Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
REVIEW (Open Access)

Digital sexually transmitted infection and HIV services across prevention and care continuums: evidence and practical resources

Joseph D. Tucker https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2804-1181 A B * , Jane Hocking https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9329-8501 C , David Oladele D and Claudia Estcourt E F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

B Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

C Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

D Clinical Research Department, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.

E School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

F Sandyford Sexual Health Services, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK.

* Correspondence to: jdtucker@med.unc.edu

Handling Editor: Jason Ong

Sexual Health - https://doi.org/10.1071/SH22023
Submitted: 8 February 2022  Accepted: 5 May 2022   Published online: 16 June 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Increased demand for sexual health services (including prevention and treatment) have spurred the development of digital STI/HIV services. Earlier advances in testing technologies opened the door for self-testing and self-sampling approaches, in line with broader self-care strategies. Advances in HIV management mean that many people are living well with HIV and no longer need intensive in-person monitoring, whereas those at-risk of HIV are recommended to have regular asymptomatic STI screening and pre-exposure prophylaxis. This narrative review examines the evidence and implications of digital STI/HIV services, focused on promoting testing, facilitating testing, clinical management and referrals, partner services, and prevention. We have used a prevention and care continuum to structure the review to increase utility to policy as well as practice. Digital STI/HIV services can be interwoven into existing clinical pathways to enhance face-to-face services or standalone digital STI/HIV services. A growing evidence base, including randomised controlled trials and observational studies, should help inform strategies for designing effective digital STI/HIV services. However, most studies to date have focused on high-income countries and people with smartphones, despite a substantial burden of STI/HIV in low- and middle-income countries. There are also important differences between digital STI and HIV services that require careful consideration. We discuss digital STI/HIV service evidence and implications to inform research and programs in this exciting field.

Keywords: chlamydia, clinical, digital, e-health, gonorrhoea, HIV, m-health, partner services, social media, STI.


References

[1]  Cao B, Gupta S, Wang J, Hightow-Weidman LB, Muessig KE, Tang W, et al. Social media interventions to promote HIV testing, linkage, adherence, and retention: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 e394
Social media interventions to promote HIV testing, linkage, adherence, and retention: systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29175811PubMed |

[2]  Cao B, Bao H, Oppong E, Feng S, Smith KM, Tucker JD, et al. Digital health for sexually transmitted infection and HIV services: a global scoping review. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2020; 33 44–50.
Digital health for sexually transmitted infection and HIV services: a global scoping review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31789695PubMed |

[3]  WHO. Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. Geneva: WHO; 2021.

[4]  Kpokiri EE, Marley G, Tang W, Fongwen N, Wu D, Berendes S, et al. Diagnostic infectious diseases testing outside clinics: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020; 7 ofaa360
Diagnostic infectious diseases testing outside clinics: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33072806PubMed |

[5]  Tucker JD, Bien CH, Peeling RW. Point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections: recent advances and implications for disease control. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2013; 26 73–9.
Point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections: recent advances and implications for disease control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23242343PubMed |

[6]  Marcus JL, Sewell WC, Balzer LB, Krakower DS. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for HIV prevention: emerging approaches to ending the epidemic. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2020; 17 171–9.
Artificial intelligence and machine learning for HIV prevention: emerging approaches to ending the epidemic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32347446PubMed |

[7]  Muessig KE, Pike EC, Legrand S, Hightow-Weidman LB. Mobile phone applications for the care and prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases: a review. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15 e1
Mobile phone applications for the care and prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23291245PubMed |

[8]  Shen K, Yang NS, Huang W, Fitzpatrick TS, Tang W, Zhao Y, et al. A crowdsourced intervention to decrease hepatitis B stigma in men who have sex with men in China: a cohort study. J Viral Hepat 2020; 27 135–42.
A crowdsourced intervention to decrease hepatitis B stigma in men who have sex with men in China: a cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31571341PubMed |

[9]  Ong JJ, Fu H, Baggaley RC, Wi TE, Tucker JD, Smith MK, et al. Missed opportunities for sexually transmitted infections testing for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis users: a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc 2021; 24 e25673
Missed opportunities for sexually transmitted infections testing for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis users: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33605081PubMed |

[10]  Erausquin JT, Tan RKJ, Uhlich M, Francis JM, Kumar N, Campbell L, et al. The International Sexual Health And Reproductive Health Survey (I-SHARE-1): a multi-country analysis of adults from 30 countries prior to and during the initial COVID-19 wave. medRxiv 2021; 21263630
The International Sexual Health And Reproductive Health Survey (I-SHARE-1): a multi-country analysis of adults from 30 countries prior to and during the initial COVID-19 wave.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Jiang H, Xie Y, Xiong Y, Zhou Y, Lin K, Yan Y, et al. HIV self-testing partially filled the HIV testing gap among men who have sex with men in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an online survey. J Int AIDS Soc 2021; 24 e25737
HIV self-testing partially filled the HIV testing gap among men who have sex with men in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an online survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34036750PubMed |

[12]  Honeyman M, Maguire D, Evans H, Davies A. Digital technology and health inequalities: a scoping review. Cardiff: Public Health Wales NHS Trust; 2020.

[13]  Gilliam M, Chor J, Hill B. Digital media and sexually transmitted infections. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 26 381–5.
Digital media and sexually transmitted infections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25105560PubMed |

[14]  Daher J, Vijh R, Linthwaite B, Dave S, Kim J, Dheda K, et al. Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996–2017). BMJ Open 2017; 7 e017604
Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996–2017).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29101138PubMed |

[15]  Wadham E, Green C, Debattista J, Somerset S, Sav A. New digital media interventions for sexual health promotion among young people: a systematic review. Sex Health 2019; 16 101–23.
New digital media interventions for sexual health promotion among young people: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30819326PubMed |

[16]  Meiksin R, Melendez-Torres GJ, Falconer J, Witzel TC, Weatherburn P, Bonell C. eHealth interventions to address sexual health, substance use, and mental health among men who have sex with men: systematic review and synthesis of process evaluations. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23 e22477
eHealth interventions to address sexual health, substance use, and mental health among men who have sex with men: systematic review and synthesis of process evaluations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33890855PubMed |

[17]  Berendes S, Gubijev A, McCarthy OL, Palmer MJ, Wilson E, Free C. Sexual health interventions delivered to participants by mobile technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97 190–200.
Sexual health interventions delivered to participants by mobile technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33452130PubMed |

[18]  Zang X, Mah C, Linh Quan AM, Min JE, Armstrong WS, Behrends CN, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus transmission by HIV risk group and along the HIV care continuum: a contrast of six US cities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2022; 89 143–150.
Human immunodeficiency virus transmission by HIV risk group and along the HIV care continuum: a contrast of six US cities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34723929PubMed |

[19]  Vourli G, Noori T, Pharris A, Porter K, Axelsson M, Begovac J, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus continuum of care in 11 European Union Countries at the End of 2016 overall and by key population: have we made progress? Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71 2905–16.
Human immunodeficiency virus continuum of care in 11 European Union Countries at the End of 2016 overall and by key population: have we made progress?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32960957PubMed |

[20]  WHO/TDR/SESH/SIHI. Public engagement and crowdfunding in health research: a practical guide. Geneva: WHO; 2021.

[21]  Taggart T, Grewe ME, Conserve DF, Gliwa C, Roman Isler M. Social media and HIV: a systematic review of uses of social media in HIV communication. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 e248
Social media and HIV: a systematic review of uses of social media in HIV communication.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26525289PubMed |

[22]  Palmer MJ, Henschke N, Villanueva G, Maayan N, Bergman H, Glenton C, et al. Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 8 Cd013680
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32779730PubMed |

[23]  Pan SW, Stein G, Bayus B, Mathews A, Wang C, Wei C, et al. Systematic review of design contests for health: spurring innovation and mass engagement. BMJ Innovations 2017; 3 227–37.
| 29576873PubMed |

[24]  WHO/TDR/SESH/SIHI. Crowdsourcing in health and health research: a practical guide. Geneva: WHO/TDR; 2018.

[25]  Tucker JD, Day S, Tang W, Bayus B.. Crowdsourcing in medical research: concepts and applications. PeerJ 2019; 7 e6762
Crowdsourcing in medical research: concepts and applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30997295PubMed |

[26]  CDC. Social marketing. 2021. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/effective-interventions/respond/social-marketing/index.html

[27]  UNAIDS/AVACC. Good participatory practice. 2011. Available at https://www.avac.org/good-participatory-practice

[28]  Syred J, Holdsworth G, Howroyd C, Spelman K, Baraitser P. Choose to test: self-selected testing for sexually transmitted infections within an online service. Sex Transm Infect 2019; 95 171–4.
Choose to test: self-selected testing for sexually transmitted infections within an online service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30842345PubMed |

[29]  Aicken CR, Estcourt CS, Johnson AM, Sonnenberg P, Wellings K, Mercer CH. Use of the internet for sexual health among sexually experienced persons aged 16 to 44 years: evidence from a nationally representative survey of the british population. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 e14
Use of the internet for sexual health among sexually experienced persons aged 16 to 44 years: evidence from a nationally representative survey of the british population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26792090PubMed |

[30]  Veerus P, Hallik R, Jänes J, Jõers K, Paapsi K, Laidra K, et al. Human papillomavirus self-sampling for long-term non-attenders in cervical cancer screening: a randomised feasibility study in Estonia. J Med Screen 2022; 29 53–60.
Human papillomavirus self-sampling for long-term non-attenders in cervical cancer screening: a randomised feasibility study in Estonia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34694179PubMed |

[31]  Tang W, Han L, Best J, Zhang Y, Mollan K, Kim J, et al. Crowdsourcing HIV test promotion videos: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial in China. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62 1436–42.
Crowdsourcing HIV test promotion videos: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial in China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27129465PubMed |

[32]  Tang W, Ritchwood TD, Wu D, Ong JJ, Wei C, Iwelunmor J, et al. Crowdsourcing to improve HIV and sexual health outcomes: a scoping review. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2019; 16 270–8.
Crowdsourcing to improve HIV and sexual health outcomes: a scoping review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31155691PubMed |

[33]  Tang W, Wei C, Cao B, Wu D, Li KT, Lu H, et al. Crowdsourcing to expand HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: a closed cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 2018; 15 e1002645
Crowdsourcing to expand HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: a closed cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30153265PubMed |

[34]  Sri-Pathmanathan C, Nhamo D, Mamvuto T, Chapwanya G, Terris-Prestholt F, Mahaka I, et al. Syphilis self-testing to expand test uptake among men who have sex with men: a theoretically informed mixed methods study in Zimbabwe. Sex Transm Infect 2022; 98 197–202.
Syphilis self-testing to expand test uptake among men who have sex with men: a theoretically informed mixed methods study in Zimbabwe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33927008PubMed |

[35]  Wang C, Ong JJ, Zhao P, Weideman AM, Tang W, Smith MK, et al. Expanding syphilis test uptake using rapid dual self-testing for syphilis and HIV among men who have sex with men in China: a multiarm randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 2022; 19 e1003930
Expanding syphilis test uptake using rapid dual self-testing for syphilis and HIV among men who have sex with men in China: a multiarm randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 35235573PubMed |

[36]  Wu D, Zhou Y, Yang N, Huang S, He X, Tucker J, et al. Social media-based secondary distribution of human immunodeficiency virus/syphilis self-testing among chinese men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73 e2251–7.
Social media-based secondary distribution of human immunodeficiency virus/syphilis self-testing among chinese men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32588883PubMed |

[37]  WHO. Hepatitis C virus self-testing. WHO; 2021.

[38]  Oladele D. USSD confirmation of HIV self-testing results. NIMR; 2021.

[39]  Wang C, Han L, Stein G, Day S, Bien-Gund C, Mathews A, et al. Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review. Infect Dis Poverty 2020; 9 8
Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31959234PubMed |

[40]  Wu D, Ong JJ, Tang W, Ritchwood TD, Walker JS, Iwelunmor J, et al. Crowdsourcing methods to enhance HIV and sexual health services: a scoping review and qualitative synthesis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2019; 82 S271–8.
Crowdsourcing methods to enhance HIV and sexual health services: a scoping review and qualitative synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31764263PubMed |

[41]  Wilson E, Free C, Morris TP, Syred J, Ahamed I, Menon-Johansson AS, et al. Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: a randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. PLoS Med 2017; 14 e1002479
Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: a randomised, single-blind, controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29281628PubMed |

[42]  McGuire M, de Waal A, Karellis A, Janssen R, Engel N, Sampath R, et al. HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: a systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021). EClinMed 2021; 39 101059
HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: a systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[43]  Han L, Tang W, Ritchwood TD, Day S, Wei S, Bao H, et al. Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process. BMJ Open 2021; 11 e048699
Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34740928PubMed |

[44]  PHE. National framework for e-sexual and reproductive healthcare. Public Health England; 2021.

[45]  BASHH. Guidance for the design of self-sampling packs and associated support for self-sampling processes within sexually transmitted infection and blood borne virus testing. British Association for Sexual Health and HIV; 2021.

[46]  RSRH/BASHH. Standards for online and remote providers of sexual and reproductive health services. British Association for Sexual Health and HIV; 2019.

[47]  Exten C, Pinto CN, Gaynor AM, Meyerson B, Griner SB, Van Der Pol B, et al. Direct-to-consumer sexually transmitted infection testing services: a position statement from the american sexually transmitted diseases association. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48 e155–9.
Direct-to-consumer sexually transmitted infection testing services: a position statement from the american sexually transmitted diseases association.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34030157PubMed |

[48]  WHO. Guidelines on HIV self-testing and partner notification. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

[49]  Estcourt CS, Gibbs J, Sutcliffe LJ, Gkatzidou V, Tickle L, Hone K, et al. The eSexual health clinic system for management, prevention, and control of sexually transmitted infections: exploratory studies in people testing for Chlamydia trachomatis. Lancet Public Health 2017; 2 e182–90.
The eSexual health clinic system for management, prevention, and control of sexually transmitted infections: exploratory studies in people testing for Chlamydia trachomatis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29253450PubMed |

[50]  Horvath T, Azman H, Kennedy GE, Rutherford GW. Mobile phone text messaging for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2012 Cd009756
Mobile phone text messaging for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[51]  Rousseau E, Julies RF, Madubela N, Kassim S. Novel platforms for biomedical HIV prevention delivery to key populations – community mobile clinics, peer-supported, pharmacy-Led PrEP delivery, and the use of telemedicine. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2021; 18 500–7.
Novel platforms for biomedical HIV prevention delivery to key populations – community mobile clinics, peer-supported, pharmacy-Led PrEP delivery, and the use of telemedicine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34708316PubMed |

[52]  Adeagbo O, Herbst C, Blandford A, McKendry R, Estcourt C, Seeley J, et al. Exploring people’s candidacy for mobile health-supported HIV testing and care services in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 e15681
Exploring people’s candidacy for mobile health-supported HIV testing and care services in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31738174PubMed |

[53]  Amankwaa I, Boateng D, Quansah DY, Akuoko CP, Evans C. Effectiveness of short message services and voice call interventions for antiretroviral therapy adherence and other outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2018; 13 e0204091
Effectiveness of short message services and voice call interventions for antiretroviral therapy adherence and other outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30240417PubMed |

[54]  Kachur R, Hall W, Coor A, Kinsey J, Collins D, Strona FV. The use of technology for sexually transmitted disease partner services in the united states: a structured review. Sex Transm Dis 2018; 45 707–12.
The use of technology for sexually transmitted disease partner services in the united states: a structured review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29771868PubMed |

[55]  Balán IC, Lopez-Rios J, Nayak S, Lentz C, Arumugam S, Kutner B, et al. SMARTtest: a smartphone app to facilitate HIV and syphilis self- and partner-testing, interpretation of results, and linkage to care. AIDS Behav 2020; 24 1560–73.
SMARTtest: a smartphone app to facilitate HIV and syphilis self- and partner-testing, interpretation of results, and linkage to care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31679075PubMed |

[56]  CDC. The Toolkit for technology-based partner services. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021.

[57]  NCSD. Guidelines for Internet-based partner services. National Coalition of STD Directors; 2008.

[58]  Larson H. Stuck: how vaccine rumors start - and why they don’t go away. New York: Oxford University Press; 2020.

[59]  Dunn AG, Surian D, Leask J, Dey A, Mandl KD, Coiera E. Mapping information exposure on social media to explain differences in HPV vaccine coverage in the United States. Vaccine 2017; 35 3033–40.
Mapping information exposure on social media to explain differences in HPV vaccine coverage in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28461067PubMed |

[60]  Jarrett C, Wilson R, O’Leary M, Eckersberger E, Larson HJ. Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy – a systematic review. Vaccine 2015; 33 4180–90.
Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy – a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25896377PubMed |

[61]  Du J, Luo C, Shegog R, Bian J, Cunningham RM, Boom JA, et al. Use of deep learning to analyze social media discussions about the human papillomavirus vaccine. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 e2022025
Use of deep learning to analyze social media discussions about the human papillomavirus vaccine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33185676PubMed |

[62]  Asare M, Popelsky B, Akowuah E, Lanning BA, Montealegre JR. Internal and external validity of social media and mobile technology-driven HPV vaccination interventions: systematic review using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Vaccines 2021; 9 197
Internal and external validity of social media and mobile technology-driven HPV vaccination interventions: systematic review using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33652809PubMed |

[63]  Ortiz RR, Smith A, Coyne-Beasley T. A systematic literature review to examine the potential for social media to impact HPV vaccine uptake and awareness, knowledge, and attitudes about HPV and HPV vaccination. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 15 1465–75.
A systematic literature review to examine the potential for social media to impact HPV vaccine uptake and awareness, knowledge, and attitudes about HPV and HPV vaccination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30779682PubMed |

[64]  Fitzpatrick T, Tang W, Mollan K, Pan X, Chan PL, Zhou K, et al. A crowdsourced intervention to promote hepatitis B and C testing among men who have sex with men in China: a nationwide online randomized controlled trial. EClinMed 2019; 16 64–73.
A crowdsourced intervention to promote hepatitis B and C testing among men who have sex with men in China: a nationwide online randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[65]  Turner KME, Looker KJ, Syred J, Zienkiewicz A, Baraitser P. Online testing for sexually transmitted infections: a whole systems approach to predicting value. PLoS ONE 2019; 14 e0212420
Online testing for sexually transmitted infections: a whole systems approach to predicting value.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30794589PubMed |

[66]  Graham H. Understanding health inequalities. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 2009.

[67]  Gann B. Digital inclusion and health in wales. J Consum Health Internet 2019; 23 146–60.

[68]  McAuley A. Digital health interventions: widening access or widening inequalities? Public Health 2014; 128 1118–20.
| 25458115PubMed |

[69]  WHO Regional Office for Europe. From innovation to implementation: eHealth in the WHO European Region. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2016.

[70]  Day S, Li C, Hlatshwako TG, Abu-Hijleh F, Han L, Deitelzweig C, et al. Assessment of a crowdsourcing open call for approaches to university community engagement and strategic planning during COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 e2110090
Assessment of a crowdsourcing open call for approaches to university community engagement and strategic planning during COVID-19.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33988706PubMed |

[71]  Mathews A, Conserve D, Mason H, Alston L, Rennie S, Tucker J. ‘Informed and empowered’: a mixed-methods study of crowdsourcing contests to promote uptake of HIV self-testing kits among African Americans. J Virus Erad 2020; 6 74–80.
‘Informed and empowered’: a mixed-methods study of crowdsourcing contests to promote uptake of HIV self-testing kits among African Americans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32405425PubMed |

[72]  Tan RKJ, Wu D, Day S, Zhao Y, Larson HJ, Sylvia S, et al. Digital approaches to enhancing community engagement in clinical trials. npj Digit Med 2022; 5 37
Digital approaches to enhancing community engagement in clinical trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 35338241PubMed |

[73]  Sumray K, Lloyd KC, Estcourt S, Burns F, Gibbs J. Scoping review of online postal sexually transmitted infection services: access, usage and clinical outcomes. Sex Transm Infect 2021;
Scoping review of online postal sexually transmitted infection services: access, usage and clinical outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[74]  Rahib D, Delagreverie H, Gabassi A, Le Thi TT, Vassel E, Vodosin P, et al. Online self-sampling kits to screen multipartner MSM for HIV and other STIs: participant characteristics and factors associated with kit use in the first 3 months of the MemoDepistages programme, France, 2018. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97 134–40.
Online self-sampling kits to screen multipartner MSM for HIV and other STIs: participant characteristics and factors associated with kit use in the first 3 months of the MemoDepistages programme, France, 2018.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33397802PubMed |

[75]  Gilbert M, Thomson K, Salway T, Haag D, Grennan T, Fairley CK, et al. Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada. Sex Transm Infect 2019; 95 151–6.
Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29437984PubMed |

[76]  Middleton A, Pothoulaki M, Woode Owusu M, Flowers P, Mapp F, Vojt G, et al. How can we make self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and bloodborne viruses more inclusive? A qualitative study with people with mild learning disabilities and low health literacy. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97 276–81.
How can we make self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and bloodborne viruses more inclusive? A qualitative study with people with mild learning disabilities and low health literacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33906976PubMed |

[77]  Li C, Xiong Y, Sit HF, Tang W, Hall BJ, Muessig KE, et al. A men who have sex with men-friendly doctor finder hackathon in Guangzhou, China: development of a mobile health intervention to enhance health care utilization. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8 e16030
A men who have sex with men-friendly doctor finder hackathon in Guangzhou, China: development of a mobile health intervention to enhance health care utilization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32130189PubMed |

[78]  Kickbusch I, Agrawal A, Jack A, Lee N, Horton R. Governing health futures 2030: growing up in a digital world-a joint The Lancet and Financial Times Commission. Lancet 2019; 394 1309
Governing health futures 2030: growing up in a digital world-a joint The Lancet and Financial Times Commission.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31548090PubMed |

[79]  Morrison A, Polisena J, Husereau D, Moulton K, Clark M, Fiander M, et al. The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012; 28 138–44.
The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22559755PubMed |