Refining crop and livestock management for dual-purpose spring canola (Brassica napus)
J. A. Kirkegaard A C , S. J. Sprague A , P. J. Hamblin B , J. M. Graham A and J. M. Lilley AA CSIRO National Sustainable Agriculture Flagship, CSIRO Plant Industry, PO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
B Kalyx Australia, PO Box 678, Young, NSW 2594, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: john.kirkegaard@csiro.au
Crop and Pasture Science 63(5) 429-443 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP12163
Submitted: 17 April 2012 Accepted: 4 June 2012 Published: 16 July 2012
Abstract
Dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) describes the use of a canola crop for grazed winter forage before seed production, a practice that has only recently been developed in southern Australia. Long-season winter canola has been grazed without yield penalty in higher rainfall zones of Australia (>650 mm) and the USA, but the potential areas are small. The feasibility to graze spring canola varieties across wider areas of the medium-rainfall (450–650 mm), mixed-farming zone in Australia is therefore of interest. We conducted a series of six field experiments involving a range of canola cultivars and grazing management and agronomy systems from 2007 to 2009 at Young in southern New South Wales, Australia, to determine the feasibility of and refine the principles for grazing dual-purpose spring canola without significant yield penalty. Mid-season, Australian spring canola cultivars including conventional and hybrid varieties representing a range of herbicide tolerance (triazine-tolerant, Clearfield®, and Roundup Ready®) were sown from 16 April to 12 May and grazed with sheep at a range of growth stages from early vegetative (June) to mid-flowering (September). In general, early-sown crops (sown mid-April) provided significant grazing (~800 dry sheep equivalent grazing days/ha) in winter before bud elongation, and recovered with no impact on grain yield or oil content. As previously reported, yield was significantly reduced (by up to 1 t/ha) when grazing occurred after buds had elongated (late July), due to the delayed flowering associated with bud removal by sheep and insufficient time for biomass and yield recovery. However, yield was also reduced in crops grazed before bud elongation if insufficient residual biomass remained (<1.0 t/ha for late July lock-up) to facilitate crop recovery even when there was little delay in crop development. We suggest that refinements to the existing ‘phenology-based’ grazing recommendations would assist to avoid yield loss in grazed spring varieties, and propose three grazing stages (safe, sensitive, and unsafe) that integrate the impacts of time, crop growth stage, residual biomass, and seasonal conditions to avoid yield loss under different circumstances. Such refinements to reduce the likelihood of grazing-induced yield loss would provide more confidence for mixed farmers to maximise the benefits from dual-purpose canola in different environments. Based on the outcomes of these experiments, dual-purpose spring canola is likely to have significant potential for wider application in other mixed farming zones, with similar region-specific refinements based on the principles reported here.
Additional keywords: feed gap, grazing crops, mixed farm, rapeseed, sheep.
References
Angus JF, Mackenzie DH, Morton R, Shafer CA (1981) Phasic development in field crops II. Thermal and photoperiodic responses of spring wheat. Field Crops Research 4, 269–283.| Phasic development in field crops II. Thermal and photoperiodic responses of spring wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clarke JM (1978) The effects of leaf removal on yield and yield components of Brassica napus. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58, 1103–1105.
| The effects of leaf removal on yield and yield components of Brassica napus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dann PR, Axelsen A, Edwards CBH (1977) The grain yield of winter-grazed crops. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 17, 452–461.
| The grain yield of winter-grazed crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dann PR, Axelsen A, Edwards CBH (1983) Herbage, grain and animal production from winter-grazed cereal crops. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 23, 154–161.
| Herbage, grain and animal production from winter-grazed cereal crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harper FR, Berkenkamp B (1975) Revised growth stage key for Brassica campestris and B. napus. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55, 657–658.
| Revised growth stage key for Brassica campestris and B. napus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrison MT, Evans JR, Dove H, Moore AD (2011) Dual-purpose cereals: can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected? Crop & Pasture Science 62, 930–946.
| Dual-purpose cereals: can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heer WF (2006) Grazing winter canola in the Southern Great Plains. In ‘Abstracts of ASA-CSA-SSSA 2006 International Annual Meetings’. 12–16 November, Indianapolis, USA. Available at: http://a-c-s.confex.com/crops/2006am/techprogram/P23808.HTM
Hocking PJ, Kirkegaard JA, Angus JF, Gibson AH, Koetz EA (1997b) Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and linola in two contrasting environments. I Effects of nitrogen fertiliser on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality. Field Crops Research 49, 107–125.
| Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and linola in two contrasting environments. I Effects of nitrogen fertiliser on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hocking PJ, Randall PJ, DeMarco D (1997a) The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertiliser: partitioning and mobilisation of dry matter and nitrogen and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crops Research 54, 201–220.
| The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertiliser: partitioning and mobilisation of dry matter and nitrogen and nitrogen effects on yield components.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ Revised edn (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Dove H, Kelman WM, Marcroft SJ, Lieschke A, Howe GN, Graham JM (2008a) Dual-purpose canola – a new opportunity in mixed farming systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 291–302.
| Dual-purpose canola – a new opportunity in mixed farming systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Dove H, Potter T, Marcroft SJ, Kelman WM, Lilley J, Hamblin P (2010) Adaptation of winter canola (Brassica napus) for grain and dual-purpose use in Australia’s high rainfall zone. In ‘Proceedings 15th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference’. Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2010/index.htm
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Lilley JM, McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Morrison MJ (2012) Physiological response of spring canola (Brassica napus) to defoliation in diverse environments. Field Crops Research 125, 61–68.
| Physiological response of spring canola (Brassica napus) to defoliation in diverse environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Marcroft SJ, Potter TD, Graham JM, Virgona JM, McCormick J (2008b) Identifying canola varieties for dual-purpose use. In ‘Proceedings 14th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference’. Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2008/index.htm
McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Kirkegaard JA (2012) Growth and yield of dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) under drier inland seasonal conditions of south-eastern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 63, in press.
Sprague SJ, Graham JM, Hamblin PJ, Kirkegaard JA (2012) Interaction of defoliation by livestock and stem canker caused by Leptosphaeria maculans in Brassica napus. Plant Pathology
| Interaction of defoliation by livestock and stem canker caused by Leptosphaeria maculans in Brassica napus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | in press.
Sprague SJ, Kirkegaard JA, Marcroft SJ, Graham JM (2010) Defoliation of Brassica napus increases severity of blackleg caused by Leptosphaeria maculans: implications for dual-purpose cropping. Annals of Applied Biology 157, 71–80.
| Defoliation of Brassica napus increases severity of blackleg caused by Leptosphaeria maculans: implications for dual-purpose cropping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Virgona JM, Gummer FAJ, Angus JF (2006) Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 1307–1319.
| Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
