. L.,
Johnston D. J.,
Barwick S. A.,
Iker C. L.,
Thompson J. M., Burrow H. M.
Animal Production Science. 2009 49(6). p.383
Drivers of Consumer Liking for Beef, Pork, and Lamb: A Review
Miller Rhonda
Foods. 2020 9(4). p.428
Brazilian consumers' perception of tenderness of beef steaks classified by shear force and taste
Delgado Eduardo Francisquine,
Aguiar Ana Paula,
Ortega Edwin Moisés Marcos,
Spoto Marta Helena Fillet, Castillo Carmen Josefina Contreras
Scientia Agricola. 2006 63(3). p.232
Production and processing studies on calpain-system gene markers for beef tenderness: Consumer assessments of eating quality1
Robinson D. L.,
Cafe L. M.,
McIntyre B. L.,
Geesink G. H.,
Barendse W.,
Pethick D. W.,
Thompson J. M.,
Polkinghorne R., Greenwood P. L.
Journal of Animal Science. 2012 90(8). p.2850
SmartStretch™ technology. III. The impact of medium voltage stimulation and SmartStretch™ technology on sheep topside (m. semimembranosus) meat quality traits under commercial processing conditions
Toohey E.S.,
van de Ven R.,
Thompson J.M.,
Geesink G.H., Hopkins D.L.
Meat Science. 2013 93(2). p.187
Consumer perceptions of food quality in Malaysia
Chamhuri Norshamliza, Batt Peter J
British Food Journal. 2015 117(3). p.1168
How Australian consumers value intrinsic and extrinsic attributes of beef products
Ardeshiri Ali, Rose John Matthew
Food Quality and Preference. 2018 65 p.146
Eating quality of the longissimus thoracis muscle in beef cattle – Contributing factors to the underlying variability and associations with performance traits
Judge M.M.,
Conroy S.,
Hegarty P.J.,
Cromie A.R.,
Fanning R.,
Kelly D.,
Crofton E., Berry D.P.
Meat Science. 2021 172 p.108371
Variation in Flavor and Textural Descriptions of Cooked Steaks from Bovine m. longissimus thoracis et lumborum from Different Production and Aging Regimes
Bruce Heather L.,
Beilken Shane L., Leppard Philip
Journal of Food Science. 2006 70(4). p.S309
Consumer evaluation of venison sensory quality: Effects of sex, body condition score and carcase suspension method
Hutchison C.L.,
Mulley R.C.,
Wiklund E., Flesch J.S.
Meat Science. 2010 86(2). p.311
Brahman and Brahman crossbred cattle grown on pasture and in feedlots in subtropical and temperate Australia. 1. Carcass quality
Schutt K. M.,
Burrow H. M.,
Thompson J. M., Bindon B. M.
Animal Production Science. 2009 49(6). p.426
Beef quality attributes: A systematic review of consumer perspectives
Henchion Maeve M.,
McCarthy Mary, Resconi Virginia C.
Meat Science. 2017 128 p.1
A South African beef quality survey
van Wyngaard B.E.,
Strydom P.E., Hugo A.
Meat Science. 2023 198 p.109109
Limousin myostatin F94L variant affects semitendinosus tenderness
Lines D.S.,
Pitchford W.S.,
Kruk Z.A., Bottema C.D.K.
Meat Science. 2009 81(1). p.126
Southeast Brazilian Consumers’ Involvement and Willingness to Pay for Quality Cues in Fresh and Cooked Beef
Alves Malheiros Bruna,
Spers Eduardo Eugênio,
Silva Hermes Moretti Ribeiro da, Contreras Castillo Carmen Josefina
Journal of Food Products Marketing. 2022 28(6). p.276
Beef from Calves Finished with a Diet Based on Concentrate Rich in Agro-Industrial By-Products: Acceptability and Quality Label Preferences in Spanish Meat Consumers
Angón Elena,
Requena Francisco,
Caballero-Villalobos Javier,
Cantarero-Aparicio Miguel,
Martínez-Marín Andrés Luís, Perea José Manuel
Animals. 2021 12(1). p.6
Effects of vitamin A on growth performance and carcass quality in steers
Kruk Z.A.,
Bottema C.D.K.,
Davis J.J.,
Siebert B.D.,
Harper G.S.,
Di J., Pitchford W.S.
Livestock Science. 2008 119(1-3). p.12
Red Meat Science and Production (2019)
Brahman and Brahman crossbred cattle grown on pasture and in feedlots in subtropical and temperate Australia. 2. Meat quality and palatability
Schutt K. M.,
Burrow H. M.,
Thompson J. M., Bindon B. M.
Animal Production Science. 2009 49(6). p.439
Evaluation of the contribution of tenderness, juiciness, and flavor to the overall consumer beef eating experience1
O’Quinn Travis G,
Legako J F,
Brooks J C, Miller Mark F
Translational Animal Science. 2018 2(1). p.26
Relative importance of cues underlying Spanish consumers’ beef choice and segmentation, and consumer liking of beef enriched with n-3 and CLA fatty acids
Realini C.E.,
Kallas Z.,
Pérez-Juan M.,
Gómez I.,
Olleta J.L.,
Beriain M.J.,
Albertí P., Sañudo C.
Food Quality and Preference. 2014 33 p.74
Divergent genotypes for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 2. Body composition but not reproduction was affected in first-parity cows on both low and high levels of nutrition
Laurence M.,
Accioly J. M.,
Copping K. J.,
Deland M. P. B.,
Graham J. F.,
Hebart M. L.,
Herd R. M.,
Jones F. M.,
Lee S. J.,
Speijers E. J., Pitchford W. S.
Animal Production Science. 2018 58(1). p.43
The effects of hot boning on meat quality from six different contractile‐metabolic sheep muscles: A preliminary study
Ithurralde Javier,
Bianchi Gianni,
Feed Oscar,
Nan Fernando,
Ballesteros Fernando,
Garibotto Gustavo, Bielli Alejandro
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2020 44(10).
Beef acceptability and consumer expectations associated with production systems and marbling
Morales R.,
Aguiar A.P.S.,
Subiabre I., Realini C.E.
Food Quality and Preference. 2013 29(2). p.166
