Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Well log facies classification for improved regional exploration *

Tom Crampin
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Woodside Plaza, 240 St Georges Terrace, Perth, WA 6000, Australia. Email: tom.crampin@woodside.com.au

Exploration Geophysics 39(2) 115-123 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08012
Submitted: 5 December 2007  Accepted: 22 February 2008   Published: 16 June 2008

Abstract

Well log and rock sample data from fourteen offshore petroleum exploration wells have been successfully up-scaled and integrated using facies classification. Over 100 rock samples were categorised into six petrofacies classes based on their composition and texture. Cluster analysis was used to classify well log data into five electrofacies units, after careful conditioning and selection of input logs. The result is a direct link between well logs and rock samples. Electrofacies profiles clearly illustrate stratigraphic information previously hidden in the well logs. In addition, well log acoustic rock property relationships based on the new electrofacies classes are found to be better constrained than lithology-based models.

Previous facies studies either have been applied at a field scale or have had conventional core for petrofacies calibration. In this paper, I illustrate how facies analysis can be successfully applied at a regional scale with only sidewall sample calibration. Particular attention was given to conditioning the cluster analysis input logs by removing all effects of fluid fill and mechanical compaction, which varied significantly across the study area. A lesson learned from the project was that it is easy to generate misleading results with cluster analysis, so care was taken to select only the most appropriate input logs, and to thoroughly quality control the output electrofacies.

Key words: facies classification, electrofacies, petrofacies, cluster analysis, rock properties, well logs, petrophysics.


Acknowledgments

The author thanks Paul Ventris for his enthusiastic geological guidance and Dianna Chamings for her invaluable data collation efforts. This study builds on significant previous petrophysical and geophysical studies and I acknowledge the work of Woodside and Shell colleagues including: Jos Bonnie, Michelle Carroll, Angelika Wulff, and Sean Dolan. Acknowledgements to Woodside management for granting permission to publish this work. Final thanks to Martin Kennedy and Trevor Magee for reviewing and improving the final draft.


References

Bates R. L. , and Jackson J. A., 1984, Dictionary of geological terms: American Geological Institute.

Bonnell L. M. , Toenne I. , Lander R. H. , and Larese R. E., 2001, The Use of Petrofacies for Reservoir Quality Prediction Using Diagenetic Models: AAPG Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, p. A21.

Espejo I. S. , and Kittridge M. G. , 2006, Facies-Based Rock Physics in the Nelson Field, United Kingdom Central North Sea – Part I: Petrofacies Characterisation: AAPG International Conference, November 5–8, Reservoir Characterisation and Management Poster Session, Booth #64.

Kittridge M. G. , and Espejo I. S. , 2006, Facies-Based Rock Physics in the Nelson Field, United Kingdom Central North Sea – Part II: Rock Properties: AAPG International Conference, November 5–8, Reservoir Characterisation and Management Poster Session, Booth #65.

Mavko G. , Mukerji T. , and Dvorkin J. , 1998, The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media: Cambridge University Press, p. 168–177.

Rider M. H. , 1996, The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs: Whittles Publishing, 2nd edn, p. 232.

Sullivan, K. B., Campbell, J. S., and Dahlberg, K. E., 2003, Petrofacies: Enhancing the Deepwater Reservoir Characterization Effort in West Africa: Petrophysics 44, 177–189.
Ye S. , and Rabiller P. , 2000, A New Tool for Electro-Facies Analysis: Multi-Resolution Graph-Based Clustering: SPWLA 41st Annual Logging Symposium, June 4–7.




* *Presented at the 19th ASEG Conference & Exhibition, November 2007.