Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
EDITORIAL

How long should clinicians spend sampling the pharynx for gonorrhoea culture specimens?

Sarah Stuart A , Daniel Richardson https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0955-6307 A B * , Collins Iwuji A B and Suneeta Soni A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9PX, UK.

B Sexual Health and HIV, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, BN2 5BE, UK.

* Correspondence to: docdanielr@hotmail.com

Handling Editor: Eric Chow

Sexual Health 19(1) 74-75 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH21203
Submitted: 8 October 2021  Accepted: 5 November 2021   Published: 31 December 2021

© 2021 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

There are few data on the length of time clinicians should take sampling the pharynx to optimise the sensitivity of gonorrhoea culture specimens and we aimed to gain a consensus on sampling time. The estimated mean time clinicians reported that they spent sampling the pharynx for gonorrhoea culture specimens was 4.63 s (s.d. ± 2.04). There was no significant difference in sampling times between clinicians who had worked in sexual health for over and under 10 years, (4.7 (s.d. ±2.02) vs 4.6 (s.d. ± 2.3); P = 0.45). We are now using these findings to design an educational tool with the aim of improving pharyngeal gonorrhoea culture sensitivity.

Keywords: gag reflex, gonorrhoea, gonorrhoea culture, men who have sex with men, pharynx, sampling, sexual health clinicians, sexually transmitted infections.

Pharyngeal gonorrhoea is highly prevalent among men who have sex with men (MSM) and the pharynx is an important site for the development and transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).1 Rising AMR continues to threaten the effective management of gonorrhoea and as such is an urgent public health threat.1 National guidelines recommend that specimens for culture should be taken in all cases of suspected and confirmed gonorrhoea.2 However, the sensitivity of gonorrhoea culture from the pharynx is low (27% compared with NAAT at this centre) and is dependent on several factors, including the sampling technique used by clinicians.3 Previous studies from Australia have demonstrated that increasing the surface area of swab taking, increasing the anatomical sites of the oropharynx being sampled, increasing the pressure applied during swabbing and eliciting gag reflex are all associated with an improvement in detection rate by culture.4,5 However, data are lacking for the length of time clinicians should take sampling the pharynx to optimise gonorrhoea culture sensitivity. Furthermore there are no published guidelines on optimal pharyngeal sampling technique for gonorrhoea culture. We aimed to gain a consensus of opinion on the sampling time for pharyngeal gonorrhoea culture specimens from sexual health clinicians to standardise practice.

As part of a service improvement project to increase gonorrhoea culture positivity from pharyngeal culture samples, we disseminated a short anonymous online survey to sexual health clinicians in our local Sussex (UK) sexual health clinical network (Brighton, Worthing and Eastbourne) in November 2020. We asked clinicians how long they had been working in sexual health, how long they take sampling (in total number of seconds) the pharynx for gonorrhoea culture specimens and the frequency at which they elicit the gag reflex. Using pictorial diagrams, we asked which anatomical sites of the pharynx they would sample for gonorrhoea culture specimens (posterior wall of the pharynx, tonsils or both). Ethical approval was not required as this was part of a service improvement project to increase the quality of pharyngeal sampling among clinicians.

A total of 110/136 clinians responded to our survey; 12 were excluded because they did not regularly take pharyngeal swabs for gonorrhoea culture and 52/98 (53%) reported that they had worked in sexual health for more than 10 years. Eighty-two (84%) reported that they took samples from the tonsils, 75/98 (76%) the posterior wall and 94/98 (96%) took samples from both the tonsils and the posterior wall. Less than half (46/98; 47%) of the clinicians reported that they attempted to elicit the gag reflex either always or sometimes. The estimated mean time clinicians reported that they spent sampling the pharynx for gonorrhoea culture specimens was 4.63 seconds (s.d. ± 2.04). There was no significant difference in estimated mean sampling times between clinicians who had worked in sexual health for over and under 10 years (4.7 (s.d. ± 2.02) vs 4.6 (s.d. ± 2.3); P = 0.45).

There is variation in practice among sexual health clinicians when sampling the pharynx for gonorrhoea culture specimens, but reassuringly we found no difference between experienced and less experienced clinicians. Our finding of the average sampling time (4.63 s) will standardise and strengthen existing recommendations for pharyngeal sampling for gonorrhoea culture.

Considering the roll out of widespread pharyngeal sampling for COVID-19 testing we anticipate greater acceptance of thorough pharyngeal sampling. We are now using these findings to design an educational tool with the aim of improving pharyngeal gonorrhoea culture sensitivity.


Data availability

All data from this study are presented in this research letter.


Conflicts of interest

None of the authors have any disclosure of conflicts of interest for this work.


Declaration of funding

This research did not receive any specific funding.


Author contributions

S. Soni and DR designed the study; S. Stuart, S. Soni and DR designed the clinician survey; S. Stuart, DR and CI analysed the data; and all authors contributed to the final manuscript.



References

[1]  PHB. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in England and Wales: key findings from the gonococcal resistance to antimicrobials surveillance programme (GRASP 2018). PHB; 2019. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/834924/GRASP__2018_report.pdf [accessed 27 February 2021]

[2]  Fifer H, Saunders J, Soni S, Sadiq ST, Fitzgerald M. 2018 UK national guideline for the management of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Int J STD AIDS 2020; 31 4–15.
2018 UK national guideline for the management of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31870237PubMed |

[3]  Richardson D, Pickering A, Trotman D, Nichols K, Buss Z, Devlin J, Finnerty F. Pharyngeal gonorrhoea in men who have sex with men. Int J STD AIDS 2021; 32 449–52.
Pharyngeal gonorrhoea in men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33533296PubMed |

[4]  Razali MF, Fairley CK, Hocking J, Bradshaw CS, Chen MY. Sampling technique and detection rates for pharyngeal gonorrhea using culture. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37 522–4.
Sampling technique and detection rates for pharyngeal gonorrhea using culture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20661116PubMed |

[5]  Mitchell M, Rane V, Fairley CK, Whiley DM, Bradshaw CS, Bissessor M, Chen MY. Sampling technique is important for optimal isolation of pharyngeal gonorrhoea. Sex Transm Infect 2013; 89 557–60.
Sampling technique is important for optimal isolation of pharyngeal gonorrhoea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23694937PubMed |