Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Fine-scale habitat selection by adult female swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor)

Matthew Swan A B , Julian Di Stefano A C D , Andrew Greenfield A and Graeme Coulson A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B Current address: Biosis Research, 8 Tate Street, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia.

C Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science, The University of Melbourne, Water Street, Creswick, Vic. 3363, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: juliands@unimelb.edu.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 56(5) 305-309 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO07051
Submitted: 20 September 2007  Accepted: 3 December 2008   Published: 20 February 2009

Abstract

Animals typically use habitat in a non-random way, but the factors influencing habitat selection may change throughout the 24-h cycle. In this study, we quantified resources at used and available locations to test two predictions about the fine-scale habitat selection of seven adult female swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor). We predicted that selection would be (i) non-random and (ii) differ between diurnal and nocturnal periods with respect to both food and shelter. Variables quantifying food abundance and lateral cover were recorded at 56 diurnal, 17 nocturnal and 143 randomly selected available locations. Logistic regression indicated that diurnal habitat selection was positively correlated with lateral cover, and the cover of trees, shrubs and forbs, whereas nocturnal selection was positively correlated with forb cover only. Diurnal locations had more lateral cover than nocturnal locations. The data were consistent with our first prediction, but only partially supported our second. At a fine scale, diurnal habitat selection was influenced by the co-availability of shelter and food resources, whereas nocturnal selection was influenced by food availability only, indicating that factors influencing habitat selection changed throughout the 24-h cycle.


Acknowledgements

Angela Constantine and Bernadette Schmidt were involved in the planning process and helped to design the sampling protocol, and David O’Carroll helped with the field work. An anonymous reviewer made comments that greatly improved the manuscript. M. Swan and J. Di Stefano received funding from the Zoology Department at Melbourne University and J. Di Stefano was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award, the Holsworth Research Endowment, the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) and Melbourne University’s Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science. This research was conducted with the permission of DSE (Permit No. 10002779) and the Faculty of Science Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (Register No. 03429).


References

Ager, A. A. , Johnson, B. K. , Kern, J. W. , and Kie, J. G. (2003). Daily and seasonal movements and habitat use by female rocky mountain elk and mule deer. Journal of Mammalogy 84, 1076–1088.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bureau of Meteorology (2008). Climate statistics for Australian locations. Monthly climate statistics. Available at: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_081000.shtml [Verified 20 January 2008].

Davis, N. E. , Coulson, G. , and Forsyth, D. M. (2008). Diets of native and introduced mammalian herbivores in shrub-encroached grassy woodland, south-eastern Australia. Wildlife Research 35, 684–694.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Manly B. F. J. , McDonald L. L. , Thomas D. L. , McDonald T. L. , and Erickson W. P. (2002). ‘Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies.’ (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.)

McCorquodale, S. M. (2003). Sex-specific movements and habitat use by elk in the Cascade Range of Washington. Journal of Wildlife Management 67, 729–741.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Troy S. , Coulson G. , and Middleton D. (1992). A comparison of radio-tracking and line transect techniques to determine habitat preferences in the swamp wallaby (Wallabia bicolor) in south-eastern Australia. In ‘Wildlife Telemetry: Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals’. (Eds I. G. Priede and S. M. Swift.) pp. 651–660. (Ellis Horwood: Chichester.)

Tufto, J. , Andersen, R. , and Linnell, J. (1996). Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid: the roe deer. Journal of Animal Ecology 65, 715–724.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wood M. S. (2002). Resource partitioning in sympatric populations of red-necked and black wallabies. Ph.D. Thesis, Deakin University, Geelong.