Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Processes underpinning natural capital account compilation highlight the potential for low-input grazing to mitigate farm carbon emissions while also improving biodiversity outcomes

Rachel Lawrence https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8773-475X A * , Sue Ogilvy orcid.org/0000-0001-6959-065X B C , Danny O’Brien C , Mark Gardner D and Sue McIntyre orcid.org/0000-0002-0399-750X B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Bush Heritage Australia, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.

B Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.

C Integrated Futures, Gundaroo, NSW 2620, Australia.

D Vanguard Business Services, Dubbo, NSW 2875, Australia.

The Rangeland Journal 45(1) 27-35 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ22053
Submitted: 31 August 2022  Accepted: 28 April 2023   Published: 6 June 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Rangeland Society. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Remnant woodland areas are commonly part of livestock grazing operations in temperate Australia. These remnant areas can store substantial amounts of carbon and have important biodiversity value, but are at risk of ongoing decline due to nutrient enrichment, overgrazing, clearing of woody debris and lack of tree recruitment. The process of compiling experimental farm-scale natural capital accounts (NCA) for 11 wool-growing businesses in temperate Australia demonstrated that some wool growers may be managing these areas in ways that sustained, and at times regenerated, carbon and other natural values. When managed sensitively, these largely native areas provide forage and shelter for livestock production while carbon and associated biodiversity is also protected, and in some cases regenerated. The farm-scale NCA process highlighted that for some farm businesses net sequestration of carbon can occur at a farm-scale, substantially owing to the management approach applied to these remnant areas. The process highlighted the potential for livestock grazing approaches underpinned by the ecosystem services provided by native grasses, forbs and woodlands (i.e. low-input rather than nutrient enrichment and pasture modification) to contribute to balancing carbon emissions from other areas of more intensive management within a farm business. With the current momentum worldwide aimed at achieving net zero emissions, there is an opportunity that has not existed previously to conserve, and sometimes regenerate, these remnant woodland areas on farmland. This could contribute to reversing a crisis of biodiversity loss in this threatened ecosystem while also helping farm businesses to reduce overall carbon emissions.

Keywords: biodiversity conservation, climate change adaptation, greenhouse gas fluxes, landscape ecology, nature-based solutions, sustainable livelihoods, system of environmental economic accounting, woodland ecology.


References

Australian Government, Department of Agriculture, Water and Environment (2022a) Private Landholders. Available at https://www.awe.gov.au/agriculture-land/land/nrs/getting-involved/private-landholders [accessed 24 May 2022]

Australian Government, Department of Agriculture, Water and Environment (2022b) Species Profile and Threats Database. Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl [accessed 24 May 2022]

Australian Government, Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources (2022) Full Carbon Accounting Model (FullCAM). Available at https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/full-carbon-accounting-model-fullcam [accessed 24 May 2022]

Australian Wool Innovation (2021) Natural Capital Accounting. Measuring Environmental Health with Natural Capital Accounting. Available at https://www.wool.com/land/regenerative-agriculture/natural-capital-accounting/ [accessed 9 November 2021]

Barber CV, Petersen R, Young V, Mackey B, Kormos C (2020) ‘The Nexus Report: Nature-Based Solutions to the Biodiversity and Climate Crisis.’ p. 55. (F20 Foundations, Campaign for Nature and SEE Foundation)

Barrett, GW, Ford, HA, and Recher, H (1994). Conservation of woodland birds in a fragmented rural landscape. Pacific Conservation Biology 1, 245–256.
Conservation of woodland birds in a fragmented rural landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bird, PR, Jackson, TT, Kearney, GA, Saul, GR, Waller, RA, and Whipp, G (2004). The effect of improved pastures and grazing management on soil water storage on a basaltic plains site in south-west Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 559–569.
The effect of improved pastures and grazing management on soil water storage on a basaltic plains site in south-west Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Çapitals Coalition (2020) Draft TEEB for Agriculture and Food: Operational Guidelines for Business. Available at http://teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/TEEBAgriFood-Operational-Guidelines.pdf [accessed 25 May 2022]

Clean Energy Regulator (2021) Human-induced regeneration of a permanent, even-aged, native forest. Available at http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/ERF/Choosing-a-project-type/Opportunities-for-the-land-sector/Vegetation-methods/Human-Induced%20regeneration%20of%20a%20permanent%20even-aged%20native%20forest [accessed 8 November 2021]

Dorrough, J, Moxham, C, Turner, V, and Sutter, G (2006). Soil phosphorus and tree cover modify the effects of livestock grazing on plant species richness in Australian grassy woodland. Biological Conservation 130, 394–405.
Soil phosphorus and tree cover modify the effects of livestock grazing on plant species richness in Australian grassy woodland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dorrough, J, Moll, J, and Crosthwaite, J (2007). Can intensification of temperate Australian livestock production systems save land for native biodiversity? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 121, 222–232.
Can intensification of temperate Australian livestock production systems save land for native biodiversity?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Eldridge, DJ, and Wilson, BR (2002). Carbon storage in soil and vegetation in paired roadside sites in the box woodlands of eastern Australia. Australian Forestry 65, 268–272.
Carbon storage in soil and vegetation in paired roadside sites in the box woodlands of eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

EPA (2021) ‘NSW State of the Environment 2021.’ p. 117. (NSW Environment Protection Authority)

Gibbons, P, and Boak, M (2002). The value of paddock trees for regional conservation in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Management & Restoration 3, 205–210.
The value of paddock trees for regional conservation in an agricultural landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gibbons, P, Lindenmayer, DB, Fischer, J, Manning, AD, Weinberg, A, Seddon, J, Ryan, P, and Barrett, G (2008). The future of scattered trees in agricultural landscapes. Conservation Biology 22, 1309–1319.
The future of scattered trees in agricultural landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kashmanian, RM, and Moore, JR (2014). Building greater sustainability in supply chains. Environmental Quality & Management 23, 13–37.

Keith, H, Vardon, M, Obst, C, Young, V, Houghton, RA, and Mackey, B (2021). Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting. Science of the Total Environment 769, 144341.
Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kotliar, NB, and Wiens, JA (1990). Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59, 253–260.
Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lavorel, S, Colloff, MJ, McIntyre, S, Doherty, MD, Murphy, HT, Metcalfe, DJ, Dunlop, M, Williams, RJ, Wise, RM, and Williams, KJ (2015). Ecological mechanisms underpinning climate adaptation services. Global Change Biology 21, 12–31.
Ecological mechanisms underpinning climate adaptation services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawrence, R, Whalley, R, Reid, N, and Rader, R (2019). Short-duration rotational grazing leads to improvements in landscape functionality and increased perennial herbaceous plant cover. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 281, 134–144.
Short-duration rotational grazing leads to improvements in landscape functionality and increased perennial herbaceous plant cover.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McIntyre, S (2005). Biodiversity attributes of different sward structures in grazed grassland. Ecological Management and Restoration 6, 71–73.
Biodiversity attributes of different sward structures in grazed grassland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McIntyre, S, and Barrett, GW (1992). Habitat variegation, an alternative to fragmentation. Conservation Biology 6, 146–147.
Habitat variegation, an alternative to fragmentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McIntyre, S, and Lavorel, S (2007). A conceptual model of land use effects on the structure and function of herbaceous vegetation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 119, 11–21.
A conceptual model of land use effects on the structure and function of herbaceous vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McIntyre S, McIvor JG, Heard KM (Eds) (2002) ‘Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

McIntyre, S, Lewis, J, and Nicholls, AO (2022). Potential for conservation and restoration following long-term pastoral use in a temperate forest–woodland–grassland mosaic on the Southern Tablelands, New South Wales. Cunninghamia 22, 027–044.

Ogilvy, S, O’Brien, D, Lawrence, R, and Gardner, M (2022). A natural capital accounting framework to communicate the environmental credentials of individual wool-producing businesses. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 13, 765–802.
A natural capital accounting framework to communicate the environmental credentials of individual wool-producing businesses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reid N, Landsberg J (2000) Tree decline in agricultural landscapes: what we stand to lose. In ‘Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia: biology, conservation, management and restoration’. (Eds RJ Hobbs, CJ Yates) pp. 127–166. (Surrey Beatty & Sons)

Scott, JM, Gaden, CA, Edwards, C, Paull, DR, Marchant, R, Hoad, J, Sutherland, H, Coventry, T, and Dutton, P (2013). Selection of experimental treatments, methods used and evolution of management guidelines for comparing and measuring three grazed farmlet systems. Animal Production Science 53, 628–642.
Selection of experimental treatments, methods used and evolution of management guidelines for comparing and measuring three grazed farmlet systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Simpson P, Langford C (1996) ‘Managing native grass-based and introduced pastures on a whole farm basis - putting it together.’ Newsletter. pp. 8–11. (The Grassland Society of NSW Inc.)

Smith, FP, Prober, SM, House, AP, and McIntyre, S (2013). Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes: the 10:20:40:30 guidelines. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 166, 35–45.
Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes: the 10:20:40:30 guidelines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tremont, R (1994). Life-history attributes of plants in grazed and ungrazed grasslands on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales. Australian Journal of Botany 42, 511–530.
Life-history attributes of plants in grazed and ungrazed grasslands on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Unc, A, Altdorff, D, Abakumov, E, Adl, S, Baldursson, S, Bechtold, M, Cattani, DJ, Firbank, LG, Grand, S, Guðjónsdóttir, M, Kallenbach, C, Kedir, AJ, Li, P, McKenzie, DB, Misra, D, Nagano, H, Neher, DA, Niemi, J, Oelbermann, M, et al. (2021). Expansion of agriculture in Northern Cold-Climate Regions: a cross-sectoral perspective on opportunities and challenges. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5, 663448.
Expansion of agriculture in Northern Cold-Climate Regions: a cross-sectoral perspective on opportunities and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

United Nations, European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, & World Bank Group (2014) ‘System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012—Experimental Ecosystem Accounting’. (p. 177) (United Nations) Available at https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/eea_final_en.pdf [accessed 25 May 2022]

van der Lugt C, van de Wijs PP, Petrovics D (2020) Carrots & Sticks: Sustainability Reporting Policy: Global trends in disclosure as the ESG agenda goes mainstream. (Global Reporting Initiative and the University of Stellenbosch)

Waters C, Cowie A, Wang B, Simpson M, Gray J, Simmons A, Stephens S (2020) ‘Abatement opportunities from the agriculture sector in NSW: Modelling to support the development of the Primary Industries Productivity and Abatement Program.’ (NSW Department of Primary Industry) Available at https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1315562/FINAL_May2021Abatement-opprtunities-in-NSW.pdf [accessed 17 November 2021]

Whitten SM, Doerr E, Doerr V, Langston A, Wood A (2010) Multiple Ecological Communities Conservation Value Metric. Final Report for the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. (CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems)

World Economic Forum (2022) Explainer: carbon insetting vs offsetting. Available at https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/03/carbon-insetting-vs-offsetting-an-explainer/

WRI, WBCSD (2020) ‘Greenhouse Gas Protocol Agricultural Guidance.’ p. 103. (World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development) Available at https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/GHG%20Protocol%20Agricultural%20Guidance%20%28April%2026%29_0.pdf [accessed 8 November 2022]