Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Barriers to optimal management of syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis in south-east Queensland: a qualitative investigation

James A. Fowler https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5716-5250 A * , Sarah Warzywoda https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9149-1962 A , Clare Nourse B C , Mandy Wu B D , Sumudu Britton B E , Diane Rowling F , Paul Griffin B G , Mattea Lazarou A D , Zoe Hamilton A and Judith A. Dean https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2513-2013 A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Qld, 4006, Australia.

B The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia.

C Infection Management and Prevention Service, Queensland Children’s Hospital, Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, 501 Stanley Street, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia.

D Queensland Children’s Hospital, Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, 501 Stanley Street, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia.

E Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, 7 Butterfield Street, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia.

F Metro North Public Health Unit, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Bryden Street, Windsor, Qld 4030, Australia

G Mater Health Brisbane, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia.

* Correspondence to: james.fowler@uq.edu.au

Handling Editor: Tiffany Renee Phillips

Sexual Health - https://doi.org/10.1071/SH23119
Submitted: 29 June 2023  Accepted: 3 August 2023   Published online: 21 August 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background: Australia, like many high-income countries, is experiencing a resurgence of infectious syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis. Evaluations of public health notifications and clinical records suggest that healthcare systems may not be providing optimal care to women and their neonates. This study aims to explore the barriers to optimal management of syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis to identify key areas for improvement.

Methods: Between 2021 and 2022, 34 healthcare workers (HCW) practicing in south-east Queensland (SEQ) Australia were recruited to complete semi-structured interviews regarding their perceptions towards management of syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis. Interviews were analysed thematically.

Results: Thematic analysis identified four themes related to the management of syphilis in pregnancy. These included poor communication between disciplines, services, and teams from delivery through to management and post-delivery, lack of formal internal and external referral pathways, unclear and often complex maternal and congenital syphilis management procedures, and limited HCW knowledge of infectious syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis.

Conclusion: As congenital syphilis numbers continue to rise in SEQ, it is imperative that healthcare systems and HCWs identify and address gaps in the provision of health care.

Keywords: congenital syphilis, health personnel, healthcare provider, management, pregnancy, qualitative, syphilis, treatment.


References

[1]  French P. Syphilis. BMJ 2007; 334 143–7.
Syphilis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Stoltey JE, Cohen SE. Syphilis transmission: a review of the current evidence. Sex Health 2015; 12 103–9.
Syphilis transmission: a review of the current evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Clement ME, Okeke NL, Hicks CB. Treatment of syphilis: a systematic review. JAMA 2014; 312 1905–17.
Treatment of syphilis: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Schmidt R, Carson PJ, Jansen RJ. Resurgence of syphilis in the United States: an assessment of contributing factors. Infect Dis: Res Treat 2019; 12 1178633719883282
Resurgence of syphilis in the United States: an assessment of contributing factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Spiteri G, Unemo M, Mårdh O, Amato-Gauci AJ. The resurgence of syphilis in high-income countries in the 2000s: a focus on Europe. Epidemiol Infect 2019; 147 e143
The resurgence of syphilis in high-income countries in the 2000s: a focus on Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Kojima N, Klausner JD. An update on the global epidemiology of syphilis. Curr Epidemiol Rep 2018; 5 24–38.
An update on the global epidemiology of syphilis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Qin J, Yang T, Xiao S, Tan H, Feng T, Fu H. Reported estimates of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with and without syphilis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014; 9 e102203
Reported estimates of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with and without syphilis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Schmid GP, Stoner BP, Hawkes S, Broutet N. The need and plan for global elimination of congenital syphilis. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34 S5–S10.
The need and plan for global elimination of congenital syphilis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Newman L, Kamb M, Hawkes S, Gomez G, Say L, Seuc A, et al. Global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy and associated adverse outcomes: analysis of multinational antenatal surveillance data. PLoS Med 2013; 10 e1001396
Global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy and associated adverse outcomes: analysis of multinational antenatal surveillance data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Arnold SR, Ford-Jones EL. Congenital syphilis: a guide to diagnosis and management. Paediatr Child Health 2000; 5 463–9.
Congenital syphilis: a guide to diagnosis and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Lim J, Yoon SJ, Shin JE, Han JH, Lee SM, Eun HS, et al. Outcomes of infants born to pregnant women with syphilis: a nationwide study in Korea. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21 47
Outcomes of infants born to pregnant women with syphilis: a nationwide study in Korea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Communicable Diseases Branch. Notifications of syphilis in Queensland, 2010–2015. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Health; 2016.

[13]  Communicable Diseases Branch. Notifications of syphilis in Queensland 2019 report. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2020.

[14]  Kirby Institute and the Centre for Social Research in Health. National update on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: 2009–2018. Sydney: Kirby Institute and the Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW; 2020.

[15]  State of Queensland (Queensland Health). North Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander sexually transmissible infections action plan 2016−2021. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2016.

[16]  Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts. Office of Northern Australia. 2023. Available at https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/territories-regions-cities/regional-australia/office-northern-australia

[17]  Government of Western Australia Department of Health. Metropolitan Perth syphilis outbreak alert. 2020. Available at https://www.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/J_M/Metropolitan-Perth-syphilis-outbreak-alert [last reviewed 28 July 2020]

[18]  Victoria State Goverment. Health advisory – congential syphilis in Victoria. Melbourne: Victoria State Government; 2020. Available at https://www.health.vic.gov.au/health-advisories/congenital-syphilis-in-victoria

[19]  Korenromp EL, Rowley J, Alonso M, Mello MB, Wijesooriya NS, Mahiané SG, et al. Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes—estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012. PLoS ONE 2019; 14 e0211720
Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes—estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Wu M, Seel M, Britton S, Dean JA, Lazarou M, Safa H, et al. Addressing the crisis of congenital syphilis: key findings from an evaluation of the management of syphilis in pregnancy and the newborn in South-East Queensland. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 62 91–7.
Addressing the crisis of congenital syphilis: key findings from an evaluation of the management of syphilis in pregnancy and the newborn in South-East Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Kanai M, Arima Y, Shimada T, Hori N, Yamagishi T, Sunagawa T, et al. Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical description of congenital syphilis patients and their mothers in Japan: a qualitative study, 2016. Sex Health 2018; 15 460–7.
Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical description of congenital syphilis patients and their mothers in Japan: a qualitative study, 2016.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Munro CH, Henniker-Major R, Homfray V, Browne R. Improving the antenatal and post-partum management of women presenting to Sexual Health Services with positive syphilis serology through audit. Int J STD AIDS 2017; 28 929–31.
Improving the antenatal and post-partum management of women presenting to Sexual Health Services with positive syphilis serology through audit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Matteelli A, Dal Punta V, Angeli A, Basché R, Carvalho AC, Tomasoni LR, et al. Congenital syphilis in Italy. Sex Transm Infect 2007; 83 590–1.
Congenital syphilis in Italy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Patel SJ, Klinger EJ, OʼToole D, Schillinger JA. Missed opportunities for preventing congenital syphilis infection in New York City. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 882–8.
Missed opportunities for preventing congenital syphilis infection in New York City.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Plitt SS, Osman M, Sahni V, Lee BE, Charlton C, Simmonds K. Examination of a prenatal syphilis screening program, Alberta, Canada: 2010–2011. Can J Public Health 2016; 107 e285–90.
Examination of a prenatal syphilis screening program, Alberta, Canada: 2010–2011.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[26]  Townsend CL, Francis K, Peckham CS, Tookey PA. Syphilis screening in pregnancy in the United Kingdom, 2010-2011: a national surveillance study. BJOG 2017; 124 79–86.
Syphilis screening in pregnancy in the United Kingdom, 2010-2011: a national surveillance study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  Doroshenko A, Sherrard J, Pollard AJ. Syphilis in pregnancy and the neonatal period. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17 221–8.
Syphilis in pregnancy and the neonatal period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[28]  Warzywoda S, Fowler JA, Nourse C, Wu M, Britton S, Rowling D, et al. Syphilis in pregnancy: a qualitative investigation of healthcare provider perspectives on barriers to syphilis screening during pregnancy in south-east Queensland. Sex Health 2023;
Syphilis in pregnancy: a qualitative investigation of healthcare provider perspectives on barriers to syphilis screening during pregnancy in south-east Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  Trepka MJ, Bloom SA, Zhang G, Kim S, Nobles RE. Inadequate syphilis screening among women with prenatal care in a community with a high syphilis incidence. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33 670–4.
Inadequate syphilis screening among women with prenatal care in a community with a high syphilis incidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  Magalhães M, Basto L, Areia AL, Franco S, Malheiro ME, Afonso ME, et al. Syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis: reality in a Portuguese Central University Hospital. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017; 39 265–72.
Syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis: reality in a Portuguese Central University Hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[31]  Chan EYL, Smullin C, Clavijo S, Papp-Green M, Park E, Nelson M, et al. A qualitative assessment of structural barriers to prenatal care and congenital syphilis prevention in Kern County, California. PLoS ONE 2021; 16 e0249419
A qualitative assessment of structural barriers to prenatal care and congenital syphilis prevention in Kern County, California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Zhang X, Wang X, Wang H, He X, Wang X. Stigmatization and social support of pregnant women with HIV or syphilis in eastern China: a mixed-method study. Front Public Health 2022; 10 764203
Stigmatization and social support of pregnant women with HIV or syphilis in eastern China: a mixed-method study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[33]  Broyles LM, Rodriguez KL, Price PA, Bayliss NK, Sevick MA. Overcoming barriers to the recruitment of nurses as participants in health care research. Qual Health Res 2011; 21 1705–18.
Overcoming barriers to the recruitment of nurses as participants in health care research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Salmon P, Peters S, Rogers A, Gask L, Clifford R, Iredale W, et al. Peering through the barriers in GPs’ explanations for declining to participate in research: the role of professional autonomy and the economy of time. Fam Pract 2007; 24 269–75.
Peering through the barriers in GPs’ explanations for declining to participate in research: the role of professional autonomy and the economy of time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[35]  Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3 77–101.
Using thematic analysis in psychology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[36]  Braun V, Clarke V. Successful thematic analysis. London: Sage Publications; 2013.

[37]  Queensland Clinical Guidelines. Syphilis in pregnancy. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2018.

[38]  Tsai CH, Eghdam A, Davoody N, Wright G, Flowerday S, Koch S. Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: a scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life 2020; 10 327
Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: a scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[39]  Taran S. An examination of the factors contributing to poor communication outside the physician-patient sphere. Mcgill J Med 2011; 13 86
An examination of the factors contributing to poor communication outside the physician-patient sphere.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[40]  Pereda-Goikoetxea B, Huitzi-Egilegor JX, Zubeldia-Etxeberria J, Uranga-Iturrioz MJ, Elorza-Puyadena MI. Hospital childbirth: perspectives of women and professionals for a positive experience—a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 10238
Hospital childbirth: perspectives of women and professionals for a positive experience—a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[41]  O’Daniel M, Rosenstein A. Professional communication and team collaboration. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.

[42]  O’Leary KJ, Sehgal NL, Terrell G, Williams MV, for the High Performance Teams the Hospital of the Future Project Team Interdisciplinary teamwork in hospitals: a review and practical recommendations for improvement. J Hosp Med 2012; 7 48–54.
Interdisciplinary teamwork in hospitals: a review and practical recommendations for improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[43]  Esegbona-Adeigbe S. Impact of COVID-19 on antenatal care provision. Eur J Midwifery 2020;
Impact of COVID-19 on antenatal care provision.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |