Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Australian health service organisation assessment outcome data for the first 2 years of implementing the Comprehensive Care Standard

Margherita Murgo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3879-7268 A B * and Angie Dalli A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Partnering with Consumers, Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Level 5, 255 Elizabeth Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

B Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Camperdown Campus, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Australian Health Review 46(2) 210-216 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH21299
Submitted: 6 May 2021  Accepted: 11 December 2021   Published: 3 March 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Objective To review implementation of the Comprehensive Care Standard (CCS) by evaluating assessment outcome data of Australian health service organisations (HSOs) from January 2019. The CCS was introduced with the National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standards (second edition). It has 36 actions and over 40 resources to support implementation.

Methods Retrospective assessment outcome data submitted by accrediting agencies were examined to gauge progress of CCS implementation by considering met or other ratings of the CCS actions.

Results There were 495 assessments completed between January 2019 and December 2020. Most (71% n = 352) HSOs met the requirements of the CCS after initial assessment. Seventy-four (15%) of the HSOs did not meet all the requirements and a further 58 (12%) HSOs were provided with recommendations to meet the actions.

Conclusions There was indication of underperformance related to some actions in the CCS. The assessment data highlighted common issues for organisations including difficulties implementing governance processes, demonstrating effective care planning, implementing the end-of-life care actions and some minimising harm actions. Future evaluation of the implementation of the CCS may benefit from strengthening links between other safety and quality programs.

Keywords: accreditation, health data, health standards, healthcare, outcome measurement, patient safety, quality of care, risk management


References

[1]  Schneider EC, Sarnak DO, Squires D, Shah A, Doty MM. Mirror, mirror 2017: International comparison reflects flaws and opportunities for better U.S. health care. The Commonwealth Fund; 2017.

[2]  Australian Institute of Health Welfare. Admitted patient care 2017–18. Canberra: AIHW; 2019.

[3]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. The state of patient safety and quality in Australian hospitals. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2019.

[4]  Office of Parliamentary Counsel. National Health Reform Act. Canberra: Australian Government; 2011.

[5]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Review of the Australian Health Service Safety and Quality Accreditation Scheme: Improving the reliability of health service organisation accreditation processes. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2018.

[6]  Braithwaite J, Vincent C, Nicklin W, Amalberti R. Coping with more people with more illness. Part 2: new generation of standards for enabling healthcare system transformation and sustainability. Int J Qual Health Care 2019; 31 159–63.
Coping with more people with more illness. Part 2: new generation of standards for enabling healthcare system transformation and sustainability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30476117PubMed |

[7]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National safety and quality health service standards Sydney. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2012.

[8]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National safety and quality health service standards. 2nd edn. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2017.

[9]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Creating safer, better health care – the impact of the National safety and quality health service standards. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2018.

[10]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Fact sheet 1: standardised accreditation cycles. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2018.

[11]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Fact sheet 4: rating scale for assessment. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2020.

[12]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2020: In brief. Canberra: AIHW; 2020.

[13]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. AS18/01: advice on not applicable actions. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2020.

[14]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. AS18/15: comprehensive care standard: developing the comprehensive care plan. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2020.

[15]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. AS18/14: comprehensive care standard: screening and assessment for risk of harm. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2020.

[16]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National model clinical governance framework. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2017.

[17]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Implementing the comprehensive care standard: a conceptual model for supporting comprehensive care delivery. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2018.

[18]  Morello RT, Barker AL, Watts JJ, Haines T, Zavarsek SS, Hill KD, et al. The extra resource burden of in-hospital falls: a cost of falls study. Med J Aust 2015; 203 367
| 26510807PubMed |

[19]  Nguyen KH, Chaboyer W, Whitty JA. Pressure injury in Australian public hospitals: a cost-of-illness study. Aust Health Rev 2015; 39 329–36.
Pressure injury in Australian public hospitals: a cost-of-illness study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25725696PubMed |

[20]  Independent Hospital Pricing Authority. Safety and quality. Sydney: IHPA; 2019. Available at https://www.ihpa.gov.au/what-we-do/safety-and-quality [Accessed 12 August 2020]

[21]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National consensus statement: essential elements for safe, high-quality end-of-life care. 2nd edn. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2015.

[22]  Mitchell I, Lacey J, Anstey M, Corbett C, Douglas C, Drummond C. Understanding end-of-life care in Australian hospitals. Aust Health Rev 2021; 45 540–47.
Understanding end-of-life care in Australian hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |