Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sustainable livelihoods approach through the lens of the State-and-Transition Model in semi-arid pastoral systems

Marcos H. Easdale A C D and Dardo R. López B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), EEA Bariloche, Desarrollo Rural. Modesta Victoria 4450 (8400), San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.

B INTA, Estación Forestal Villa Dolores, Av. Illia 303 (5870) Villa Dolores, Córdoba, Argentina.

C Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET).

D Corresponding author. Email: easdale.marcos@inta.gob.ar

The Rangeland Journal 38(6) 541-551 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ15091
Submitted: 9 September 2016  Accepted: 19 October 2016   Published: 14 December 2016

Abstract

Dealing with complex challenges worldwide regarding sustainable development and environmental management requires applied frameworks to understand and manage change in complex social-ecological systems. In this regard, frameworks that have originated from different research arenas such as the State-and-Transition Model and the sustainable livelihoods approach provide a conceptual basis for theory and operative integration. The aim of this paper was to provide a conceptual model for social-ecological research and sustainable management in semi-arid pastoral systems. We suggest integrating the state-and-transition model by including structural and functional features of social-ecological systems into the sustainable livelihoods approach. Both attributes are analysed at a household level in five types of capital that typically comprise social-ecological systems: natural, human, manufactured, social and financial. We propose to perform the structural-functional analysis for each capital as separate sub-systems in order to assess the impact of different disturbance factors. Some implications of this framework are explained by providing an example of the impact of drought in smallholder pastoral systems from semi-arid rangelands of North-West Patagonia, Argentina. This approach is encouraging as a step towards two main challenges: (i) the provision of applied frameworks for social-ecological assessment and management, and (ii) an attempt to bring closer science and decision making.

Additional keywords: disturbance, rangeland, resilience, social-ecological systems, threshold, vulnerability.


References

Adams, J., Faust, K., and Lovasi, G. S. (2012). Capturing context: Integrating spatial and social networks analyses. Social Networks 34, 1–5.
Capturing context: Integrating spatial and social networks analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Adler, P. S., and Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27, 17–40.

Andersen, T., Carstensen, J., Hernandez-Garcia, E., and Duarte, C. M. (2009). Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 49–57.
Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ares, J. O. (2007). Systems valuing of natural capital and investment in extensive pastoral systems: Lessons from the Patagonian case. Ecological Economics 62, 162–173.
Systems valuing of natural capital and investment in extensive pastoral systems: Lessons from the Patagonian case.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Azqueta, D., and Sotelsek, D. (2007). Valuing nature: From environmental impacts to natural capital. Ecological Economics 63, 22–30.
Valuing nature: From environmental impacts to natural capital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., and Webb, P. (2001). Nonfarm income diversification and household strategies in rural Africa: concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy 26, 315–331.
Nonfarm income diversification and household strategies in rural Africa: concepts, dynamics, and policy implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2003). ‘Navigating Social-ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Bestelmeyer, B. T., and Briske, D. D. (2012). Grand challenges for resilience-based management of rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 65, 654–663.
Grand challenges for resilience-based management of rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bestelmeyer, B. T., Brown, J. R., Havstad, K. M., Chavez, G., Alexander, R., and Herrick, J. E. (2003). Development and use of state and transition models for rangelands. Journal of Range Management 56, 114–126.
Development and use of state and transition models for rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bestelmeyer, B. T., Tugel, A. J., Peacock, G. L., Robinett, D. G., Shaver, P. L., Brown, J. R., Herrick, J. E., Sanchez, H., and Havstad, K. M. (2009). State-and-transition models for heterogeneous landscapes: a strategy for development and application. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62, 1–15.
State-and-transition models for heterogeneous landscapes: a strategy for development and application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bestelmeyer, B. T., Moseley, K., Shaver, P. L., Sanchez, H., Briske, D. D., and Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2010). Practical guidance for developing state-and-transition models. Rangelands 32, 23–30.
Practical guidance for developing state-and-transition models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bestelmeyer, B. T., Goolsby, D. P., and Archer, S. R. (2011). Spatial perspectives in state-and-transition models: a missing link to land management? Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 746–757.
Spatial perspectives in state-and-transition models: a missing link to land management?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brian, K. (2007). ‘Human Capital: How What you Know Shapes your Life.’ (OECD Publishing: Paris, France.)

Briske, D. D., Fuhlendorf, S. D., and Smeins, F. E. (2005). State-and-transition models, thresholds, and rangeland health: a synthesis of ecological concepts and perspectives. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58, 1–10.
State-and-transition models, thresholds, and rangeland health: a synthesis of ecological concepts and perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Briske, D. D., Fuhlendorf, S. D., and Smeins, F. E. (2006). A unified framework for assessment and application of ecological thresholds. Rangeland Ecology and Management 59, 225–236.
A unified framework for assessment and application of ecological thresholds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Briske, D. D., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Stringham, T. K., and Shaver, P. L. (2008). Recommendations for development of resilience-based state-and-transition models. Rangeland Ecology and Management 61, 359–367.
Recommendations for development of resilience-based state-and-transition models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior 22, 345–423.
The network structure of social capital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B. H., Anderies, J. M., and Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4, 765–781.
From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jäger, J., and Mitchell, R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 8086–8091.
Knowledge systems for sustainable development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXlsFGnsrc%3D&md5=72aa4341883d3b235a6f1724a7b5ebc2CAS |

Chiesura, A., and de Groot, R. (2003). Critical natural capital: A socio-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics 44, 219–231.
Critical natural capital: A socio-cultural perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clark, W. C., and Dickson, N. M. (2003). Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 8059–8061.
Sustainability science: the emerging research program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXlsFGnsro%3D&md5=0ba4866648dc5812429c1d82522598ceCAS |

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, S95–S120.
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cooper, A. C., Gimeno-Gascon, F. J., and Woo, C. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing 9, 371–395.
Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Daly, H. (1994). Operationalizing sustainable development by investing in natural capital. In: ‘Investing in Natural Capital: the Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability’. (Eds A. M. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Folke and R. Costanza.) pp. 22–37. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Daly, H. E., and Farley, J. (2004). ‘Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Davies, J., White, J., Wright, A., Maru, Y., and La Flamme, M. (2008). Applying the sustainable livelihoods approach in Australian desert Aboriginal development. The Rangeland Journal 30, 55–65.
Applying the sustainable livelihoods approach in Australian desert Aboriginal development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Groot, R., Wilson, M. A., and Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem function, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41, 393–408.
A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem function, goods and services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Domptail, S. E., Easdale, M. H., and Yuerlita, (2013). Managing socio-ecological systems to achieve sustainability: A study of resilience and robustness. Environmental Policy and Governance 23, 30–45.
Managing socio-ecological systems to achieve sustainability: A study of resilience and robustness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Easdale, M. H. (2016). Zero Net Livelihood Degradation – The quest for a multidimensional protocol to combat desertification. SOIL 2, 129–134.
Zero Net Livelihood Degradation – The quest for a multidimensional protocol to combat desertification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Easdale, M. H., and Aguiar, M. R. (2012). Regional forage production assessment in arid and semiarid rangelands – a step towards social-ecological analysis. Journal of Arid Environments 83, 35–44.
Regional forage production assessment in arid and semiarid rangelands – a step towards social-ecological analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Easdale, M. H., and Domptail, S. E. (2014). Fate can be changed! Arid rangelands in a globalizing world- a complementary co-evolutionary perspective on the current ‘desert syndrome’. Journal of Arid Environments 100–101, 52–62.
Fate can be changed! Arid rangelands in a globalizing world- a complementary co-evolutionary perspective on the current ‘desert syndrome’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Easdale, M. H., and Rosso, H. (2010). Dealing with drought: social implications of different smallholder survival strategies in semi-arid rangelands of Northern Patagonia, Argentina. The Rangeland Journal 32, 247–255.
Dealing with drought: social implications of different smallholder survival strategies in semi-arid rangelands of Northern Patagonia, Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Easdale, M. H., Sacchero, D., Vigna, M., and Willems, P. (2014). Assessing the magnitude of impact of volcanic ash deposits on Merino-wool production and fibre traits in the context of a drought in North-west Patagonia, Argentina. The Rangeland Journal 36, 143–149.
Assessing the magnitude of impact of volcanic ash deposits on Merino-wool production and fibre traits in the context of a drought in North-west Patagonia, Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Easdale, M. H., Aguiar, M. R., and Paz, R. (2016). A social-ecological network analysis of Argentinean Andes transhumant pastoralism. Regional Environmental Change 16, 2243–2252.
A social-ecological network analysis of Argentinean Andes transhumant pastoralism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ekins, P. (1992). A four-capital model of wealth creation. In: ‘Real-life Economics: Understanding Wealth Creation’. (Eds P. Ekins and M. Max-Neef.) pp. 147–155. (Routledge: London/New York.)

Ekins, P., Simon, S., Deutsch, L., Folke, C., and de Groot, R. (2003). A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics 44, 165–185.
A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ellis, F. (2000). The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics 51, 289–302.
The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Escobal, J. (2001). The determinants of nonfarm income diversification in rural Peru. World Development 29, 497–508.
The determinants of nonfarm income diversification in rural Peru.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Faber, M., Frank, K., Klauer, B., Manstetten, R., Schiller, J., and Wissel, Ch. (2005). On the foundation of a general theory of stocks. Ecological Economics 55, 155–172.
On the foundation of a general theory of stocks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16, 253–267.
Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Glasbergen, P. (2011). Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically: the Ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool. Environmental Policy and Governance 21, 1–13.
Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically: the Ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Groffman, P. M., Baron, J. S., Blett, T., Gold, A. J., Goodman, I., Gunderson, L. H., Levinson, B. M., Palmer, M. A., Paerl, H. W., Peterson, G. D., LeRoy Poff, N., Rejeski, D. W., Reynolds, J. F., Turner, M. G., Weathers, K. C., and Wiens, J. (2006). Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9, 1–13.
Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (2002). ‘Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Jansen, K. (2009). Implicit sociology, interdisciplinarity and systems theories in agricultural science. Sociologia Ruralis 49, 172–188.
Implicit sociology, interdisciplinarity and systems theories in agricultural science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Janssen, M. A., Bodin, Ö., Anderies, J. M., Elmqvist, T., Ernstson, H., McAllister, R. R. J., Olsson, P., and Ryan, P. (2006). Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11, 15.

Jerneck, A., and Olsson, L. (2008). Adaptation and the poor-development, resilience and transition. Climate Policy 8, 170–182.
Adaptation and the poor-development, resilience and transition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jerneck, A., Olsson, L., Ness, B., Anderberg, S., Baier, M., Clark, E., Hickler, T., Hornborg, A., Kronsell, A., Lövbrand, E., and Persson, J. (2011). Structuring sustainability science. Sustainability Science 6, 69–82.
Structuring sustainability science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kitzberger, T., Aráoz, E., Gowda, J. H., Mermoz, M., and Morales, J. M. (2012). Decreases in fire spread probability with forest age promotes alternative community states, reduced resilience to climate variability and large fire regime shifts. Ecosystems 15, 97–112.
Decreases in fire spread probability with forest age promotes alternative community states, reduced resilience to climate variability and large fire regime shifts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

López, D. R., Cavallero, L., Brizuela, M. A., and Aguiar, M. R. (2011). Ecosystemic structural-functional approach of the state and transition model. Applied Vegetation Science 14, 6–16.
Ecosystemic structural-functional approach of the state and transition model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

López, D. R., Brizuela, M. A., Willems, P., Siffredi, G., Aguiar, M. R., and Bran, D. (2013). Linking ecosystem resistance, resilience and stability in steppes of north Patagonia. Ecological Indicators 24, 1–11.
Linking ecosystem resistance, resilience and stability in steppes of north Patagonia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McAllister, R. R. J., Cheers, B., Darbas, T., Davies, J., Richards, C., Robinson, C. J., Ashley, M., Fernando, D., and Maru, T. (2008). Social networks in arid Australia: a review of concepts and evidence. The Rangeland Journal 30, 167–176.
Social networks in arid Australia: a review of concepts and evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McAllister, R. R. J., Holcombe, S., Davies, J., Cleary, J., Boyle, A., Tremblay, P., Stafford Smith, D. M., Rockstroh, D., LaFlamme, M., Young, M., and Rola-Rubzen, M. F. (2011). Desert networks: A conceptual model for the impact of scarce, variable and patchy resources. Journal of Arid Environments 75, 164–173.
Desert networks: A conceptual model for the impact of scarce, variable and patchy resources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meert, H., van Huylenbroeck, G., Vernimmen, T., Bourgeois, M., and van Hecke, E. (2005). Farm household survival strategies and diversification on marginal farms. Journal of Rural Studies 21, 81–97.
Farm household survival strategies and diversification on marginal farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharwani, S., Ziervogel, G., Walker, B., Birkmann, J., Van der Leeuw, S., Rockström, J., Hinkel, J., Downing, T., Folke, C., and Nelson, D. (2010). Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society 15, 11.

Müller, F., Hoffmann-Kroll, R., and Wiggering, H. (2000). Indicating ecosystem integrity — theoretical concepts and environmental requirements. Ecological Modelling 130, 13–23.
Indicating ecosystem integrity — theoretical concepts and environmental requirements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nahapiet, J. (2011). A social perspective: exploring the links between human and social capital. In: ‘The Oxford Handbook of Human Capital’. (Eds A. Burton-Jones and J. C. Spender.) pp. 71–95. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N., and Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32, 395–419.
Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Niehof, A. (2004). The significance of diversification for rural livelihood systems. Food Policy 29, 321–338.
The significance of diversification for rural livelihood systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olsson, L., Jerneck, A., Thoren, H., Persson, J., and O’Byrne, D. (2015). Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience. Science Advances 1, e1400217.
Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oñatibia, G. R., Aguiar, M. R., and Semmartin, M. (2015). Are there any trade-offs between forage provision and the ecosystem service of C and N storage in arid rangelands? Ecological Engineering 77, 26–32.
Are there any trade-offs between forage provision and the ecosystem service of C and N storage in arid rangelands?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 15181–15187.
A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFagtb7I&md5=b3778ca563cc0dbbf47178e9c4c4a2dfCAS |

Pintér, L., Hardi, P., Martinuzzi, A., and Hall, J. (2012). Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecological Indicators 17, 20–28.
Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reynolds, J. F., and Stafford Smith, D. M. (2002). ‘Global Desertification: Do Humans Cause Deserts?’ (Dahlem University Press: Berlin, Germany.)

Reynolds, J. F., Stafford Smith, D. M., Lambín, E. F., Turner, B. L., Mortimore, M., Batterbury, S. P. J., Downing, T. E., Dowlatabadi, H., Fernández, R., Herrick, J. E., Huber-Sannwald, E., Jiang, H., Leemans, R., Lynam, T., Maestre, F. T., Ayrza, M., and Walker, B. (2007). Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316, 847–851.
Global desertification: building a science for dryland development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXltVentb4%3D&md5=cc123797173a8462843c8cc35a6bd996CAS |

Reza, M. I. H., and Abdullah, S. A. (2011). Regional Index of Ecological Integrity: A need for sustainable management of natural resources. Ecological Indicators 11, 220–229.
Regional Index of Ecological Integrity: A need for sustainable management of natural resources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Röling, N. (1999). Modelling the soft side of land: the potential of multi agent systems. In: ‘Integral Design: Innovation in Agriculture and Resource Management’. (Ed. C. Leeuwis.) pp. 73–98. (Mansholt Institute: Wageningen, The Netherlands.)

Scheffer, M., and Carpenter, S. R. (2003). Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 648–656.
Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scoones, I. (1998). ‘Sustainable Rural Livelihoods. A Framework for Analysis.’ (IDS: Brighton, UK.)

Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspective and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, 171–196.
Livelihoods perspective and rural development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Suding, K. N., and Hobbs, R. J. (2009). Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 271–279.
Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Texeira, M., and Paruelo, J. M. (2006). Demography, population dynamics and sustainability of the Patagonian sheep flocks. Agricultural Systems 87, 123–146.
Demography, population dynamics and sustainability of the Patagonian sheep flocks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., and Schiller, A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 8074–8079.
A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXlsFGnsrk%3D&md5=9865772fa9ef99c821e0d11dff9754a1CAS |

Van Dyke, C. (2015). Boxing daze–using state-and-transition models to explore the evolution of socio-biophysical landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography 39, 594–621.
Boxing daze–using state-and-transition models to explore the evolution of socio-biophysical landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Villagra, E. S., Easdale, M. H., Giraudo, C. G., and Bonvissuto, G. L. (2015). Productive and income contributions of sheep, goat, and cattle, and different diversification schemes in smallholder production systems of Northern Patagonia, Argentina. Tropical Animal Health and Production 47, 1373–1380.
Productive and income contributions of sheep, goat, and cattle, and different diversification schemes in smallholder production systems of Northern Patagonia, Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., and Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9, Article No. 5.

Weisz, H., Suh, S., and Graedel, T. E. (2015). Industrial ecology: The role of manufactured capital in sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 6260–6264.
Industrial ecology: The role of manufactured capital in sustainability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXosFKgurw%3D&md5=a7835bf676325e135d85669861210222CAS |

Westley, F., Carpenter, S. R., Brock, W. A., Holling, C. S., and Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Why systems of people and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In: ‘Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems’. (Eds L. H. Gunderson and C. S. Holling.) pp. 103–120. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Westoby, M., Walker, B. H., and Noy-Meir, I. (1989). Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal of Range Management 42, 266–274.
Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zheng, W. (2010). A social capital perspective of innovation from individuals to nations: where is empirical literature directing us? International Journal of Management Reviews 12, 151–183.
A social capital perspective of innovation from individuals to nations: where is empirical literature directing us?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |