Session 16. Oral Presentation for: Geomechanical modelling of hydrogen storage at the CO2CRC Otway International Test Centre
Z. J. Pallikathekathil A *A
Zachariah John Pallikathekathil graduated from the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi in Mechanical Engineering. He has held technical and management positions in wireline and logging-while-drilling log acquisition and interpretation. His passion for geomechanics and its multi-disciplinary requirement drew him into the field of geomechanics 15 years ago. He is currently involved in rock testing design, construction of 1D and 3D mechanical earth models for addressing issues on wellbore stability (drilling), completion integrity (sanding, casing), compaction–subsidence, and fault stability over the life of the field for oil and gas reservoirs and CCS projects. He is a member of SPE and was the past President of the SPWLA chapter in Australia in 2010 and 2011. |
Abstract
Presented on 28 May 2025: Session 16
As part of the former ‘Exploring for the Future’ program (2016–2024), the Australian Government committed significant resources to lay the foundations for the nation’s future hydrogen economy. One component was to understand how to identify, characterise, and operate potential hydrogen storage sites. This paper presents a case study of hydrogen storage in a depleted gas field, focusing on geomechanical behaviour, using data from the CO2CRC Otway International Test Centre in Australia. This study is the first to compare fluid dynamic behaviour and geomechanical risks of hydrogen storage with the more extensively studied methane and carbon dioxide (CO2) storage. At reservoir depth, hydrogen exhibits large differences in density, compressibility, viscosity, and thermal properties compared to the other gases, necessitating different operational approaches for underground storage. The study’s uniqueness lies in the inclusion of coupled reservoir geomechanics with thermal simulation in reservoir and cap rock, using a high-resolution grid around the wellbore. A key finding is that hydrogen storage causes significantly less thermal perturbation compared to methane and CO2 storage under an identical reservoir injection volume. The fault reactivation and wellbore fracturing risk due to thermally-induced stress changes are lower in hydrogen storage compared to CO2 storage. Simulations suggest that reducing the injection rate dampens both temperature and pressure effects, further reducing the risk of wellbore fracturing and fault reactivation. This study highlights the potential advantages of integrating reservoir flow simulation with geomechanical risk assessment. Implementing dynamic control mechanisms in coupled simulations could optimise injection rates without compromising underground storage safety.
To access the Oral Presentation click the link on the right. To read the full paper click here
Keywords: CO2 storage, depleted gas field, fault stability, gas storage, geomechanics, hydrogen storage, reservoir simulation, thermal modelling, wellbore fracturing.
Zachariah John Pallikathekathil graduated from the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi in Mechanical Engineering. He has held technical and management positions in wireline and logging-while-drilling log acquisition and interpretation. His passion for geomechanics and its multi-disciplinary requirement drew him into the field of geomechanics 15 years ago. He is currently involved in rock testing design, construction of 1D and 3D mechanical earth models for addressing issues on wellbore stability (drilling), completion integrity (sanding, casing), compaction–subsidence, and fault stability over the life of the field for oil and gas reservoirs and CCS projects. He is a member of SPE and was the past President of the SPWLA chapter in Australia in 2010 and 2011. |
