Engaging citizens to conduct large-scale qualitative research: lessons learnt from a community-engaged research project on queer men’s lived experiences of health in Singapore
Shao Yuan Chong
A # , Benedict Xin Hao Tan B # , Daniel Weng Siong Ho B # , Ye Xuan Wee C * , Muhammad Hafiz bin Jamal D , Rayner Kay Jin Tan E and A
B
C
D
E
# These authors contributed equally to this paper
Handling Editor: Ucheoma Nwaozuru
Abstract
HIV science has made significant progress, but community engagement in some contexts remains suboptimal, with marginalized and key populations being left behind. Discriminatory policies, medical mistrust, stigma and a lack of resources remain key roadblocks. Citizen-led, community-engaged approaches hold promise in subverting power structures that reproduce such barriers and allow us to leverage community resources.
We draw on our experience of a collaborative research project between the National University of Singapore and RainbowAsia, a community-based organization addressing the needs of young gay, bisexual and queer men in Singapore. The study focused on stigma, resilience, relationships, sexual partnerships and mental health among Singaporean gay, bisexual and queer men, and commenced in June 2022. Despite being a high-income country, research funding for HIV key populations in Singapore remains sparse, as local funders prioritize less politically sensitive topics while international funders rightfully focus funding on resource limited settings. A citizen-led approach was therefore implemented out of necessity and a desire by community members to translate research into evidence-based programs. We propose a citizen science framework comprising eight key phases, including: (1) developing a research and implementation pipeline, (2) stakeholder and resource mapping, (3) delegation of expertise, (4) creating plans for equity, (5) developing a research plan, (6) generating evidence, (7) dissemination and translation, and (8) plans for sustainability and impact. Cross-cutting processes across all phases include the adoption of deliberative democratic processes, training and mentorship, and (re)negotiation of power and recognition for all stakeholders. A total of 44 in-depth interviews were completed, transcribed, and analyzed by a core research team and 26 volunteer research assistants. The entire study required crowdfunding USD1600.00 for participant reimbursements, but otherwise leveraged academic, community and citizen resources to accomplish the study’s outputs.
Our case study illustrates a microcosm of how research evidence can be generated, disseminated, and translated by citizens and communities into evidence-based programs at the community level. Our framework aligns itself with stakeholder engagement principles, and can provide a roadmap for sustainable collaborative research between academic, community and citizen stakeholders.
Keywords: citizen science, community engagement, HIV key population, LGBTQIA+, participatory research, qualitative research, Singapore, stakeholder engagement.
References
1 Amirrudin A, Harrigan N, Naqvi I. Scaled, citizen-led, and public qualitative research: a framework for citizen social science. Curr Sociol 2023; 71(6): 1019-1039.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
3 Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. BMJ 2015; 350: h1258.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Kpokiri EE, Sri-Pathmanathan C, Shrestha P, et al. Crowdfunding for health research: a qualitative evidence synthesis and a pilot programme. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7(7): e009110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
5 Silvertown J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 2009; 24(9): 467-471.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Bonney R, Phillips TB, Ballard HL, et al. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Underst Sci 2016; 25(1): 2-16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
9 Israel BA, Parker EA, Rowe Z, et al. Community-based participatory research: lessons learned from the Centers for Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113(10): 1463-1471.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Stark E, Ali D, Ayre A, et al. Coproduction with Autistic adults: reflections from the authentistic research collective. Autism Adulthood 2020; 3(2): 195-203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
11 Wang C, Han L, Stein G, et al. Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review. Infect Dis Poverty 2020; 9(1): 8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Tan RKJ, Marley G, Kpokiri EE, et al. Participatory approaches to delivering clinical sexually transmitted infections services: a narrative review. Sex Health 2022; 19(4): 299-308.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
13 Goodman MS, Ackermann N, Bowen DJ, et al. Reaching consensus on principles of stakeholder engagement in research. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2020; 14(1): 117-127.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Tan BXH, Chong SY, Ho DWS, et al. Fostering citizen-engaged HIV implementation science. J Int AIDS Soc 2024; 27(Suppl 1): e26278.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
15 O’Hara CA, Foon XL, Ng JC. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI+) healthcare in Singapore: perspectives of non-governmental organisations and clinical year medical students. Med Educ Online 2023; et al. 28(1): 2172744.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
16 SG Mental Heath Matters. National Suicide Prevention Strategy White Paper. Project Hayat; 2024. Available at https://sgmentalhealthmatters.com/suicide-prevention
17 Tan RKJ, O’Hara CA, Koh WL, et al. Delineating patterns of sexualized substance use and its association with sexual and mental health outcomes among young gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Singapore: a latent class analysis. BMC Public Health 2021; 21: 1026.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
18 Tan RK, Yang DW, Le D, et al. Minority statuses and mental health outcomes among young gay, bisexual and queer men in Singapore. J LGBT Youth 2023; 20(1): 198-215.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
19 Tan RKJ, Low TQ, Le D, et al. Experienced homophobia and suicide among young gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer men in Singapore: Exploring the mediating role of depression severity, self-esteem, and outness in the Pink Carpet Y Cohort Study. LGBT Health 2021; 8(5): 349-358.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
21 Harrison J. ‘Nothing about us without us’: GLBTI older people and older people living with HIV-prospects, possibilities and self-determination. HIV Australia 2010; 8(3): 10-12.
| Google Scholar |
22 Chong SY, Tan BXH, Ho DWS, et al. Relegated to and thriving in the margins: a case study analysis of narratives of stigma and resilience amongst gay, bisexual and queer (GBQ) men in Singapore from an intersectional lens. In Council of university directors of clinical psychology diversifying clinical psychology conference, Council of University Directors of Clinical Psychology, Virtual. 14–15 April; 2023.
23 Wee YX, Chong SY, Jamal MH et al. Lonely and forced to experiment without guidance: explaining positive correlational effects between casual sex behaviour and postcoital dysphoria amongst GBQ+ Men in Singapore. In Association for behavioral and cognitive therapies first annual student research symposium, Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, Virtual. 3 June; 2023.
