Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Adult obesity management in New Zealand general practice: a review

Kimberley Norman 1 3 , Lynne Chepulis 1 , Lisette Burrows 1 , Ross Lawrenson 1 2
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 University of Waikato, Gate 1, Knighton Road, Hillcrest, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.

2 Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.

3 Corresponding author. Email: Kimberley.norman@waikato.ac.nz

Journal of Primary Health Care 13(3) 249-259 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC20135
Published: 23 September 2021

Journal Compilation © Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners 2021 This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is an important issue that leads to further health complications, increases the strain on the national health system and lowers quality of life. There is little available information on obesity management to guide best practice in general practice, despite 32% of New Zealand adults reported to be obese.

AIM: To review obesity management in New Zealand general practice.

METHODS: We searched six online databases for peer-reviewed research about adult obesity management. Inclusion criteria were original research, a New Zealand adult sample aged 25–64 years with a body mass index (BMI) >30 (or >25 BMI if participants had comorbidities) with weight loss (kg) as a measurable outcome.

RESULTS: Eleven articles were identified: nine studies reported statistically significant weight loss from baseline, and two studies reported no significant weight loss. Three studies used a Kaupapa Māori approach. Weight loss results ranged from 0.56 to 12.1 kg. Weight loss interventions varied in strategy and suitability for individual patients.

DISCUSSION: We found that there are effective weight loss interventions available for primary health-care professionals to refer to. Although most interventions did produce some weight loss, patients may need more comprehensive interventions that include a combination of diet, exercise and behaviour modifications in culturally appropriate ways. Future research should aim to identify and mitigate potential barriers to obesity management in primary care, as well as develop comprehensive, multileveled interventions that are effective for the local population.

KEYwords: Weight loss; obesity intervention; health-care professionals; primary care; obesity health care.

WHAT GAP THIS FILLS
What is already known: Obesity rates can be reduced through effective weight loss intervention strategies in general practice; however, minimal information is available to guide best practice for health professionals with obesity management in New Zealand.
What this study adds: This article provides a synthesis review of what is known about obesity management in New Zealand primary care to assist with guiding best practice for health professionals in the effective management of obesity. This review provides evidence that can contribute to effective obesity health-care delivery, improve patients’ quality of life, as well as reduce obesity rates and financial strain on the national health system.



Introduction

Obesity is an important health issue with New Zealand having the third highest obesity rate globally, behind America and Mexico.1 Currently, 32% of New Zealand adults are classed as obese.1 The most at-risk populations nationally are adults living in high deprivation areas and of Māori or Pasifika descent.2 Obesity is a risk factor for several other conditions, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer and reproductive abnormalities.1 Obesity is a socially discriminated health issue and correlates with psychological disorders such as depression, anxiety, social isolation and identity changes.36 Obesity can also cause poor mobility, often because of joint strain, and collectively, these comorbidities can lead to loss of employment and an overall lower quality of life.79 The health-care costs attributable to obesity and excess weight in New Zealand were estimated to be NZ$624 million in 2006 with this figure expected to increase.10 High rates of obesity and related comorbidities are causing economic strain on the health system through increased costs of time, resources, health-care demand, and loss of productivity.1012 Obesity reduction measures are urgently required.

Reducing obesity rates is achieved through effective weight management intervention and prevention strategies.13 The Ministry of Health’s Clinical Weight Management Guidelines for adults14 align with encouraged international approaches1518 which suggest that primary care professionals are best positioned to measure, monitor, advise, and intervene with their patients’ obesity risk.14,17 The Ministry of Health advise that effective weight management is achieved through a combination of food control, increased physical activity and behavioural changes actioned in culturally appropriate ways,14 but there are multiple psychosocial, cultural, environmental and economic factors that influence the effectiveness of weight loss attempts.1921 Although there are many options for people to attempt to autonomously manage their weight outside primary care (using commercial weight loss programmes such as Weight Watchers and Jenny Craig, self-determined low-calorie diets such as Ketogenic or Optifast meal replacements, available over-the-counter meals, increasing exercise, or self-funded medication), primary care has been tasked with the job of delivering care for people living with obesity.14 Weight is related to many other health issues that primary care professionals treat (such as diabetes) and therefore is an integral part of primary care, yet little is known about how best to deliver this care. Regardless of how individuals engage with weight management, obesity is a complex health issue13 and there is minimal information about effective primary care weight loss interventions, or best practice approaches, for the unique New Zealand population.

Quality overseas reviews suggest that a combination approach of health-care professional counselling, meal replacements, commercial weight loss programmes or pharmacotherapy provides effective intervention.2225 The purpose of this review is to identify the range of interventions tested for use in New Zealand general practice, and to report on the effectiveness of these studies. This review aims to identify knowledge gaps, evaluate the research, and shed light on a significant health issue facing individuals, families and their primary health-care providers.


Methods

This review was based on the protocol detailed in the Cochrane Collaboration handbook for systematic reviews for interventions.26 Due to the complex nature of obesity as a health risk, a stigmatised health condition, and a major public health issue, a review synthesis of quantitative literature was adapted to generate a comprehensive understanding of what is known about the management of obesity in primary care in New Zealand. Obesity was defined in this review as the clinical measurement of body mass index (BMI) >30, and BMI >25 for people with comorbidities.27

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria were: original research, focused on weight loss intervention in general practice, published in English language, with a New Zealand adult sample aged 25–64 years who had a BMI >30 (or >25 BMI for participants with obesity-related comorbidities); and weight loss (kg) as a measurable primary or secondary outcome. Evaluations of weight loss programmes and interventions that also aimed to reduce comorbidities, such as HbA1c levels for diabetes, were included if weight change was also measured.

Excluded were: studies based on institutionalised participants, people with mental illness, cancer or pregnant participants, post-menopausal women only, and older (aged >65 years) adults only; family, child or adolescent-focused interventions; community-based or secondary care interventions with no involvement of primary health care; research where weight measurement was not an outcome; digital or web-only interventions; protocols.

Outcome measures

The primary outcome measure was difference in bodyweight (kg) at baseline and after an intervention. Bodyweight could be measured by health-care professionals or self-reported. Studies were categorised into short (<12 months) and long-term (≥12 months): length of time interventions varied within each group.

Search strategy

In September 2020, we searched six major electronic databases for peer-reviewed papers published between 2000 and 2020: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, APA Psych Net, and AlterNative. Keywords used in the search strategy were variations of ‘food’, ‘weight’, ‘diet’, ‘weight loss’, ‘general practice’, ‘primary care’, ‘general practitioner’, ‘obesity’, ‘overweight’, ‘BMI’, ‘New Zealand’, and ‘nurse’. The AlterNative journal was included to elucidate quality research, give voice to minority groups, and generate a comprehensive review.


Results

A total of 198 studies were retrieved and screened against the inclusion criteria, resulting in 22 full-text articles. From these, 11 were identified for inclusion in this review (Table 1).2838 The PRISMA flowchart in Figure 139 shows the selection process. Table 1 summarises the characteristics of the included studies. Table 2 summarises the intervention type, weight loss outcome and significance of results. Nine studies were found to have statistically significant weight loss from baseline, and two studies found no significant weight loss from baseline.


Table 1.  General characteristics and results of included studies
Click to zoom


Figure 1.  PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2009 flowchart showing selection of articles.
F1


Table 2.  Summarised results from included studies
Click to zoom

Interventions showing statistically significant weight loss

Nine interventions produced statistically significant weight loss within their intervention timeframes. Two studies included a change in diet only,32,36 one used diet changes and social support,31 one used diet and exercise changes,35 one used exercise and behavioural changes,28 three Māori approaches used exercise34,37,38 and one included a Māori approach with behavioural changes, food education and exercise.29

Interventions that included more than one weight management component (food, exercise, behavioural changes and culturally appropriate changes) all produced statistically significant weight loss results. The only interventions with an isolated component for weight loss that produced significant results was the changes in diet.32,36

For Māori, in addition to the exercise, nutrition workshops and behavioural changes,34,37,38 there was a strong cultural component,29 which contributed to the statistically significant weight loss each intervention produced. The inclusion of whānau29,38 and values such as whanaungatanga (support or connectedness),37 pātaka mātauranga (sharing knowledge that leads to understanding and responsibility) and manaakitanga (enhancing the integrity of the person)34 was integral to the weight loss achievements within these interventions.

Of the included studies in this review, four were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), three were cohort designs, one used convergent mixed methods, and three were Kaupapa Māori research. Six of the 11 studies included a diabetes component to their research. Weight loss ranged from no mean change33 to 10.6 kg mean change.32 Intervention timeframes and weight loss measurements from baseline ranged from 9 weeks to 12 months. Three studies were long-term (measurements taken at baseline and at ≥12 months) and seven were short-term (<12 months).

Six of the 11 studies included a diabetes sample or focus and all produced significant weight loss. Three studies focused solely on patients with diabetes,29,34,36 one on patients with prediabetes,31 and two with aims to reduce diabetes or heart disease in their study groups.32,35

A survey found that the odds of losing weight were higher if patients changed both diet and exercise behaviours (17.5), as opposed to only physical activity (5.2) or only diet (7.2), and culturally appropriate interventions are vital for Māori and Pasifika populations.40 No study included all three (or four for specific culturally tailored interventions) components in their weight loss interventions.

Interventions showing no significant weight loss

Two studies did not produce statistically significant weight loss within their intervention timeframes; one RCT used a medication-only intervention30 and one cohort study used lifestyle behaviour changes only.33 Neither study included a diabetes factor in their design.


Discussion

This review of weight loss interventions in primary care among New Zealand adults identified only 11 studies, with heterogeneous study methodologies and mixed results. This review found that there are effective weight loss interventions available for patients in the primary care context, but they vary in strategy and suitability for individual patients. The intervention options tested align with the Ministry of Health best practice recommendations and included unique combinations of diet, exercise, and behavioural changes in culturally appropriate ways.14 Although the interventions did produce weight loss, the results ranged widely from 0.56 kg to 12.1 kg with variable follow-up times, leading to uncertainty that the findings are sustainable. These findings suggest that more comprehensive approaches are needed that include a combination of diet, exercise, and behaviour modifications conducted in culturally appropriate ways.

It was unsurprising to find that six of the studies in this review recruited patients with a diabetes diagnosis (an obesity comorbidity), as weight loss can reduce comorbidity risks.41 The weight loss results from these studies varied considerably (1.3 kg31 to 12.1 kg32), highlighting difficulties in achieving weight loss while also controlling blood sugar levels. Weight gain prevention (and therefore diabetes prevention) could be more effective as an intervention due to the more achievable nature of weight management at a less severe obesity level.

When investigating the management and referral of obesity health care in a general practice, one study found that although obesity risk factors were managed appropriately by the general practice (following Ministry of Health guidelines), earlier identification and referral of high-risk patients could improve obesity health outcomes and act as an obesity prevention tactic.42 Effective interventions producing greater weight loss results could be better positioned at the time of a patient’s excess weight gain or identification of a high health risk, but before developing a comorbidity. This could enable individuals to reach weight loss and health goals faster and reduce additional health system strain. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of prevention as intervention for obesity and comorbidities at early stages of patients’ health journeys.

The low number and limited scope of New Zealand studies found for this review is surprising given the high obesity rates in this country,2 and suggests that there are barriers to weight loss management in primary care. Obesity is a complex social, environmental, cultural and psychological health issue that also carries stigma and discrimination.1,19,21,43 Previous studies have identified barriers to primary care obesity management, including ineffective conversational strategies, patients’ readiness to change, system limitations and inconsistencies in the general practice role in obesity management.4447

Some patients have beliefs that align with pro-obesity, believe that obesity is not a health concern for them or are unaware they are classified as obese, so do not seek obesity care.48,49 These opposing views make obesity management a delicate and complicated issue for health professionals to deal with in their practice, as obesity is a significant issue both within and outside general practice. One study identified barriers to be lack of accessibility to effective interventions for their patients (including culturally appropriate interventions), stigma associated with obesity, and a lack of training, support or resources to support best practice obesity care.45 These barriers could help explain failures to reduce obesity rates in recent years. Further investigation is needed to identify and mitigate barriers to obesity health care and generate support for primary care professionals who are tasked with providing this care effectively.

Primary care professionals are positioned as responsible for intervening in obesity care,14 yet there is limited information available to inform ‘best practice’ for this individualised and complex health issue. Overseas research has found that medications,24 very low energy diets and meal replacements,5052 commercial weight loss programmes,25,53 and dietitian referral54 interventions produce positive weight loss outcomes, and they also support multileveled intervention approaches.22,55 Primary health-care professionals can refer to previous New Zealand research that focuses on children, adolescents, older adults or secondary care,5659 but research does not directly assist with health-care professionals’ best practice options for patients outside these samples. Culturally appropriate interventions for high-risk populations, including Māori and Pasifika, have also been tested, but these interventions are actioned at the community or family level rather than in primary care.60,61 Another recent study used a partnership methodology of an academic university team and a Māori community health provider who co-designed a lifestyle intervention programme with Māori men and community stakeholders and was not based in a general practice (or clinical) context.62

Until more definitive New Zealand research is completed, it is reasonable for health professionals to use a combination of weight loss evidence from international samples, New Zealand-based evidence, and Ministry of Health guidelines14 to guide their practice. Using this available literature is recommended in conjunction with medical advice and tailoring to specific patient needs (including medical, cultural and psychosocial needs) for effective obesity health-care delivery.

This review is subject to publication bias and time lag. Further limitations were the inclusion of English-language articles only, exclusion of grey literature and hospital-based research, along with interventions that had no weight loss outcome measurement. General methodological problems, including participant dropout rates, participants’ compliance with interventions, and self-report bias, could skew the reported effectiveness of these interventions. The statistically significant weight loss found in 9 out of 11 studies was measured to the timeframe of each study and not checked beyond this for sustainability of effectiveness. Furthermore, diabetes intervention research was not purposely searched for, but due to the integrated nature of diabetes and obesity, some diabetes studies with weight loss measurements appeared from the searches. Although including diabetes-specific research could generate more studies, the aim of this review was to understand primary care interventions about all adults, including those without comorbidities.

In conclusion, the current evidence of effective primary care weight loss interventions in New Zealand is limited and based on a low number of studies. Nine out of the 11 studies identified achieved significant weight loss from their interventions, showing promise, although weight loss was not measured long-term for sustainability. The Kaupapa Māori studies achieved similarly significant weight loss results, demonstrating that the inclusion of a cultural component is effective and important for Māori people. The current literature is too sparse to allow for firm conclusions to be drawn as there is too much heterogeneity in participant populations, theoretical perspectives, and study designs. Primary care clinicians should draw upon the combination approach of dietary, exercise, and behavioural changes for effective obesity interventions in their practice. Until more research is done in New Zealand, primary care professionals may use international evidence for effective weight loss interventions, while offering tailored health advice that takes into account the medical, cultural and psychosocial needs of individual patients. Further research is needed to identify barriers influencing the effectiveness of primary care obesity interventions in New Zealand to improve health outcomes and reduce the burden of obesity on the health system.


Funding

This project was part of a larger PhD project for Kimberley Norman (University of Waikato), which is funded by the Waikato District Health Board Research Trust.


Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.



References

[1]  Ministry of Health. Obesity. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2020. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/obesity.

[2]  Ministry of Health. Obesity Statistics. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2020. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/nz-health-statistics/health-statistics-and-data-sets/obesity-statistics.

[3]  Zhao G, Ford ES, Dhingra S, et al. Depression and anxiety among US adults: associations with body mass index. Int J Obes. 2009; 33 257–66.
Depression and anxiety among US adults: associations with body mass index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Abilés V, Rodríguez-Ruiz S, Abilés J, et al. Psychological characteristics of morbidly obese candidates for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2010; 20 161–7.
Psychological characteristics of morbidly obese candidates for bariatric surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18958537PubMed |

[5]  Magdaleno R, Chaim EA, Turato ER. Understanding the life experiences of Brazilian women after bariatric surgery: a qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2010; 20 1086–9.
Understanding the life experiences of Brazilian women after bariatric surgery: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18830785PubMed |

[6]  Young J, Burrows L. Finding the ‘self’ after weight loss surgery: two women’s experiences. Fem Psychol. 2013; 23 498–516.
Finding the ‘self’ after weight loss surgery: two women’s experiences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Goettler A, Grosse A, Sonntag D. Productivity loss due to overweight and obesity: a systematic review of indirect costs. BMJ Open. 2017; 7 e014632
Productivity loss due to overweight and obesity: a systematic review of indirect costs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28982806PubMed |

[8]  Nigatu YT, Reijneveld SA, de Jonge P, et al. The combined effects of obesity, abdominal obesity and major depression/anxiety on health-related quality of life: the lifelines cohort study. PLoS One. 2016; 11 e0148871
The combined effects of obesity, abdominal obesity and major depression/anxiety on health-related quality of life: the lifelines cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26866920PubMed |

[9]  Forhan M, Gill SV. Obesity, functional mobility and quality of life. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 27 129–37.
Obesity, functional mobility and quality of life.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23731875PubMed |

[10]  Lal A, Moodie M, Ashton T, et al. Health care and lost productivity costs of overweight and obesity in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012; 36 550–6.
Health care and lost productivity costs of overweight and obesity in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23216496PubMed |

[11]  Clough P, Destremau K. The wider economic and social costs of obesity: a discussion of the non-health impacts of obesity in New Zealand. Wellington: New Zealand Institute of Economic Research; 2015.

[12]  Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, et al. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011; 378 815–25.
Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21872750PubMed |

[13]  World Health Organization. Obesity. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2021. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://www.who.int/topics/obesity/en/.

[14]  Ministry of Health. Clinical Guidelines for Weight Management in New Zealand Adults. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2017. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/clinical-guidelines-weight-management-new-zealand-adults.

[15]  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Weight management: lifestyle services for overweight or obese adults. 2014. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph53.

[16]  Moyer VA. Screening for and management of obesity in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157 373–8.
Screening for and management of obesity in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22733087PubMed |

[17]  National Health and Medical Research Council. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of overweight and obesity in adults, adolescents and children in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government; 2013. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/clinical-practice-guidelines-management-overweight-and-obesity.

[18]  UK Government. Adult obesity: applying all our health. London: Public Health England; 2019. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/adult-obesity-applying-all-our-health/adult-obesity-applying-all-our-health.

[19]  Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F. Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med. 1999; 29 563–70.
Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10600438PubMed |

[20]  British Psychological Society. Psychological perspectives on obesity: addressing policy, practice and research priorities. Leicester: British Psychological Society; 2019. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy-Files/Psychological.

[21]  Siahpush M, Huang TTK, Sikora A, Tibbits M, Shaikh RA, Singh GK. Prolonged financial stress predicts subsequent obesity: results from a prospective study of an Australian national sample. Obesity. 2014; 22 616–21.
Prolonged financial stress predicts subsequent obesity: results from a prospective study of an Australian national sample.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23839823PubMed |

[22]  Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Treatment of obesity in primary care practice in the United States: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24 1073–9.
Treatment of obesity in primary care practice in the United States: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19562419PubMed |

[23]  Yoong SL, Carey M, Sanson-Fisher R, Grady A. A systematic review of behavioural weight-loss interventions involving primary-care physicians in overweight and obese primary-care patients (1999–2011). Public Health Nutr. 2013; 16 2083–99.
A systematic review of behavioural weight-loss interventions involving primary-care physicians in overweight and obese primary-care patients (1999–2011).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23101456PubMed |

[24]  Yanovski SZ, Yanovski JA. Long-term drug treatment for obesity: a systematic and clinical review. JAMA. 2014; 311 74–86.
Long-term drug treatment for obesity: a systematic and clinical review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24231879PubMed |

[25]  Gudzune KA, Doshi RS, Mehta AK, et al. Efficacy of commercial weight-loss programs: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162 501–12.
Efficacy of commercial weight-loss programs: an updated systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25844997PubMed |

[26]  van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine. 2003; 28 1290–9.
Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12811274PubMed |

[27]  Ministry of Health. Measuring Weight. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2018. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/your-health/healthy-living/food-activity-and-sleep/healthy-weight/measuring-weight.

[28]  Sellman D, Schroder R, Deering D, et al. Psychosocial enhancement of the Green Prescription for obesity recovery: a randomised controlled trial. N Z Med J. 2017; 130 44–54.
| 28207724PubMed |

[29]  Simmons D, Rush E, Crook N. Te Wai o Rona: Diabetes Prevention Strategy Team. Development and piloting of a community health worker-based intervention for the prevention of diabetes among New Zealand Maori in Te Wai o Rona: Diabetes Prevention Strategy. Public Health Nutr. 2008; 11 1318–25.
Te Wai o Rona: Diabetes Prevention Strategy Team. Development and piloting of a community health worker-based intervention for the prevention of diabetes among New Zealand Maori in Te Wai o Rona: Diabetes Prevention Strategy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18547452PubMed |

[30]  Mhurchu CN, Poppitt SD, McGill AT, et al. The effect of the dietary supplement, Chitosan, on body weight: a randomised controlled trial in 250 overweight and obese adults. Int J Obes. 2004; 28 1149–56.
The effect of the dietary supplement, Chitosan, on body weight: a randomised controlled trial in 250 overweight and obese adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[31]  Coppell KJ, Abel SL, Freer T, et al. The effectiveness of a primary care nursing-led dietary intervention for prediabetes: a mixed methods pilot study. BMC Fam Pract. 2017; 18 106
The effectiveness of a primary care nursing-led dietary intervention for prediabetes: a mixed methods pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29268719PubMed |

[32]  Wright N, Wilson L, Smith M, et al. The BROAD study: A randomised controlled trial using a whole food plant-based diet in the community for obesity, ischaemic heart disease or diabetes. Nutr Diabetes 2017; 7 e256
The BROAD study: A randomised controlled trial using a whole food plant-based diet in the community for obesity, ischaemic heart disease or diabetes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28319109PubMed |

[33]  Cutler L, King B, McCarthy N, et al. Appetite for life: an evaluation of a primary care lifestyle programme. J Prim Health Care. 2010; 2 281–7.
Appetite for life: an evaluation of a primary care lifestyle programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21125068PubMed |

[34]  Williams M, Cairns S, Simmons D, Rush EC. Face-to-face versus telephone delivery of the Green Prescription for Māori and New Zealand Europeans with type-2 diabetes mellitus: influence on participation and health outcomes. N Z Med J. 2017; 130 71–9.
| 29121625PubMed |

[35]  McAuley KA, Murphy E, Mclay RT, et al. Implementation of a successful lifestyle intervention programme for New Zealand Maori to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003; 12 423–6.
| 14672866PubMed |

[36]  Krebs JD, Elley CR, Parry-Strong A, et al. The Diabetes Excess Weight Loss (DEWL) Trial: a randomised controlled trial of high-protein versus high-carbohydrate diets over 2 years in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2012; 55 905–14.
The Diabetes Excess Weight Loss (DEWL) Trial: a randomised controlled trial of high-protein versus high-carbohydrate diets over 2 years in type 2 diabetes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22286528PubMed |

[37]  Forrest R, Taylor L-A, Roberts J, et al. Fighting fit, fighting fat! The Hinu Wero approach. Alternative. 2016; 12 282–97.
Fighting fit, fighting fat! The Hinu Wero approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  Eggleton K, Stewart L, Kask A. Ngātiwai Whakapakari Tinana: strengthening bodies through a Kaupapa Māori fitness and exercise programme. J Prim Health Care. 2018; 10 25–30.
Ngātiwai Whakapakari Tinana: strengthening bodies through a Kaupapa Māori fitness and exercise programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30068448PubMed |

[39]  Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: The PRISMA Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62 1006–12.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: The PRISMA Statement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19631508PubMed |

[40]  Durie M. Maori cultural identity and its implications for mental health services. Int J Ment Health. 1997; 26 23–5.
Maori cultural identity and its implications for mental health services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[41]  Ministry of Health. Diabetes. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2021. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/your-health/conditions-and-treatments/diseases-and-illnesses/diabetes.

[42]  Naper J, Manetto L, Wiren D. A project to improve the quality of care for overweight and obese patients in a Nelson general practice. J Prim Health Care. 2017; 9 321–7.
A project to improve the quality of care for overweight and obese patients in a Nelson general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29530145PubMed |

[43]  Puhl RM, Heuer CA. Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100 1019–28.
Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20075322PubMed |

[44]  Glenister KM, Malatzky CA, Wright J. Barriers to effective conversations regarding overweight and obesity in regional Victoria. Aust Fam Physician. 2017; 46 769
| 29036779PubMed |

[45]  Claridge R, Gray L, Stubbe M, et al. General practitioner opinion of weight management interventions in New Zealand. J Prim Health Care. 2014; 6 212–20.
General practitioner opinion of weight management interventions in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25194248PubMed |

[46]  Gray L, Stubbe M, Macdonald L, et al. A taboo topic? How General Practitioners talk about overweight and obesity in New Zealand. J Prim Health Care. 2018; 10 150–8.
A taboo topic? How General Practitioners talk about overweight and obesity in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30068470PubMed |

[47]  Sonntag U, Brink A, Renneberg B, Braun V, Heintze C. GPs’ attitudes, objectives and barriers in counselling for obesity – a qualitative study. Eur J Gen Pract. 2012; 18 9–14.
GPs’ attitudes, objectives and barriers in counselling for obesity – a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22034942PubMed |

[48]  NAAFA (National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance). Las Vegas: National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance; 2020. [cited 2021 March 31]. Available from: https://naafa.org/.

[49]  Johnson F, Beeken RJ, Croker H, Wardle J. Do weight perceptions among obese adults in Great Britain match clinical definitions? Analysis of cross-sectional surveys from 2007 and 2012. BMJ Open. 2014; 4 e005561
Do weight perceptions among obese adults in Great Britain match clinical definitions? Analysis of cross-sectional surveys from 2007 and 2012.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25394816PubMed |

[50]  Ard JD, Lewis KH, Rothberg A, et al. Effectiveness of a Total Meal Replacement Program (OPTIFAST Program) on weight loss: results from the OPTIWIN Study. Obesity. 2019; 27 22–9.
Effectiveness of a Total Meal Replacement Program (OPTIFAST Program) on weight loss: results from the OPTIWIN Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30421863PubMed |

[51]  Castellana M, Conte E, Cignarelli A, et al. Efficacy and safety of very low calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) in patients with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2020; 21 5–16.
Efficacy and safety of very low calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) in patients with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31705259PubMed |

[52]  Maston G, Gibson AA, Kahlaee HR, et al. Effectiveness and characterization of severely energy-restricted diets in people with class III obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Sci. 2019; 9 144
Effectiveness and characterization of severely energy-restricted diets in people with class III obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[53]  Jebb SA, Ahern AL, Olson AD, et al. Primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment versus standard care: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011; 378 1485–92.
Primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment versus standard care: a randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21906798PubMed |

[54]  Howatson A, Wall C, Turner-Benny P. The contribution of dietitians to the primary health care workforce. J Prim Health Care. 2015; 7 324–32.
The contribution of dietitians to the primary health care workforce.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26668838PubMed |

[55]  Johns DJ, Hartmann-Boyce J, Jebb SA, et al. Diet or exercise interventions vs combined behavioral weight management programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparisons. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014; 114 1557–68.
Diet or exercise interventions vs combined behavioral weight management programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparisons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25257365PubMed |

[56]  Baur LA, Fitzgerald DA. Recommendations for bariatric surgery in adolescents in Australia and New Zealand. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010; 46 704–7.
Recommendations for bariatric surgery in adolescents in Australia and New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21210527PubMed |

[57]  Rajput N, Tuohy P, Mishra S, et al. Overweight and obesity in 4–5‐year‐old children in New Zealand: results from the first 4 years (2009–2012) of the B4School Check programme. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015; 51 334–43.
Overweight and obesity in 4–5‐year‐old children in New Zealand: results from the first 4 years (2009–2012) of the B4School Check programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25157848PubMed |

[58]  Mummery W, Kolt G, Schofield G, McLean G. Associations between physical activity and other lifestyle behaviors in older New Zealanders. J Phys Act Health. 2007; 4 412–23.
Associations between physical activity and other lifestyle behaviors in older New Zealanders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[59]  Duncan S, Goodyear‐Smith F, McPhee J, et al. Family‐centered brief intervention for reducing obesity and cardiovascular disease risk: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity. 2016; 24 2311–8.
Family‐centered brief intervention for reducing obesity and cardiovascular disease risk: a randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27616217PubMed |

[60]  Bell AC, Swinburn BA, Amosa H, Scragg RK. A nutrition and exercise intervention program for controlling weight in Samoan communities in New Zealand. Int J Obes. 2001; 25 920–7.
A nutrition and exercise intervention program for controlling weight in Samoan communities in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[61]  Anderson YC, Wynter LE, Moller KR, et al. The effect of a multi-disciplinary obesity intervention compared to usual practice in those ready to make lifestyle changes: design and rationale of Whanau Pakari. BMC Obes. 2015; 2 41
The effect of a multi-disciplinary obesity intervention compared to usual practice in those ready to make lifestyle changes: design and rationale of Whanau Pakari.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26464806PubMed |

[62]  Oetzel J, Rarere M, Wihapi R, et al. A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity. Int J Equity Health. 2020; 19 103
A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32571330PubMed |