Stocktake Sale on now: wide range of books at up to 70% off!
Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mycotoxins and food

Nai Tran-Dinh
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

CSIRO Animal, Food and Health Sciences
Riverside Corporate Park
11 Julius Avenue, North Ryde
NSW 2113, Australia
Tel: +61 2 9490 8473
Email: Nai.Tran-Dinh@csiro.au

Microbiology Australia 34(2) 70-72 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA13024
Published: 13 May 2013

Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by filamentous fungi that may occur in almost all food commodities but particularly in cereals, oilseeds and nuts. They are recognised as an unavoidable risk and are found in the world’s most important food and feed crops, including maize, wheat, and barley. When present in foods in sufficiently high levels, mycotoxins pose a significant food safety risk and health hazard. Besides negative health impacts, mycotoxin contamination of food and feeds has a major worldwide economic impact. Mycotoxin contamination of foods is the subject of increasing international importance due to a number of worldwide issues, including globalisation of food trade, global food security and climate change. Innovative strategies to meet the menace of mycotoxin contamination are required, and a greater understanding of the ecology of mycotoxigenic fungi and the molecular regulation of mycotoxin production may aide in the development of such strategies.


Mycotoxigenic fungi: occurrence, costs and effects


Fungi are ubiquitous in nature and are a normal part of the microflora of worldwide food supplies. They can colonise food throughout the food chain from preharvest to storage wherever favourable conditions prevail. Some of these fungi are able to produce mycotoxins; the most important mycotoxigenic fungi belong to the genera Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium. Thousands of mycotoxins have been identified, but only a few are a food safety risk and have an impact on global agriculture1. Major mycotoxin classes are aflatoxins, produced by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus; fumonisins, produced by Fusarium verticillioides; trichothecenes, most importantly deoxynivelanol, produced by Fusarium graminearum; and ochratoxins, produced by Aspergillus ochraceus, Aspergillus carbonarius and Penicillium verrucosum. A wide range of commodities can be contaminated by these mycotoxins (Table 1). Exposure to mycotoxins may cause diverse and powerful toxic effects leading to both acute and chronic disease, ranging from liver and kidney damage, cancer, immunosuppression and childhood stunting (Table 1). These diseases are referred to as mycotoxicoses and the symptoms are dependent upon the type of mycotoxin, the concentration and length of exposure, and characteristics of the individual exposed, such as genetics, age, health and gender. Other factors contributing to disease development include synergies with other diseases and mycotoxin co-contamination food and feed2. The main route of exposure to mycotoxins is through ingestion of plant derived contaminated foods, however exposure may also occur through carryover of mycotoxins and their metabolites in animal products such as milk, meat and eggs or through inhalation of air and dust containing toxins3,4.


Table 1. Mycotoxins, associated commodities, toxic effects and producing fungal species.
Click to zoom

The true cost of mycotoxin contamination is difficult to estimate due to the complexity of the issue and its effect throughout the food chain on numerous stakeholders. Obvious costs include health impacts, crop losses and reduced animal productivity. Aflatoxins alone may cause up to 150,000 deaths worldwide per annum from liver cancer, and many more when the synergistic effect of hepatitis B virus is taken into account5. Other costs from mycotoxin contamination are incurred through efforts by producers to improve production, storage and handling to minimise the risk of mycotoxin contamination6. With over 100 countries having regulations regarding levels of mycotoxins in the food and feed industry7, there are significant costs associated with monitoring, enforcing and analysing at-risk commodities. There are also social costs associated with the loss of consumer confidence in the safety of food products.

In developed countries, stringent food safety regulations and monitoring ensures low levels of mycotoxin exposure in the population, however this is not the case in developing countries. In developing countries, the lack of infrastructure, the prominence of subsistence farming systems, the lack of irrigation, and inadequate drying and storing facilities results in chronic exposure to mycotoxins in the diet and the risk of serious health problems. The costs of these health problems include mortality and morbidity, as well as the more intangible costs of pain, suffering, anxiety, and reduction in quality of life.

Globalisation of food trade has several potential impacts on mycotoxin contamination in food and feeds. It possibly can extend the impact of mycotoxin contamination in food supplies beyond local communities. Mycotoxin exposure in humans and other animals, previously dictated by local factors such as crop production, climatic conditions and agronomic practices, is now affected by international food trade potentially distributing mycotoxin contaminated crops globally. The use of strict mycotoxin regulations on commodities for importation by developed countries reduce exposure risks in the importing countries, however the complexity and volume of international trade, importing corporations lacking accountability, greater opportunities for intentional fraud and the lack of enforcement tools, mean that there remains a potential mycotoxin food safety risk8. These strict mycotoxin regulations also have a significant economic impact on developing countries9. For example, a World Bank study estimated that the European Union regulations on aflatoxins cost Africa $750 million each year in exports of cereals, dried fruit and nuts10. Strict international mycotoxin regulations may also inadvertently result in higher exposure in developing countries because only the best quality foods are exported, leaving poorer quality, mycotoxin contaminated commodities for local consumption11.

Mycotoxin production on a food commodity is greatly influenced by environmental factors, most importantly temperature, relative humidity, insect attack, and stress conditions of the crop12. Global climate change with warmer temperatures and more extreme rainfall and drought events are likely to increase the threat of mycotoxins to human health1214. Climate change effects on fungal colonisation and mycotoxin production should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, as optimum temperature and relative humidity for growth and mycotoxin formation vary between fungi12. In general, however, warmer temperatures with greater extremes in rainfall and drought events will increase plant stress, predisposing crops to fungal infection and mycotoxin contamination. Additionally, warmer temperatures may increase insect activity facilitating the establishment of mycotoxigenic fungi, through altered insect population growth rates, increased insect voltinism, altered crop-pest synchrony, and altered geographical ranges of important pest species14.

The costs of mycotoxin contamination of food commodities will significantly hamper the world’s ability to address the challenge of global food security. As defined by the World Health Organization, global food security exists “when all people at all times have access to sufficient, safe, nutritious, food to maintain a healthy and active life”15. Clearly, mycotoxin contamination of food commodities will affect the provision of safe and nutritious foods. The Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) estimates that 25% of the world’s food crops are significantly contaminated with mycotoxins and that in the range of 1 billion tonnes of food is lost worldwide due to mycotoxins16.


Future considerations

Mycotoxin contamination of food and feeds remains a food safety risk of worldwide significance that has major economic impacts in both developed and developing countries. Various approaches have been put forward to reduce the impact of mycotoxins in food, and have had varying degrees of success: biocontrol by competitive exclusion, plant breeding and genetics, improved agricultural practices, increased irrigation, improved sorting, drying and storage techniques, dietary interventions including specific clays and antioxidants and, specifically for aflatoxin, immunisation against hepatitis B6. A greater understanding of the interactions between mycotoxigenic fungi and their host plants, and the use of genomic and transcriptomic information may assist in improving existing intervention strategies and may also lead to other interventions. Whole-genome sequences are available for A. flavus, F. verticillioides and F. graminearum1719, and research is at a point that allows an examination of the similarities and differences in molecular mechanisms that regulate mycotoxin biosynthesis20. These whole-genome sequences have provided reference databases for genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses that have revealed complex transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of mycotoxin biosynthesis.

It is important that strategies aimed at reducing the risk of mycotoxin contamination of human food and animal feed be implemented, especially in the light of global issues such as international food trade, food security and climate change.



References

[1]  Improving Public Health Through Mycotoxin Control IARC Scientific Publication No. 158 (Pitt, J.I. et al., eds), World Health Organization.

[2]  Grenier, B. and Oswald, I.P. (2011) Mycotoxin co-contamination of food and fee: meta-analysis of publications describing toxicological interactions. World Mycotoxin Journal 4, 285–313.
Mycotoxin co-contamination of food and fee: meta-analysis of publications describing toxicological interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXht1WmtL3O&md5=a0bdd19eca1a90cb65e0a10aac330fdbCAS |

[3]  Jarvis, B.B. (2002) Chemistry and toxicology of molds isolated from water-damaged buildings. Mycotoxins and Food Safety. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 504, 43–52.
Chemistry and toxicology of molds isolated from water-damaged buildings. Mycotoxins and Food Safety.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XosFaqt7g%3D&md5=61dd55a25e9e014ccba351c687265935CAS | 11922098PubMed |

[4]  CAST (2003) Mycotoxins: Risks in Plant, Animal and Human Systems. Report No. 139, Council for Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA.

[5]  Liu, Y. and Wu, F. (2010) Global burden of aflatoxin-induced hepatocellular carcinoma: a risk assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 118, 818–824.
Global burden of aflatoxin-induced hepatocellular carcinoma: a risk assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXovVKhtr4%3D&md5=c912c236bfbd807d322fc66ecfe4a2ecCAS | 20172840PubMed |

[6]  Khlangwiset, L. and Wu, F. (2010) Costs and efficacy of public health interventions to reduce aflatoxin-induced human disease. Food Addit. Contam., part A 27, 998–1014.
Costs and efficacy of public health interventions to reduce aflatoxin-induced human disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXnt12kurs%3D&md5=c779cff32e8b0d16df8ac2381ffb2554CAS |

[7]  van Egmond, H.P. et al. (2007) Regulations relating to mycotoxins in food: perspectives in a global and European context. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 389, 147–157.
Regulations relating to mycotoxins in food: perspectives in a global and European context.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17508207PubMed |

[8]  U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2011) Strategic Priorities 2011–2015. Responding to the Public Health Challenges of the 21st Century.

[9]  Wu, F. (2004) Mycotoxin risk assessment for the purpose of setting international regulatory standards. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 4049–4055.
Mycotoxin risk assessment for the purpose of setting international regulatory standards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXltFGgu7g%3D&md5=6e99bb8388a56fc1bc8a26bcc8a93db0CAS | 15352440PubMed |

[10]  Annan, K. (2001) Secretary General tells special event on poverty eradication, ‘best hope’ for least developed countries would be new round of global trade negations. Press Release G/SM/7802 Dev/2311, 14 May 2001.

[11]  Cardwell, K.F. et al. (2001) Mycotoxins: the cost of achieving food security and food quality. APSnet Features.

[12]  Miraglia, M. et al. (2009) Climate change and food safety: an emerging issue with special focus on Europe. Food Chem. Toxicol. 47, 1009–1021.
Climate change and food safety: an emerging issue with special focus on Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXktF2kuro%3D&md5=62d42bef1ce21036a00d8795944383d9CAS | 19353812PubMed |

[13]  Paterson, R.R.M. and Lima, N. (2010) How will climate change affect mycotoxins in food? Food Res. Int. 43, 1902–1914.
How will climate change affect mycotoxins in food?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtFCkt7jN&md5=494414b30059e2cabb186d8cc53a27f5CAS |

[14]  Wu, F. et al. (2011) Climate change impacts on mycotoxin risks in US maize. World Mycotoxin Journal 4, 79–93.
Climate change impacts on mycotoxin risks in US maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXktFWnsr0%3D&md5=a3edac0e1c4c91cef7876382fc2285b1CAS |

[15]  World Health Organisation (WHO) (1996) World Food Summit. http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story028/en/

[16]  Smith J.E. et al 1994 Mycotoxins in human nutrition and health. Commission of the European Communities. Directorate-General for Science, Research and Development .

[17]  Payne, G.A. et al. (2006) Whole genome comparison of Aspergillus flavus and A. oryzae. Med. Mycol. 44, S9–S11.
Whole genome comparison of Aspergillus flavus and A. oryzae.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXktVShsg%3D%3D&md5=c65c31b0c3ae1e5fc0a8c16a34d0a083CAS |

[18]  Ma, L.J. et al. (2010) Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium. Nature 464, 367–373.
Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXjsFWjs7g%3D&md5=9cb6505c8d2835908746e2a2f22e500cCAS | 20237561PubMed |

[19]  Cuomo, C.A. et al. (2007) The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localised polymorphism and pathogen specialisation. Science 317, 1400–1402.
The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localised polymorphism and pathogen specialisation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpvFWmu7k%3D&md5=b8df67aaf32a3e897bc228cd02a0a053CAS | 17823352PubMed |

[20]  Woloshuk, C.P. and Shim, W.-B. (2013) Aflatoxins, fumonisins, and trichothecenes: a convergence of knowledge. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 94–109.
Aflatoxins, fumonisins, and trichothecenes: a convergence of knowledge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXht1Ohtbc%3D&md5=77767cfdb42bff691cd7c757ef219916CAS | 23078349PubMed |


Biography

Nai Tran-Dinh joined CSIRO in 2002 as a postdoctoral fellow and is currently a project leader with research interests in mycotoxigenic moulds. He has expertise in microbiology and molecular biology, and has applied these skills in a variety of food safety/spoilage research areas. He has worked on and led projects investigating the physiology, ecology, taxonomy, biochemistry, mycotoxigenic potential and understanding relationships between strains of fungi from the agriculturally important fungal genera of Aspergillus, Fusarium and Alternaria. He has worked extensively in the area of Aspergillus flavus/parasiticus infection and aflatoxin contamination in peanuts and other crops. This work has included investigating infection cycles, fungal population surveys from crops and soils, mycotoxin production, biological control of aflatoxin contamination and differentiation and phylogeny of strains using molecular markers.