The relative importance of socio-ecological factors in regard to psychosexual health among adolescent students: based on dominance analysis
Xiuqing Fang
A , Mengfan Zhang A , Mengjie Yang A , Wenjing Liu A , Linpei Dong A , Yawen Ren A , Wenguang Wang A , Ting Liu A B # * and Li Yang A B # *
A
B
# These authors contributed equally to this paper
Handling Editor: Heather Armstrong
Abstract
Psychosexual health refers to an individual’s capacity to acquire sexual knowledge through appropriate means, develop healthy values, accept bodily changes, align with socio-cultural norms and regulate sexual behaviors. The study aimed to explore the relative importance of general self-efficacy, sexual refusal self-efficacy, peer relationship, parental monitoring and parent–teen communication about sex in influencing psychosexual health among secondary vocational school students.
A total of 2895 secondary vocational school students from of Shandong province in China were selected to complete the General Self-Efficacy Scale, Sexual Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Peer Relationship Scale, Parental Monitoring Questionnaire, Parent–Teen Communication about Sex Questionnaire, School Connectedness Scale, School Sex Education Questionnaire and High School Student Psychosexual Health Scale. Dominance analysis was used for statistical analysis.
Dominance analysis revealed that importance rankings of the socio-ecological factors on psychosexual health in descending order were: peer relationship (the degree of contribution was 36.1%), parent–adolescent communication about sex (the degree of contribution was 34.2%), general self-efficacy (the degree of contribution was 14.5%), sexual refusal self-efficacy (the degree of contribution was 9.6%) and parental monitoring (the degree of contribution was 5.9%).
Peer relationship, parent–adolescent communication about sex, general self-efficacy, sexual refusal self-efficacy and parental monitoring are the main socio-ecological factors on psychosexual health among secondary vocational school students. Accordingly, helping students build good peer relationships, facilitating appropriate parent–adolescent communication about sex and proper parental monitoring, and increasing students’ general self-efficacy and sexual refusal self-efficacy are crucial measures to improve psychosexual health for secondary vocational school students.
Keywords: adolescent, dominance analysis, parent–adolescent communication, parental monitoring, peer relationship, psychosexual health, sexual health, social ecology system theory.
References
1 Sawyer SM, Azzopardi PS, Wickremarathne D, et al. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018; 2(3): 223-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Mastorci F, Lazzeri MFL, Vassalle C, et al. The transition from childhood to adolescence: between health and vulnerability. Children 2024; 11(8): 989.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
3 Kang S, Park MJ, Kim JM, et al. Ongoing increasing trends in central precocious puberty incidence among Korean boys and girls from 2008 to 2020. PLoS ONE 2023; 18(3): e0283510.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Paul C, Fitzjohn J, Herbison P, et al. The determinants of sexual intercourse before age 16. J Adolesc Health 2000; 27(2): 136-47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Epstein M, Madeline F, Kosterman R, et al. Adolescent age of sexual initiation and subsequent adult health outcomes. Am J Public Health 2018; 108(6): 822-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Etrawati F, Yeni Y, Lionita W, et al. Sexual risk behavior and its impact on unwanted pregnancy among adolescents. JIKM 2023; 14(3): 319-21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
7 Xu RB, Wen B, Song Y, et al. The change in mortality and major causes of death among Chinese adolescents from 1990 to 2016. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2018; 52(8): 802-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 WHO. Defining sexual health: report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002. Geneva: WHO; 2006. Available at http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/sexual_health/sh_definitions/en/
9 Luo Y, Zheng Y. A preliminary study on the sexual and psychological health of adolescents. Tongfang Knowledge Network (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.; 2006. Available at https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2006.03.035
10 Cicek Ozdemir S, Cevik E. The relationship between risky sexual behaviors and sexual health literacy and self-esteem in young women. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2025; 71(2): e20241040.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
11 Hensel DJ, Nance J, Fortenberry JD. The association between sexual health and physical, mental, and social health in adolescent women. J Adolesc Health 2016; 59(4): 416-21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Dou K, Feng X-K, Wang L-X, et al. Longitudinal association between parental involvement and internet gaming disorder among Chinese adolescents: consideration of future consequences as a mediator and peer victimization as a moderator. J Behav Addict 2022; 11(3): 820-30.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Chen X, Allen JL, Hesketh T. The influence of individual, peer, and family factors on the educational aspirations of adolescents in rural China. Soc Psychol Educ 2023; 26(3): 735-59.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
14 Minnis AM, Browne EN, Chavez M, et al. Early sexual debut and neighborhood social environment in Latinx youth. Pediatrics 2022; 149(3): e2021050861.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
15 Cook EF, Goldman L. Empiric comparison of multivariate analytic techniques: advantages and disadvantages of recursive partitioning analysis. J Chronic dis 1984; 37(9–10): 721-31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Yang D, Hu S, Li M. The influence of family socioeconomic status on adolescents’ mental health in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(13): 7824.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
17 Wang C, Hu Z, Liu Y. Evidences for reliability and validity of the Chinese version of general self-efficacy scale. Chin J Appl Psychol 2001; 7(1): 37-40.
| Google Scholar |
18 Xu J, Cheng Y, Lou C, et al. Effect of sexual negotiation self-efficacy on safe sex among unmarried migrant youth. Chin J Reprod Contracept 2012; 32(03): 179-84.
| Google Scholar |
19 Chen G, Zhu X, Ye L, et al. A revised report on the Shanghai norm of self-description questionnaire. J Psychol Sci 1997; 20(6): 499-503.
| Google Scholar |
20 Longmore MA, Eng AL, Giordano PC, et al. Parenting and adolescents’ sexual initiation. J Marriage Fam 2009; 71(4): 969-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
21 Yu CF, Zhang W, Zeng YY, et al. Relationship between adolescents’ gratitude and problem behavior: the mediating role of school connectedness. Psychol Dev Educ 2011; 27: 425-33.
| Google Scholar |
23 Baoguo X, Lirong L. Dominance Analysis and its Application. Psychol Sci 2006; 29(4): 922-5.
| Google Scholar |
24 Miller SA, Byers ES. An exploratory examination of the sexual intervention self-efficacy of clinical psychology graduate students. Train Educ Prof Psychol 2008; 2(3): 137-44.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
25 Wang Y, Yin F. Chain mediating effect of self－perceived social competence and peer relationshipon the loneliness and psychosexual health of left-behind adolescents. Chinese Rural Health Service Administration 2023; 02(43): 147-52.
| Google Scholar |
26 Yin F, Jiang W, Shao T, et al. Longitudinal association of cumulative ecological risk on psychosexual health in left-behind adolescents. Chin J Sch Health 2022; 7(43): 1070-4.
| Google Scholar |
27 Roach A. Supportive peer relationships and mental health in adolescence: an integrative review. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2018; 39(9): 723-37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Wang H, Xu J, Fu S, et al. Friend emotional support and dynamics of adolescent socioemotional problems. J Youth Adolesc 2024; 53(12): 2732-45.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
29 Miller PH. Developmental theories: past, present, and future. Dev Rev 2022; 66: 101049.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
30 Nesi J, Choukas-Bradley S, Prinstein MJ. Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 1-a theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2018; 21(3): 267-94.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
31 Cherewick M, Lebu S, Su C, et al. Study protocol of a distance learning intervention to support social emotional learning and identity development for adolescents using interactive mobile technology. Front Public Health 2021; 9: 623283.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
32 Guse K, Levine D, Martins S, et al. Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual health: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health 2012; 51(6): 535-43.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
33 Allsop Y. Setting the social media stage, a narrative review: the role of theory and research in understanding adolescent online sexual health information-seeking. Sexes 2024; 5(4): 544-78.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
34 Rogers AA. Parent–adolescent sexual communication and adolescents’ sexual behaviors: a conceptual model and systematic review. Adolescent Research Review 2017; 2(4): 293-313.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
35 Widman L, Choukas-Bradley S, Noar SM, et al. Parent-adolescent sexual communication and adolescent safer sex behavior: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2016; 170(1): 52-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
36 Hurst JL, Widman L, Maheux AJ, et al. Parent–child communication and adolescent sexual decision making: an application of family communication patterns theory. J Fam Psychol 2022; 36(3): 449-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
37 Thoma BC, Huebner DM. Parent-adolescent communication about sex and condom use among young men who have sex with men: an examination of the theory of planned behavior. Ann Behav Med 2018; 52(11): 973-87.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
38 Cederbaum JA, Rodriguez AJ, Sullivan K, et al. Attitudes, norms, and the effect of social connectedness on adolescent sexual risk intention. J Sch Health 2017; 87(8): 575-83.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
39 Schoon I, Henseke G. Social inequalities in young people’s mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: do psychosocial resource factors matter? Front Public Health 2022; 10: 820270.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
40 Dana NR, Yulia DI. Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between sexual education and prevention of sexually-transmitted diseases awareness among secondary school students in Padang City, Indonesia. Afr J Infect Dis 2024; 19(1): 57-63.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
41 Lei H, Yuan Y, Wang Z, et al. Measurement invariance and intergenerational parallelism of general self-efficacy in adolescent and parent dyads. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 1251.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
42 Rogala A, Szczepaniak M, Michalak N, et al. Internet-based self-help intervention aimed at increasing social self-efficacy among internal migrants in Poland: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv 2020; 21: 100322.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
43 Lu C, Liang L, Chen W, et al. A way to improve adolescents’ life satisfaction: school altruistic group games. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 533603.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
44 Huang S, Li X, Chen S-H, et al. Enhancing academic self-efficacy on decreasing adolescents’ unmonitored internet usage and depressive mood. Heliyon 2024; 10(1): e23286.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
45 De Graaf H, Ine V, Meijer S. Educational differences in adolescents’ sexual health: a pervasive phenomenon in a national Dutch sample. J Sex Res 2015; 52(7): 747-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
46 Siswantara P, Qomaruddin MB, Bilqis TRIB. How does self efficacy and motivation influence the adoption of sexual abstinence among students in Indonesia. Indian J Public Health 2024; 68(3): 428-30.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
47 Forrester EJ, Henke J, Knab J, et al. Promising predictors of adolescent sexual behavior outcomes: a systematic review of longitudinal research. J Adolesc Health 2025; 77: 29-40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
48 Zhao L. Evaluation of the effect of parental participation on chinese adolescent behavioral development through the mediating effect of peers: a moderated mediation model. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2024; 17: 1881-901.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
49 Peng B, Hu N, Yu H, et al. Parenting style and adolescent mental health: the chain mediating effects of self-esteem and psychological inflexibility. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 738170.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
50 Miller CR, Gajos JM, Cropsey KL. School connectedness and risk for sexual intercourse and nonconsensual sex in adolescence. Prev Sci 2024; 25(4): 661-72.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
51 Lee GY, Lee DY. Effects of a life skills-based sexuality education programme on the life-skills, sexuality knowledge, self-management skills for sexual health, and programme satisfaction of adolescents. Sex Educ 2019; 19(5): 519-33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
