Sexual dysfunction: a study on learning experience of Australian medical students
Vijayasarathi Ramanathan
A * and Maya Sawaqed B
A
B
Abstract
Research has shown that clinicians are not comfortable managing sexual dysfunction (SD), and there are gaps in the SD-specific training of medical students in the US and the UK. However, there is little research into the extent of SD-specific training needs and learning experiences of Australian medical students. This study aims to explore the extent of students’ learning experiences and training gaps in the postgraduate medical curriculum at one Australian university.
The study was completed as part of the Doctor of Medicine program requirement, and due ethics approval was obtained. An anonymous 10-item online questionnaire, including one open-ended question was created and distributed to all final-year medical students at the University of Sydney. Data were analysed using descriptive and analytical statistical measures, and a thematic analysis was used for the open-ended question.
There are 252 final-year medical students at the University of Sydney, of which 31 students completed the questionnaire, giving a 12% response rate. Of the 31 respondents, the majority of students reported that they never (n = 7; 23%) or rarely (n = 16; 52%) had opportunities to interact with patients presenting with SD throughout their training. Erectile dysfunction was the topic that all students had some training, whereas female orgasmic disorder was the topic that students had the least training. Of all the students who reported receiving training in the medication/substance-induced SD (n = 26), one in two (n = 14, 54%) reported feeling unprepared. Only 55% of students (n = 17) felt comfortable to initiate discussions around SD with patients, whereas 84% of students (n = 26) felt comfortable to discuss SD when the patient initiated the conversation. Students expressed a need for training on how to address these sensitive topics with patients, with more emphasis on the management of SD.
The data suggests that the current medical curriculum at the University of Sydney does offer some training in SD, but it is not adequate enough to confidently and comfortably manage SD. Considerations should be made to the curriculum to facilitate a broader recognition and understanding of SD and to prepare future clinicians to adequately address and manage SD.
Keywords: education, MD program, medical curriculum, medical students, medical training, sexual dysfunction.
References
1 Richters J, Yeung A, Rissel C, McGeechan K, Caruana T, de Visser R. Sexual difficulties, problems, and help-seeking in a national representative sample: the second Australian study of health and relationships. Arch Sex Behav 2022; 51(3): 1435-46.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Dias R, Alarcão V, da Mata S, Leão Miranda F, Simões R, Carreira M, et al. Erectile dysfunction in primary care: sexual health inquiry and cardiovascular risk factors among patients with no previous cardiovascular events. Rev Port de Saúde Pública 2016; 34(3): 250-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
3 Sadovsky R, Nusbaum M. REVIEWS: Sexual health inquiry and support is a primary care priority. J Sex Med 2006; 3(1): 3-11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Coleman E, Elders J, Satcher D, Shindel A, Parish S, Kenagy G, et al. Summit on medical school education in sexual health: report of an expert consultation. J Sex Med 2013; 10(4): 924-38.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Beebe S, Payne N, Posid T, Diab D, Horning P, Scimeca A, et al. The lack of sexual health education in medical training leaves students and residents feeling unprepared. J Sex Med 2021; 18(12): 1998-2004.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Alarcão V, Ribeiro S, Miranda FL, Carreira M, Dias T, Garcia e Costa J, et al. General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices in the management of sexual dysfunction – results of the Portuguese SEXOS study. J Sex Med 2012; 9(10): 2508-15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Dyer K, das Nair R. Why don’t healthcare professionals talk about sex? A systematic review of recent qualitative studies conducted in the United Kingdom. J Sex Med 2013; 10(11): 2658-70.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Criniti S, Andelloux M, Woodland MB, Montgomery OC, Hartmann SU. The state of sexual health education in U.S. Medicine. Am J Sex Educ 2014; 9(1): 65-80.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
9 Burford B, Whittle V, Vance GHS. The relationship between medical student learning opportunities and preparedness for practice: a questionnaire study. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14(1): 223.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
10 Wittenberg A, Gerber J. Original Research—Education: Recommendations for improving sexual health curricula in medical schools: results from a two-arm study collecting data from patients and medical students. J Sex Med 2009; 6(2): 362-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Komlenac N, Siller H, Hochleitner M. Medical students indicate the need for increased sexuality education at an Austrian Medical University. Sex Med 2019; 7(3): 318-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Polo-Kantola P, Manninen S-M, Riskumäki M, Vahlberg T, Kero K. The knowledge of and educational interest in sexual medicine among medical and midwifery students – a web-based study. Maturitas 2023; 173: P34.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
13 Turner D, Nieder TO, Dekker A, Martyniuk U, Herrmann L, Briken P. Are medical students interested in sexual health education? A nationwide survey. Int J Impot Res 2016; 28(5): 172-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Zamboni B, Bezek K. Medical students’ perceptions and preferences for sexual health education. Sex Educ 2017; 17(4): 371-85.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
15 Solursh DS, Ernst JL, Lewis RW, Prisant LM, Mills TM, Solursh LP, et al. The human sexuality education of physicians in North American medical schools. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15(S5): S41-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
16 Barrett M, McKay A, Dickson C, Seto J, Fisher W, Read R, et al. Sexual health curriculum and training in Canadian medical schools: a study of family medicine, obstetrics and gynaecology and undergraduate medicine programs in 2011 with comparisons to 1996. Can J Hum Sex 2012; 21(2): 63-73.
| Google Scholar |
17 Galletly C, Lechuga J, Layde JB, Pinkerton S. Sexual health curricula in U.S. medical schools: current educational objectives. Acad Psychiatry 2010; 34(5): 333-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
18 Ross MW, Bayer CR, Shindel A, Coleman E. Evaluating the impact of a medical school cohort sexual health course on knowledge, counseling skills and sexual attitude change. BMC Med Educ 2021; 21(1): 37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Kakar SR, Sawleshwarkar S, Russell DB, Hillman RJ. Evaluation of sexual health medicine teaching at medical schools in Australia and New Zealand. Sex Health 2011; 8(1): 86-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
20 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
22 Ramanathan V, Redelman M. Sexual dysfunctions and sex therapy: the role of a general practitioner. Aust J Gen Pract 2020; 49(7): 412-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
23 Shindel AW, Baazeem A, Eardley I, Coleman E. Sexual health in undergraduate medical education: existing and future needs and platforms. J Sex Med 2016; 13(7): 1013-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
