Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH FRONT (Open Access)

Digital transformation of the emergency department-inpatient interface (EDii): integration for future innovation

Andrew Staib A , Clair Sullivan B F , Cara Joyce Cabilan C , Rohan Cattell D and Rob Eley E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia. Email: andrew.staib@health.qld.gov.au

B Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia.

C Emergency Department Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia. Email: carajoyce.cabilan@health.qld.gov.au

D Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia. Email: rohancattell@healthroundtable.org

E Princess Alexandra Hospital, UQ-School of Medicine, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia. Email: r.eley@uq.edu.au

F Corresponding author. Email: clair.sullivan@health.qld.gov.au

Australian Health Review 44(5) 666-671 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH18176
Submitted: 2 September 2018  Accepted: 3 April 2019   Published: 23 October 2019

Journal Compilation © AHHA 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

As the focus of clinicians and government shifts from speciality-based care to system-based key performance indicators such as the National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) or the 4-h rule, integration between emergency department (ED) and inpatient clinical workflows and information systems is becoming increasingly necessary. Such system measures drive the implementation of integrated electronic medical records (ieMR) to digitally integrate these workflows. The objective of this case study was to describe the impact of digital transformation of the ED–in-patient interface (EDii) of a large tertiary hospital on process measures and clinical outcomes for patients requiring emergency admission to hospital. Data were collected from routine clinical and administrative information systems to measure process and clinical outcome measures, including ED length of stay, compliance with the 4-h rule and in-patient mortality between 28 November 2014 and 28 February 2017. The 4-h rule compliance for all patients, as well as for the EDii group (admitted to hospital excluding short stay ward), declined after digitisation. There were 55 fewer deaths in the postintervention group (15% relative reduction; P = 0.02) and a 10% relative reduction in adjusted mortality as measured by the Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio for emergency patients (eHSMR), which did not reach statistical significance. Digital deceleration in ED performance did occur with an ieMR rollout, but worsening of key patient outcomes was not observed.

What is known about this topic? Much has been written about the introduction of electronic medical records (EMRs) in emergency departments. This work sits alongside a substantial body of evidence outlining the relationship between process measures of ED performance and important patient outcomes. However, much less is known about the impact of digital transformation on the complex adaptive system that is the EDii and the impact of digitisation on the vulnerable group of patients who require emergency admission to hospital.

What does this paper add? The objective of this case study was to describe the effect of a rapid rollout of an integrated EMR. This EMR simultaneously transformed care delivery both in the ED and the inpatient space and impacted on the politically and clinically sensitive performance and outcome measures of the EDii in a large tertiary hospital. The present study is the first that specifically examined the effect of digitisation at the EDii.

What are the implications for practitioners? The understanding that digital deceleration will occur, but that with good patient outcome monitoring worsening of key patient outcomes is not likely to occur, now holds a key place in digital transformation planning. The measures of the EDii examined in this case study provide a foundation for this montoring.


References

[1]  Staib A, Sullivan C, Griffin B, Bell A, Scott I. Report on the 4-h rule and National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) in Australia: time to review. Aust Health Rev 2016; 40 319–23.
Report on the 4-h rule and National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) in Australia: time to review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26433943PubMed |

[2]  Queensland Health. Digital health strategic vision for Queensland 2016. 2017. Available at: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/645010/digital-health-strat-vision.pdf [verified 4 July 2017].

[3]  NSW Health. eHealth Strategy for NSW Health 2016–2026. 2016. Available at: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/eHealth/Documents/eHealth-Strategy-for-NSW-Health-2016-2026.pdf [verified 4 July 2017].

[4]  Staib A, Sullivan C, Prins JB, Burton-Jones A, Fitzgerald G, Scott I. Uniting emergency and inpatient clinicians across the ED–inpatient interface: the last frontier? Emerg Med Australas 2017; 29 740–5.
Uniting emergency and inpatient clinicians across the ED–inpatient interface: the last frontier?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29090515PubMed |

[5]  Sullivan CM, Staib A, Flores J, Aggarwal L, Scanlon A, Martin JH, Scott IA. Aiming to be NEAT: safely improving and sustaining access to emergency care in a tertiary referral hospital. Aust Health Rev 2014; 38 564–74.
Aiming to be NEAT: safely improving and sustaining access to emergency care in a tertiary referral hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25297518PubMed |

[6]  Sullivan C, Staib A, Khanna S, Good NM, Boyle J, Cattell R, Heiniger L, Griffin BR, Bell A, Lind J, Scott IA. The National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) and the 4-hour rule: time to review the target. Med J Aust 2016; 204 354
The National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) and the 4-hour rule: time to review the target.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27169971PubMed |

[7]  Sullivan C, Staib A, Ayre S, Daly M, Collins R, Draheim M, Ashby R. Pioneering digital disruption: Australia’s first integrated digital tertiary hospital. Med J Aust 2016; 205 386–9.
Pioneering digital disruption: Australia’s first integrated digital tertiary hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27809727PubMed |

[8]  Ben-Tovim DI, Woodman RJ, Hakendorf P, Harrison J. Standardised mortality ratios. Neither constant nor a fallacy. BMJ 2009; 338 b1748
Standardised mortality ratios. Neither constant nor a fallacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19403573PubMed |

[9]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian hospital statistics 2013–14: emergency department care. Health Services Series no. 58. Catalogue no. HSE 153. 2014. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129549039 [verified June 2016].

[10]  Spiegelhalter DJ. Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med 2005; 24 1185–202.
Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15568194PubMed |

[11]  Sullivan C, Staib A. Digital disruption syndromes in a hospital: important considerations for the quality and safety ofpatient care during rapid digital transformation. Aust Health Rev 2017; 42 294–98.

[12]  Deloitte. NSW Health independent review of Cerner FirstNet. 2011. Available at: http://www.ecinsw.com.au/sites/default/files/Deloitte%20Report%20FirstNet.pdf [verified 16 March 2016].

[13]  White K, Scott IA, Vaux A, Sullivan CM. Rapid response teams in adult hospitals: time for another look? Intern Med J 2015; 45 1211–20.
Rapid response teams in adult hospitals: time for another look?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26122775PubMed |