Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Influence of dung pats on soil physical quality mediated by earthworms: from dung deposition to decay and beyond

M. G. Bacher https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-0640 A B , O. Schmidt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0098-7960 B C , G. Bondi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8896-0262 A and O. Fenton https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-2538 A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Teagasc, Environment Research Centre, Wexford, Ireland.

B UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.

C UCD Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

D Corresponding author. Email: owen.fenton@teagasc.ie

Soil Research 58(5) 421-429 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR19319
Submitted: 5 November 2019  Accepted: 17 April 2020   Published: 3 June 2020

Abstract

Soil quality determines the ability of soil to deliver ecosystem services and can be inferred from physical, biological and chemical indicators either in isolation or in combination. Earthworms are good soil-quality indicators that contribute to both chemical and physical quality by maintaining soil structure and cycling nutrients. The presence of dung pats can increase earthworm abundance locally and consequently the network of pores that they create through their burrowing activity. Inevitably this affects soil structure and consequently will have a spatially distributed effect on soil physical quality (SPQ). The aim of this field study was to examine the relationship between SPQ and earthworm abundance under dung and non-dung pat areas from deposition to decay and beyond. The present spatial and temporal study compared SPQ indicator (integral air-water energy, AWr) results with earthworm abundance across control and simulated dung pat treatments. Results showed that existing earthworm populations in this grassland were already very large (>500 individuals m–2) and SPQ (AWr) remained in the ‘very good’ category throughout the experiment. Earthworm abundance under dung pats and SPQ exhibited a significant (P = 0.05) temporal trend. In general, the time of decay of the dung pats played a role in increasing earthworm abundance and SPQ. Earthworm abundance and macropore density data formed a similar, ‘hump’-shaped dynamic over time. However, when an earthworm abundance threshold was exceeded (equivalent to about >3000 individuals m–2), the increase of SPQ under dung was attenuated and did increase further only under the control sward with high earthworm abundance. After 11 weeks, for both treatments, AWr under dung pats was capped at 0.83% and AWr under control sward peaked at 1.34%. Future work should focus on (a) further exploration of the threshold where earthworm abundance becomes detrimental for SPQ and (b) using the AWr SPQ indicator within an actual grazed trial which incorporates a gradient of soil degradation.

Additional keywords: dung decomposition, earthworms, grassland, grazing, physical soil properties.


References

Armindo RA, Wendroth O (2016) Physical soil structure evaluation based on hydraulic energy functions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 80, 1167–1180.
Physical soil structure evaluation based on hydraulic energy functions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bacher MG, Fenton O, Bondi G, Creamer RE, Karmarkar M, Schmidt O (2018) The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures. BMC Ecology 18, 59
The impact of cattle dung pats on earthworm distribution in grazed pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30567522PubMed |

Bacher MG, Schmidt O, Bondi G, Creamer RE, Fenton O (2019) Comparison of soil physical quality indicators using direct and indirect data inputs derived from a combination of in-situ and ex-situ methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal 83, 5–17.
Comparison of soil physical quality indicators using direct and indirect data inputs derived from a combination of in-situ and ex-situ methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blouin M, Hodson ME, Delgado E, Baker G, Brussaard L, Butt KR, Dai J, Dendooven L, Peres G, Tondoh JE, Cluzeau D, Brun JJ (2013) A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Science 64, 161–182.
A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005) Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124, 3–22.
Soil structure and management: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bünemann EK, Bongiorno G, Bai Z, Creamer RE, De Deyn G, De Goede R, Fleskens L, Geissen V, Kuyper TW, Mäder P, Pulleman M, Sukkel W, van Groenigen JW, Brussaard L (2018) Soil quality – a critical review. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 120, 105–125.
Soil quality – a critical review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cong Z, Lü H, Ni G (2014) A simplified dynamic method for field capacity estimation and its parameter analysis. Water Science and Engineering 7, 351–362.
A simplified dynamic method for field capacity estimation and its parameter analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Curry JP, Schmidt O (2007) The feeding ecology of earthworms - a review. Pedobiologia 50, 463–477.
The feeding ecology of earthworms - a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Curry JP, Doherty P, Purvis P, Schmidt O (2008) Relationships between earthworm populations and management intensity in cattle-grazed pastures in Ireland. Applied Soil Ecology 39, 58–64.
Relationships between earthworm populations and management intensity in cattle-grazed pastures in Ireland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dexter AR (2004) Soil physical quality Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120, 201–214.
Soil physical quality Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dickinson CH, Underhay VSH, Ross V (1981) Effect of season, soil fauna and water content on the decomposition of cattle dung pats. New Phytologist 88, 129–141.
Effect of season, soil fauna and water content on the decomposition of cattle dung pats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

dos Reis AMH, Armindo R, Pires L (2019) Physical assessment of a Haplohumox soil under integrated crop-livestock system. Soil & Tillage Research 194, 104294
Physical assessment of a Haplohumox soil under integrated crop-livestock system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Edwards CA, Lofty JR (1977) ‘Biology of Earthworms.’ (Chapman and Hall: London)

Elzhov T V, Mullen KM, Spiess A-N, Bolker B (2016) minpack.lm: R Interface to the Levenberg-Marquardt Nonlinear Least-Squares Algorithm Found in MINPACK, Plus Support for Bounds. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/minpack.lm/index.html [verified 26 May 2020]

Fischer C, Roscher C, Jensen B, Eisenhauer N, Baade J, Attinger S, Scheu S, Weisser WW, Schumacher J, Hildebrandt A (2014) How do earthworms, soil texture and plant composition affect infiltration along an experimental plant diversity gradient in grassland? PLoS One 9, e98987
How do earthworms, soil texture and plant composition affect infiltration along an experimental plant diversity gradient in grassland?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25514321PubMed |

Gardner EA, Shaw RJ, Smith GD, Coughlan KJ (1984) Plant available water capacity: concept, measurement and prediction. In ‘Proceedings of the Properties and Utilization of Cracking Clay Soils Symposium’ (Eds JW McGarity, EH Hoult, HB So), University of New England, Armidale, NSW. Reviews in Rural Science 5, 164–175.

Grossman RB, Reinsch TG (2002) Bulk density and linear extensibility. In ‘SSSA B. Ser. Methods Soil Analysis. Part 4 Physical Methods’. (Eds JH Dane, GC Topp) pp. 201–228. (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA)10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c9

Hendriksen NB (1991) Consumption and utilization of dung by detritivorous and geophagous earthworms in a Danish pasture. Pedobiologia 35, 65–70.

Hendriksen NB (1997) Earthworm effects on respiratory a dung-soil system activity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 29, 347–351.
Earthworm effects on respiratory a dung-soil system activity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Herrick JE, Lal R (1995) Soil physical property changes during dung decomposition in a tropical pasture. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59, 908–912.
Soil physical property changes during dung decomposition in a tropical pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) ‘World reference base for soil resources 2006.’ (FAO: Rome)10.1017/S0014479706394902

Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69, 373–386.
Organisms as ecosystem engineers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Knight D, Elliott PW, Anderson JM, Scholefield D (1992) The role of earthworms in managed, permanent pastures in Devon, England. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 24, 1511–1517.
The role of earthworms in managed, permanent pastures in Devon, England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lamandé M, Labouriau R, Holmstrup M, Torp SB, Greve MH, Heckrath G, Iversen BV, De Jonge LW, Moldrup P, Jacobsen OH (2011) Density of macropores as related to soil and earthworm community parameters in cultivated grasslands. Geoderma 162, 319–326.
Density of macropores as related to soil and earthworm community parameters in cultivated grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee KE, Foster RC (1991) Soil fauna and soil structure. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29, 745–775.
Soil fauna and soil structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lovell RD, Jarvis SC (1996) Effect of cattle dung on soil microbial biomass C and N in a permanent pasture soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 28, 291–299.
Effect of cattle dung on soil microbial biomass C and N in a permanent pasture soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research 12, 513–522.
A new model for predicting hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peters A, Durner W (2008) Simplified evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties. Journal of Hydrology 356, 147–162.
Simplified evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2016R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at) [verified 26 May 2020]https://www.R-project.org

Schindler U (1980) Ein Schnellverfahren zur Messung der Wasserleitfähigkeit im teilgesättigten Boden and Stechzylinderproben. Archiv für Acker- und Pflanzenbau und Bodenkunde 24, 1–7.

Schulte RPO, Creamer RE, Donnellan T, Farrelly N, Fealy RM, O’Donoghue C, O’hUallachain D (2014) Functional land management: a framework for managing soil-based ecosystem services for the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Environmental Science & Policy 38, 45–58.
Functional land management: a framework for managing soil-based ecosystem services for the sustainable intensification of agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 892–898.
A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |