Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Associations between clinical indicators of quality and aged-care residents’ needs and consumer and staff satisfaction: the first Australian study

Yun-Hee Jeon A F , Anne-Nicole Casey A , Kha Vo B C , Kris Rogers B D , Belinda Poole A E and Judith Fethney A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney, Level 5, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. Email: anne-nicole.casey@sydney.edu.au; belinda.poole@sydney.edu.au; judith.fethney@sydney.edu.au

B The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney. Global office: Level 5, 1 King Street, Newtown, NSW 2042, Australia. Email: kvo@georgeinstitute.org; krogers@georgeinstitute.org

C Present address: Bureau of Health Information, NSW Health, L11, 67 Albert Ave, Chatswood, NSW 2067, Australia. Email: NgocVanKha.Vo@health.nsw.gov.au

D Present address: The George Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.

E Present address: School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Brennan MacCallum Building, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.

F Corresponding author. Email: yun-hee.jeon@sydney.edu.au

Australian Health Review 43(2) 133-141 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17213
Submitted: 7 September 2017  Accepted: 13 November 2017   Published: 16 January 2018

Abstract

Objectives To ascertain Australian multistate prevalence and incidence of five commonly collected clinical indicators of aged-care home quality and to measure associations between these clinical indicators and levels of care needs and consumer and staff satisfaction.

Methods A retrospective analysis of national audit data collected from 426 facilities between 2015 and 2016 was performed. Regression models were used to examine associations between five clinical indicators (falls, pressure injury, physical restraint, unplanned weight loss and polypharmacy) and level of care needs measured by the Aged Care Funding Instrument (ACFI) and consumer and care staff survey responses.

Results With the exception of polypharmacy, commonly collected negative clinical outcomes were rare events. Compared with care homes with <25% of residents having high-level care needs (high ACFI), homes with 25<75% high-ACFI residents had more occurrences of all negative clinical outcomes except pressure injury. Homes with ≥75% high-ACFI residents reported the highest rates of polypharmacy (odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.39 – 1.57). Falls, unplanned weight loss and pressure injury were inversely associated with satisfaction scores adjusted for residents’ level of care needs.

Conclusions This first Australian study of multistate clinical indicator data suggests interpretation of clinical indicators of aged-care home quality requires consideration of the level of residents’ care needs.

What is known about the topic? Many Australian aged-care providers use quality indicators (QI) through benchmarking companies or in-house programs. The five most widely used aged-care clinical QIs in Australia are falls, pressure injury, physical restraint, unplanned weight loss and polypharmacy. Prevalence and incidence of these QIs are highly variable among Australian studies. A consistent message in the international literature is that residents’ clinical characteristics influence QI outcomes at baseline and may continue to influence outcomes over time. Study of associations between Australian aged-care home characteristics and QI outcomes has been limited.

What does this paper add? This is the first Australian study of multistate clinical QI data. It is also the first to consider the level of resident care needs in the interpretation of clinical QI outcomes and exploration of the association between level of consumer and staff satisfaction and QI outcomes.

What are the implications for practitioners? Understanding the connections between aged-care home characteristics, consumer and staff perceptions and clinical QIs is crucial in the meaningful interpretation of QI outcomes in context. With the recent introduction of the National Aged Care Quality Indicator Program, it is timely to review national policy, to gauge current quality of care and the measure of care quality in the sector, and to develop directions for possible research to inform and resolve debates regarding the potential influence and unplanned effects that such a program may have.

Additional keywords: care needs, long-term care, nursing homes, quality indicators, satisfaction.


References

[1]  Australian Government Department of Health. National aged care quality indicator program: resource manual for residential aged care facilities. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2015. Available at: https://agedcare.health.gov.au/ sites/g/files/net1426/f/documents/09_2016/nac-quality-indicator-programresourcemanual_ september_2016_0.pdf [verified 15 June 2017].

[2]  Australian Government Department of Health. National aged care quality indicator programme - residential care pilot outcomes: departmental response and next steps. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2016. Available at: https://agedcare.health.gov.au/sites/g/files/net1426/f/documents/08_2016/nqip_pilot_outcomes_-_dept_response.pdf [verified 15 June 2017].

[3]  Moore KJ, Doyle CJ, Dunning TL, Hague AT, Lloyd LA, Bourke J, Gill SD. Public sector residential aged care: identifying novel associations between quality indicators and other demographic and health-related factors. Aust Health Rev 2014; 38 325–31.
Public sector residential aged care: identifying novel associations between quality indicators and other demographic and health-related factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15 523–30.
Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Courtney M, O’Reilly M, Edwards H, Hassall S. The relationship between clinical outcomes and quality of life for residents of aged care facilities. Aust J Adv Nurs 2009; 26 49–57.

[6]  Baldwin R, Chenoweth L, Dela Rama M, Liu Z. Quality failures in residential aged care in Australia: the relationship between structural factors and regulation imposed sanctions. Australas J Ageing 2015; 34 E7–12.
Quality failures in residential aged care in Australia: the relationship between structural factors and regulation imposed sanctions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  State Government of Victoria Department of Health and Human Services. Quality indicators in public sector residential aged care services. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria Department of Health and Human Services; 2015. Available at: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/ about/publications/policiesandguidelines/quality-indicators-psracs-resource-materials-2015 [verified 13 April 2017].

[8]  Santamaria N, Carville K, Prentice J, Ellis I, Ellis T, Lewin G, Newall N. Pressure ulcer prevalence and its relationship to comorbidity in nursing home residents: results from phase 1 of the PRIME trial. Prim Inten 2005; 13 107–16.

[9]  Lewin G, Carville K, Newall N, Phillipson M, Smith J, Prentice J. Determining the effectiveness of implementing the AWMA Guidelines for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Silver Chain, a large home care agency. Stage 1: baseline measurement. Prim Inten 2003; 11 57–72.

[10]  O’Reilly M, Courtney M, Edwards H, Hassall S. Clinical outcomes in residential care: setting benchmarks for quality. Australas J Ageing 2011; 30 63–9.
Clinical outcomes in residential care: setting benchmarks for quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Nitz J, Cyarto E, Andrews S, Fearn M, Fu S, Haines T, Haralambous B, Hill K, Hunt S, Lea E, Moore K, Renehan E, Robinson A. Outcomes from the implementation of a facility-specific evidence-based falls prevention intervention program in residential aged care. Geriatr Nurs 2012; 33 41–50.
Outcomes from the implementation of a facility-specific evidence-based falls prevention intervention program in residential aged care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Retsas AP. Survey findings describing the use of physical restraints in nursing homes in Victoria, Australia. Int J Nurs Stud 1998; 35 184–91.
Survey findings describing the use of physical restraints in nursing homes in Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fgs1aisw%3D%3D&md5=a567141e2236b52f3912133356ee8bc2CAS |

[13]  Retsas AP, Crabbe H. Use of physical restraints in nursing homes in Queensland, Australia. Collegian 1997; 4 14–21.
Use of physical restraints in nursing homes in Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FosFCjtQ%3D%3D&md5=d5379f57da0391e4daa5f8128510dc09CAS |

[14]  Retsas AP, Crabbe H. Use of physical restraints in nursing homes in New South Wales, Australia. Int J Nurs Stud 1998; 35 177–83.
Use of physical restraints in nursing homes in New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fgs1aisg%3D%3D&md5=29692ef9bf080434d546f4c13da1ef47CAS |

[15]  Darcy L. Reducing and/or minimising physical restraint in a high care, rural aged care facility. Int J Evid-Based Healthc 2007; 5 458–67.
Reducing and/or minimising physical restraint in a high care, rural aged care facility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Kellett J, Kyle G, Itsiopoulos C, Naunton M, Bacon R. Malnutrition prevalence in aged care residents: a pilot study. Top Clin Nutr 2015; 30 276–80.
Malnutrition prevalence in aged care residents: a pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Banks M, Ash S, Bauer J, Gaskill D. Prevalence of malnutrition in adults in Queensland public hospitals and residential aged care facilities. Nutr Diet 2007; 64 172–8.
Prevalence of malnutrition in adults in Queensland public hospitals and residential aged care facilities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Heeren P, Van de Water G, De Paepe L, Boonen S, Vleugels A, Milisen K. Staffing levels and the use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicenter study. J Gerontol Nurs 2014; 40 48–54.
Staffing levels and the use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicenter study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Zhang X, Grabowski DC. Nursing home staffing and quality under the Nursing Home Reform Act. Gerontologist 2004; 44 13–23.
Nursing home staffing and quality under the Nursing Home Reform Act.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Konetzka RT, Brauner DJ, Shega J, Werner RM. The effects of public reporting on physical restraints and antipsychotic use in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; 62 454–61.
The effects of public reporting on physical restraints and antipsychotic use in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Van Doorn C, Gruber-Baldini AL, Zimmerman S, Richard Hebel J, Port CL, Baumgarten M, Quinn CC, Taler G, May C, Magaziner J. Dementia as a risk factor for falls and fall injuries among nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51 1213–8.
Dementia as a risk factor for falls and fall injuries among nursing home residents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Ibrahim JE, Chadwick L, MacPhail A, McAuliffe L, Koch S, Wells Y. Use of quality indicators in nursing homes in Victoria, Australia: a cross-sectional descriptive survey. J Aging Health 2014; 26 824–40.
Use of quality indicators in nursing homes in Victoria, Australia: a cross-sectional descriptive survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Hofmann H, Hahn S. Characteristics of nursing home residents and physical restraint: a systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs 2014; 23 3012–24.
Characteristics of nursing home residents and physical restraint: a systematic literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Santamaria N, Carville K, Prentice J, Ellis I, Lewin G, Newall N, Haslehurst P, Bremner A. Reducing pressure ulcer prevalence in residential aged care: results from phase II of the PRIME trial. Wound Pract Res 2009; 17 12–22.

[25]  Heinze C, Dassen T, Grittner U. Use of physical restraints in nursing homes and hospitals and related factors: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs 2012; 21 1033–40.
Use of physical restraints in nursing homes and hospitals and related factors: a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[26]  Konetzka RT, Brauner DJ, Coca Perraillon M, Werner RM. The role of severe dementia in nursing home report cards. Med Care Res Rev 2015; 72 562–79.
The role of severe dementia in nursing home report cards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  Australian Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA). Aged care funding instrument (ACFI) user guide. Canberra: DOHA; 2009. Available at: https://agedcare.health.gov.au/sites/g/files/net1426/f/documents/10_2014/acfi_user_guide_1_july_2013.pdf [verified 11 December 2017].

[28]  Werner RM, Konetzka RT, Polsky D. Changes in consumer demand following public reporting of summary quality ratings: an evaluation in nursing homes. Health Serv Res 2016;
Changes in consumer demand following public reporting of summary quality ratings: an evaluation in nursing homes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  Mor V. Improving the quality of long-term care with better information. Milbank Q 2005; 83 333–64.
Improving the quality of long-term care with better information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  Konetzka RT, Polsky D, Werner RM. Shipping out instead of shaping up: rehospitalization from nursing homes as an unintended effect of public reporting. J Health Econ 2013; 32 341–52.
Shipping out instead of shaping up: rehospitalization from nursing homes as an unintended effect of public reporting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[31]  Konetzka RT, Grabowski DC, Perraillon MC, Werner RM. Nursing home 5-star rating system exacerbates disparities in quality, by payer source. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015; 34 819–27.
Nursing home 5-star rating system exacerbates disparities in quality, by payer source.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Kim SJ, Park EC, Kim S, Nakagawa S, Lung J, Choi JB, Ryu WS, Min TJ, Shin HP, Kim K, Yoo JW. The association between quality of care and quality of life in long-stay nursing home residents with preserved cognition. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014; 15 220–5.
The association between quality of care and quality of life in long-stay nursing home residents with preserved cognition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[33]  Li Y, Li Q, Tang Y. Associations between family ratings on experience with care and clinical quality-of-care measures for nursing home residents. Med Care Res Rev 2016; 73 62–84.
Associations between family ratings on experience with care and clinical quality-of-care measures for nursing home residents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Tolson D, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, Aquino J-P, Beard J, Benetos A, Berrut G, Coll-Planas L, Dong B, Forette F, Franco A, Franzoni S, Salva A, Swagerty D, Trabucchi M, Vellas B, Volicer L, Morley JE. International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics: a global agenda for clinical research and quality of care in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2011; 12 184–9.
International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics: a global agenda for clinical research and quality of care in nursing homes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[35]  McGilton KS, Bowers BJ, Heath H, Shannon K, Dellefield ME, Prentice D, Siegel EO, Meyer J, Chu CH, Ploeg J, Boscart VM, Corazzini KN, Anderson RA, Mueller C. Recommendations from the International Consortium on Professional Nursing Practice in Long-Term Care Homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 17 99–103.
Recommendations from the International Consortium on Professional Nursing Practice in Long-Term Care Homes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[36]  Van Haitsma K, Crespy S, Humes S, Elliot A, Mihelic A, Scott C, Curyto K, Spector A, Eshraghi K, Duntzee C, Heid AR, Abbott K. New toolkit to measure quality of person-centered care: development and pilot evaluation with nursing home communities. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014; 15 671–80.
New toolkit to measure quality of person-centered care: development and pilot evaluation with nursing home communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Bradford A, Kunik ME, Schulz P, Williams SP, Singh H. Missed and delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care: prevalence and contributing factors. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2009; 23 306–14.
Missed and delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care: prevalence and contributing factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Aged care services and places. Residential aged care and home care 2014–15. Canberra: AIHW; 2017. Available at: http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/20170818053841/http://www.aihw.gov.au/aged-care/residential-and-home-care-2014-15/services-and-places/ [verified 11 Dec 2017].

[39]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Care needs in residential aged care. Residential aged care and home care 2013–14. Canberra: AIHW; 2017. Available at: http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/20170818054017/http://www.aihw.gov.au/aged-care/residential-and-home-care-2013-14/care-needs/ [verified 11 Dec 2017].

[40]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Care needs in residential aged care. Residential aged care and home care 2014–15. Canberra: AIHW; 2017. Available at: http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/20170818053922/http://www.aihw.gov.au/aged-care/residential-and-home-care-2014-15/care-needs/ [verified 11 Dec 2017].

[41]  Fávaro-Moreira NCF, Krausch-Hofmann S, Matthys C, Vereecken C, Vanhauwaert E, Declercq A, Bekkering GE, Duyck J. Risk factors for malnutrition in older adults: a systematic review of the literature based on longitudinal data. Adv Nutr 2016; 7 507–22.
Risk factors for malnutrition in older adults: a systematic review of the literature based on longitudinal data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[42]  Lane NE, Wodchis WP, Boyd CM, Stukel TA. Disability in long-term care residents explained by prevalent geriatric syndromes, not long-term care home characteristics: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17 49
Disability in long-term care residents explained by prevalent geriatric syndromes, not long-term care home characteristics: a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[43]  Deandrea S, Bravi F, Turati F, Lucenteforte E, La Vecchia C, Negri E. Risk factors for falls in older people in nursing homes and hospitals. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2013; 56 407–15.
Risk factors for falls in older people in nursing homes and hospitals. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[44]  Dawson J. Staff experience and patient outcomes: What do we know? Leeds, London, England: NHS Employers on behalf of NHS England; 2014. Available at http://www.nhsemployers.org/~/media/Employers/Publications/Research%20report%20Staff%20experience%20and%20patient%20outcomes.pdf [verified 15 May 2017].

[45]  Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA 1988; 260 1743–8.
The quality of care: how can it be assessed?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1czhslajsA%3D%3D&md5=3911b4a7c1a002e9006ccd57b0046634CAS |

[46]  Senate Community Affairs Committee Secretariat. Future of Australia’s aged care sector workforce. Canberra: Parliament House; 2017.

[47]  Gaskill D, Black LJ, Isenring EA, Hassall S, Sanders F, Bauer JD. Malnutrition prevalence and nutrition issues in residential aged care facilities. Australas J Ageing 2008; 27 189–94.
Malnutrition prevalence and nutrition issues in residential aged care facilities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |