Constructing Aboriginal NRM livelihoods: Anmatyerr employment in water management
Naomi Rea A B C and Julia Messner AA School of Australian Indigenous Knowledge Systems, Charles Darwin University, NT 0909, Australia.
B Present address: Mulga Data Services, Box 202, Nightcliff, NT 0814, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: mulga.data@bigpond.com
The Rangeland Journal 30(1) 85-93 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ07044
Submitted: 18 June 2007 Accepted: 22 November 2007 Published: 1 April 2008
Abstract
The provision of livelihoods for desert Aboriginal people is a common goal for desert communities as well as governments, research agencies and other organisations. We examine six issues surrounding the creation of indigenous livelihoods in cultural and natural resource management. Our analysis draws from the character of the training pathways and the livelihoods in water management that are being constructed in central Australia as part of the Anmatyerr Water Project, a research program that identifies culturally-based livelihoods as a major mechanism for facilitating the process of having Aboriginal rights and cultural values provided for in water management. Such livelihoods aim to enhance the cultural and natural resource management needs of non-Aboriginal and Aboriginal owners and managers through integration of profit and non-profit activities, and previously disconnected policies. The building of inter-cultural capacity and inter-cultural arrangements would assist in creating livelihoods in existing enterprises and work programs. A broader approach aims for cultural and natural resource livelihoods that have additional socio-cultural and economic outcomes. We discuss relevant issues and make consequent recommendations that inform the construction of these livelihoods.
Additional keywords: cultural, economy, jobs, natural, resource.
Acknowledgements
The work reported in this publication was supported by funding to the Anmatyerr Water Research Program from Land & Water Australia and the Australian Government Cooperative Research Centre’s Programme through the Desert Knowledge CRC. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of Desert Knowledge CRC or its Participants. The strong working together philosophy of the senior Kwertengerl (traditional managers) and Merekartwey (traditional owners) from the Anmatyerr region and research with Anmatyerr colleagues has helped to generate the ideas herein. Jocelyn Davies has supported this work from the outset and through the LivelihoodsinLand Project, Desert Knowledge CRC. Collins Gipey, Mark Stafford Smith and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments.
Altman J.
(2003) People on country, healthy landscapes and sustainable Indigenous economic futures: the Arnhem Land case. The Drawing Board. An Australian Review of Public Affairs 4, 65–82.
(accessed 12 June 2007).
Costanza R.,
d’Arge R.,
de Groot R.,
Farberk S., Grasso M. , et al..
(1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 20 July 2007).
Grey-Gardner R.
(2008) Implementing risk management for water supplies: a catalyst and incentive for change. The Rangeland Journal 30, 149–156.
(accessed 20 July 2007).
Rigney L.
(1999) Internationalisation of an indigenous anti-colonial cultural critique of research methodologies: a guide to indigenist research methodology and its principles. Reprinted in WICAZO SA review. Journal of Native American Studies 14, 109–122.
(accessed 20 July 2007).
Stafford Smith M.,
Moran M., Seemann K.
(2008) The ‘viability’ and resilience of communities and settlements in desert Australia. The Rangeland Journal 30, 123–135.
Wirf L.,
Campbell A., Rea N.
(2007) Implications of gendered environmental knowledge in water allocation processes in central Australia. Gender, Culture and Place in press ,