CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Zoology   
Australian Journal of Zoology
Journal Banner
  Evolutionary, Molecular and Comparative Zoology
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Contacts
Content
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Author Instructions
Submit Article
Scope
Open Access
Awards and Prizes
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter LinkedIn

 

Article     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 60(2)

An assessment of the taxonomic status of wild canids in south-eastern New South Wales: phenotypic variation in dingoes

Cameron G. Radford A, Mike Letnic A B, Melanie Fillios C and Mathew S. Crowther A D

A School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
B School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
C Department of Archaeology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: mathew.crowther@sydney.edu.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 60(2) 73-80 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ZO12006
Submitted: 15 July 2011  Accepted: 5 June 2012   Published: 27 August 2012


 
PDF (446 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

In Australia, the genetic integrity of dingoes (Canis lupus dingo) is threatened through hybridisation with feral dogs and consequently the identification of the modern ‘pure’ dingo is ambiguous. There are no accurate classification techniques for dingoes and dingo–dog hybrids in the wild. Genetics, skull morphology and visual assessment are methods currently used, but they often yield contrasting results. We tested skull morphological and visual assessment methods for classifying wild canids in south-eastern New South Wales and examined temporal and geographic trends in skull morphology. Published equations based on discriminant functions revealed varying percentages of dingoes, dogs and their hybrids over time, and did not yield similar results to visual assessment methods. Skull characteristics generally became larger over time but have recently stabilised. Changes in the morphology of the molars were consistent with the occurrence of hybridisation with dogs. Geographic variation was apparent and consistent with Bergmann’s Law, with skulls increasing in size with altitude. This study highlights the importance for improved classification methods of wild canids and the importance of considering geographical variation in morphological studies.





References

Allen, L. R., and Sparkes, E. C. (2001). The effect of dingo control on sheep and beef cattle in Queensland. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 76–87.
CrossRef |

Augustin, N. H., Mugglestone, M. A., and Buckland, S. T. (1996). An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. Journal of Applied Ecology 33, 339–347.
CrossRef |

Bergmann, C. (1847). Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien 3, 595–708.

Bivand, R. (2011). ‘Spdep: spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models.’ R package version 0.5–40. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/spdep.html

Claridge, A. W., and Hunt, R. (2008). Evaluating the role of the dingo as a trophic regulator: additional practical suggestions. Ecological Management & Restoration 9, 116–119.
CrossRef |

Corbett, L. K. (1985). Morphological comparisons of Australian and Thai dingoes: a reappraisal of dingo status, distribution and ancestry. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 13, 277–291.

Corbett, L. K. (2001a). The conservation status of the dingo Canis lupus dingo in Australia, with particular reference to New South Wales: threats to pure dingoes and potential solutions. In ‘A Symposium on the Dingo’. (Eds C. R. Dickman and D. Lunney.) pp. 10–19. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Corbett, L. K. (2001b). ‘The Dingo in Australia and Asia.’ 2nd edn. (J.B. Books: South Australia.)

Daniels, M. J., and Corbett, L. (2003). Redefining introgressed protected mammals: when is a wildcat a wild cat and a dingo a wild dog? Wildlife Research 30, 213–218.
CrossRef |

Dormann, C. F., McPherson, J. M., Araujo, M. B., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., Davies, R. G., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Kissling, W. D., Kuhn, I., Ohlemuller, R., Peres-Neto, P. R., Reineking, B., Schroder, B., Schurr, F. M., and Wilson, R. (2007). Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30, 609–628.
CrossRef |

Elledge, A. E., Leung, L. K. P., Allen, L. R., Firestone, K., and Wilton, A. N. (2006). Assessing the taxonomic status of dingoes Canis familiaris dingo for conservation. Mammal Review 36, 142–156.
CrossRef |

Elledge, A. E., Allen, L. R., Carlsson, B. L., Wilton, A. N., and Leung, L. K. P. (2008). An evaluation of genetic analyses, skull morphology and visual appearance for assessing dingo purity: implications for dingo conservation. Wildlife Research 35, 812–820.
CrossRef |

Fleming, P., Corbett, L., Harden, R., and Thomson, P. (2001). ‘Managing the Impacts of Dingoes and Other Wild Dogs.’ (Bureau of Rural Sciences: Canberra.)

Humphries, J. M., Bookstein, F. L., Chernoff, B., Smith, G. R., Elder, R. L., and Poss, S. G. (1981). Multivariate discrimination by shape in relation to size. Systematic Zoology 30, 291–308.
CrossRef |

Johnson, C. N., Isaac, J. L., and Fisher, D. O. (2007). Rarity of a top predator triggers continent-wide collapse of mammal prey: dingoes and marsupials in Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B 274, 341–346.
CrossRef |

Jolicoeur, P. (1959). Multivariate geographical variation in the wolf Canis lupus L. Evolution 13, 283–299.
CrossRef |

Jones, E. (1990). Physical characteristics and taxonomic status of wild canids, Canis familiaris, from the Eastern Highlands of Victoria. Wildlife Research 17, 69–81.
CrossRef |

Jones, E. (2009). Hybridisation between the dingo, Canis lupus dingo, and the domestic dog, Canis lupus familiaris, in Victoria: a critical review. Australian Mammalogy 31, 1–7.
CrossRef |

Letnic, M., Crowther, M. S., and Koch, F. (2009a). Does a top-predator provide an endangered rodent with refuge from an invasive mesopredator? Animal Conservation 12, 302–312.
CrossRef |

Letnic, M., Koch, F., Gordon, C., Crowther, M. S., and Dickman, C. R. (2009b). Keystone effects of an alien top-predator stem extinctions of native mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 276, 3249–3256.
CrossRef |

Letnic, M., Ritchie, E. G., and Dickman, C. R. (2012). Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 87, 390–413.
CrossRef |

Macintosh, N. W. G. (1975). The origin of the dingo: an enigma. In ‘The Wild Canids: Their Systematics, Behavioural Ecology and Evolution’. (Ed. M. W. Fox.) pp. 87–106. (Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York.)

Murray, D. L., and Lariviere, S. (2002). The relationship between foot size of wild canids and regional snow conditions: evidence for selection against a high footload? Journal of Zoology 256, 289–299.
CrossRef |

Newsome, A. E., and Corbett, L. K. (1982). The identity of the dingo. II. Hybridization with domestic dogs in captivity and in the wild. Australian Journal of Zoology 30, 365–374.
CrossRef |

Newsome, A. E., and Corbett, L. K. (1985). The identity of the dingo. III. The incidence of dingoes, dogs and hybrids and their coat colours in remote and settled regions of Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 33, 363–375.
CrossRef |

Newsome, A. E., Corbett, L. K., and Carpenter, S. M. (1980). The identity of the dingo. I. Morphological discriminants of dingo and dog skulls. Australian Journal of Zoology 28, 615–625.
CrossRef |

Ralls, K., and Harvey, P. H. (1985). Geographic variation in size and sexual dimorphism of North American weasels. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 25, 119–167.
CrossRef |

Roy, M. S., Geffen, E., Smith, D., Ostrander, E. A., and Wayne, R. K. (1994). Patterns of differentiation and hybridization in North American wolflike canids, revealed by analysis of microsatellite loci. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11, 553–570.
| CAS |

Savolainen, P., Zhang, Y. P., Luo, J., Lundeberg, J., and Leitner, T. (2002). Genetic evidence for an east Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science 298, 1610–1613.
CrossRef | CAS |

Savolainen, P., Leitner, T., Wilton, A. N., Matisoo-Smith, E., and Lundeberg, J. (2004). A detailed picture of the origin of the Australian dingo, obtained from the study of mitochondrial DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 12 387–12 390.
CrossRef | CAS |

Thomson, P. C. (1992a). The behavioural ecology of dingoes in north-western Australia. I. The Fortescue River study area and details of captured dingoes. Wildlife Research 19, 509–518.
CrossRef |

Thomson, P. C. (1992b). The behavioural ecology of dingoes in north-western Australia. IV. Social and spatial organisation, and movements. Wildlife Research 19, 543–563.
CrossRef |

Thurber, J. M., and Peterson, R. O. (1991). Changes in body size associated with range expansion in the coyote (Canis latrans). Journal of Mammalogy 72, 750–755.
CrossRef |

Vilà, C., and Wayne, R. K. (1999). Hybridization between wolves and dogs. Conservation Biology 13, 195–198.
CrossRef |

Wallach, A. D., Ritchie, E. G., Read, J., and O’Neill, A. J. (2009). More than mere numbers: the impact of lethal control on the social stability of a top-order predator. PLoS ONE 4, e6861.
CrossRef |

Wayne, R. K. (1993). Molecular evolution of the dog family. Trends in Genetics 9, 218–224.
CrossRef | CAS |

Wilton, A. N. (2001). DNA methods of assessing dingo purity. In ‘A Symposium on the Dingo’. (Eds C. R. Dickman and D. Lunney.) pp. 10–19. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Wilton, A. N., Steward, D. J., and Zafiris, K. (1999). Microsatellite variation in the Australian dingo. The Journal of Heredity 90, 108–111.
CrossRef | CAS |

Woodall, P. F., Pavlov, P., and Twyford, K. L. (1996). Dingoes in Queensland, Australia: skull dimensions and the identity of wild canids. Wildlife Research 23, 581–587.
CrossRef |

Yom-Tov, Y., and Geffen, E. (2011). Recent spatial and temporal changes in body size of terrestrial vertebrates: probable causes and pitfalls. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 86, 531–541.
CrossRef |


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2015