CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Zoology   
Australian Journal of Zoology
Journal Banner
  Evolutionary, Molecular and Comparative Zoology
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter youtube

red arrow Supplementary Series
blank image
All volumes of the Australian Journal of Zoology Supplementary Series are online and available to subscribers of Australian Journal of Zoology.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 52(1)

Osteological variation and taxonomic affinities of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops spp., from South Australia

Catherine M. Kemper

Australian Journal of Zoology 52(1) 29 - 48
Published: 15 March 2004

Abstract

Skulls and skeletons of 84 cranially mature bottlenose dolphins collected from South Australia were studied to distinguish morphological groups. The dataset comprised 38 skull measurements, 5 tooth counts/measurements, 6 coded skull features and 2 vertebral counts. There was no significant difference between sexes. Agglomerative, heirarchical cluster analyses performed on all variables and a dataset refined by eliminating those with high partial correlations produced two clear groups of skulls but with some differences in group membership between the statistical treatments. Size was an important factor in distinguishing groups, especially when categorical variables were excluded. Groups produced by cluster analysis of all variables were aligned with Tursiops truncatus and T. aduncus. In general, Tursiops truncatus was distinguished by a wide band (3-9 mm) of cancellous bone on the premaxillae, a distinct supraoccipital crest, raised naso-frontal complex, the almost complete lack of bone resorption on the pterygoid bones, a relatively wider rostrum, generally larger skull size (condylobasal length >465 mm versus <476 mm, except two skulls of 445 and 448 mm), and more than 60 vertebrae. This species was collected from open ocean coasts and sometimes stranded in groups. Tursiops aduncus generally had a narrow or no band of cancellous bone (0-5 mm), an indistinct or no supraoccipital crest, a naso-frontal complex that was not markedly raised, moderate to extensive bone resorption on the pterygoids, relatively narrow rostrum, fewer than 63 vertebrae and was collected mainly from the large gulfs. There was no significant difference between tooth diameter of T. aduncus and T. truncatus from South Australia.



Full text doi:10.1071/ZO03026

© CSIRO 2004

blank image
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 
PDF (3.1 MB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2014