Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > RJ > RJ09079
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 32(2)

From productivism to multi-functionality in the Gascoyne–Murchison Rangelands of Western Australia

Michael Hughes A B and Roy Jones A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Curtin Sustainable Tourism Centre, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: m.hughes@curtin.edu.au

The Rangeland Journal 32(2) 175-185 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ09079
Submitted: 26 November 2009  Accepted: 17 February 2010   Published: 30 June 2010

Abstract

A sustainability assessment of the Western Australian (WA) rangelands identified a range of issues associated with regional economic decline typical of many marginal rangeland regions in Australia. As part of a regional rejuvenation strategy, the WA state government purchased selected pastoral lease properties for incorporation into the conservation estate. It was intended as a means of land-use transition from mono-functional productivism to multi-functionality incorporating protection of significant rangeland bioregions and development of tourism.

A 1-year project was conducted to assess the issues relating to this transition. Archived information was obtained from government relating to the characteristics of the lease properties at the time they were purchased. Site visits were undertaken to purchased leases acquired by the government as well as neighbouring leases. During site visits, interviews with pastoralists and purchased lease managers were conducted. A series of facilitated community discussion groups in the region was held to ascertain the views of landholders and managers, government representatives, indigenous interests and commercial operators in the region.

This paper describes how the transition to a combination of protection and consumption exchanged one set of problems for another. This was due partly to the intrinsic character of the land, in terms of previous overgrazing, isolation, large distances, and limited infrastructure and services. More importantly, the top-down approach to land transition failed to allocate adequate management resources to replace those lost when the former pastoral leaseholders left. The consequences of inadequate management included theft and rapid degradation of assets, inadequate control of pests and weeds; inadequate fire prevention management and poor communication between the government and other stakeholders over management decisions. This paper discusses the dynamics of this WA rangeland transition with reference to the multi-functional rural transition concept.

Additional keywords: land use, management, protection, rural transition, tourism.


Acknowledgements

The research on which this paper is based was funded by the Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre, a Commonwealth Government initiative, and the WA Department of Environment and Conservation.


References


Blank U. (1989). ‘The Community Tourism Industry Imperative: The Necessity, the Opportunities, its Potential.’ (Venture Publishing: State College.)

Brown G. , Koth B. , Kreag G. , and Weber D. (2006). ‘Managing Australia’s Protected Areas: A Review of Visitor Management Models, Frameworks and Processes.’ (Sustainable Tourism CRC: Gold Coast.)

Carson D., Taylor A. (2008) Sustaining four wheel drive tourism in desert Australia: exploring the evidence from a demand perspective. The Rangeland Journal 30, 77–83.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 24 August 2009).

Dept of Local Government and Regional Development (2008). Statistical snapshot – regional economy. Government of Western Australia, Perth. Available at: www.dlgrd.wa.gov.au (accessed 19 September 2008).

Dwyer L., Forsyth P., Spurr R. (2004) Evaluating tourism’s economic effects: new and old approaches. Tourism Management 25, 307–317.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 7 July 2006).

Leiper N. (1990) Tourist attraction systems. Annals of Tourism Research 17, 367–384.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 7 July 2009).

O’Grady C. (2004). The historical geography of six major river basins in the north-west of Western Australia since pastoral occupation. PhD Thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.

Parr J. (1999) Growth-pole strategies in regional economic planning: a retrospective view. Part 1. Origins and advocacy. Urban Studies 36, 1195–1215.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 7 July 2009).

Seaton A. (1999) Book towns as tourism developments in peripheral areas. International Journal of Tourism Research 1, 389–399.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Smith A. , Hughes M. , Wood D. , and Glasson J. (2008). ‘Inventory of Tourism Assets on Department of Environment and Conservation Rangeland Properties.’ (Sustainable Tourism CRC: Gold Coast.)

Southern Rangelands Advisory Group (2009). ‘A Review of the Economic and Ecological Sustainability of Pastoralism in the Southern Rangelands of Western Australia.’ (Government of Western Australia: Perth.)

URS (2004). ‘Final Evaluation of the Gascoyne-Murchison Strategy.’ (WA Dept of Agriculture and Gascoyne-Murchison Strategy Board: Geraldton.)

WA Department of Environment and Conservation (2007). ‘Living Next Door to the Department of Environment and Conservation: Statewide 2006 Survey Results.’ (Department of Environment and Conservation: Perth.)

Williams R. , and Thomas P. (2005). A Report Prepared for the Pastoral Lands Board of Western Australia by the Department of Agriculture. Department of Agriculture Western Australia, Perth.

Woinarski J., Fisher A. (2003) Conservation and the maintenance of biodiversity in the rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 25, 157–171.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1