Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Interprofessional education in clinical practice: not a single vaccine

Amanda J. Henderson A B F , Maree F. O’Keefe C D and Heather G. Alexander E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.

B School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia.

C Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.

D University of Adelaide School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.

E Griffith Institute of Higher Education, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia.

F Corresponding author. Email: amanda_henderson@health.qld.gov.au

Australian Health Review 34(2) 224-226 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH09855
Submitted: 30 October 2009  Accepted: 3 February 2010   Published: 25 May 2010

Abstract

In increasingly complex health service environments, the quality of teamwork and co-operation between doctors, nurses and allied health professionals, is ‘under the microscope’. Interprofessional education (IPE), a process whereby health professionals learn ‘from, with and about each other’, is advocated as a response to widespread calls for improved communication and collaboration between healthcare professionals.

Although there is much that is commendable in IPE, the authors caution that the benefits may be overstated if too much is attributed to, or expected of, IPE activities. The authors propose that clarity is required around what can realistically be achieved. Furthermore, engagement with clinicians in the clinical practice setting who are instrumental in assisting students make sense of their knowledge through practice, is imperative for sustainable outcomes.


References


[1] Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. Learning from Bristol: the report of the Public Inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. 2001. Command Paper: CM 5207(1). Available at www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk/final_report/index.htm [verified 14 September 2009].

[2] Barr H , Koppel I , Reeves S , Hammick M , Freeth D . Effective interprofessional education: argument, assumption and evidence. London: Blackwell Publishing, CAIPE; 2005.

[3] Zwarenstein M,  Goldman J,  Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; Jul 8(3): CD000072.
[verified 14 September 2009].

[7] Pollard KC. Non-formal learning and interprofessional collaboration in health and social care: the influence of the quality of staff interaction on student learning about collaborative behaviour in practice placements. Learn Health Soc Care 2008; 7(1): 12–26.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8] Anderson E,  Manek N,  Davidson A. Evaluation of a model for maximising interprofessional education in an acute hospital. J Interprof Care 2006; 20(2): 182–94.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[9] Barnsteiner JH,  Disch JM,  Hall L,  Mayer D,  Moore SM. Promoting interprofessional education. Nurs Outlook 2007; 55(3): 144–50.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[10] Whitehead C. The doctor dilemma in interprofessional education and care: how and why will physicians collaborate? Med Educ 2007; 41 1010–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[11] Hammick M,  Freeth D,  Koppel I,  Reeves S,  Barr H. A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9. Med Teach 2007; 29(8): 735–51.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |

[12] Reeves S,  Freeth D. The London training ward: an innovative interprofessional learning initiative. J Interprof Care 2002; 16(1): 41–52.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |