Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Optimising the delivery of sexual health services in Australia: a qualitative study

Varsicka Kularadhan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-1673 A B , Christopher K. Fairley https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9081-1664 C D , Marcus Chen C D , Jade Bilardi C D E , Ria Fortune C , Eric P. F. Chow https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1766-0657 C D F , Tiffany Philips https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6920-7710 C D § and Jason J. Ong https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5784-7403 C D G § *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Monash University, School of Rural Health, Bendigo, Vic., Australia.

B Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Vic., Australia.

C Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

D Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

E Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

F Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

G Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

* Correspondence to: Jason.Ong@monash.edu
# These authors contributed equally to this paper

Handling Editor: Jane Hocking

Sexual Health 19(4) 376-385 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH22024
Submitted: 29 January 2022  Accepted: 27 July 2022   Published: 23 August 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background: With a rise in sexually transmitted infections in Australia, it is important to evaluate and optimise current sexual health services to reduce barriers to access and increase testing. We aimed to describe the range of sexual health services in Australia, focusing on strategies to improve testing among priority populations, and any future strategies participants believed would improve service delivery.

Methods: We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with key informants working in Australian sexual health services from July to December 2020, and collected data on service characteristics and strategies to improve access. We used content analysis, then coded and categorised the data into recurring themes and sub-themes.

Results: We identified two major themes: ‘Expanding Traditional Service Delivery’ and ‘Thinking Outside the Box’. The first theme outlines strategies that build upon pre-existing service delivery models, such as express clinics and an increased focus on confidentiality. The second theme outlines new strategies introduced to fill gaps in service delivery, such as self-testing and outreach.

Conclusions: To improve access to HIV/STI testing, there is a need for multiple access points to cater for a range of populations and their preferences. Establishing strategies to accomplish this involves utilising a combination of expanding traditional service models and implementing new approaches to service delivery.

Keywords: Australian sexual health services, health service delivery, HIV, priority populations, service providers, sexually transmitted infection, strategies, strategies to optimise.


References

[1]  Hengel B, Guy R, Garton L, Ward J, Rumbold A, Taylor-Thomson D, et al. Barriers and facilitators of sexually transmissible infection testing in remote Australian Aboriginal communities: results from the Sexually Transmitted Infections in Remote Communities, Improved and Enhanced Primary Health Care (STRIVE) Study. Sex Health 2015; 12 4–12.
Barriers and facilitators of sexually transmissible infection testing in remote Australian Aboriginal communities: results from the Sexually Transmitted Infections in Remote Communities, Improved and Enhanced Primary Health Care (STRIVE) Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Denison HJ, Bromhead C, Grainger R, Dennison EM, Jutel A. Barriers to sexually transmitted infection testing in New Zealand: a qualitative study. Aust N Z J Public Health 2017; 41 432–7.
Barriers to sexually transmitted infection testing in New Zealand: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Footman A, Dagama D, Smith CH, Van Der Pol B. A systematic review of new approaches to sexually transmitted infection screening framed in the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior model of implementation science. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48 S58–65.
A systematic review of new approaches to sexually transmitted infection screening framed in the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior model of implementation science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19 349–57.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000; 23 334–40.
Whatever happened to qualitative description?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J. Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol 2009; 9 52
Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Rampin R, Rampin V. Taguette: open-source qualitative data analysis. J Open Source Software 2021; 6 3522
Taguette: open-source qualitative data analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Poljski C, Atkin L, Williams H. Review of sexual health clinical services in Victoria. Family Planning Victoria; 2019.

[9]  Rana J, Guiang CB, Lisk R, Shahin R, Brunetta J, Mitterni L, et al. Survey of health care providers’ practices and opinions regarding bacterial sexually transmitted infection testing among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48 94–102.
Survey of health care providers’ practices and opinions regarding bacterial sexually transmitted infection testing among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Mullens AB, Duyker J, Brownlow C, Lemoire J, Daken K, Gow J. Point-of-care testing (POCT) for HIV/STI targeting MSM in regional Australia at community ‘beat’ locations. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19 93
Point-of-care testing (POCT) for HIV/STI targeting MSM in regional Australia at community ‘beat’ locations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Mullens AB, Daken K, Lemoire J, Brownlow C, Driver G, Gow J. HIV point of care testing (PoCT) at late-night sex on premises venues (SOPV) for gay and bisexual men and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM): a mixed methods analysis. AIDS Behav 2020; 24 450–66.
HIV point of care testing (PoCT) at late-night sex on premises venues (SOPV) for gay and bisexual men and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM): a mixed methods analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Turner SD, Anderson K, Slater M, Quigley L, Dyck M, Guiang CB. Rapid point-of-care HIV testing in youth: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health 2013; 53 683–91.
Rapid point-of-care HIV testing in youth: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Hengel B, Jamil MS, Mein JK, Maher L, Kaldor JM, Guy RJ. Outreach for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes. BMC Public Health 2013; 13 1040
Outreach for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Katz DA, Golden MR, Hughes JP, Farquhar C, Stekler JD. HIV self-testing increases HIV testing frequency in high-risk men who have sex with men: a randomized controlled trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018; 78 505–12.
HIV self-testing increases HIV testing frequency in high-risk men who have sex with men: a randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Habel MA, Brookmeyer KA, Oliver-Veronesi R, Haffner MM. Creating innovative sexually transmitted infection testing options for university students: the impact of an STI self-testing program. Sex Transm Dis 2018; 45 272–7.
Creating innovative sexually transmitted infection testing options for university students: the impact of an STI self-testing program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |