Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparisons of vaginal flora patterns among sexual behaviour groups of women: implications for the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis

Kristin M. Olson A E , Louis J. Boohaker B , Jane R. Schwebke D , Stella Aslibekyan C and Christina A. Muzny D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NIH Medical Scientist Training Program, Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health (USA), 703 19th Street South, Zeigler Research Building Room 242, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007, USA.

B Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health (USA), 1600 7th Avenue South, Lowder 516, Birmingham, AL 35233-1711, USA.

C Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health (USA), 1720 2nd Ave S, RPHB 230J, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022, USA.

D Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham (USA), 703 19th Street South, Zeigler Research Building Room 242, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007, USA.

E Corresponding author. Email: kmolson@uab.edu

Sexual Health 15(1) 61-67 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH17087
Submitted: 17 September 2016  Accepted: 28 July 2017   Published: 7 December 2017

Abstract

Background: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginal discharge. The objective was to compare the prevalence of BV by Nugent score among African-American women who have sex with women (WSW) and women who have sex with women and men (WSWM) compared with an age-matched group of women who have sex with men (WSM). Secondary objectives were to correlate low versus high Nugent scores with vaginal symptoms among women with BV and to correlate BV diagnosis with sexual practices. Methods: A secondary analysis of clinical and laboratory data from African-American WSW (n = 73) and WSWM (n = 68) participating in the Women’s Sexual Health Project (August 2011–October 2013) and a 3 : 1 age-matched group of African-American WSM participating in the Longitudinal Study of Vaginal Flora (August 1999–February 2002) at a sexually transmissible infection clinic (n = 423) was performed. Results:Compared with WSM, WSW and WSWM were significantly more likely to have BV based on the Nugent score (OR 2.63; 95% CI 1.55–4.48; P < 0.01 and OR 3.67; 95% CI 2.17–6.21; P < 0.01 respectively). WSW and WSWM with BV were not significantly more likely to have higher Nugent scores than WSM with BV. Among women with BV reporting symptoms, there was no significant difference in the proportion of women with low-positive versus high-positive Nugent scores. Women who participated in receptive vaginal sex (penile or digital) within the 30 days preceding study enrolment were significantly more likely to have BV (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.57–3.63; P < 0.01). Conclusions: WSW and WSWM were significantly more likely to have BV than WSM. Further analysis of sexual practices among sexual behaviour groups of women is needed to determine their potential impact on BV rates.


References

[1]  Allsworth JE, Peipert JF. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis: 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 114–20.
Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis: 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Hillier SLMJ, Holmes KK. Bacterial vaginosis. In: Holmes KK SP, Sparling PF, Mardh PA, Lemon SM, Stamm WE, Piot P, and Wasserheit JN, editors. Sexually transmitted diseases. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008. pp. 737–68.

[3]  Martin HL, Richardson BA, Nyange PM, Lavreys L, Hillier SL, Chohan B, Mandaliya K, Ndinya-Achola JO, Bwayo J, Kreiss J. Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora, and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and sexually transmitted disease acquisition. J Infect Dis 1999; 180 1863–8.
Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora, and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and sexually transmitted disease acquisition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FislSgug%3D%3D&md5=d7af755dd71fa5491a4f26d55842e9b9CAS |

[4]  Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, Krohn MA, Gibbs RS, Martin DH, Cotch MF, Edelman R, Pastorek JG, Rao AV, McNellis D, Regan JA, Carey JC, Klebanoff MA. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 333 1737–42.
Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fpt1ejtw%3D%3D&md5=f126f59a25ff3ad2365cf2d2d26eeecfCAS |

[5]  Eschenbach DA, Davick PR, Williams BL, Klebanoff SJ, Young-Smith K, Critchlow CM, Holmes KK. Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 1989 251–6.

[6]  Hawes SE, Hillier SL, Benedetti J, Stevens CE, Koutsky LA, Wolner-Hanssen P, Holmes KK. Hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli and acquisition of vaginal infections. J Infect Dis 1996; 174 1058–63.
Hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli and acquisition of vaginal infections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FltFyktg%3D%3D&md5=19c9034df7cceb189d74b63fd6d16f80CAS |

[7]  Thorsen P, Jensen IP, Jeune B, Ebbesen N, Arpi M, Bremmelgaard A, Møller BR. Few microorganisms associated with bacterial vaginosis may constitute the pathologic core: a population-based microbiologic study among 3596 pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178 580–7.
Few microorganisms associated with bacterial vaginosis may constitute the pathologic core: a population-based microbiologic study among 3596 pregnant women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7pvV2gtQ%3D%3D&md5=06accb636e0350ae3f62c372ea283a9aCAS |

[8]  Hill GB. The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169 450–4.
The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3szmt1OgtA%3D%3D&md5=0ccc7009c9a293b4f3a3944167505a17CAS |

[9]  Catlin BW. Gardnerella vaginalis: characteristics, clinical considerations, and controversies. Clin Microbiol Rev 1992; 5 213–37.
Gardnerella vaginalis: characteristics, clinical considerations, and controversies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38zmtFCqsQ%3D%3D&md5=aa3cca02a7b42047a5eac8a1aae99b7eCAS |

[10]  Schwebke JR, Muzny CA, Josey WE. Role of Gardnerella vaginalis in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis: a conceptual model. J Infect Dis 2014; 210 338–43.
Role of Gardnerella vaginalis in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis: a conceptual model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Srinivasan S, Fredricks DN. The human vaginal bacterial biota and bacterial vaginosis. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2008; 2008 750479
The human vaginal bacterial biota and bacterial vaginosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Ness RB, Hillier SL, Richter HE, Soper DE, Stamm C, McGregor J, Bass DC, Sweet RL, Rice P. Douching in relation to bacterial vaginosis, lactobacilli, and facultative bacteria in the vagina. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100 765

[13]  Koumans EH, Sternberg M, Bruce C, McQuillan G, Kendrick J, Sutton M, Markowitz LE. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001–2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34 864–9.
The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001–2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Evans AL, Scally AJ, Wellard SJ, Wilson JD. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in lesbians and heterosexual women in a community setting. Sex Transm Infect 2007; 83 470–5.
Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in lesbians and heterosexual women in a community setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Muzny CA, Sunesara IR, Martin DH, Mena LA. Sexually transmitted infections and risk behaviors among African American women who have sex with women: does sex with men make a difference? Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38 1118–25.
Sexually transmitted infections and risk behaviors among African American women who have sex with women: does sex with men make a difference?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Muzny CA, Sunesara IR, Austin EL, Mena LA, Schwebke JR. Bacterial vaginosis among African American women who have sex with women. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40 751–5.
Bacterial vaginosis among African American women who have sex with women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Greene B. African American Women. In Comas-Díaz L, Greene B, editors. Women of color: Integrating ethnic and gender identities in psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press; 1994. p. 10–29.

[18]  Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KC, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983; 74 14–22.
Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL3s%2FpslGltw%3D%3D&md5=65903ec59c5d6e6499b16ab3e5b9d89bCAS |

[19]  Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29 297–301.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7nvVSmsQ%3D%3D&md5=7636691df017ec5865758b75aa2fabedCAS |

[20]  Zozaya-Hinchliffe M, Lillis R, Martin DH, Ferris MJ. Quantitative PCR assessments of bacterial species in women with and without bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48 1812–9.
Quantitative PCR assessments of bacterial species in women with and without bacterial vaginosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXnt1Cnsrw%3D&md5=76b23c960365c76b6803f49b607e73beCAS |

[21]  Srinivasan S, Morgan MT, Liu C, Matsen FA, Hoffman NG, Fiedler TL, Agnew KJ, Marrazzo JM, Fredricks DN. More than meets the eye: associations of vaginal bacteria with gram stain morphotypes using molecular phylogenetic analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8 e78633
More than meets the eye: associations of vaginal bacteria with gram stain morphotypes using molecular phylogenetic analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhslWgsbbN&md5=9218b76221641245175bf2e9879bb71bCAS |

[22]  Pereira L, Culhane J, McCollum K, Agnew K, Nyirjesy P. Variation in microbiologic profiles among pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 746–51.
Variation in microbiologic profiles among pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Nyirjesy P, McIntosh MJ, Steinmetz JI, Schumacher RJ, Joffrion JL. The effects of intravaginal clindamycin and metronidazole therapy on vaginal mobiluncus morphotypes in patients with bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34 197–202.
The effects of intravaginal clindamycin and metronidazole therapy on vaginal mobiluncus morphotypes in patients with bacterial vaginosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjvVKitLY%3D&md5=52c4e84fcf9b600c440c548979e5a355CAS |

[24]  Gorgos LM, Marrazzo JM. Sexually transmitted infections among women who have sex with women. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53 S84–91.
Sexually transmitted infections among women who have sex with women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Marrazzo JM, Koutsky LA, Eschenbach DA, Agnew K, Stine K, Hillier SL. Characterization of vaginal flora and bacterial vaginosis in women who have sex with women. J Infect Dis 2002; 185 1307–13.
Characterization of vaginal flora and bacterial vaginosis in women who have sex with women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[26]  Berger BJ, Kolton S, Zenilman JM, Cummings MC, Feldman J, McCormack WM. Bacterial vaginosis in lesbians: a sexually transmitted disease. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 21 1402–5.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK28zltFCrtw%3D%3D&md5=e6fc6f06fdd54065969821619450dca8CAS |

[27]  Marrazzo JM, Thomas KK, Agnew K, Ringwood K. Prevalence and risks for bacterial vaginosis in women who have sex with women. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37 335–9.

[28]  Muzny CA, Sunesara IR, Kumar R, Mena LA, Griswold ME, Martin DH, Lefkowitz EJ, Schwebke JR, Swiatlo E. Characterization of the vaginal microbiota among sexual risk behavior groups of women with bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One 2013; 8 e80254
Characterization of the vaginal microbiota among sexual risk behavior groups of women with bacterial vaginosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  Marrazzo JM, Thomas KK, Fiedler TL, Ringwood K, Fredricks DN. Risks for acquisition of bacterial vaginosis among women who report sex with women: a cohort study. PLoS One 2010; 5 e11139
Risks for acquisition of bacterial vaginosis among women who report sex with women: a cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  Mitchell C, Manhart LE, Thomas KK, Agnew K, Marrazzo JM. Effect of sexual activity on vaginal colonization with hydrogen-peroxide producing Lactobacilli and Gardnerella vaginalis. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38 1137–44.
Effect of sexual activity on vaginal colonization with hydrogen-peroxide producing Lactobacilli and Gardnerella vaginalis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[31]  Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Garland SM, Morris MB, Moss LM, Fairley CK. Higher-risk behavioral practices associated with bacterial vaginosis compared with vaginal candidiasis. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106 105–14.
Higher-risk behavioral practices associated with bacterial vaginosis compared with vaginal candidiasis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Klebanoff MA, Schwebke JR, Zhang J, Nansel TR, Yu K-F, Andrews WW. Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104 267–72.
Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[33]  Yen S, Shafer M-A, Moncada J, Campbell CJ, Flinn SD, Boyer CB. Bacterial vaginosis in sexually experienced and non-sexually experienced young women entering the military. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102 927–33.
Bacterial vaginosis in sexually experienced and non-sexually experienced young women entering the military.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Hallén A, Påhlson C, Forsum U. Bacterial vaginosis in women attending STD clinic: diagnostic criteria and prevalence of Mobiluncus spp. Genitourin Med 1987; 63 386–9.

[35]  Chen KC, Forsyth PS, Buchanan TM, Holmes KK. Amine content of vaginal fluid from untreated and treated patients with nonspecific vaginitis. J Clin Invest 1979; 63 828–35.
Amine content of vaginal fluid from untreated and treated patients with nonspecific vaginitis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE1MXktFOqtrc%3D&md5=34175df3cb802edc90dd7ae9abbd92d2CAS |

[36]  Chen KC, Amsel R, Eschenbach DA, Holmes KK. Biochemical diagnosis of vaginitis: determination of diamines in vaginal fluid. J Infect Dis 1982; 145 337–45.
Biochemical diagnosis of vaginitis: determination of diamines in vaginal fluid.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL387ktl2iuw%3D%3D&md5=ccc729244921ef9f080b8203af8a9ec8CAS |

[37]  Eschenbach D, Hillier S, Critchlow C. Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1989; 28 195
Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  Nelson DB, Bellamy S, Nachamkin I, Ruffin A, Allen-Taylor L, Friedenberg FK. Characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of pregnant women asymptomatic for bacterial vaginosis. Matern Child Health J 2008; 12 216–22.
Characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of pregnant women asymptomatic for bacterial vaginosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |