Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Numerical modelling of soil–landscape relationships using diversity indices and conditional probability: a case study from an Iranian arid region

Mohsen Bagheri-Bodaghabadi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7006-6123 A # * , Azam Jafari B # , Mojtaba Zeraatpisheh C D , Hamidreza Owliaie https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-2557 E * , Peter Finke F and Ming Xu C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.

B Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

C Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, 81 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.

D Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, 210 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.

E Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran.

F Department of Environment, Research Group of Soilscape Genesis, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, Ghent B-9000, Belgium.

# These authors contributed equally to this paper

Handling Editor: Brendan Malone

Soil Research 61(7) 697-716 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR22216
Submitted: 11 October 2022  Accepted: 2 May 2023   Published: 23 May 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: Quantitative and numerical modelling of conceptual and qualitative concepts in the soil–landscape relationship is of great interest for soil mapping.

Aims: We quantified some conceptual and qualitative concepts concerning soil–landscape relationships by numerical analysis of landforms in soil identification using diversity indices (DIs) and conditional probability (CP).

Method: The geomorphology map was prepared based on the method of Zinck (1989) and used as a basic design for soil sampling. Finally, 200 soil profiles were excavated and described. The DIs and CP were calculated based on soil taxonomic and geomorphological hierarchies.

Key results: The DIs increased from landscape to landform level. The lowest and highest DIs were obtained for the soil order and soil family at each geomorphic level. The geomorphic diversity based on the soil taxonomy hierarchy showed that soil orders, including Entisols and Inceptisols, were observed in various landscapes and landforms. In contrast, some soil classes, such as Mollisols and its lower levels, did not have geomorphic diversity. The CP based on the geomorphological hierarchy indicated that the present possibility of a specific soil at the higher level (landscape) was less than at the lower level (landform), indicating more soil homogeneity at lower geomorphic levels. However, the probability of observing a certain geoform increased according to the soil classification hierarchy, consistent with the DI results.

Conclusions: The efficiency of DIs and CP in showing the distribution and possibility of soil separation depends on the alignment of soil and geomorphological processes and the diagnosis of these processes.

Keywords: geopedology, numerical analysis, pedodiversity, pedometrics, quantitative pedology, soil geomorphology, soil–landscape relationship, soil mapping.


References

Arnold RW (2006) Soil survey and soil classification. In ‘Environmental soil-landscape modeling, geographic information technologies and pedometrics’. (Ed. S Grunwald) pp. 38–60. (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Ratón, FL, USA)

Bagheri-Bodaghabadi M, Toomanian N (2020) Investigating the interconnection of soil-forming processes with geomorphological processes. Applied Soil Research 8, 174–189.

Bagheri-Bodaghabadi M, Toomanian N (2019) Investigation of the relationship between geopedology and soil taxonomy in the soil-landscape models using conditional probabilities. Water Soil Research Iran 50, 1152–1168.

Bagheri-Bodaghabadi M, Salehi MH, Martínez-Casasnovas JA, Mohammadi J, Toomanian N, Esfandiarpoor Borujeni I (2011) Using Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) to identify the most important DEM attributes for digital soil mapping applications. CATENA 86, 66–74.
Using Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) to identify the most important DEM attributes for digital soil mapping applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Esfandiarpoor Borujeni I, Mohammadi J, Salehi MH, Toomanian N, Poch RM (2010) Assessing geopedological soil mapping approach by statistical and geostatistical methods: a case study in the Borujen region, Central Iran. CATENA 82, 1–14.
Assessing geopedological soil mapping approach by statistical and geostatistical methods: a case study in the Borujen region, Central Iran.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In ‘Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. Agronomy Monograph, Vol. 9’. 2nd edn. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 383–411. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Grinand C, Arrouays D, Laroche B, Martin MP (2008) Extrapolating regional soil landscapes from an existing soil map: sampling intensity, validation procedures, and integration of spatial context. Geoderma 143, 180–190.
Extrapolating regional soil landscapes from an existing soil map: sampling intensity, validation procedures, and integration of spatial context.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grunwald S (2006) What do we really know about the space–time continuum of soil-landscapes?. In ‘Environmental soil-landscape modeling, geographic information technologies and pedometrics’. (Ed. S Grunwald) pp. 3–36. (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Ratón, FL, USA)

Guo Y, Gong P, Amundson R (2003) Pedodiversity in the United States of America. Geoderma 117, 99–115.
Pedodiversity in the United States of America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hartemink AE, Hempel J, Lagacherie P, McBratney AB, McKenzie NJ, MacMillan RA (2010) GlobalSoilMap.net – a new digital soil map of the world. In ‘Digital soil mapping: bridging research, environmental application, and operation’. (Eds JL Boettinger, DW Howell, AC Moore, AE Hartemink, S Kienast-Brown) pp. 423–428. (Springer1: Dordrecht, Netherlands)

Hawinkel P, De Pauw E, Deckers J (2016) Probabilistic soil mapping by Bayesian inference to assess suitability for derocking in northwest Syria. Soil Use and Management 32, 137–149.
Probabilistic soil mapping by Bayesian inference to assess suitability for derocking in northwest Syria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ibáñez JJ, De-Albs S, Bermúdez FF, García-Alvarez A (1995) Pedodiversity: concepts and measures. CATENA 24, 215–232.
Pedodiversity: concepts and measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ibáñez JJ, De-Alba S, Lobo A, Zucarello V (1998) Pedodiversity and global soil patterns at coarse scales (with discussion). Geoderma 83, 171–192.
Pedodiversity and global soil patterns at coarse scales (with discussion).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ibáñez JJ, Caniego J, San Jose F, Carrera C (2005) Pedodiversity-area relationships for islands. Ecological Modelling 182, 257–269.
Pedodiversity-area relationships for islands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jafari A, Ayoubi S, Khademi H, Finke PA, Toomanian N (2013) Selection of a taxonomic level for soil mapping using diversity and map purity indices: a case study from an Iranian arid region. Geomorphology 201, 86–97.
Selection of a taxonomic level for soil mapping using diversity and map purity indices: a case study from an Iranian arid region.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kalra YP (1995) Determination of pH of soils by different methods: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 78, 310–324.
Determination of pH of soils by different methods: collaborative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keshtkar S, Jafari A, Farpoor MH (2018) The effect of environmental and pedogenic factors on soil diversity in Kerman and Lalehzar regions. Journal Soil Management and Sustainability 8, 89–106.

Ma Y, Minasny B, Malone BP, Mcbratney AB (2019) Pedology and digital soil mapping (DSM). European Journal of Soil Science 70, 216–235.
Pedology and digital soil mapping (DSM).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maleki S, Khormali F, Bodaghabadi MB, Mohammadi J, Hoffmeister D, Kehl M (2020) Role of geomorphic surface on the above-ground biomass and soil organic carbon storage in a semi-arid region of Iranian loess plateau. Quaternary International 552, 111–121.
Role of geomorphic surface on the above-ground biomass and soil organic carbon storage in a semi-arid region of Iranian loess plateau.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McBratney A, Minasny B (2007) On measuring pedodiversity. Geoderma 141, 149–154.
On measuring pedodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mikhailova EA, Zurqani HA, Post CJ, Schlautman MA, Post GC (2021) Soil diversity (pedodiversity) and ecosystem services. Land 10, 288
Soil diversity (pedodiversity) and ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mohamed MA (2020) Classification of landforms for digital soil mapping in urban areas using LiDAR data derived Terrain attributes: a case study from Berlin, Germany. Land 9, 319
Classification of landforms for digital soil mapping in urban areas using LiDAR data derived Terrain attributes: a case study from Berlin, Germany.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

National Cartographic Center of Iran (NCC) (2007) Aerial photo, 1:55000 scale. Available at https://fa.ncc.gov.ir/en/

Nazari N, Mahmoodi S, Masihabadi MH (2016) Employing diversity and similarity indices to evaluate geopedological soil mapping in Miyaneh, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Open Journal of Geology 6, 1221–1239.
Employing diversity and similarity indices to evaluate geopedological soil mapping in Miyaneh, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nelson RE (1982) Carbonate and gypsum. In ‘Methods of soil analysis. Part 2’. (Eds AL Page, RH Miller, DR Keeney) pp. 181–197. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and matter. In ‘Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agronomy Monograph, Vol. 9’. 2nd edn. (Eds AL Page, RH Miller, DR Keeney) pp. 539–577. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Phillips JD (2005) Weathering instability and landscape evolution. Geomorphology 67, 255–272.
Weathering instability and landscape evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rhoades JD (1996) Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In ‘Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods, SSSA Book Series 5’. (Ed. DL Sparks) pp. 417–435. (SSSA: Madison, WI, USA)

Saldana A, Ibáñez JJ (2004) Pedodiversity analysis at large scales: an example of three fluvial terraces of the Henares River (central Spain). Geomorphology 62, 123–138.
Pedodiversity analysis at large scales: an example of three fluvial terraces of the Henares River (central Spain).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schaetzl R, Anderson S (2005) ‘Soils: genesis and geomorphology.’ p. 817. (Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA)

Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocki DA, Benham EC, Broderson WD (Eds) (2002) ‘Field book for describing and sampling soils, Version 2/0.’ (Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center: Lincoln, NE, USA)

Schoorl JM, Veldkamp A (2001) Linking land use and landscape process modelling: a case study for the Alora region (south Spain). Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 85, 281–292.
Linking land use and landscape process modelling: a case study for the Alora region (south Spain).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schumann AH (1998) Thiessen polygon. In ‘Encyclopedia of hydrology and lakes. Encyclopedia of Earth Science’. pp. 648–649. (Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands)

Soil Survey Staff (2014) ‘Keys to soil taxonomy.’ 12th edn. (NRCS, USDA)

Taalab K, Corstanje R, Zawadzka J, Mayr T, Whelan MJ, Hannam JA, Creamer R (2015) On the application of Bayesian Networks in digital soil mapping. Geoderma 259–260, 134–148.
On the application of Bayesian Networks in digital soil mapping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Toomanian N (2013) Pedodiversity and landforms. In ‘Pedodiversity’. (Eds JJ Ibáñez, J Bockheim) pp. 133–152. (CRC Press: Boca Ratón, FL, USA)

Toomanian N, Esfandiarpour Boroujeni I (2017) Outcomes of applying a geopedologic approach to soil survey in Iran. Desert 22, 239–247.

Toomanian N, Jalalian A, Khademi H, Eghbal MK, Papritz A (2006) Pedodiversity and pedogenesis in Zayandeh-rud Valley, Central Iran. Geomorphology 81, 376–393.
Pedodiversity and pedogenesis in Zayandeh-rud Valley, Central Iran.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van der Meij WM, Temme AJAM, Wallinga J, Sommer M (2020) Modeling soil and landscape evolution – the effect of rainfall and land-use change on soil and landscape patterns. SOIL 6, 337–358.
Modeling soil and landscape evolution – the effect of rainfall and land-use change on soil and landscape patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zinck JA (1989) Physiography and soils. Lecture notes for soil students. International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede, Netherlands.