Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR08060
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 35(8)

Visible Implant Alphanumeric tags as an alternative to toe-clipping for marking amphibians – a case study

Geoffrey W. Heard A C , Michael P. Scroggie B and Brian Malone A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia.

B Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, PO Box 137, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: gwheard@students.latrobe.edu.au

Wildlife Research 35(8) 747-759 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR08060
Submitted: 17 April 2008  Accepted: 29 July 2008   Published: 16 December 2008

Abstract

The removal of toes in unique combinations (‘toe-clipping’) has historically been the most popular technique for individually marking amphibians. However, recent studies have questioned the utility and ethics of this technique, and provided impetus for research on the efficacy of alternative methods. In this study, the efficacy of Visible Implant Alphanumeric (VIA) tags for marking juvenile growling grass frogs (Litoria raniformis) was assessed with reference to the fundamental assumptions of the mark–recapture approach. Three questions were investigated: (1) What is the probability of tag loss? (2) What is the probability of tag misidentification, and does it vary between frogs or observers, or with observer experience? and (3) To what extent does tagging influence survival or growth? Laboratory and field trials demonstrated that the probability of tag loss for juvenile L. raniformis was ~0.07 (95% CI: 0.03–0.13) when tags where implanted on the dorsolateral region of the thorax, eight times lower than that estimated for tags implanted on the thigh (mean 0.59; 95% CI: 0.29–0.86). Tags were rarely misidentified by naïve observers (mean probability of tag misidentification <0.01), but tag read accuracy varied amongst observers. In the laboratory, tagging did not adversely influence survival or growth of L. raniformis during the 12-week study period. Given that modification of the techniques used here may eliminate tag loss, and that variation in tag read accuracy between observers may be easily avoided, it is concluded that VIA tags represent a promising alternative to toe-clipping for marking L. raniformis and other amphibians.


Acknowledgements

We thank Nick Clemann, Graeme Gillespie, Andrew Hamer, David Hunter and Peter Robertson for discussion of marking techniques for anurans. We are particularly indebted to Arthur Buchan for provision of information on the use and implantation of VIA tags whilst planning this project. Gerry Marantelli and his staff at the Amphibian Research Centre allowed tagging of juvenile L. raniformis in their collection during the pilot study. We are indebted to volunteers who contributed to the tag read accuracy and field trials. Tanja Beer, Rob Heard, Wendy Moore, Prue Simmons, Jeremy Tscharke and Rob Valentic are particularly thanked for their assistance with the latter. For access to private property we acknowledge Richard and Margaret Lloyd, John and Margaret Glide, Austral Bricks Pty Ltd, Boral Pty Ltd, Hanson Pty Ltd and Shell Pty Ltd. Parks Victoria granted access to the Craigieburn Grasslands. Michael McCarthy discussed the use of Bayesian statistics, and Nick Clemann, Andrew Gormley and Kirsten Parris kindly reviewed an earlier draft of this manuscript. GH was supported by a David Myer Postgraduate Scholarship and Dean’s Top-Up Award (La Trobe University). The project was funded by grants from La Trobe University, the Growling Grass Frog Trust Fund (composed of the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, Australian Gas Limited, and Friends of Merri Creek), and the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment. This study was undertaken pursuant to the provisions of the Wildlife Act 1975, in accordance with the conditions of research permit no. 10003005. It was approved by the La Trobe University Animal Ethics Committee (approval number AEC04/24(L)/V4).


References

Altwegg, R. , and Reyer, H.-U. (2003). Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Evolution 57, 872–882.
| PubMed | Amstrup S. C. , McDonald T. L. , and Manly B. F. (Eds) (2005). ‘Handbook of Capture–Recapture Analysis.’ (Princeton University Press: New Jersey.)

Arnason, A. N. , and Mills, K. H. (1981). Bias and loss of precision due to tag loss in Jolly–Seber estimates for mark–recapture experiments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38, 1077–1095.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ashworth J. M. (1998). An appraisal of the conservation status of Litoria raniformis (Kefferstein) in Tasmania. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Tasmania, Hobart.

Bailey, L. L. (2004). Evaluating elastomer marking and photo identification methods for terrestrial salamanders: marking effects and observer bias. Herpetological Review 35, 38–41.
Barker R. J. (2005). Joint modeling of tag-recovery and live-resighting data. In ‘Handbook of Capture–Recapture Analysis’. (Eds S. C. Amstrup, T. L. McDonald, and B. F. Manly.) pp. 142–164. (Princeton University Press: New Jersey.)

Beck, C. W. , and Congdon, J. D. (1999). Effects of individual variation in age and size at metamorphosis on growth and survivorship of southern toad (Bufo terrestris) metamorphs. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 944–951.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bradfield K. S. (2004). Photographic identification of individual Archey’s frogs, Leiopelma archeyi, from natural markings. DOC Science Internal Series 191. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington.

Brooks, S. P. , and Gelman, A. (1998). Alternative methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7, 434–455.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Burnham K. P. , and Anderson D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multi-model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer: New York.)

Caughley G. (1977). ‘Analysis of Vertebrate Populations.’ (John Wiley and Sons: London.)

Chelgren, N. D. , Rosenberg, D. K. , Heppell, S. S. , and Gitelman, A. I. (2006). Carryover aquatic effects on survival of metamorphic frogs during pond emigration. Ecological Applications 16, 250–261.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Christy M. T. (1996). The efficacy of using passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags without anaesthetic in free-living frogs. In ‘The Green and Golden Bell Frog (Litoria aurea): Biology and Conservation’. (Eds G. H. Pyke and W. S. Osborne.) pp. 139–142. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Cowen, L. , and Schwarz, C. J. (2006). The Jolly–Seber model with tag loss. Biometrics 62, 699–705.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Donnelly M. A. , Guyer C. , Juterbock J. E. , and Alford R. A. (1994). Techniques for marking amphibians. In ‘Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians’. (Eds W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donnelly, R. W. McDiarmid, L.-A. C. Hayek, and M. S. Foster.) pp. 277–284. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC.)

Doody, J. S. (1995). A photographic mark–recapture method for patterned amphibians. Herpetological Review 26, 19–20.
Ferner J. W. (2007). A review of marking and individual recognition techniques for amphibians and reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 35. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Salt Lake City.

Funk, W. C. , Donnelly, M. A. , and Lips, K. R. (2005). Alternative views of amphibian toe clipping. Nature 433, 193.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | McCarthy M. A. (2007). ‘Bayesian Methods for Ecology.’ (Cambridge University Press: New York.)

McCarthy, M. A. , and Parris, K. M. (2004). Clarifying the effect of toe clipping on frogs with Bayesian statistics. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 780–786.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Moberg G. P. (1985). Biological response to stress: key assessment of animal well-being? In ‘Animal Stress’. (Ed. G. P. Moberg.) pp. 27–49. (American Physiological Society: Bethesda, MD.)

Moosman, D. L. , and Moosman, P. R. J. (2006). Subcutaneous movements of Visible Implant Elastomers in wood frogs (Rana sylvatica). Herpetological Review 37, 300–301.
Neal R. M. (1998). Suppressing random walks in Markov Chain Monte Carlo using ordered overrelaxation. In ‘Learning in Graphical Models’. (Ed. M. I. Jordan.) pp. 205–225. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.)

Nichols J. D. , and Hines J. E. (1993). Survival rate estimation in the presence of tag loss using joint analysis of capture–recapture and resighting data. In ‘Marked Individuals in the Study of Bird Populations’. (Eds J.-D. LeBreton, and P. M. North.) pp. 229–243. (Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel.)

Nichols, J. D. , Bart, J. , Limpert, R. J. , Sladen, W. J. L. , and Hines, J. E. (1992). Annual survival rates of adult and immature eastern population tundra swans. Journal of Wildlife Management 56, 485–494.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pretzlaw T. , Huynh M. , Takats L. , and Wilkinson L. (2002). Protocol for monitoring long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum) populations in Alberta. 35. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Division, Edmonton.

Pyke, G. H. (2002). A review of the biology of the southern bell frog Litoria raniformis (Anura: Hylidae). Australian Zoologist 32, 32–48.
Seber G. A. F. (1982). ‘The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters.’ (Charles Griffin and Co. Ltd: London.)

Sinsch, U. (1997). Postmetamorphic dispersal and recruitment of first breeders in a Bufo calamita metapopulation. Oecologia 112, 42–47.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Spiegelhalter D. , Thomas A. , Best N. , and Lunn D. (2007). ‘WinBUGS User Manual, Version 3.0.3.’ (MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health: Cambridge.)

Thomas, A. , O’Hara, B. , Ligges, U. , and Sturtz, S. (2006). Making BUGS Open. R News 6, 12–17.


Tilley, S. G. (1980). Life histories and comparative demography of two salamander populations. Copeia 1980, 806–821.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Watters, T. S. , and Kats, L. B. (2006). Longevity and breeding site fidelity in the Californian newt (Taricha torosa): a long-term study showing the efficacy of PIT tagging. Herpetological Review 37, 151–152.