CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Health Promotion Journal of Australia   
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
  Journal of the Australian Health Promotion Association
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
For Advertisers
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Virtual Issues
Sample Issue
Call for Papers
For Authors
General Information
Author Instructions
Open Access
Awards and Prizes
For Referees
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
Library Recommendation

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with CP
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn

red arrow Connect with HPJA
blank image


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 21(3)

Industry self-regulation of food marketing to children: Reading the fine print

Lana Hebden, Lesley King, Bridget Kelly, Kathy Chapman and Christine Innes-Hughes

Health Promotion Journal of Australia 21(3) 229 - 235
Published: 01 December 2010


Issue addressed: Despite the evidence showing the negative influences of food marketing on children?s dietary beliefs and behaviours, and risk of adiposity, regulatory action to limit unhealthy food marketing has made little progress within Australia. Our aim was to describe and critically examine the Australian Food and Grocery Council?s (AFGC) approach to self-regulate food marketing to Australian children through the Responsible Marketing to Children Initiative (Initiative). Methods: The Initiative?s core principles and the commitments of the 16 signatory companies (as at December 2009) were assessed in terms of their capacity to limit unhealthy food advertising in media accessed by children. All information was publicly available from AFGC and signatory company websites (September-December 2009). Results: Limitations of the Initiative included inadequate definitions for when and where food marketing to children can occur, and permissive definitions of foods considered appropriate for advertising. The study also identified numerous examples of ongoing food marketing to children by AFGC companies that illustrate these limitations. Conclusions: Until one reads the fine print, the self-regulatory commitments of companies signed to the AFGC Initiative may appear to be responsible. However, this study shows that the commitments are permissive and allow companies to circumvent the stated intent of the Initiative. Key words: child, marketing, food, regulation, organisational policy.

Full text doi:10.1071/HE10229

© Australian Health Promotion Association 2010

blank image
Subscriber Login

PDF (608 KB) $25
 Export Citation
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2016