Is there unwarranted variation in obstetric practice in Australia? Obstetric intervention trends in Queensland hospitals
Haylee Fox
A C , Emily Callander B , Daniel Lindsay A and Stephanie M. Topp A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia. Email: daniel.lindsay1@jcu.edu.au; stephanie.topp@jcu.edu.au
B School of Medicine, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Southport, Qld 4214, Australia. Email: e.callander@griffith.edu.au
C Corresponding author. Email: haylee.fox1@my.jcu.edu.au
Australian Health Review 45(2) 157-166 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20014
Submitted: 24 January 2020 Accepted: 13 July 2020 Published: 1 February 2021
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to report on the rates of obstetric interventions within each hospital jurisdiction in the state of Queensland, Australia.
Methods This project used a whole-of-population linked dataset that included the health and cost data of all mothers who gave birth in Queensland, Australia, between 2012 and 2015 (n = 186 789), plus their babies (n = 189 909). Adjusted and unadjusted rates of obstetric interventions and non-instrumental vaginal delivery were reported within each hospital jurisdiction in Queensland.
Results High rates of obstetric intervention exist in both the private and public sectors, with higher rates demonstrated in the private than public sector. Within the public sector, there is substantial variation in rates of intervention between hospital and health service jurisdictions after adjusting for confounding variables that influence the need for obstetric intervention.
Conclusions Due to the high rates of obstetric interventions statewide, a deeper understanding is needed of what factors may be driving these high rates at the health service level, with a focus on the clinical necessity of the provision of Caesarean sections.
What is known about the topic? Variation in clinical practice exists in many health disciplines, including obstetric care. Variation in obstetric practice exists between subpopulation groups and between states and territories in Australia.
What does this paper add? What we know from this microlevel analysis of obstetric intervention provision within the Australian population is that the provision of obstetric intervention varies substantially between public sector hospital and health services and that this variation is not wholly attributable to clinical or demographic factors of mothers.
What are the implications for practitioners? Individual health service providers need to examine the factors that may be driving high rates of Caesarean sections within their institution, with a focus on the clinical necessity of Caesarean section.
References
[1] Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, Moller AB, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, de Lyra Rabello Neto D, Temmerman M. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in Caesarean sections. Lancet 2018; 392 1341–8.| Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in Caesarean sections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30322584PubMed |
[2] Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán A, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary Caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Report 30. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
[3] Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, Oladapo OT, Souza JP, Tuncalp O, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu AM. What is the optimal rate of Caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health 2015; 12 57
| What is the optimal rate of Caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26093498PubMed |
[4] Ye J, Betrán AP, Guerrero Vela M, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary Cesarean delivery. Birth 2014; 41 237–44.
| Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary Cesarean delivery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24720614PubMed |
[5] World Health Organization (WHO). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
[6] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s mothers and babies 2001. Canberra: AIHW; 2004.
[7] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s mothers and babies 2016 – in brief. Canberra: AIHW; 2018.
[8] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). National core maternity indicators – Stage 3 and 4. Canberra: AIHW; 2016.
[9] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s mothers and babies 2017 – in brief. Canberra: AIHW; 2019.
[10] Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph K, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer M, Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned Cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ 2007; 176 455–60.
| Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned Cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17296957PubMed |
[11] van Dillen J, Zwart JJ, Schutte J, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Severe acute maternal morbidity and mode of delivery in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89 1460–5.
| Severe acute maternal morbidity and mode of delivery in the Netherlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20955100PubMed |
[12] Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Gissler M. Severe maternal morbidity and the mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87 662–8.
| Severe maternal morbidity and the mode of delivery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18568466PubMed |
[13] Pretlove SJ, Thompson PJ, Toozs‐Hobson PM, Radley S, Khan KS. Does the mode of delivery predispose women to anal incontinence in the first year postpartum? A comparative systematic review. BJOG 2008; 115 421–34.
| Does the mode of delivery predispose women to anal incontinence in the first year postpartum? A comparative systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18271879PubMed |
[14] Abenhaim HA, Tulandi T, Wilchesky M, Platt R, Spence AR, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Suissa S. Effect of Cesarean delivery on long-term risk of small bowel obstruction. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 354–9.
| Effect of Cesarean delivery on long-term risk of small bowel obstruction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29324607PubMed |
[15] Gurol-Urganci I, Bou-Antoun S, Lim C, Cromwell DA, Mahmood TA, Templeton A, van der Meulen JH. Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 1943–52.
| Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23644593PubMed |
[16] O’Neill SM, Kearney PM, Kenny LC, Henriksen TB, Lutomski JE, Greene RA, Khashan AS. Caesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancy interval: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13 165
| Caesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancy interval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23981569PubMed |
[17] DiMatteo MR, Morton SC, Lepper HS, Damush TM, Carney MF, Pearson M, Kahn KL. Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 1996; 15 303–14.
| Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 8818678PubMed |
[18] Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with Cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2018; 15 e1002494
| Long-term risks and benefits associated with Cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29360829PubMed |
[19] Dahlen HG, Tracy S, Tracy M, Bisits A, Brown C, Thornton C. Rates of obstetric intervention and associated perinatal mortality and morbidity among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW (2000–2008): a linked data population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2014; 4 e004551
| Rates of obstetric intervention and associated perinatal mortality and morbidity among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW (2000–2008): a linked data population-based cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24848087PubMed |
[20] Clark EA, Silver RM. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat Cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 S2–10.
| Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat Cesarean delivery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22114995PubMed |
[21] Hyde MJ, Mostyn A, Modi N, Kemp PR. The health implications of birth by Caesarean section. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2012; 87 229–43.
| The health implications of birth by Caesarean section.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21815988PubMed |
[22] Tracy SK, Tracy MB, Sullivan E. Admission of term infants to neonatal intensive care: a population‐based study. Birth 2007; 34 301–7.
| Admission of term infants to neonatal intensive care: a population‐based study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18021145PubMed |
[23] Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GHA, Homer CSE, Gibbons D, Kelly NM, Powell Kennedy H, Kidanto H, Taylor P, Temmerman M. Short-term and long-term effects of Caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet 2018; 392 1349–57.
| Short-term and long-term effects of Caesarean section on the health of women and children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30322585PubMed |
[24] Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2 CD000081
| Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28176333PubMed |
[25] Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, et al Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 513–23.
| Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30089070PubMed |
[26] Dunne C, Da Silva O, Schmidt G, Natale R. Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective Caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks’ gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009; 31 1124–30.
| Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective Caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks’ gestation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20085677PubMed |
[27] Roberts CL, Tracy S, Peat B. Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study. BMJ 2000; 321 137–41.
| Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10894690PubMed |
[28] Halpern SH, Leighton BL, Ohlsson A, Barrett JF, Rice A. Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1998; 280 2105–10.
| Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9875879PubMed |
[29] Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1999; 3 CD000331
| Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Howell CJ, Kidd C, Roberts W, Upton P, Lucking L, Jones PW, Johanson RB. A randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non‐epidural analgesia in labour. BJOG 2001; 108 27–33.
| A randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non‐epidural analgesia in labour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11213000PubMed |
[31] Enkin M, Keirse MJ, Chalmers I, Enkin E. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1989.
[32] Bor P, Ledertoug S, Boie S, Knoblauch NO, Stornes I. Continuation versus discontinuation of oxytocin infusion during the active phase of labour: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2016; 123 129–35.
| Continuation versus discontinuation of oxytocin infusion during the active phase of labour: a randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26309128PubMed |
[33] Harris JC, Carter CS. Therapeutic interventions with oxytocin: current status and concerns. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2013; 52 998–1000.
| Therapeutic interventions with oxytocin: current status and concerns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24074464PubMed |
[34] Buckley SJ, Dip O. Undisturbed birth: nature’s blueprint for ease and ecstasy. J Prenat Perinat Psychol Health 2003; 17 261–88.
[35] Callander EJ, Fenwick J, Donnellan-Fernandez R, Toohill J, Creedy DK, Gamble J, Fox H, Ellwood D. Cost of maternity care to public hospitals: a first 1000-days perspective from Queensland. Aust Health Rev 2019; 43 556–64.
| 31303194PubMed |
[36] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s health 2014: understanding health and illness. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.
[37] Daley J, Duckett S, Goss P, Norton A, Terrill M, Wood D, Wood T, Coates B. Commonwealth orange book 2019. Melbourne: Grattan Institute; 2019.
[38] Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). Australian atlas of healthcare variation 2017: 3.4 Caesarean section. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2017. Available at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/australian-atlas-healthcare-variation-2017-34-caesarean-section-0 [verified 30 May 2019].
[39] National Health Performance Committee. National health performance framework report. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2001.
[40] World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendations non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
[41] Queensland Health. Normal birth. Brisbane: Queensland Government; 2018.
[42] New South Wales Health. Maternity – towards normal birth in NSW. Sydney: NSW Department of Health; 2010.
[43] Department of Health and Ageing. Improving maternity services in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.
[44] Commonwealth of Australia. National maternity services plan 2010. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2011. Available at: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/8AF951CE492C799FCA257BF0001C1A4E/$File/maternityplan.pdf [verified 18 November 2020].
[45] Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council (AHMAC). Strategic directions for Australian maternity services. Canberra: AHMAC; 2018.
[46] Betrán AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Musana O, Wanyonyi SZ, Gülmezoglu AM, Downe S. Interventions to reduce unnecessary Caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet 2018; 392 1358–68.
| Interventions to reduce unnecessary Caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30322586PubMed |
[47] World Health Organization (WHO). Robson classification: implementation manual. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
[48] Queensland Health. Queensland perinatal data collection manual. Brisbane: Queensland Health, Statistical Services Branch; 2020.
[49] Callander EJ, Fox H. What are the costs associated with child and maternal healthcare within Australia? A study protocol for the use of data linkage to identify health service use, and health system and patient costs. BMJ Open 2018; 8 e017816
| What are the costs associated with child and maternal healthcare within Australia? A study protocol for the use of data linkage to identify health service use, and health system and patient costs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29437751PubMed |
[50] Queensland Health. Data quality statement – comprehensive Queensland perinatal data collection. Brisbane: Queensland Health, Statistical Services Branch; 2020.
[51] Mesterton J, Lindgren P, Abreu AE, Ladfors L, Lilja M, Saltvedt S, Amer-Wåhlin I. Case mix adjustment of health outcomes, resource use and process indicators in childbirth care: a register-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16 125
| Case mix adjustment of health outcomes, resource use and process indicators in childbirth care: a register-based study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27245845PubMed |
[52] Mesterton J, Ladfors L, Abreu AE, Lindgren P, Saltvedt S, Weichselbraun M, Amer-Wåhlin I. Case mix adjusted variation in Cesarean section rate in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96 597–606.
| Case mix adjusted variation in Cesarean section rate in Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28222233PubMed |
[53] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2033.0.55.001 – Census of population and housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2016: IRSD. Canberra: ABS; 2018. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/2033.0.55.001~2016~Main%20Features~IRSD~19 [verified 22 December 2020].
[54] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). National core maternity indicators. Canberra: AIHW; 2018.
[55] Fox H, Callander E, Lindsay D, Topp S. Evidence of overuse? Patterns of obstetric interventions during labour and birth among Australian mothers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19 226
| 31272397PubMed |
[56] Dankwah E, Kirychuk S, Zeng W, Feng C, Farag M. Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of Caesarean section delivery in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data. Int J Equity Health 2019; 18 162
| Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of Caesarean section delivery in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31653255PubMed |
[57] Dahlen HG, Tracy S, Tracy M, Bisits A, Brown C, Thornton C. Rates of obstetric intervention among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW: a population-based descriptive study. BMJ Open 2012; 2 e001723
| Rates of obstetric intervention among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW: a population-based descriptive study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22964120PubMed |
[58] Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4 CD004667
| Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27121907PubMed |
[59] Tracy SK, Welsh A, Hall B, Hartz D, Lainchbury A, Bisits A, White J, Tracy MB. Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14 46
| Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24456576PubMed |
[60] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Hospital resources 2014–15: Australian hospital statistics. Canberra: AIHW; 2016.
[61] Fox H, Topp SM, Callander E, Lindsay D. A review of the impact of financing mechanisms on maternal health care in Australia. BMC Pub Health 2019; 19 1540
[62] Bita N. Doctors pushing mums-to-be for early delivery. The Courier Mail, 14 July 2018. Available at: https://www.couriermail.com.au/doctors-pushing-women-to-induce-babies-at-39-weeks-to-reduce-stillbirths [verified 30 May 2019].
[63] Collard S. WA caesarean birth rates highest on record as numbers of private c-sections soar. ABC News, 13 August 2018. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-13/wa-caesarean-rates-highest-on-record/10114098 [verified 18 November 2020].
[64] The Feed. Debate: ‘Are government efforts to reduce the C-section rate a good thing?’ A midwife argues ‘yes’. SBS, 18 September 2018. Available at: https://www.sbs.com.au/news/the-feed/debate-are-government-efforts-to-reduce-the-c-section-rate-a-good-thing-a-midwife-argues-yes [verified 30 May 2019].
[65] Dow A. Caesarean rates soar with doctors ‘less prepared to take risks’. The Sydney Morning Herald, 25 October 2018. Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/healthcare/caesarean-rates-soar-with-doctors-less-prepared-to-take-risks-20181025-p50bzs.html [verified 22 December 2020].
[66] Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112 489–94.
| 26249251PubMed |
[67] Laws P, Abeywardana S, Walker J, Sullivan EA. Australia’s mothers and babies 2005. Perinatal statistics series no. 20. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) cat. no. PER 40. Sydney: AIHW Natioanl Perinatal Statistics Unit; 2007. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/67e797a5-1f21-49af-8f22-9f15648cfb1c/amb05.pdf.aspx?inline=true [verified 22 December 2020].
[68] National Rural Health Alliance, Inc. (NRHA). Position paper: Principles for maternity services in rural and remote Australia: October 2006. Canberra: NRHA; 2006. Available at: https://www.ruralhealth.org.au/sites/default/files/position-papers/position-paper-06-10-17.pdf [verified 18 November 2020].
[69] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s mothers and babies 1991. Canberra: AIHW; 1991.
[70] Rolfe MI, Donoghue DA, Longman JM, Pilcher J, Kildea S, Kruske S, Kornelsen J, Grzybowski S, Barclay L, Morgan GG. The distribution of maternity services across rural and remote Australia: does it reflect population need? BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17 163
| The distribution of maternity services across rural and remote Australia: does it reflect population need?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28231830PubMed |
[71] Queensland Health. Torres and Cape HHS self-assessment summary. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2018.
[72] Queensland Health. Cairns and Hinterland HHS self-assessment summary. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2018.
[73] Walsh T. Queensland rural maternity taskforce report June 2019. Aust Midwifery News 2019; 19 37
[74] Yu S, Fiebig D, Viney R, Scarf V, Homer C. Private provider incentives in health care: the case of birth interventions. CHERE Working Paper 2019/01. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney; 2019.
[75] Kingdon C, Downe S, Betran AP. Interventions targeted at health professionals to reduce unnecessary Caesarean sections: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 2018; 8 e025073
| Interventions targeted at health professionals to reduce unnecessary Caesarean sections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30559163PubMed |
[76] Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM, WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section WHO statement on Caesarean section rates. BJOG 2016; 123 667–70.
| WHO statement on Caesarean section rates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26681211PubMed |
[77] Boatin AA, Schlotheuber A, Betran AP, Moller AB, Barros AJD, Boerma T, Torloni MR, Victoria CG, Hosseinpoor AR. Within country inequalities in Caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries. BMJ 2018; 360 k55
| Within country inequalities in Caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29367432PubMed |
