Measuring transaction costs of grassland eco-compensation policies: the case of the Compensation and Rewards Policy for Grassland Protection in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region
Bao Zhang A , Scott Waldron B , Colin Brown B , Jing Zhang B and Guanghua Qiao A *A
B
Abstract
China is investing heavily in agri-environmental and eco-compensation schemes to address growing environmental problems in rural areas. However, assessments of the schemes often overlook transaction costs. Transaction costs are of particular importance in pastoral areas characterised by remoteness, dispersed populations, diverse agro-ecological conditions and heterogeneous livestock systems. Drawing on principles from institutional economics, this analysis investigated transaction costs associated with China’s current grassland eco-compensation schemes in Inner Mongolia and how they might change under alternative policy scenarios. The analysis examined the magnitude of overall transaction costs, their disaggregation among cost types and the incidence of the transaction costs at different administrative levels. The analysis found that the relative magnitude of transaction costs is substantial for the existing policy, whereas an alternative policy more effective in achieving stocking-rate reductions and improved grassland conditions increases transaction costs more than two-fold. The analysis demonstrated the value in accounting for transaction costs in the design and assessment of eco-compensation schemes.
Keywords: administrative levels, alternative policy, cost measurement, grassland incentives, grassland monitoring, grassland policy, grassland protection, stocking rates.
References
Behrendt K, Brown C, Qiao G, Zhang B (2022) Assessing the opportunity costs of Chinese herder compliance with a payment for environmental services scheme. Ecological Economics 193, 107313.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brown C, Behrendt K, Ping L, Guanghua Q, Bennett J, Bao Z, Addison J, Kemp D, Guodong H, Jing Z (2021) Refining China’s grassland policies: an interdisciplinary and ex-ante analysis. The Rangeland Journal 42, 435-445.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Colby BG (1990) Transactions costs and efficiency in western water allocation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, 1184-1192.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Falconer K, Dupraz P, Whitby M (2008) An investigation of policy administrative costs using panel data for the English Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Journal of Agricultural Economics 52, 83-103.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fang F, Easter KW, Brezonik PL (2005) Point-nonpoint source water quality trading: a case study in the Minnesota river basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41(3), 645-657.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fan S, Xu Y, Duan S, Lan J, Xu J (2012) Measurement of transaction cost of rest-grazing policy. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 20, 1248-1253.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fan S, Lan J, Xu J, Chen Y (2013a) A comparison between transaction cost and structure of ecological construction policies. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology 1283-1291 [In Chinese].
| Google Scholar |
Fan S, Zhao D, Lan J, Xu J (2013b) Comparative analysis on transaction cost of two ecology management policies in sandy desertification areas of China. Journal of Desert Research 33, 1211-126 [In Chinese].
| Google Scholar |
Fullerton D (2001) A framework to compare environmental policies. Southern Economic Journal 68, 224-248.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gao L, Kinnucan HW, Zhang Y, Qiao G (2016) The effects of a subsidy for grassland protection on livestock numbers, grazing intensity, and herders’ income in inner Mongolia. Land Use Policy 54, 302-312.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Howitt RE (1994) Empirical analysis of water market institutions: the 1991 California water market. Resource and Energy Economics 16, 357-371.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hu Z, Kong D, Jin L (2015) Grassland eco-compensation: rate differentiations of ‘Reward for Balanced Grazing’ and its reasons. China Population, Resources and Environment 152-159 [In Chinese].
| Google Scholar |
Hu Z, Liu D, Jin L (2016) Grassland eco-compensation: ecological performance, income effect and policy satisfaction. China Population, Resources and Environment 165-176 [In Chinese].
| Google Scholar |
Li P, Bennett J (2019) Understanding herders’ stocking rate decisions in response to policy initiatives. Science of the Total Environment 672, 141-149.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Li Z, Han G, Zhao M, Wang J, Wang Z, Kemp DR, Michalk DL, Wilkes A, Behrendt K, Wang H (2015) Identifying management strategies to improve sustainability and household income for herders on the desert steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. Agricultural Systems 132, 62-72.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lu Z, Lu X, Xin X (2005) Present situation and trend of grassland desertification of northern China. Acta Agrestia Sinica 13, 24-27 [In Chinese].
| Google Scholar |
McCann LM, Easter KW (1999) Transaction costs of policies to reduce agricultural phosphorous pollution in the Minnesota river. Land Economics 75, 402-414.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McCann LMJ, Easter KW (2000) Estimates of public sector transaction costs in NRCS programs. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 32, 555-563.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McCann LMJ, Colby BG, Easter KW, Kasterine A, Kuperan KV (2005) Transaction cost measurement for evaluating environmental policies. Ecological Economics 52, 527-542.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ofeimensah A, Bennett J (2013) Transaction costs of alternative greenhouse gas policies in the Australian transport energy sector. Ecological Economics 88, 214-221.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stavins RN (1995) Transaction costs and tradeable permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 133-148.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thompson DB (1999) Beyond benefit-cost analysis: institutional transaction costs and regulation of water quality. Natural Resources Journal 39, 517-541.
| Google Scholar |
Yan Y, Gao J, Lu S, Ren H (2014) Survey on strengthening grassland ecological protection and improving its ecological services. China Development 6, 7-12 [In Chinese].
| Google Scholar |
Yang J, Zhao L (2012) Ecological environment protection and construction of grassland in Inner Mongolia. Inner Mongolia Prataculture 24, 1-5 [In Chinese].
| Google Scholar |
Yang X, Yang C, Meng Z (2016) The current situation,problems and suggestions of grassland ecological protection in China. Pratacultural Science 33, 1901-1909 [In Chinese].
| Google Scholar |
Zhang J, Brown C, Qiao G, Zhang B (2019) Effect of eco-compensation schemes on household income structures and herder satisfaction: lessons from the grassland ecosystem subsidy and award scheme in Inner Mongolia. Ecological Economics 159, 46-53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zhong L, Lu S, Yang R, Duan J, Liang X (2016) Phase Analysis of compensation and rewards policy for grassland protection: an empirical survey of three regions in Xilinguole League, Inner Mongolia. Forward Position 09, 105-112 [In Chinese].
| Google Scholar |
